- Gordon, Sean P;
- Contreras-Moreira, Bruno;
- Levy, Joshua J;
- Djamei, Armin;
- Czedik-Eysenberg, Angelika;
- Tartaglio, Virginia S;
- Session, Adam;
- Martin, Joel;
- Cartwright, Amy;
- Katz, Andrew;
- Singan, Vasanth R;
- Goltsman, Eugene;
- Barry, Kerrie;
- Dinh-Thi, Vinh Ha;
- Chalhoub, Boulos;
- Diaz-Perez, Antonio;
- Sancho, Ruben;
- Lusinska, Joanna;
- Wolny, Elzbieta;
- Nibau, Candida;
- Doonan, John H;
- Mur, Luis AJ;
- Plott, Chris;
- Jenkins, Jerry;
- Hazen, Samuel P;
- Lee, Scott J;
- Shu, Shengqiang;
- Goodstein, David;
- Rokhsar, Daniel;
- Schmutz, Jeremy;
- Hasterok, Robert;
- Catalan, Pilar;
- Vogel, John P
Our understanding of polyploid genome evolution is constrained because we cannot know the exact founders of a particular polyploid. To differentiate between founder effects and post polyploidization evolution, we use a pan-genomic approach to study the allotetraploid Brachypodium hybridum and its diploid progenitors. Comparative analysis suggests that most B. hybridum whole gene presence/absence variation is part of the standing variation in its diploid progenitors. Analysis of nuclear single nucleotide variants, plastomes and k-mers associated with retrotransposons reveals two independent origins for B. hybridum, ~1.4 and ~0.14 million years ago. Examination of gene expression in the younger B. hybridum lineage reveals no bias in overall subgenome expression. Our results are consistent with a gradual accumulation of genomic changes after polyploidization and a lack of subgenome expression dominance. Significantly, if we did not use a pan-genomic approach, we would grossly overestimate the number of genomic changes attributable to post polyploidization evolution.