Background

The first step in manufacturing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells is to collect autologous CD3+ lymphocytes by apheresis. Patients, however, often have leukopenia or have other disease-related complications. We evaluated the feasibility of collecting adequate numbers of CD3+ cells, risk factors for inadequate collections, and the rate of adverse events.

Study design and methods

Apheresis lymphocyte collections from patients participating in three CAR T-cell clinical trials were reviewed. Collections were performed on the COBE Spectra by experienced nurses, with the goal of obtaining a minimum of 0.6 × 10⁹ and a target of 2 × 10⁹ CD3+ cells. Preapheresis peripheral blood counts, apheresis parameters, and product cell counts were analyzed.

Results

Of the 71 collections, 69 (97%) achieved the minimum and 55 (77%) achieved the target. Before apheresis, the 16 patients with yields below the target had significantly lower proportions and absolute numbers of circulating lymphocytes and CD3+ lymphocytes and higher proportions of circulating blasts and NK cells than those who achieved the target (470 × 10⁶ lymphocytes/L vs. 1340 × 10⁶ lymphocytes/L, p = 0.008; 349 × 10⁶ CD3+ cells/L vs. 914 × 10⁶ CD3+ cells/L, p = 0.001; 17.6% blasts vs. 4.55% blasts, p = 0.029). Enrichment of blasts in the product compared to the peripheral blood occurred in four patients, including the two patients whose collections did not yield the minimum number of CD3+ cells. Apheresis complications occurred in 11 patients (15%) and, with one exception, were easily managed in the apheresis clinic.

Conclusions

In most patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy, leukapheresis is well tolerated, and adequate numbers of CD3+ lymphocytes are collected.

Manufacturing autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapeutics is complex, and many patients experience treatment delays or cannot be treated at all. Although current allogeneic CAR products have the potential to overcome manufacturing bottlenecks, they are subject to immune rejection and failure to persist in the host, and thus do not provide the same level of efficacy as their autologous counterparts. Here, we aimed to develop universal allogeneic CAR T cells that evade the immune system and produce a durable response. We generated human hypoimmune (HIP) T cells with disrupted B2M, CIITA, and TRAC genes using CRISPR-Cas9 editing. In addition, CD47 and anti-CD19 CAR were expressed using lentiviral transduction. These allogeneic HIP CD19 CAR T cells were compared to allogeneic CD19 CAR T cells that only expressed the anti-CD19 CAR (allo CAR T). In vitro assays for cancer killing and exhaustion revealed no differences between allo CAR T and HIP CAR T cells, confirming that the HIP edits did not negatively affect T cell performance. Clearance of CD19⁺ tumors by HIP CAR T cells in immunodeficient NSG mice was comparable to that of allo CAR T cells. In fully immunocompetent humanized mice, HIP CAR T cells significantly outperformed allo CAR T cells, showed improved persistence and expansion, and provided lasting cancer clearance. Furthermore, CD47-targeting safety strategies reliably and specifically eliminated HIP CAR T cells. These findings suggest that universal allogeneic HIP CAR T cell-based therapeutics might overcome the limitations associated with poor persistence of allogeneic CAR T cells and exert durable anti-tumor responses.

Immune effector cell (IEC) therapies offer durable and sustained remissions in significant numbers of patients with hematological cancers. While these unique immunotherapies have improved outcomes for pediatric and adult patients in a number of disease states, as 'living drugs,' their toxicity profiles, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), differ markedly from conventional cancer therapeutics. At the time of article preparation, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, and brexucabtagene autoleucel, all of which are IEC therapies based on genetically modified T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), and additional products are expected to reach marketing authorization soon and to enter clinical development in due course. As IEC therapies, especially CAR T cell therapies, enter more widespread clinical use, there is a need for clear, cohesive recommendations on toxicity management, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of common toxicities in the context of IEC treatment, including baseline laboratory parameters for monitoring, timing to onset, and pharmacological interventions, ultimately forming evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

We enrolled 150 patients in a prospective multicenter study of children with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to compare the detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) by a "difference from normal" flow cytometry (ΔN) approach with assessment of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene expression without access to the diagnostic specimen. Prospective analysis of the specimens using this approach showed that 23% of patients screened for HSCT had detectable residual disease by ΔN (.04% to 53%). Of those patients who proceeded to transplant as being in morphologic remission, 10 had detectable disease (.04% to 14%) by ΔN. The disease-free survival of this group was 10% (0 to 35%) compared with 55% (46% to 64%, P < .001) for those without disease. The ΔN assay was validated using the post-HSCT specimen by sorting abnormal or suspicious cells to confirm recipient or donor origin by chimerism studies. All 15 patients who had confirmation of tumor detection relapsed, whereas the 2 patients with suspicious phenotype cells lacking this confirmation did not. The phenotype of the relapse specimen was then used retrospectively to assess the pre-HSCT specimen, allowing identification of additional samples with low levels of MRD involvement that were previously undetected. Quantitative assessment of WT1 gene expression was not predictive of relapse or other outcomes in either pre- or post-transplant specimens. MRD detected by ΔN was highly specific, but did not identify most relapsing patients. The application of the assay was limited by poor quality among one-third of the specimens and lack of a diagnostic phenotype for comparison.