Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC Riverside

UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations bannerUC Riverside

The Editor as Producer: Nineteenth-Century British Literary Editors

Abstract

To more fully understand nineteenth-century literary production, literary scholars must consider periodical editing as more than biographical footnotes to the lives of famous Victorian authors or secondary details in a text’s publishing history. In The Editor as Producer: Nineteenth-Century British Literary Editors, I seek to render more visible the work of the periodical editor, positing this figure as pivotal to the nineteenth-century literary scene. A single metanarrative of the editorial role is impossible to tell and undesirable insofar as it would necessarily flatten out a rich and varied history of practices and the influences particular men and women have had on literary texts, periodicals, and nineteenth-century print culture; however, critical work on editors has been too fragmented. My approach is to trace the historical trajectory of editorial roles through the nineteenth century but to focus in each period on a pair of editors to explore the editorial trends of professionalization, celebrity author-editorship, and responses to new technologies.

Pairing Francis Jeffrey of the Edinburgh Review and William Blackwood along with the fictional Christopher North of Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine , chapter 1 focuses on the struggle for professionalization in literary reviews and magazines during the early nineteenth century. In chapter 2, I draw on the figure of the naked editor to represent the emotional openness and literary intimacy audiences pursued in author-editors. William Makepeace Thackeray’s Cornhill Magazine and Ellen Wood’s Argosy form this chapter’s central set of periodicals. Finally, The Editor as Producer concludes with perhaps the most unlikely pairing: George Newnes’s popular magazine Tit-Bits and Henry Harland and Aubrey Beardsley’s artistic quarterly the Yellow Book. The editors of both periodicals responded to late-century changes in audience and technology, but while Newnes embraced the increased pace of modern life and shorter reader attention span, Harland and Beardsley focused on creating a periodical that was first and foremost an objet d’art. Chapter 3 emphasizes how the fitness of periodicals in their cultural environments was influenced by the editor’s vision.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View