<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/arf_xrfreports/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent arf_xrfreports items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/arf_xrfreports/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from Archaeological X-ray Fluorescence Reports</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>XRF Analysis of samples from the Anillo Obsidian Source near Cotahuasi, Arequipa, Peru</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vb1790z</link>
      <description>This geochemistry report is a dynamic notebook hosted on Github at https://github.com/arf-berkeley/obsidian-source-anilloThe Anillo obsidian source lies to the north of the Cotahuasi Canyon in southern Peru. It is geochemically distinct from the better known Alca obsidian south on the south side of the Cotahuasi valley. This report shares the geochemical results of analysis with a Bruker Tracer 5g XRF.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vb1790z</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tripcevich, Nicholas</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Pen &amp;amp; Old Ink: XRF Analysis of a Unique Archive from 1st c. BCE Tebtunis</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/25n2k5bn</link>
      <description>This study examines the ink used in an archive of &amp;gt;50 bilingual papyri (in Greek and Demotic) written by a single scribe that were found in two crocodile mummies excavated from Tebtunis by B.P. Grenfell and A.S. Hunt in 1900.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/25n2k5bn</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Packard Grams, Leah</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM LA 99414 AND LA 183311, SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xc9h5bz</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 49 artifacts (48 obsidian) from two sites in southeastern New Mexico exhibits an obsidian provenance assemblage entirely from Jemez Mountains sources, one of which (Cerro Toledo Rhyolite, 79.2%) was most likely procured from Rio Grande Quaternary alluvium. Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) at 20.8% of total was probably not procured from Rio Grande Quaternary alluvium, but the primary source proper, according to available research (Church 2000; Shackley 2012).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xc9h5bz</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR ONE TURQUOISE GLOBULAR BEAD AND ONE OBSIDIAN ARTIFACT FROM SITE SRPMICH-62, ON THE SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY, CENTRAL ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9k84q2z8</link>
      <description>The analysis here ofone obsidian flake and one turquoise bead indicates that the obsidian artifact was produced from the Vulture source west of the Phoenix Basin, commonly recovered in Preclassic Hohokam contexts in the Lower Salt River Valley (Shackley 2005, 2019; Table 1 herein). A short discussion of the turquoise bead is offered belowas well.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9k84q2z8</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR OBSIDIAN AND OTHER VOLCANIC ROCK ARTIFACTS FROM THE EL SEGUNDO ARCHAEOLOGY PROJECT, NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9d96s3jd</link>
      <description>The analysis here of a variety of artifacts from a number of sites or site groups in the El Segundo project area is dominated by obsidian sources along the Jemez Lineament, and a variety of rock types likely typical of the local geology. One piece of obsidian debitage was produced from the Government Mountain source in the San Francisco Volcanic Field or northern Arizona, over 370 linear km west. Government Mountain obsidian has occurred in El Segundo project sites and other Archaic contexts in the Grants, New Mexico area just south of El Segundo (Birkmann et al. 2018). One dacite projectile point base was produced from the San Antonio Mountain source in the Taos Plateau Volcanic field over 250 linear km north.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9d96s3jd</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE CROSSPATCH SITE SOUTHWEST COLORADO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85p4w2n8</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 71 artifacts (70 obsidian) from the Crosspatch site in southwestern Colorado indicates a very diverse obsidian provenance assemblage with artifacts produced from obsidian sources in northern and southwestern New Mexico, to northern Arizona, to southwestern Utah (Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 1 and 2). A short discussion of the results is offered below.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85p4w2n8</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY.DISPERSIVE X.RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OFOBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM LA 1 87467 AND LA 190067, LORDSBURGMESA, SOUTHWESTERN NEI'V MEXIGO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8088d0c5</link>
      <description>All the artifacts were produced from two of the sources in the Mule Creek Obsidian Complex, Mogollon-Datil volcanic province, western New Mexico (Antelope Creek and Mule Mountains), although obsidian from these sources are also available as secondary deposits in San Francisco and Gila River Quaternary alluvium in eastern Arizona (Shackley 1992. 1998; Shackley et al. 2018; Table 1, Figure 1, and cover image herein). The cortex on sample #12 fnmLA 187467 appears to be typical of the secondary deposit obsidian in Gila River alluvium (Shackley 1992,1998).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8088d0c5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR ARTIFACTS FROM THE EL SEGUNDO ARCHAEOLOGY PROJECT, NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7nx2m613</link>
      <description>The analysis here of a variety of artifacts from a number of sites or site groups in the ElSegundo project area is dominated by obsidian sources along the Jemez Lineament, and a variety of rock types likely typical of the local geology. These results are similar to previous studies of sites in the area, and support the provenance inferences from these studies (see Shackley 2015a, 2015b, 2016). None of the volcanic rocks determined to be dacite are from the three known sources in northern New Mexico (Shackley 2011a). At least two artifacts could be produced from the Black Canyon hydrothermally altered rhyolite near Socorro, New Mexico, but the variability at the source is so great, that confident inferences cannot be made at this time (Dello-Russo 2004; Table 1).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7nx2m613</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXTS IN THREE REGIONS OF SONORA, MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7hw4g60r</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 297 artifacts (292 obsidian, and a few not analyzed due to size) from three regions and a number of sites in the State of Sonora, Mexico indicates a very diverse provenance assemblage with known sources on both sides of the border, Chihuahua and Sonora, and a large proportion of, as yet, unlocated sources (58.2%) dominated by one source (44.2%) that is likely located somewhere along the Río Sonora or somewhere above that stream basin (see cover image and Figure 1). This is the largest, as yet, archaeological obsidian provenance study in Sonora, and despite the number of "unknown" sources provides a good basis for further archaeological and geoarchaeological research in Sonora.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7hw4g60r</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM A NUMBER OF SITES IN THE BIG BEND REGION OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d69g2xx</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 55 obsidian artifacts from a number of sites in the Big Bend Region of southwest Texas indicates procurement of obsidian for tool production from sources in New Mexico, Chihuahua, and a significant as yet unlocated source possibly from the Big Bend region (TX Unknown A). This diverse provenance assemblage is dominated by Cerro Toledo Rhyolite obsidian, a Rio Grande secondary deposit source from northern New Mexico, Los Jagueyes a secondary source along the Rio Santa Maria in northeastern Chihuahua, Sierra Fresnal in the range by the same name, and Lago Fredrico, another source defined by only two source standards (Shackley 2005; see Figures 1 and 2 here). The number of as yet located primary sources in northwest Mexico and probably southwest Texas frustrates provenance studies in the region (cf Lintz et al. 2014; Hughes 2019). Included is a short discussion of the regional geology as relevant for geoarchaeological studies as well as a short description of...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d69g2xx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF GILA RIVER QUATERNARY ALLUVIAL OBSIDIAN AND OBSIDIAN ARTIFACT PROVENANCE FROM THE SANCEZ SITE (AZ CC:2:452 ASM), SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7b2987z4</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 38 Quaternary alluvial secondary deposit obsidian indicates a diverse source provenance dominated by obsidian from the upstream primary sources of the Cow Canyon Obsidian Complex, and eachof the three major localities at the Mule Creek Obsidian Complex in eastern New Mexico, all part of the Mogollon-Datil Volcanic Province(see cover image). All of these sourceshave been eroding into the Blue, San Francisco, and Gila River systems for over 21 Ma (Shackley 2018; Shackley et al. 2018). The surface and excavated obsidian artifact assemblage (n=16) from the Sanchez Site (AZ CC:2:452 ASM) is generally a reflection of the mix of sources in the Gila River alluvium with slightly less diversity, but still dominated by sources of the Cow Canyon Obsidian Complex.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7b2987z4</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM TWO SITES IN PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76h596t2</link>
