- Main
Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome Editing.
- Angrist, Misha;
- Barrangou, Rodolphe;
- Baylis, Françoise;
- Brokowski, Carolyn;
- Burgio, Gaetan;
- Caplan, Arthur;
- Chapman, Carolyn Riley;
- Church, George M;
- Cook-Deegan, Robert;
- Cwik, Bryan;
- Doudna, Jennifer A;
- Evans, John H;
- Greely, Henry T;
- Hercher, Laura;
- Hurlbut, J Benjamin;
- Hynes, Richard O;
- Ishii, Tetsuya;
- Kiani, Samira;
- Lee, LaTasha Hoskins;
- Levrier, Guillaume;
- Liu, David R;
- Lunshof, Jeantine E;
- Macintosh, Kerry Lynn;
- Mathews, Debra JH;
- Meslin, Eric M;
- Mills, Peter HR;
- Montoliu, Lluis;
- Musunuru, Kiran;
- Nicol, Dianne;
- O'Neill, Helen;
- Qiu, Renzong;
- Ranisch, Robert;
- Sherkow, Jacob S;
- Soni, Sheetal;
- Terry, Sharon;
- Topol, Eric;
- Williamson, Robert;
- Zhang, Feng;
- Davies, Kevin
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2020.29106.manAbstract
In September 2020, a detailed report on Heritable Human Genome Editing was published. The report offers a translational pathway for the limited approval of germline editing under limited circumstances and assuming various criteria have been met. In this perspective, some three dozen experts from the fields of genome editing, medicine, bioethics, law, and related fields offer their candid reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society report, highlighting areas of support, omissions, disagreements, and priorities moving forward.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-