Table 1. Reported Cases of Cell Phone Nickel Contact Dermatitis
Report Date |
Age/ Sex |
Country |
Reference |
2000 |
36 F 32 F |
Italy |
Pazzaglia M, Pasquale L, Colombina V, Tosti A. Contact dermatitis from nickel in mobile phone. ContactDermatitis 2000: 42: 362–363. |
2007 |
25 F |
France |
Livideanu C, Giordano-Labadie F, Paul C. Cellular Phone Addiction and Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Nickel. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 130-131. |
2007 |
19 F |
Austria |
Wohrl S, Jandl T, Stingl G, et al. Mobile telephone as new source for nickel dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:113. |
2008 |
18 M |
USA |
Bercovitch L, Luo J. Cellphone Contact Dermatitis with Nickel Allergy. CMAJ 2008: 178 (1); 23-24. |
2008 |
32 M |
India |
Madhukara J, Kumaran MS, Abraham A. Cell phone dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008;74:500-1 |
2009 |
2 patients |
Korea |
Lee D, Yang J. Preauricular eczema: a sign of cellular phone Dermatitis. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 2009: 35; 193–208. |
2010 |
39 M |
Australia |
Roberts H, Tate B. Nickel allergy presenting as mobile phone contact dermatitis. Australian Journal of Dermatology 2010: 51(1); 23-25. |