      <description>The analysis here of sixobsidianartifacts fromtwo Formative Period sites near Kelvin, Arizona along the Gila River indicates that all the artifacts were produced from the Superior (Picketpost Mountain) source approximately 25 linear kilometers north of the sites, and the nearest obsidian source (see cover image, Table 1 and Figure 1). Superior obsidian is also available as secondary deposits in Queen Creek Quaternary alluvium at least as far as Florence Junction (Shackley 1988, 1995, 2005).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76h596t2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THREE EXCAVATED SITES FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, SAN ANTONIO 2016 FIELD SCHOOL PROJECT IN EASTERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76h016fd</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 109 artifacts from three excavated sites from the University of Texas, San Antonio field school, indicates procurement of four of the regional obsidian sources from the Mogollon-Datil Volcanic Province in western New Mexico and eastern Arizona, a similar distribution to the surface collections from these and other sites in the project area (see Shackley 2015; Shackley et al. 2016a). The assemblage overall is dominated by obsidian from the Antelope Creek West locality at Mule Creek, New Mexico, followed by the North Sawmill Creek group, and two artifacts produced from the Mule Mountains source at Mule Creek. All of the four sources are present in San Francisco and Gila River Quaternary alluvium, but there are reasons to infer that at least some of the artifacts were produced from obsidian procured from the primary sources to the north and east (see discussion).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76h016fd</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM FOUR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN SOUTHEASTER NNEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nw524zv</link>
      <description>The source provenance of the artifacts is dominated by Jemez Mountains sources(Table 1and Figure1; see Shackley 2016). Cerro Toledo Rhyolite obsidianis available as secondary deposits in Rio Grande Quaternary alluviumat least to Las Cruces, but Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) has not been found south of Albuquerque, and only as a few small diameter samples(Church 2000; Shackley 2005, 2013, 2020).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nw524zv</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM TWO SITES IN PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hb26665</link>
      <description>The analysis here of sixobsidianartifacts fromtwo Formative Period sites near Kelvin, Arizona along the Gila River indicates that all the artifacts were produced from the Superior (Picketpost Mountain) source approximately 25 linear kilometers north of the sites, and the nearest obsidian source (see cover image, Table 1 and Figure 1). Superior obsidian is also available as secondary deposits in Queen Creek Quaternary alluvium at least as far as Florence Junction (Shackley 1988, 1995, 2005).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hb26665</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM FROM THE STEWARD SITE (41PT519), NORTH TEXAS</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6fr1r27d</link>
      <description>The analysis here of five obsidian artifacts from 41PT501 in north Texas indicates that all the artifacts were produced from the Cerro Toledo Rhyolite obsidian source in the Jemez Mountains of northern New Mexico (Table 1 and Figure 1). Cerro Toledo Rhyolite obsidian&amp;nbsp;along with Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) obsidian was the most commonly procured from the Jemez Mountains sources (Shackley 2005; Shackley et al. 2016).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6fr1r27d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN THE EAST RANKIN VALLEY, BARRY M. GOLDWATER AIR FORCE RANGE, SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5md1274m</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 18 obsidian artifacts from various sites in the east Rankin Valley on the Barry Goldwater Air Force Range (BMGR) yields a source provenance typical of various periods on the range, dominated by one of the two chemical groups of Sauceda Mountains, with Los Vidrios, and Los Sitios del Agua present in the minority (Martynec et al. 2011; Shackley 2005, 2012, 2014; Shackley and Tucker 2001).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5md1274m</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4kf4v1tq</link>
      <description>Two of the artifacts are produced from Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) obsidian, and one was not obsidian (Table 1). Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) has not been recorded in any size or quantity in the alluvium, including Rio Grande southern New Mexico localities, so was likely originally procured in Valles Caldera proper (Church 2000; Shackley 2005, 2012).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4kf4v1tq</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM PINTO CANYON RANCH, SOUTHWESTERN TEXAS</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4638080d</link>
      <description>The mix of sources is similar to the previous study (Shackley 2019) with the addition of sources to the west of the Sierra Madre ridgeline in Sonora (see Table 1 and Figure 1; Kibler et al. 2014; Shackley 2005). The TX Unknown A type is also present as well as Jemez Mountains obsidian most likely procured from Rio Grande Quaternary alluvium, and the two Chihuahuan source present in the previous study (Church 2000; Shackley 2012). The assignment to Lago Barreal is not confident with some elements outside the range of the source standards and that there are only eight source standards known from that source (Shackley 2005). See previous study for a more extensive discussion of sources and regional geology (Shackley 2019)</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4638080d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM AZ AA:12:85 (ASM), CENTRAL, ARZIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vk2b96g</link>
      <description>The one piece of obsidian debitage was produced from the Sand Tanks source located in western Maricopa County, Arizona (Shackley 2005, Shackley and Tucker 2001). This source is relatively uncommon in archaeological contexts, but has occurred in central Arizona sites (Shackley and Tucker 2001).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vk2b96g</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF AN OBSIDIAN BIFACE FROM SOUTHEASTERN UTAH</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qx1j20d</link>
      <description>As we discussed, the obsidian biface was produced from the El Rechuelos Rhyolite obsidian source in the northern Jemez Mountains, northern New Mexico&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qx1j20d</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THREE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN THE VALLE DE ALTAR, NORTHERN SONORA, MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gr6j3hn</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 300 artifacts (12 not obsidian and a few not analyzed) from three sites (SON:F:2:4, 61, and 82) in the Valle de Altar in the northern State of Sonora, Mexico indicates a very diverse provenance assemblage with known sources on both sides of the border, including Arizona, New Mexico, Chihuahua and Sonora, and a large proportion of, as yet, unlocated sources (73.9%) dominated by one unusual trachyte obsidian source (72.9%). The main unknown source is likely located somewhere along the Río Altar or somewhere above that stream basin, and called provisionally here SON Valle de Altar Unknown. The diversity of obsidian source provenance decreases from west to east as the unknown source dominates the assemblage (see cover image). This study is one of the largest archaeological obsidian provenance studies in Sonora, and despite the number of "unknown" sources provides a good basis for further archaeological and geoarchaeological research in Sonora (see also Shackley 2019a).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gr6j3hn</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE CLASSIC PERIOD ROWLEY SITE (AZ U:9:49 ASU), MESA, ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3ff4t2hg</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 83obsidian bifaces (five were not obsidian or too burned/dirty to analyze) indicates an extremely diverse obsidian provenance assemblage with a mix of sources somewhat atypical for Classic contexts in the Middle Salt River Valley&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3ff4t2hg</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM PIEDRAS MARCADAS PUEBLO RUIN (LA 290), MIDDLE RIO GRANDE VALLEY, NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/37v1n9v3</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The analysis here of 195 obsidian artifacts from the surface and subsurface of Piedras Marcadas Pueblo ruin (LA 290) in the middle Rio Grande River valley indicates a source provenance similar to previous analyses of surface and subsurface contexts dominated by sources from the Jemez Mountains, both pre-and-post caldera, (Shackley 2009, 2013a, 2014a, 2014b). All these sources are present in the Rio Grande alluvium as far south as Albuquerque, although the Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) nodules are very small, probably too small to produce the one projectile point made from this source (Sample 1911; Shackley 2021). Mount Taylor is not available in Rio Grande Quaternary sediments this far north (Shackley 2021). Refer to Shackley (2021) for a thorough discussion of the sources and secondary distribution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most unique and important for the history of the site, and indeed the Coronado presence in the Middle Rio Grande valley is the occurrence of two polyhedral blade fragments...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/37v1n9v3</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM LA 193369, SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/35v8s7kv</link>
