http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification720Recent berkeleylogic_wp items
https://escholarship.org/uc/berkeleylogic_wp/rss
Recent eScholarship items from Working PapersThu, 29 Feb 2024 17:23:28 -0800Completeness for an Intuitionistic Modal Logic of Vagueness
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/80n21914
Completeness for an Intuitionistic Modal Logic of Vaguenesshttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/80n21914Sat, 14 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000Christensen, AhmeeB-Frame Duality
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/78v634pc
This paper introduces the category of b-frames as a new tool in the study of complete lattices. B-frames can be seen as a generalization of posets, which play an important role in the representation theory of Heyting algebras, but also in the study of complete Boolean algebras in forcing. This paper combines ideas from the two traditions in order to generalize some techniques and results to the wider context of complete lattices. In particular, we lift a representation theorem of Allwein and MacCaull to a duality between complete lattices and b-frames, and we derive alternative characterizations of several classes of complete lattices from this duality. This framework is then used to obtain new results in the theory of complete Heyting algebras and the semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/78v634pcFri, 5 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0000Massas, GuillaumeA fundamental non-classical logic
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bp759nc
We give a proof-theoretic as well as a semantic characterization of a logic in the signature with conjunction, disjunction, negation, and the universal and existential quantifiers that we suggest has a certain fundamental status. We present a Fitch-style natural deduction system for the logic that contains only the introduction and elimination rules for the logical constants. From this starting point, if one adds the rule that Fitch called Reiteration, one obtains a proof system for intuitionistic logic in the given signature; if instead of adding Reiteration, one adds the rule of Reductio ad Absurdum, one obtains a proof system for orthologic; by adding both Reiteration and Reductio, one obtains a proof system for classical logic. Arguably neither Reiteration nor Reductio is as intimately related to the meaning of the connectives as the introduction and elimination rules are, so the base logic we identify serves as a more fundamental starting point and common ground between proponents...https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bp759ncSun, 17 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley HalcrowA partial-state space model of unawareness
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5039n29t
A partial-state space model of unawarenesshttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/5039n29tWed, 22 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley HalcrowThe Orthologic of Epistemic Modals
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0ss5z8g3
Epistemic modals have peculiar logical features that are challenging to account for in a broadly classical framework. For instance, while a sentence of the form $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$ ('$p$, but it might be that not~$p$') appears to be a contradiction, $\Diamond\neg p$ does not entail $\neg p$, which would follow in classical logic. Likewise, the classical laws of distributivity and disjunctive syllogism fail for epistemic modals. Existing attempts to account for these facts generally either under- or over-correct. Some theories predict that $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$, a so-called <em>epistemic contradiction</em>, is a contradiction only in an etiolated sense, under a notion of entailment that does not always allow us to replace $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$ with a contradiction; these theories underpredict the infelicity of embedded epistemic contradictions. Other theories savage classical logic, eliminating not just rules that intuitively fail, like distributivity...https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0ss5z8g3Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley HalcrowMandelkern, MatthewSplit Cycle: A New Condorcet Consistent Voting Method Independent of Clones and Immune to Spoilers
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/37z3r3t4
We introduce a new Condorcet consistent voting method, called Split Cycle. Split Cycle belongs to the small family of known voting methods satisfying <em>independence of clones</em> and the <em>Pareto principle</em>. Unlike other methods in this family, Split Cycle satisfies a new criterion we call <em>immunity to spoilers</em>, which concerns adding candidates to elections, as well as the known criteria of <em>positive involvement</em> and <em>negative involvement</em>, which concern adding voters to elections. Thus, relative to other clone-independent Paretian methods, Split Cycle mitigates “spoiler effects” and “strong no show paradoxes.”https://escholarship.org/uc/item/37z3r3t4Sun, 19 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley HalcrowPacuit, EricChoice-free representation of ortholattices
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d43h924
Choice-free representation of ortholatticeshttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d43h924Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0000Yamamoto, KentarôOn the Logic of Belief and Propositional Quantification
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7476g21w
We consider extending the modal logic KD45, commonly taken as the baseline system for belief, with propositional quantifiers that can be used to formalize natural language sentences such as “everything I believe is true” or “there is some-thing that I neither believe nor disbelieve.” Our main results are axiomatizations of the logics with propositional quantifiers of natural classes of complete Boolean algebras with an operator (BAOs) validating KD45. Among them is the class of complete, atomic, and completely multiplicative BAOs validating KD45. Hence, by duality, we also cover the usual method of adding propositional quantifiers to normal modal logics by considering their classes of Kripke frames. In addition, we obtain decidability for all the concrete logics we discuss.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7476g21wSun, 16 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0000Ding, YifengULTRAHOMOGENEOUS AND EXISTENTIALLY CLOSED HEYTING ALGEBRAS
