<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent cshe_fsc items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines - Executive Summary</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kr8s78v</link>
      <description>Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines - Executive Summary</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kr8s78v</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Harley, Diane</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Acord, Sophia Krzys</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Earl-Novell, Sarah</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lawrence, Shannon</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>King, C. Judson</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g</link>
      <description>Since 2005, the Center for Studies in Higher Education (CSHE), with generous funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, has been conducting research to understand the needs and practices of faculty for in-progress scholarly communication (i.e., forms of communication employed as research is being executed) as well as archival publication. This report brings together the responses of 160 interviewees across 45, mostly elite, research institutions in seven selected academic fields: archaeology, astrophysics, biology, economics, history, music, and political science. The overview document summarizes the main practices we explored across all seven disciplines: tenure and promotion, dissemination, sharing, collaboration, resource creation and consumption, and public engagement. We published the report online in such a way that readers can search various topics within and across case studies. Our premise has always been that disciplinary conventions matter and that social realities...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Harley, Diane</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Acord, Sophia Krzys</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Earl-Novell, Sarah</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lawrence, Shannon</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>King, C. Judson</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