      <description>The two obsidian debitage pieces are both produced from Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) obsidian in the Jemez Mountains, northern New Mexico (Table 1).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/35v8s7kv</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF TWO OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM LAS TORTUGAS, GRAN DESIERTO, SONORA, MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3415d99v</link>
      <description>The two artifacts from the Clovis site of Las Tortugas, Gran Desierto, northern Sonora are from one known and one as yet unlocated source: one piece of debitage from the Sauceda Mountains source in southwest Arizona, and one matching the composition of a single artifact recovered from the upper Rio Sonora in northern Sonora (Shackley 2005, 2019a). The biface, a possible Clovis fragment, produced from the source matching the one artifact from the Rio Sonora region is likely from a locality in northern Sonora, the location of which remains unknown. It does not match any known source in the Skinner/Shackley database of North American obsidian sources, including those in northwest Mexico (see Shackley 2005; Vidal-Solano et al. 2020; Table 1, Figures 1 and 2, see also cover image).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3415d99v</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF AN OBSIDIAN ARTIFACT AND X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (XRF) COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF A CERAMIC SHERD FROM LA 159019, EDDY COUNTY, SOUTHEASTERN, NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/33h737rq</link>
      <description>Analyzed here is one obsidian artifact assigned to Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) from the Jemez Mountains in northern New Mexico and one ceramic sherd with a high alkaline composition (i.e. Na, Ca, K) that suggests a sedimentary origin rather than silicic (i.e. granitoid) residual clay origin (Table 1 and Figure 1; see discussion).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/33h737rq</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM LA 192236 and 192238, CATRON COUNTY, SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3213g546</link>
      <description>The four pieces of obsidian debitage are allproduced from the Red Hill obsidian source located within a radius of two km, essentially on site(Table 1; Figure 1). This source is actually a discontinuous Neogene remnant rhyolite dome complex that has been partly subsumed by Quaternary mafic volcanism, much of it fissure flows that have formed mesas as well as cinder cones such as Red Hill (see http://swxrflab.net/redhill.htm; Shackley 1995, 2005)</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3213g546</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM CRYSTAL CAVE (39LA504) WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2pg883hc</link>
      <description>The results of the x-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) here of 148 obsidian artifacts from Late Archaic contexts at Crystal Cave (39LA504), western South Dakota indicates procurement of three major prehistoric obsidian sources in western Wyoming (Obsidian Cliff) and eastern Idaho (Bear Gulch and Malad; see Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 1 and 2 here). These sources are common in Great Plains and Rocky Mountain sites (Hughes 2007; see discussion).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2pg883hc</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM ARMIJO SHELTER, CENTRAL NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/25b0c3b4</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 72 obsidian projectile points from Armijo Shelter (LA 9300) is dominated by the production of projectile ponts from obsidian sources along the Jemez Lineament, mainly sources from the Jemez Mountains (94.4%) north of the site, and one of the two Mount Taylor sources (Horace/La Jara Mesa) south of the project area (5.6%). Nearly 42% of the obsidian projectile points were produced from the Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) source in Valles Caldera in the Jemez Mountains.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/25b0c3b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN AND VOLCANIC ROCK ARTIFACTS FROM A PRIVATE COLLECTION</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1st487nf</link>
      <description>The analysis here of a variety of artifacts from a private collection with unknown provenience indicates that some of the obsidian artifacts were produced from the Craine Creek source, Bog Hot Springs locality, in northwest Nevada (see Table 1, Figures 1 and 2). This source is not necessarily common even in Great Basin sites, and given this and that the remainder of the artifacts could not be assigned to source, suggests that at least some of the collection is from northern Nevada or southern Oregon&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1st487nf</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THREE SITES NEAR THE JUNCTION OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 40 AND NEW MEXICO STATE HIGHWAY 6, CENTRAL NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0sv269vd</link>
      <description>As you suspected, the artifacts from these three sites were produced from one of the Mount Taylor sources, or one of the three major sources in the Jemez Mountains (Tables 1 and 2).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0sv269vd</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM PINTOCANYON RANCH, AND SAN ESTEBAN ROCKSHELTER, SOUTHWESTERN TEXAS</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0jp8w8nx</link>
      <description>The mix of sources is similar to the previous study (Shackley 2019a) with none of the sourcesto the west of the Sierra Madre ridgeline in Sonora (see Table 1 and Figure 1; Kibler et al. 2014; Shackley 2005). The TX UnknownA type is also present as well as Mount Taylorobsidian(Grants Ridge) the latter most likely procured from Rio Grande Quaternary alluvium, and two Chihuahuan sources(Lago Fredrico and Lago Barreal) the latter present in the previous study(Church 2000; Shackley 2012).See previous study for a more extensive discussion of sources and regional geology (Shackley 2019b).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0jp8w8nx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL OBSIDIAN FROM AZ U:15:24/27 (ASM), NEAR FLORENCE, ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0f077800</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 111 artifacts, 108 obsidian, indicates a somewhat diverse assemblage dominated by artifacts produced from the Superior (Picketpost Mountain; 97.2%) source, the obsidian source nearest the site. Sauceda Mountains obsidian (n=2), and Vulture (n=1), both in west-central Arizona were also present (see discussion).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0f077800</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN PALEOARCHAIC BIFACES FROM THE GREAT BASIN</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0ct13792</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 51 Paleoarchaic bifaces (49 obsidian) from the North American Great Basin indicates a very diverse provenance assemblage derived throughout western North America. The XRF analysis and most of the source assignments was performed at the Geoarchaeological XRF Laboratory in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and some of the source assignments, mainly from Oregon sources, was performed by Craig Skinner, former Director of the Northwest Research Obsidian Studies Laboratory, Bend, Oregon. The Skinner/Shackley database of 261 North American obsidian source data was mainly used to assign to source.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0ct13792</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MAJOR OXIDE, MINOR OXIDE, AND TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF CHERT AND QUARTZITE SOURCE MATERIAL FROM THE HARTVILLE UPLIFT, SOUTHEASTERN WYOMING</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0b72q8b5</link>
      <description>The analysis here of chert and quartzite source samples from the Hartville Uplift, Wyoming indicates relatively low variability in the chert samples, and somewhat higher variability in the quartzite samples, particularly in the major and minor oxides and some of the trace elements such as strontium and barium. Also, a previously unpublished analysis by this lab of Spanish Diggings, Wyoming chert for Bruce Huckell at the University of New Mexico is compared to the Hartville chert using the oxides of potassium and calcium, and trace elements Zn and Zr (see also Shackley 1999). This study is mainly seen as an exploratory exercise compositionally documenting the Hartville Uplift chert and quartzite. The comparison with the Spanish Diggings samples is for illustrative purposes.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0b72q8b5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF AN OBSIDIAN CORE FRAGMENT FROM LA44517 SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00j643qb</link>
