<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre_esarm/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent ctcre_esarm items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre_esarm/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from Economic Studies and Related Methods</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Image Examples of COVID-19 Related Announcements on Cannabis Dispensary Websites in 2020</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1743k69x</link>
      <description>Image Examples of COVID-19 Related Announcements on Cannabis Dispensary Websites in 2020</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1743k69x</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ling, Pamela M, MD, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Crosbie, Eric, PhD, MA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Holmes, Louisa M, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hoang, Christine</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hoeper, Samantha, Msc</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A $2.00 per pack increase in the tobacco excise tax will reduce smoking, save billions in healthcare expenditures, and create thousands of California jobs</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9w38h5rn</link>
      <description>A $2.00 per pack increase in the tobacco excise tax will reduce smoking, save billions in healthcare expenditures, and create thousands of California jobs</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9w38h5rn</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Max, Wendy, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sung, Hai-Yen, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lightwood, James, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Effect of a $2.00 Per Pack Increase in the Tobacco Excise Tax on Smoking and Healthcare Expenditures: 2017-2020</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4g6677fq</link>
      <description>The Effect of a $2.00 Per Pack Increase in the Tobacco Excise Tax on Smoking and Healthcare Expenditures: 2017-2020</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4g6677fq</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Max, Wendy, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sung, Hai-Yen, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lightwood, James, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economic Impact of the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016: Job creation and economic activity</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9g738223</link>
      <description>Economic Impact of the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016: Job creation and economic activity</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9g738223</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Lightwood, James, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Glantz, Stanton A, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Image examples of marketing claims to accompany “Smoking Revolution".  A Content Analysis of Electronic Cigarette Retail Websites  </title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09g206qz</link>
      <description>Image examples of marketing claims to accompany “Smoking Revolution".  A Content Analysis of Electronic Cigarette Retail Websites  </description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09g206qz</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Grana, Rachel A.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ling, Pamela M.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economic Impact of the California Cancer Research Act Job Creation and Economic Activity</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73g8m5j5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;•The California Cancer Research Act (CCRC) is an initiative on the June 2012 California ballot that, if passed by the voters, will increase the tax on cigarettes by $1.00 per pack (with corresponding increases for other tobacco products) and allocate the money to reinvigorating the California Tobacco Control Program, cancer and other biomedical research, law enforcement to enforce sales to minors laws and ensure that the taxes are collected, administration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;•There will be a small increase in jobs and economic activity as funds are shifted from other activities into the tobacco control, cancer and other research and related activities specified by the CCRA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;•The combined effect of the price increase associated with the tax and the substantially reinvigorated tobacco control program the CCRA will create is projected to reduce tobacco consumption by an average of $1.0 billion per year for the first five years after the CCRA passes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;•Of this total reduction in...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73g8m5j5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Glantz, Stanton A.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economic and Health Effects of a State Cigarette Excise Tax Increase in California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mp5k068</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Coalition for a Healthy California is sponsoring a comprehensive statewide ballot initaitve to rasie the tobacco excise tax by $2.60 per pack of cigarettes in order to provide funding to qualified hospitals for emergency services, nursing education and health insurance to eligible children.  This paper uses the best possible science to estimate the effect of a new tax on cigarette consumption, adult and youth smoking rates, tax revenues, and long term health outcomes.  The additional tax would raise the average price of cigrettes to $6.55 per pack.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mp5k068</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Department of Health Services</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Annotated Bibliography to Accompany Anderson, Pollay, &amp;amp; Ling, "Taking Ad-Vantage of Lax Advertising Regulations:  Reassuring and Distracting Health-Concerned Smokers" (Social Science &amp;amp; Medicine, 2006)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nx5j6x5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We explored the evolution from cigarette product attributes to psychosocial needs in advertising campaigns for low-tar cigarettes.  Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents and print advertising images indicated that low-tar brands targeted smokers who were concerned about their health with advertising images intended to distract them from the health hazards of smoking.  Advertising first emphasized product characteristics (filtration, low tar) that implied health benefits.  Over time, advertising emphasis shifted to salient psychosocial needs of the target markets.  A case study of Vantage in the USA and Canada showed that advertising presented images of intelligent, upward-striving people who had achieved personal success and intentionally excluded the act of smoking from the imagery, while minimal product information was provided.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This illustrates one strategy to appeal to concerned smokers by not describing the product itself (which may remind smokers...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nx5j6x5</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Anderson, Stacey J, Ph.D.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valuing Human Life: Estimating the Present Value of Lifetime Earnings, 2000</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82d0550k</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Objectives. This paper describes the methodology for estimating             the present value of lifetime earnings (PVLE) for              the year 2000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Methods. Estimation takes into account life expectancy by           gender and age group, percent of people in the labor           force or keeping house, current pattern of earnings at          successive ages, an imputed value for household           production, and the discount rate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results. At a discount rate of 3 percent, males and females           aged 20-24 have the highest PVLE — $1,517,045 and          $1,085,188 respectively. Lifetime earnings for men are          higher than for women. Higher discount rates yield           lower values at all ages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusions. The present value of lifetime earnings yields              useful estimates of the valueof life. These               estimates are conservative compared with other                approaches.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82d0550k</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Max, Wendy, Ph.D.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rice, Dorothy P</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sung, Hai-Yen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Michel, Martha</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
