<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/idea/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent idea items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/idea/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from UCLA Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>ARE CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS READY FOR THE EXIT EXAM?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/79g3b9md</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On April 21, 2005, UCLA’s Institute for Democracy and Access (IDEA) published a policy brief raising a series of questions about California’s readiness for the California Exit Exam (CAHSEE). The policy brief challenged the conclusion of the state’s independent evaluator, Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), that California schools have made great progress in providing all students with opportunities to learn the material covered on the Exit Exam. IDEA researchers Holme and Rogers concluded that HumRRO’s own “data reveals that many California schools still are not adequately preparing students for success on the CAHSEE.” In correspondence in early May, HumRRO’s President Lauress Wise argued that the IDEA researchers misunderstood HumRRO’s data. The differences between HumRRO and IDEA researchers are not merely academic. The questions raised are of critical importance to current policy discussions about the implementation of the Exit Exam. In an effort to inform this...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/79g3b9md</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Policy Brief: A response to the HumRRO Evaluation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/63h2n2tw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 1999, the California Department of Education contracted with the Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), an independent evaluation firm based in Alexandria, Virginia, to perform annual evaluations of the quality and impact of the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE). HumRRO’s Fall 2004 Report asserts that California’s high schools have made a great deal of progress in preparing students for the CAHSEE. It recommends that California deny diplomas to students in the Class of 2006 who do not pass the High School Exit Exam.  Our review of HumRRO’s points to a number of problems with HumRRO’s analysis and conclusions. In fact, HumRRO’s data reveals that many California schools still are not adequately preparing students for success on the CAHSEE.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/63h2n2tw</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brown vs. Board of Education Booklet</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ks076jf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This booklet was designed for K-12 classrooms and community groups examining the legacy of Brown v Board for California. The booklet chronicles the national battle for equal schooling up to and since the Brown decision. It also highlights the history of school segregation in California and the ongoing struggle for equal schooling.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ks076jf</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>IDEA, UCLA</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Policy Brief: High School Exit Exam Failure Rates and Opportunity to Learn</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2f3571w1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;California has required students to take the High School Exit Exam since 2001. This exam assesses core academic skills in two areas: Mathematics and English Language Arts. To date, the results of the Exit Exam have been used as part of California’s accountability system. Current law calls for the state to withhold diplomas from students in the class of 2006 who do not pass either section of the Exit Exam. The law also states that it is the responsibility of school districts to “prepare pupils to succeed.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2f3571w1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Separate and Unequal 50 Years after Brown: California's Racial "Opportunity Gap"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1rr6d06h</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court's promise in Brown v. Board of Education: a public school system "available to all on equal terms.” However, findings from a recent Louis Harris survey of California teachers, together with other evidence presented in this report, make clear that California schools remain both very separate and very unequal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1rr6d06h</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>IDEA, UCLA</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS: CAHSEE Results, Opportunity to Learn, &amp;amp; the Class of 2006</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18p2s6mj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;California’s Class of 2006 is the first group of students required to pass the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) in order to receive a diploma. CAHSEE asks students to show what they know by answering 72 multiple-choice English-language arts questions, completing 1 writing task, and answering 80 multiple-choice questions in mathematics. Students who get 60% correct on the English test and 44% in math by the end of their senior year get diplomas. The rest do not, even if they have passed all of their classes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although 20 states currently have an exit exam requirement, most allow students to demonstrate their proficiency through other means (other standardized tests or assessments, course grades and passage, culminating projects, portfolios of work, etc.) if they fail the test. No students are granted diplomas unless they meet clear standards. Because California has only a single measure of student proficiency, it is one of only eight states that automatically...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18p2s6mj</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pipelines, Pathways, and Payoffs: Economic Challenges and Returns to Changing Demographics in California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4md4x1k8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For individuals, success and persistence in schooling has a huge economic impact on their lives.  Educational attainment affects the kinds of employment job seekers can find, the amount of money they earn, the housing conditions and lifestyle they can afford, the level of savings they can accumulate for retirement, their risk for incarceration, and the likelihood that they will live in poverty or need to rely on transfer payment for basic needs.  Perhaps less obviously, the state also has a strong stake in the educational attainment of its residents.  One element of the state's economic stake is its financial balance, since the demand for incarceration and poverty-related state services declines with higher levels of educational attainment, while higher rates of per capita income permit the provision of a fixed set of state services at lower average rates of taxation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Historically, California has experienced a "brain gain", as the flows of highly educated and skilled...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4md4x1k8</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Stiles, Jon</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Brady, Henry</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Restructuring and Reculturing Schools to Provide Students with Multiple Pathways to College and Career</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0w60x02k</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The prevailing way of conceptualizing multiple pathways to college and career segregates or “tracks” students into college prep or voc-ed curriculum. Recent research and public commentary have shown that tracking neither provides students with equal educational opportunities nor serves the needs of employers for a well-educated workforce. Recognizing that tracked schools are both inequitable and ineffective, educators have been exploring alternatives to tracking practices since the 1980s.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper focuses on one attempt to redefine and restructure the academic curriculum, pedagogy, and course structures of California schools into “multiple pathways” to college and career. The Preuss School at UCSD “detracks” its curriculum, i.e., establishes high instructional standards and presents rigorous curriculum to all students while varying the supports available to enable all students to meet high the school’s academic standards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Detracking high schools can provide students...