      <description>The source provenance of the "lonely" bipolar core fragment is Cerro Toledo Rhyolite, and between the waterwom coftex and typical procurement in that par1 of New Mexico was likely procured lrom Rio Grande Quaternary alluvium where Cerro Toledo Rhyolite obsidian is the most commonlyrecovered secondarily deposited obsidian in the Rio Grande gravels at least as far as Las Cruces (Church 2000; Shackley 2005, 2020</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00j643qb</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM LA 104416, SOUTHEAST NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0065k2qm</link>
      <description>All the artifacts were produced from the Cerro Toledo Rhyolite source from the Jemez Mountains, northern New Mexico, although the obsidian is available as secondary deposits in Rio Grande Quaternary alluvium (Church 2000; Shackley 2012; Table 1 and Figure 1 here).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0065k2qm</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (EDXRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR OXIDE AND TRACE ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS FOR OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE MIDDLE AWASH RIVER BASIN, CENTRAL ETHIOPIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9s230639</link>
      <description>The non-destructive whole rock analysis here of 17 obsidian artifacts from archaeological contexts along the Middle Awash River Basin, Ethiopia indicates a very diverse obsidian provenance assemblage similar to the diversity seen in the Negash et al. (2011) study including known and, as yet, unlocated sources. Many of those artifacts were analyzed at the Berkeley Archaeological XRF Laboratory using similar methods and calibrations (see Shackley 2005, 2019:Supplement). The results here were compared to the Negash et al. (2011) study as well as source standard data at this laboratory.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9s230639</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL OBSIDIAN FROM MESA GRANDE (AZ U:9:25 ASM), MESA,ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9998n7kv</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 23 obsidian artifacts from Mesa Grande (AZ U:9:25 ASM), central Arizona displays a typical Classic Period Hohokam obsidian artifact assemblage (Table 1 and Figure 1; Mills et al. 2013; Shackley 2005). The assemblage is completely dominated by SonoranDesert sources including Sauceda Mountains and Tank Mountains in western Arizona, and Los Vidrios in northern Sonora (Shackley 1988, 1989, 1991, 1995, 2005).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9998n7kv</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM FOUR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SIES IN WYOMING</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96c030mz</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 30 obsidian artifacts from four sites in Wyoming is dominated by Obsidian Cliff, Yellowstone Volcanic Field obsidian, and a few from Bear Gulch, in the Centennial Mountains of northeastern Idaho (Table 1).&amp;nbsp; This combination of sources is common in archaeological contexts in the region, and in previous results from the Caldwell Creek Site (48FR7091; Shackley 2014).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96c030mz</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (EDXRF) WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR ANDTRACE ELEMENTS FOR SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANIC ROCKS(SPV), LUSARDI FORMATION LOCALITY, NORTHERN SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94h3q7xh</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 16source samples from Santiago Peak Volcanics, Lusardi Formation rock samples indicates some variability in composition, but mainly high silica rhyolites. The composition, however, appearsdistinctive from the Santiago Peak Volcanics in southern San Diego County in the Middle Sweetwater River area, called colloquially the Dictionary Hill/Mount Miguel Formation of aphyric fine-grained black and green high silica rhyolites (see discussion; Herzig and Kimbrough 2014; Shackley 2017; Tanaka et al. 1984). At this first approximation it appears that there is some variability in the composition of the various Santiago Peak volcanic rocklocalitiessuch that some elemental discrimination may be possible. Santiago Peak was used so commonly for chipped stone tool production, particularly projectile points in western San Diego County that there is a promise thatmore intensive source provenance studies in regional prehistoric contextswould be fruitful (see Pigniolo 1996;...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94h3q7xh</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM FROM SEVEN SITES ALONG THE MIDDLE RIO GRANDE, CENTRAL NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/92h994q1</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 10 obsidian artifacts from four sites along the Middle Rio Grande indicates procurement from one of three sources in the Jemez Mountains, all of which are available in Quaternary sediments nearby on the eastern terraces of the Rio Grande (Shackley 2005, 2012; Table 1 and Figure 1 here). Most of the artifacts were produced from the Cerro Toledo Rhyolite obsidian source, the most commonly recovered source in Rio Grande alluvium between the Jemez Mountains and Chihuahua</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/92h994q1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM CABEZA PRIETA WILDLIFE REFUGE, SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8rc3q8gs</link>
      <description>The artifacts were produced with Sauceda Mountains obsidian (n=2) with one from Los Vidrios,not unlike the distribution of sources in previous studies at CPWR (Table 1 and Figure 1).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8rc3q8gs</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR ARCHAIC PERIOD ARTIFACTS FROM THE TULAROSA BASIN, SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8037q3fg</link>
      <description>The analysis here of mainly Early and Middle Archaic projectile points from a number of sites or site groups in the Tularosa Basin of southern New Mexico is dominated by dacite raw materials, and a few Socorro hydrothermally altered rhyolites (Table 1, Figures 1 through 3). One of the dacite artifacts was produced from the San Antonio Mountain source and one possibly from the Newman Dome source, both part of the Taos Plateau Volcanic Field in northern New Mexico (Shackley 2011a; Table 1 and Figure 3 here).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8037q3fg</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR VOLCANIC GLASS ROCKS FROM OAHU COUNTY, HAWAI'I</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7mw8s12w</link>
      <description>The analysis here of six vitreous rock samples indicates trachy-andesite and basaltic trachy-andesite glasses according to an alkali/silica plot (Le Bas et al. 1986; Le Maitre et al. 1989; Table 1 and Figure 1 herein). Trachyte glass does occur in nature such as the Emuruangogolok volcano in Kenya, and a source in the Hawai'ian Islands, the former with SiO2 values over 62% by weight (Steve Lundblad, personal communication; Weaver 1977).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7mw8s12w</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN CRUCIFORMS FROM THE SOUTHERN U.S. SOUTHWEST</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73d8809k</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 21 obsidian cruciforms, and one cruciform produced from a volcanic or plutonic rock, from archaeological sites presumably from southern New Mexico and northern Chihuahua indicates a diverse provenance assemblage dominated by the northern Chihuahuan obsidian source at Sierra Fresnal (Shackley 2005). The remainder of the artifacts are produced from one of the sources in the Jemez Mountains of northern New Mexico, but likely procured from Rio Grande Quaternary alluvium (see Church 2000; Shackley 2021). A brief discussion is offered below.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73d8809k</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR SEVENPOWDERED LIMESTONE AND PLUTONICROCK SAMPLES</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6td3k1t7</link>
      <description>The analysis here of sevenpowdered samples indicates a variable composition(Table 1). The plutonicrocks vary from mafic to silicic(Table1).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6td3k1t7</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (XRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR, AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR AN OBSIDIAN NODULE RECOVERED FROM GREEN RIVER ALLUVIUM, GREEN RIVER, WYOMING</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64q422v8</link>
      <description>The results of the analysis here of one obsidian nodule from Green River alluvium near Green River, Wyoming does not match any of the 260+ sources or source groups in the Skinner/Shackley database for North America. It is certainly a rhyolite glass (obsidian) based on the TAS plot of silica and alkalis (Figure 1).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64q422v8</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF AN OBSIDIAN SAN JOSE PROJECTILE POINT, CARSON NATIONAL FOREST, NORTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5v36t2vn</link>
