<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/cedr_cbe_rw/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent cedr_cbe_rw items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/cedr_cbe_rw/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from Related Topics</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Stimulus range bias leads to different settings when using luminance adjustment to evaluate discomfort due to glare</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0zp9j294</link>
      <description>Luminance adjustment is widely used to evaluate discomfort due to glare. This paper reports an experiment conducted to investigate two factors of the luminance adjustment procedure, stimulus range bias and direct vs indirect control. Stimulus range bias describes the influence on subjective evaluations of the range of stimuli available to the test observer, with range being the minimum and maximum available glare source luminance in the current context. For the glare source, an artificial window, there were three ranges, having maximum luminances of 5 106, 7288 and 9469 cd/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. The results suggest that luminance range had a significant effect on settings made, sufficient to change settings by an amount equivalent to one step of a Hopkinson-like discomfort sensation scale. The mean luminance associated with just intolerable discomfort with the low range was less than that associated with just uncomfortable with the high range. Past experiments have used direct control,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0zp9j294</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kent, Michael G</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fotios, Steve A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cheung, Chin To</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Bayesian method of evaluating discomfort due to glare: The effect of order bias from a large glare source</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64w1z6zw</link>
      <description>Replicating scientific findings is a fundamental aspect of research. However, in studies of discomfort due to glare, it is difficult to make comparisons between the results of different experiments since the statistical tests usuallyreported do not allow independent findings to be directly compared to each other. Here we present an alternative Bayesian approach that can address this problem. To show how this approach works, we performed a laboratory test with 55 participants to validate the effect of order bias previously detected in a similar study evaluating discomfort due to glare but, this time, under a large luminous source. Using the luminance adjustment procedure, the glare source was varied to meet four sensations of discomfort due to glare. Adjustments were performed under three different order sequences: ascending, descending, and randomised. Test participants provided glare settings using a newly proposed evaluation scale. The effect of order bias detected in the original...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64w1z6zw</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kent, M.G.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cheung, T.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Altomonte, S.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Schiavon, S.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lipczyńska, A.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
