- Gruber, June;
- Borelli, Jessica L;
- Prinstein, Mitchell J;
- Clark, Lee Anna;
- Davila, Joanne;
- Gee, Dylan G;
- Klein, Daniel N;
- Levenson, Robert W;
- Mendle, Jane;
- Olatunji, Bunmi O;
- Rose, Gail L;
- Saxbe, Darby;
- Weinstock, Lauren M
The growth of clinical science as a field depends on the work of engaged mentors nurturing future generations of scientists. Effective research mentoring has been shown to predict positive outcomes, including greater scholarly productivity, reduced attrition, and increased satisfaction with training and/or employment, which ultimately may enhance the quality of the clinical-science research enterprise. Barriers to effective research mentoring, however, pose significant challenges for both mentees and mentors, as well as for labs, training programs, and/or departments. We discuss some key issues as they apply to clinical-science mentoring and note how they are affected across different developmental levels (undergraduate, postbaccalaureate, doctoral, internship, postdoctoral associates, and early career faculty). Although we do not proclaim expertise on these issues-and have struggled with them in our own careers-we believe an open discussion around best mentoring practices will enhance our collective effectiveness and help mentees and our field to flourish. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).