      <description>The San Jose point delivered by Joe Birkman was produced from El Rechuelos Rhyolite, a pre-caldera obsidian source in the northern Jemez Mountains of New Mexico (Shackley 2005).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5v36t2vn</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN PROJECTILE POINTS FROM SANTEE GREENS (CA-SDI-5669), WESTERN SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5fd8s7st</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 71 obsidian projectile points and fragments from the Santee Greens (CA-SDI-5669) prehistoric/historic site in western San Diego County indicates production predominantly from the Obsidian Butte source in Imperial County, southeastern California with one projectile point produced from the Tinajas source in northern Baja California. Both these sources are present in Late Prehistoric contexts throughout the southern San Diego and Imperial Counties of Alta California, and northern Baja California (Panich et al. 2012, 2015, 2017; Shackley 2019a).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5fd8s7st</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF PALEOINDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE GREAT DIVIDE BASIN, SOUTHERN WYOMING</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4hj0h2rj</link>
      <description>The artifacts are produced from two of the most commonly used obsidian sources in Wyoming, Malad, eastern Idaho, and Obsidian Cliff in the Yellowstone Volcanic Field, western Wyoming (see Kunselman 1998; Table 1 here).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4hj0h2rj</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (EDXRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR AND MINOR OXIDE AND TRACE ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS FOR IRON OXIDE (OCHRE) SAMPLES FROM THREE MINE LOCATIONS AND THE BEACH PALEOINDIAN CACHE IN NORTH DAKOTA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3v06z5ng</link>
      <description>The non-destructive whole rock EDXRF analysis here of source standards from the Lien Sunrise and Chicago iron mines and the Beach Paleoindian Cache in North Dakota indicate a good statistical correlation between the source rocks and the archaeological ochre (hematite) from the cache. An analytical trajectory of parametric and non-parametric multivariate and graphical statistical procedures was employed to determine source provenance (see Baxter 1994; Johnson and Wichern 1998; Shennan 1997; c.f. Zarzycka et al. 2019).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3v06z5ng</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM PICURIS PUEBLO CONVENTO, NORTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3rt2p443</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 43obsidian artifacts from the Picurus Pueblo Conventoinclude the major sources of Jemez Lineament archaeological dominated by Jemez Mountains sources, particularly Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio; Appendix Table, Table 1 in text). The one sample of No Agua Peak obsidian is rarely seen in archaeological contexts (see discussion below).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3rt2p443</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM FROM AZ AA:12:312 (ASM) SOUTHERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3pm8388g</link>
      <description>The analysis here of four obsidian artifacts from AZ AA:12:312 (ASM) indicates procurement of both regional sources (Sauceda Mountains, western Arizona) and extra-regional sources (Antelope Creek/Mule Creek western New Mexico; Table 1 and Figure 1). These two sources are relatively common in Late Classic contexts in southern Arizona (i.e. Casa Grande, Marana), and Antelope Creek is a common source in this time period throughout the Southwest</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3pm8388g</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM FROM FOUR SITES SOUTH OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3b70990f</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 20 obsidian artifacts from four sites near Santa Fe, New Mexico indicates that all the artifacts were produced from one of three sources in the Jemez Mountains: Cerro Toledo Rhyolite, El Rechuelos Rhyolite, and Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio; Table 1 and Figure 1)</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3b70990f</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (XRF) ANALYSIS OF AN IRON CROSSBOW BOLT, FROM CENTRAL NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3091v0fh</link>
      <description>The analysis here of an early Spanish crossbow bolt from central New Mexico (see cover image) indicates a dominantly iron (Fe) composition, not unlike the composition of others in the region. Data from the composition of a similar bolt from the Sevilleta Pueblo and Mission (LA 774) in the same area is included for comparison.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3091v0fh</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MAJOR, MINOR, AND TRACE ELEMENT COMPOSITION OF THE NEWMAN DOME DACITE, TAOS PLATEAU VOLCANIC FIELD, NORTHERN NEW MEXICO: GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATIONS</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3072234h</link>
      <description>The Newman Dome pyroxene dacite dome complex in the Taos Plateau Volcanic Field is a prominent stone tool raw material that was used for stone tool production for at least 11,000 years throughout northern New Mexico and southern Colorado, and perhaps beyond(Boyer 2010; Newman and Nielsen 1987; Shackley 2011a; Vierra 2010; Figures1 and 2 herein). The analysis here of 24 source samples is an extension of the earlier study (Shackley 2011a) and indicates that this extensive dacite dome complex is compositionally homogeneous in trace elements at least in the northern and central portion of the dome complex</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3072234h</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE BLUE CANYON CLOVIS SITE, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kg9z8jz</link>
      <description>The analysis here of eight obsidian artifacts so far recovered from the newly discovered Blue Canyon Clovis archaeological site southwest of Socorro, New Mexico indicates a diverse provenance assemblage including sources from the Mule Creek Source Complex in western New Mexico that must have been originally procured at the source, and Jemez Lineament sources from northern and northwest New Mexico, some probably procured from Rio Grande Quaternary gravels nearby, although the cortex on Samples 27 and 66 appears to be angular and not water eroded (see discussion below; Church 2000; Shackley 2005, 2009, 2012; Shackley et al. 2018)</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kg9z8jz</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM 48PA3604, PARK COUNTY, WYOMING</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2363q9qj</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 19 obsidian artifacts from 48PA3604 in Wyoming is dominated by Obsidian Cliff, Yellowstone Volcanic Field obsidian as in previous projects in the region, with two artifacts produced from the Malad, Idaho source (see cover image and Table 1 and Figure 1).&amp;nbsp; One artifact is produced from an, as yet, unlocated source that was not in the Skinner/Shackley North American obsidian source database.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2363q9qj</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVANANCE OF FOUR OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE MESA PRIETA PETROGLYPH PROJECT RIO ARRIBA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xk6n94q</link>
      <description>The analysis here of four obsidian samples indicates procurement from two of the Jemez Mountains sources, El Rechuelos and Canovas Canyon Rhyolite (see cover image). This is similar to the earlier study (Shackley 2013; Table 1 and Figure 1 here).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xk6n94q</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR VOLCANIC ROCKS FROM THE JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NORTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1rd9n1n7</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 22 volcanic rock samples indicates a diverse set of volcanic rock types (Table 1, Figures 1 through 2).&amp;nbsp; The obsidian nodules collected from Turkey Ridge rhyolite on the NW side of Cerro Rubio are most definitely derived from the Cerro Toledo Rhyolite (CTR) event based on comparison with a large body of CTR source standards from Rabbit Mountain and the ash flow tuff to the south including "Obsidian Ridge" (see Shackley 2005; Table 2 and 3 and Figure 2 herein).&amp;nbsp; Using XRF the composition is well within those standards (see Table 2 and Figures 2 and 3).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1rd9n1n7</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (EDXRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR OXIDE AND TRACE ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS FOR RHYOLITE AND DACITE PROJECTILE POINT FRAGMENTS FROM THE TULAROSA BASIN, SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1m2653zd</link>