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/65r7m9jr
ULTRAHOMOGENEOUS AND EXISTENTIALLY CLOSED HEYTING ALGEBRAShttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/65r7m9jrSun, 19 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000Yamamoto, Kentarô, Ph.D.Intuitionism and Nuclei
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5hx1k7mw
Intuitionism and Nucleihttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/5hx1k7mwSun, 19 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000Yamamoto, KentarôIncompleteness and jump hierarchies
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8t17f71z
Incompleteness and jump hierarchieshttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/8t17f71zTue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000Walsh, JamesLutz, PatrickReflection ranks and ordinal analysis
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1159j6ck
It is well-known that natural axiomatic theories are well-ordered by consistency strength. However, it is possible to construct descending chains of artificial theories with respect to consistency strength. We provide an explanation of this well-orderness phenomenon by studying a coarsening of the consistency strength order, namely, the $\Pi^1_1$ reflection strength order. We prove that there are no descending sequences of $\Pi^1_1$ sound extensions of $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ in this order. Accordingly, we can attach a rank in this order, which we call reflection rank, to any $\Pi^1_1$ sound extension of $\mathsf{ACA}_0$. We prove that for any $\Pi^1_1$ sound theory $T$ extending $\mathsf{ACA}_0^+$, the reflection rank of $T$ equals the proof-theoretic ordinal of $T$. We also prove that the proof-theoretic ordinal of $\alpha$ iterated $\Pi^1_1$ reflection is $\varepsilon_\alpha$. Finally, we use our results to provide straightforward well-foundedness proofs of ordinal notation systems...https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1159j6ckTue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000Walsh, JamesPakhomov, FedorA note on the consistency operator
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/40j0v0hb
A note on the consistency operatorhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/40j0v0hbThu, 9 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000Walsh, JamesOn the Logics with Propositional Quantifiers Extending S5Π
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1bf3g4fn
Scroggs's theorem on the extensions of S5 is an early landmark in the modern mathematical studies of modal logics. From it, we know that the lattice of normal extensions of S5 is isomorphic to the inverse order of the natural numbers with infinity and that all extensions of S5 are in fact normal. In this paper, we consider extending Scroggs's theorem to modal logics with propositional quantifiers governed by the axioms and rules analogous to the usual ones for ordinary quantifiers. We call them Π-logics. Taking S5Π, the smallest normal Π-logic extending S5, as the natural counterpart to S5 in Scroggs's theorem, we show that all normal Π-logics extending S5Π are complete with respect to their complete simple S5 algebras, that they form a lattice that is isomorphic to the lattice of the open sets of the disjoint union of two copies of the one-point compactification of N, that they have arbitrarily high Turing-degrees, and that there are non-normal Π-logics extending S5Π.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1bf3g4fnMon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0000Ding, YifengOperationalism Meets Modal Logic
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3dg565gq
<p>Guided by a desire to eliminate language that refers to unobservable structure from mechanics, Ernst Mach proposed a definition of mass in terms of more directly observable data. A great deal of literature surrounds the question of whether this proposed definition accomplishes its stated goal, or even whether it constitutes a definition. In this talk we aim to bring clarity to this debate by using methods from model theory and from modal logic to classify, reconstruct, and evaluate these arguments. In particular, we exhibit a general construction of first-order modal frames for appropriately presented scientific theories with epistemic constraints. These frames allow us to characterize which properties are “modally definable” in the sense of Bressan.</p>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3dg565gqSat, 23 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0000Dale, ReidOne Modal Logic to Rule Them All? (Extended Technical Report)
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/07v9360j
One Modal Logic to Rule Them All? (Extended Technical Report)https://escholarship.org/uc/item/07v9360jMon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley HalcrowLitak, TadeuszFine's canonicity theorem for some classes of neighborhood frames
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1w71d5g8
Fine's canonicity theorem for some classes of neighborhood frameshttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/1w71d5g8Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000Yamamoto, KentarôModal Correspondence Theory for Possibility Semantics
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7t12914n
New version: <a href="/uc/item/2kf0p9bg">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kf0p9bg</a>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7t12914nWed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000Yamamoto, KentarôPossibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic (February 2018)
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0tm6b30q
Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic (February 2018)https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0tm6b30qSat, 17 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley HalcrowA Representation Theorem for Possibility Models
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/881757qn
This paper is about the relation between two kinds of models for propositional modal logic: possibility models in the style of Humberstone and possible world models in the style of Kripke. We show that every countable possibility model <em>M</em> is completed by a Kripke model <em>K</em>, its <em>worldization</em>; every total world of <em>K</em> is the limit of more and more refined possibilities in <em>M</em>, and every possibility in <em>M</em> is realized by some total world of <em>K</em>. In addition, we define a general notion of a <em>possibilization</em> of a Kripke model, which is a possibility model whose possibilities are sets of worlds from the Kripke model. We then characterize the class of possibility models that are isomorphic to the possibilization of some Kripke model. In particular, every possibility model in this class can be represented as a possibilization of one of its worldizations; and every possibility model can be naturally transformed into one in this...https://escholarship.org/uc/item/881757qnSat, 30 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0000Harrison-Trainor, MatthewArrow's Decisive Coalitions
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5mr296jp
<p>In his classic monograph, Social Choice and Individual Values, Arrow introduced the notion of a decisive coalition of voters as part of his mathematical framework for social choice theory. The subsequent literature on Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem has shown the importance for social choice theory of reasoning about coalitions of voters with different grades of decisiveness. The goal of this paper is a fine-grained analysis of reasoning about decisive coalitions, formalizing how the concept of a decisive coalition gives rise to a social choice theoretic language and logic all of its own. We show that given Arrow’s axioms of the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Universal Domain, rationality postulates for social preference correspond to strong axioms about decisive coalitions. We demonstrate this correspondence with results of a kind familiar in economics—representation theorems—as well as results of a kind coming from mathematical logic—completeness theorems. We present...https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5mr296jpSun, 8 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley HalcrowPacuit, EricON THE INEVITABILITY OF THE CONSISTENCY OPERATOR
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1fm9h9bq
ON THE INEVITABILITY OF THE CONSISTENCY OPERATORhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/1fm9h9bqSun, 8 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000Montalbán, AntonioWalsh, JamesResults in Modal Correspondence Theory for Possibility Semantics
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kf0p9bg
Results in Modal Correspondence Theory for Possibility Semanticshttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kf0p9bgThu, 5 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000Yamamoto, KentarôPossibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic (June 2016)
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v11r0dq
New version: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0tm6b30qhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v11r0dqTue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley HalcrowFirst-order possibility models and finitary completeness proofs
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ht6w3kk
This paper builds on Humberstone's idea of defining models of propositional modal logic where total possible worlds are replaced by partial possibilities. We follow a suggestion of Humberstone by introducing possibility models for quantified modal logic. We show that a simple quantified modal logic is sound and complete for our semantics. Although Holliday showed that for many propositional modal logics, it is possible to give a completeness proof using a canonical model construction where every possibility consists of finitely many formulas, we show that this is impossible to do in the first-order case. However, one can still construct a canonical model where every possibility consists of a computable set of formulas and thus still of finitely much information.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ht6w3kkWed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000Harrison-Trainor, MatthewScott Ranks of Models of a Theory
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5q9634jv
<p>The Scott rank of a countable structure is a measure, coming from the proof of Scott's isomorphism theorem, of the complexity of that structure. The Scott spectrum of a theory (by which we mean a sentence of $\mc{L}_{\omega_1 \omega}$) is the set of Scott ranks of countable models of that theory. In $ZFC + PD$ we give a descriptive-set-theoretic classification of the sets of ordinals which are the Scott spectrum of a theory: they are particular $\bfSigma^1_1$ classes of ordinals.</p><p>Our investigation of Scott spectra leads to the resolution (in $ZFC$) of a number of open problems about Scott ranks. We answer a question of Montalb\'an by showing, for each $\alpha < \omega_1$, that there is a $\Pi^{\infi}_2$ theory with no models of Scott rank less than $\alpha$. We also answer a question of Knight and Calvert by showing that there are computable models of high Scott rank which are not computably approximable by models of low Scott rank. Finally, we answer a question of...https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5q9634jvWed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000Harrison-Trainor, MatthewPossibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5462j5b6
New version: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0tm6b30qhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/5462j5b6Fri, 1 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000Holliday, Wesley Halcrow