      <description>The non-destructive whole rock analysis here of three projectile point fragments from unknown provenience in the Tularosa Basin of southern New Mexico indicates that one of the artifacts was likely produced from the Socorro hydrothermally altered rhyolite, and one possibly from the Mount San Antonio dacite source in northern New Mexico, hundreds of kilometers north of the basin (see discussion).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1m2653zd</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR, AND TRACE ELEMENTS OF SOIL SAMPLES FROM RIO VERDE, OAXACA, WEST MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18x2377v</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 62 powdered soil samples indicates considerable variability based on the EDXRF analysis. I leave the interpretive details to you.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18x2377v</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (EDXRF) WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR CHERT AND VOLCANIC ROCK ARTIFACTS FROM SANTEE GREENS (CA-SDI-5669), WESTERN SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0mv4s682</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 18 biface and projectile point samples from Santee Greens indicates a high proportion of rhyolite followed by chert raw materials. A few of the artifacts may be from either the Piedra de Lumbre chert source in northern San Diego County, or one of the Santiago Peak Volcanic rhyolite sources from anywhere in Orange or San Diego Counties or northern Baja California. One of those artifacts could be produced from the Lusardi Formation Santiago Peak Volcanics source near Poway, California, also in northern San Diego County. A discussion of these issues follows the laboratory instrumentation discussion.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0mv4s682</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLOURESCENCE (EDXRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR VOLCANIC ROCKS FROM GRAND CANYON-PARASHANT NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hk4h556</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 62 rock samples indicates a large diversity of rock types, based on the TAS plot and bivariate plots of four trace elements (Tables 1 and 2, Figures 1 and 2). While basalt is a common rock type, it is not the dominant volcanic in the assemblagebased on this analysis (see Discussion).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hk4h556</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM CA-KER-8146 AND 10683 ON THE NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9n103776</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 52 obsidian artifacts from two archaeological sites within the China Lake Naval Weapons Station, as in many of the previous studies, indicated the presence of mainly Coso Volcanic Field obsidian sources (Hughes 1988; Ericson and Glascock 2004; Shackley 2014, 2015a, 2015b, 2016, 2017, 2019a, 2019b).&amp;nbsp; As typical for sites on the weapons station, the assemblage is dominated by artifacts produced from the West Sugarloaf dome, followed by Sugarloaf and West Cactus Peak (Table 1 and Figure 1).&amp;nbsp; While there has been some argument that differential procurement of the Coso sources is not necessarily socially important, the work of Eerkens and Rosenthal at Coso suggests that there is some selection that may be socially significant (2004).&amp;nbsp; Unlike previous studies, however, two artifacts from CA-KER-8146 were produced from two of the localities at Casa Diablo in east-central California (Hughes 1994; Table 1 and Figure 1 herein)</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9n103776</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM SL01, LAS ANIMAS COUNTY, COLORADO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/97g6m926</link>
      <description>Both the artifacts were produced from the Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) source in the Jemez Mountains, northern New Mexico (Shackley 2005; Table 1 and Figure 1 here).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/97g6m926</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE CLEARWATER SITE (AZ BB:13:6 ASM), SOUTHERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8k59z4tr</link>
      <description>The results of the x-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) here of 7 obsidian artifacts from the Early Cienega Phase Clearwater Site, indicate a relatively diverse obsidian source provenance in nearly opposite directions (see cover image). While most of the artifacts, including the two projectile points were produced from the Cow Canyon source in eastern Arizona, or the secondary deposits in Gila River Quaternary alluvium, two of the debitage pieces were produced from the Los Vidrios or Los Sitios del Agua sources in northern Sonora.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8k59z4tr</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF ADDITIONAL OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM A NUMBER OF SITES ALONG U.S. HIGHWAY 60, CENTRAL ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tp1791r</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 73 obsidian artifacts is one of the largest in the Superior (Picketpost Mountain) region, and the second assemblage from these sites (Shackley 2005, 2017). While the source provenance of the artifacts is diverse with sources from Government Mountain in northern Arizona, and Sonoran Desert sources (Sauceda Mountains and Vulture), but dominated by the nearby Superior (Picketpost Mountain) source as in the previous analysis (Tables 1 and 2). In this analysis a number of projectile points as well as bipolar cores from Superior and debitage was present. Most striking is that the projectile point assemblage, while diverse, does not reflect the diversity of sources present in the debitage analyzed earlier (Shackley 2017; see cover image here). A direct comparison between the projectile point obsidian provenance and the debitage could prove useful</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tp1791r</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THREE SITES IN PARK COUNTY, CENTRAL COLORADO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7q33q3nw</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 16 obsidian artifacts from three sites in central Colorado indicates a dominance of artifacts produced from the Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) dome in the Jemez Mountains of northern New Mexico. One artifact was produced from the El Rechuelos Rhyolite domes in the Jemez Mountains, and one artifact was produced from the Cochetopa Dome in Saguache County, Colorado. An earlier study of 5PA4803 also indicated procurement of obsidian from these two Jemez Mountains sources (Shackley 2017)</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7q33q3nw</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM SITES CA-INY-5728, INY-9839, AND X3JA03, NAVAL WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wx3x6rm</link>
      <description>As before, I have taken the liberty of sending a letter report in the interest of time. All the artifacts were produced from the West Sugarloaf dome in the Coso Volcanic Field (Table 1, Figure 1; see Shackley 2016). I refer you to the previous report for more detailed discussion of sources and source assignment (Shackley 2016).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wx3x6rm</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM AZ AA:12:46(ASM), SOUTHERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53d140n1</link>
      <description>The elemental concentrations indicate that the two artifacts were produced from Sauceda Mountains and Superior (Picketpost Mountain; Table 1 here).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53d140n1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM CA-INY-7833 ON THE NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4z19t2k1</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 42 obsidian artifacts, from CA-INY-7833 within the China Lake Naval Weapons Station indicates a relatively diverse provenance assemblage of regional obsidian sources similar to previous studies (Shackley 2014, 2015a, 2015b, 2016, 2017). In this case Sugarloaf is dominant (54.8%), followed by West Sugarloaf (35.7%) with a few artifacts produced from Joshua Ridge obsidian (9.5%; see Tables 1 and 2). These sources are approximately 30-35 km west of the site.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4z19t2k1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM CA-SBR-8334 ON THE NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3z00628n</link>
      <description>The analysis here of seven obsidian artifacts from CA-SBR-8334 within the China Lake Naval Weapons Station, as in many of the previous studies, indicated the presence of all Coso Volcanic Field obsidian sources (Shackley 2014, 2015a, 2015b, 2016, 2017, 2019a, 2019b). As typical for sites on the weapons station, the assemblage is dominated by artifacts produced from the West Sugarloaf dome, followed by Sugarloaf and West Cactus Peak</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3z00628n</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS COLLECTION, CORNING, NEW YORK</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3w63h7x8</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 16 obsidian artifacts from the Corning Glass Museum indicates an extremely diverse provenance assemblage from five U.S. states and two states of Mexico. While it is difficult to determine whether all the artifacts were produced prehistorically (Cat. # 62.7.2B certainly was not, given its provenance), there are some inferences in this regard that can be made and are included in the discussion. Additionally, bibliographic citations and some comments on the sources in this collection are also offered</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3w63h7x8</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THREE SITESON THE NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/34c1014j</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 23 obsidian artifacts from two sites within the China Lake Naval Weapons Station, as in many of the previous studies, indicated the presence of all the Coso Volcanic Field obsidian sources (Shackley 2014, 2015a, 2015b, 2016, 2017, 2019a, 2019b). In this case West Sugarloaf (69.6%) is dominant followed by Sugarloaf (13%) and Joshua Ridge and West Cactus Peak each at 8.7%</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/34c1014j</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROMFIVE SITES IN SOUTHWEST UTAH</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/29h1q5v4</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 63 obsidian artifacts (three are not obsidian) from five sites in southwestern Utah, indicates a source provenance assemblage with artifacts mainly produced from two sources in southwestern Utah, Modena in Iron County and Wild Horse Canyon in Beaver County, and the Kane Springs source in Lincoln County, Nevada (Haarklau et al. 2005; see cover image,Tables 1 and 2, and Figures 1 and 2).&amp;nbsp; One small piece of debitage was produced from the Obsidian Cliff source in the Yellowstone Plateau of northwestern Wyoming (source data at laboratory).&amp;nbsp; Obsidian Cliff obsidian does occur in early contexts throughout the West and into the Middle West (Beck and Jones 2011; Davis et al. 1995; Scheiber and Finley 2011; Shackley 2014, 2017).&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/29h1q5v4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM G4-DM-02 AND G4-DM-03 ON THE NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xv915bd</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 13 obsidian artifacts, from two sites within the China Lake Naval Weapons Station indicated the presence of Sugarloaf and Joshua Ridge obsidian from the Coso Volcanic Field, similar to previous studies (Shackley 2014, 2015a, 2015b, 2016, 2017, 2019).&amp;nbsp; In this case Sugarloaf is dominant followed by Joshua Ridge (Table 1 and Figure 1).&amp;nbsp; While the sample size is small, West Sugarloaf, a major source in the region was unusually not present in the assemblage.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xv915bd</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM EIGHT SITES ON THE NAVAL WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, INYOCOUNTY, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1bs6m1h8</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 132 artifacts from eight sites in Inyo County within the China Lake Naval Weapons Station indicates a relatively diverse provenance assemblage dominated by West Sugarloaf dome obsidian in the Coso Volcanic Field, as in all the previous studies by this laboratory, and all the artifacts were produced entirely from Coso Volcanic Field sources, Sugarloaf, West Sugarloaf, and West Cactus Peak domes (see discussion below). No sources outside the Coso field were present.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1bs6m1h8</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ON THE NAVAL WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, INYO, KERN, AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0v320694</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 185 artifacts, 183 obsidian, from a number of sites within the China Lake Naval Weapons Station indicates a relatively diverse provenance assemblage dominated bythe West Sugarloaf dome obsidian as in previous studies (Shackley 2014, 2015a, 2015b, 2016).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0v320694</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE CIENEGA PHASE EARLY AGRICULTURE PERIOD SITE OF LOS POZOS (AZ AA:12:91 ASM), SANTA CRUZ RIVER BASIN, TUCSON, ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0278d3hh</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 177 obsidian artifacts from the Cienega Phase Early Agricultural Los Pozos site in the Santa Cruz River basin in Tucson, Arizona indicates a very diverse provenance assemblage with sources in all Cardinal directions from the western and eastern Sonoran Desert, the Arizona Uplands, to northwest Mexico (Sonora and Chihuahua). Some of these sources (i.e. Cow Canyon) have been recovered from Los Pozos in the past as discussed below. The diversity of sources with a procurement radius of approximately 250 km in all directions was not evident before this, in part due to the rarity of obsidian in Cienega Phase sites in the Tucson Basin.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0278d3hh</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM 5MT1905 AND 5MT4126, MONTEZUMA COUNTY, SOUTHWEST COLORADO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9dm9c3rm</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 19 artifacts from two sites in Montezuma County in southwest Colorado exhibits a mix of Jemez Mountains, New Mexico (El Rechuelos, Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio), and Cerro Toledo Rhyolite) and Mount Taylor (Grants Ridge) obsidian in proportions similar to some earlier studies</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9dm9c3rm</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (XRF) ANALYSIS OF MAJOR, MINOR, AND TRACE ELEMENTS OF NATIVE COPPER NODULES AND COPPER BELLS FROM SOUTH DIAMOND CREEK (LA 181765) AND TWIN PINES PUEBLOS (LA 75947), SOUTHERNNEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7x42z3gk</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 10 native copper nodules (Figure 1), 13 copper bells, and one copper fetish (see cover image), suggests the possibility of local production of the fetish, and possibly the bells (see Table 1 and Figures 2 and 3). However, the proportion of Cu in the bells is over 91%, many near 99% and the proportion of corresponding trace elements so low that based on XRF, and the lack of data from known copper artifact production centers (i.e. Paquimé, northern Chihuahua) no confident assignments can be made at this time. The elemental and statistical correspondence between the copper nodules and the bells is generally very high, however. Analysis of local copper ore and elemental data from other copper artifacts and copper sources could shed light on the issue.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7x42z3gk</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM CABEZA PRIETA WILDLIFE REFUGE, SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7qx5j2h7</link>
      <description>The 20 obsidian artifacts from a number of sites on Cabeza Prieta Wildlife Refuge were produced from three of the sources previously recovered from sites on the refuge, Los Vidrios, Sonora (20%), Los Sitios del Agua (20%), and Sauceda Mountains (55%; see Shackley 2015. 2016; Figure 1 here). As in the previous study, the assemblage suggests that the local environment was important, with connections to the north and south apparent. The large biface recovered from Playa Concha was produced from the Black Tank source in the Mount Floyd Volcanic Field in northern Arizona (Lesko 1989; Shackley 1995, 2005; see cover image here).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7qx5j2h7</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ADDITIONAL ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE JUNIPER CREEK SITE (34SM87), SEMINOLE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7362j3fb</link>
      <description>As in the previous studies all the artifacts were produced from the Malad obsidian source (n=10) in far eastern Idaho, and Obsidian Cliff (n=6) in the Yellowstone Volcanic Field, Wyoming</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7362j3fb</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM LAS CAPAS(AZ AA:12:111 ASM), SANTA CRUZ RIVER BASIN, TUCSON, ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/723418zj</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 6 obsidian artifacts from the Early Agricultural Las Capas site in the Santa Cruz River basin in Tucson, Arizona indicates a diverse provenance assemblage with sources all from one of the major Mogollon-Datil Volcanic Province sources in western New Mexico and eastern Arizona - Cow Canyon eastern Arizona, and Antelope Creek and North Sawmill Creek at Mule Creek, western New Mexico (Shackley 2005; Shackley et al. 2018). While the sample sizes are quite different, this obsidian provenance assemblage is quite different from the nearby and mainly contemporaneous Los Pozos that exhibited an obsidian provenance assemblage from all cardinal directions</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/723418zj</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM FOUR SITES IN SOUTHWESTERN COLORADO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6rb067tv</link>
      <description>As with the previous project at the Dillard Site, this was an interesting assemblage (Shackley 2013; Table 1 and Figure 1 here).&amp;nbsp; Jemez Mountains and Mount Taylor sources dominate, with one sample from 5MT10709 from the Wild Horse Canyon source in Beaver County, western Utah.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6rb067tv</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MAJOR OXIDE, MINOR OXIDE, AND TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ANDESITE AND DACITE ARTIFACTS FROM 5LA1211 AND 5LA1416, SOUTHERN COLORADO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nt8t6xz</link>
      <description>The analysis here of volcanic rock artifacts indicates that all the samples were produced from intermediate andesite and dacite volcanic rocks. While the rocks are certainly intermediate volcanic rocks, the dacite artifacts do not match any known archaeological dacite source from the Taos Plateau Volcanic Field such as San Antonio Mountain or Newman Dome approximately 135 km southwest of Trinidad, Colorado</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nt8t6xz</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF AN OBSIDIAN BIFACE FROM WYOMING</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/66h7g2d9</link>
      <description>The large biface from Wyoming was produced from the Buck Mountain source in the Warner Mountains of far northeastern California (Table 1 and Figure 1 here; see cover image). The Warner Mountains are the farthest western basin and range example, and not part of the Sierra or Cascade Ranges. The Buck Mountain source exhibiting mahogany as well as black obsidian was distributed over a large area of western North America (Hughes 1983; Jones et al. 2003; Pinson 2001). The obsidian is an excellent media for stone tool production with boulder size nodules (at least 50 cm in diameter) at the source, and was used throughout prehistory (Jones et al. 2003; Pinson 2001). I have used the obsidian for knapping for 20 years.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/66h7g2d9</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM GREENSTONE PUEBLO AND WALLACE RUIN (5MT6970), SOUTHWESTERN COLORADO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5f41285b</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 18 obsidian artifacts from two sites, Wallace Ruin and Greenstone Pueblo (5MT6970, same site number for both sites), indicates a diverse source provenance assemblage with artifacts produced from the following sources in western North America: Jemez Lineament sources in northern New Mexico, Cerro Toledo Rhyolite, Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio), El Rechuelos Rhyolite in the Jemez volcanic field, and Grants Ridge in the Mount Taylor volcanic field; northern Arizona, Government Mountain in the San Francisco volcanic field (see Shackley 2005), and sources in southeastern Idaho (Malad), and Wild Horse Canyon of southwestern Utah (Skinner/Shackley North American Obsidian Database; see Table 1 and Figure 1).&amp;nbsp; Both Wild Horse Canyon and Government Mountain have been recovered from sites examined by Crow Canyon Archaeological Center (Shackley 2014, 2017).&amp;nbsp; The Malad, Idaho source (over 600 km north of these sites) is not uncommonly recovered in Paleoindian...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5f41285b</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM OKLAHOMA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/52w1j0ck</link>
      <description>As is often the case on Oklahoma sites, the artifacts were produced from Malad, Idaho and Jemez Mountains, New Mexico obsidian</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/52w1j0ck</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM A BASKETMAKER III SITE IN CHACO CANYON NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK, NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/51m9x1s9</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 63 artifacts from a BMIII site at Chaco Culture National History Park, northwest New Mexico indicates a diverse obsidian provenance assemblage dominated by northern New Mexico Jemez Lineament obsidian sources, particularly those in the southern Jemez Mountains (Canovas Canyon Rhyolite - 48.3%, and the two sources in the Mount Taylor Volcanic Field (Horace/La Jara Mesa - 31.7%, and Grants Ridge - 10%). A few of the artifacts were produced from three other Jemez Mountains sources (Valles Rhyolite-Cerro del Medio, n=4; and Cerro Toledo Rhyolite and El Rechuelos, one each). Based on the obsidian source provenance, the results suggest a relatively large procurement range/interaction sphere, and habitation of this site possibly after movement from the south and/or east (see discussion).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/51m9x1s9</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WHITE RIVER FIELD OFFICE SITES, NORTHWESTERN COLORADO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4c12j74v</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 28 artifacts, from a number of archaeological sites and site groups in northwestern Colorado, indicates a very diverse obsidian source provenance assemblage with some of the sources in the earlier study, and more, all from Idaho and Utah (Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 1; Shackley 2016). Most of these artifacts were produced from sources a considerable distance to the west (Utah) and the northwest (Idaho) from these sites (see cover image). No sources from the south (i.e. Colorado or northern New Mexico) were present in this assemblage (c.f. Shackley 2016).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4c12j74v</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF VOLCANIC ROCK ARTIFACTS FROM THE ROBERT WEBER COLLECTION, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3hw7c9b8</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 73 Paleoindian projectile points from the Robert Weber collection from Socorro County, New Mexico indicates a mainly local procurement of the hydrothermally altered rhyolite from the Black Canyon and Sedillo Hills sources in the Socorro Volcanic Field, called "Socorro Jasper" in the archaeological vernacular (see cover image). This ratio of Black Canyon to Sedillo hill chemical groups is similar to the results obtained by Dello-Russo in his analysis of Paleondian and Archaic projectile points and source standards from these two sources (2004).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3hw7c9b8</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL OBSIDIAN FROM ARCHAEOLOGICL SITES ALONG THE RIO SANTA MARIA, CENTRAL CHIHUAHUA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31b0t3dk</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 61 obsidian artifacts from sites along the Rio Santa Maria in central Chihuahua indicates a mix of sources from the secondary deposits along the Rio Santa Maria, the coalesced domes at Sierra Fresnal, and the Agua Fria/Sierra la Brena source along the Sonora/Chihuahua border in the northern Sierra Madre Occidental (see Shackley 2005; Figure 1 here). A number of, as yet, unlocated sources were also in the assemblage, but are likely from somewhere in northwest Mexico.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31b0t3dk</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE CORNER SITE AND DANIELS VALLEY, CABEZA PRIETA WILDLIFE REFUGE, SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2g463106</link>
      <description>The 22 obsidian artifacts, and one possible iron meteorite from two sites on Cabeza Prieta Wildlife Refuge, southwestern Arizona were produced from three of the sources previously recovered from sites on the refuge, Los Vidrios, Sonora (40.9%), Los Sitios del Agua (22.7%), and Sauceda Mountains</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2g463106</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOURCE PROVENANCE OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM ARCHAIC SITES AND PUEBLO BONITO EAST, MIDDLE AND WEST TRENCH LATE PERIODS, CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK, NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1jc5h49k</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 526 artifacts (524 obsidian) from the Archaic sites (n=69 and East, Middle, and West Trench recovery (n=455) by the University of New Mexico at Pueblo Bonito in Chaco Canyon is similar to the provenance assemblage from previous studies with some important exceptions (see Shackley 2016; Tables 1 through 4 and Figures 1 through 4). &amp;nbsp;While the assemblage is expectably dominated by debitage and utilized flakes produced from Jemez Mountains sources, a number of projectile points, and some debitage, were produced from sources throughout the U.S. West, west, north northwest, and south, of Chaco Canyon, including one piece of debitage from the Wild Horse Canyon source in west Utah over 500 linear km northwest.&amp;nbsp; The obsidian source assemblage from the late sites is derived from a very different mix of sources than the earlier sites from the large study done for Tom Windes over 15 years ago (Shackley and Dillian 2000; see also Duff et al. 2012; Shackley 2016).&amp;nbsp;...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1jc5h49k</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (XRF) ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC ALLOYED METALARTIFACTS FROM PECOS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK, NORTHERNNEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11k0829b</link>
      <description>The analysis here of 9 metal artifacts from Spanish Colonial contexts at Pecos National Historic Park, northern New Mexico indicates mainly copper based (copper to ancient bronze) metals and one lead pewter object. There could be some similarity to the earlier study, but that XRF analysis was apparently performed without the analysis of international standards, so no direct comparison was attempted (Scott, Bleed, and Haecker 2014).</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11k0829b</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&lt;strong&gt;AN &lt;/strong&gt;ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS FROM CHASE ORCHARD PUEBLO (LA 37319), NEW MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0t28d5dt</link>
      <description>All three artifacts were produced from Valles Rhyolite (Cerro del Medio) or El Rechuelos Rhyolite obsidian in the Jemez Mountains of northern New Mexico</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0t28d5dt</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shackley, M. Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