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0w60x02k</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mehan, Hugh</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Too Angry To Leave: Supporting New Teachers Commitment to Transform Urban Schools</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93351922</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;While the challenge to retain highly competent teachers affects all schools, the crisis is critical in urban school districts, which historically suffer from a severe shortage of qualified teachers and typically fill vacancies with unlicensed teachers or full-time substitutes.  This paper reports research on one effort to curb urban teacher attrition through a non-traditional approach to urban teacher education, induction and ongoing professional development.  It combines quantitative data about the retention rates over five years of teachers prepared specifically as “social justice” urban educators with qualitative data about the type of preparation and ongoing support that the teachers experienced. Analyses of these data enable the authors to suggest and probe those elements of preparation and support that may be efficacious in remedying “the revolving door” of urban schools.  This single case study attempts to extend the broad literature on teacher retention while establishing...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93351922</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Quartz, Karen Hunter</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>&amp; the TEP Research Group</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Specialized Recruitment: An Examination of the Motivations and Expectations of Pre-Service Urban Educators</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7698m4tn</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This paper reports on a cross-sectional analysis of survey data collected on over three hundred pre-service teachers enrolled in a specialized teacher education program focused on the preparation of teachers for high-poverty urban schools. Initial analyses indicate that the background characteristics of individuals attracted to the specialized program and their reasons for entering the profession differ from those of pre-service teachers in the population at large. Program entrants tend to be motivated by activist ideals, expressing high levels of initial commitment to teaching and to furthering social justice through education. Laying the groundwork for comparison studies, the author argues that the specialized recruitment of pre-service teachers may combine with specialized teacher preparation to increase the retention of educators in high-poverty, hard-to staff schools.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7698m4tn</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kimberly Barraza Lyons</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fragility of Urban Teaching: A Longitudinal Study of Career Development and Activism.</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74f7p1c0</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This paper describes the creation and development of UCLA’s Urban Teacher Education Program in Center X.  Specifically, it focuses on Center X’s  effort to partner with local communities to create alternative sites of learning for novice teachers.  The paper includes the story of Center X graduates working in one Los Angeles elementary school in order to set the stage for the research question: under what conditions do highly-qualified urban teachers remain committed to a career as a social justice educator?  The paper reports preliminary retention data from a longitudinal study of Center X graduates and explores the issue of how professional learning communities emerge in urban schools.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74f7p1c0</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Quartz, Karen Hunter</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Brad Olsen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jeff Duncan-Andrade</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Courses of Action: A Report on Urban Teacher Career Development.</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6v88p8sv</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This paper presents findings from a study investigating relationships among the reasons for entry, preparation experiences, workplace conditions, and future career plans of fifteen UCLA Teacher Education Program graduates working in urban elementary schools in Los Angeles.  More specifically, the analysis examines why these early career teachers stay in or consider leaving the urban schools in which they are teaching.  The findings highlight the need to reconceptualize notions of teacher retention in order to better acknowledge and support the development of deep, varied, successful careers in the field of urban education.  The data suggest that these urban teachers will remain in urban education if they can adopt multiple education roles inside and outside the classroom, and receive professional support during the whole of their professional careers not just the beginnings of their teaching.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6v88p8sv</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Brad Olsen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lauren Anderson</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Urban Teacher Retention Policy: A Research Brief</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1mw9h5m1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This research brief summarizes interim results from a longitudinal study designed to inform policies aimed at curbing the high rate of attrition from hard-to-staff urban schools. These policies range from ensuring specialized teacher preservice education that willthat will prepare teachers for the challenges ahead to ongoing support for professional development and advancement. As an initial step in assessing the impact of specialized urban teacher preparation on retention, the research brief first summarizes interim cross-sectional retention data and compares it to national norms. Second, the brief outlines an expanded conception of retention that captures movement or migration away from teaching into other professional roles in education. These “role migration” data help inform retention-oriented policies aimed at professionalizing the education workforce. The third section of the brief reports another form of migration—movement away from high-priority schools to less challenging...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1mw9h5m1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Quartz, Karen Hunter</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kimberly Barraza Lyons</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Katherine Masyn</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Brad Olsen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lauren Anderson</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Andrew Thomas</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Joanna Goode</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Eileen Lai Horng</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Educational Resources Do Students Need to Meet California's Educational Content Standards?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5gx8b4f1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Koski and Weiss examine California’s educational content standards and related high-stakes accountability measures. They pose the following questions 1) Are higher content standards and stiffer accountability enough to ensure that all children achieve at high levels? 2) Can we be sure that all California students and schools—particularly those in low-income minority communities—enjoy the necessary support, conditions, and resources to succeed? Koski and Weiss answer these questions with an in-depth analysis of California’s K-12 standards and other related state policies, looking specifically at the minimum level of resources and conditions required for students to meet the state’s standards. Their analysis makes clear that California’s standards-based reform strategy and accountability scheme require the provision of basic educational tools, including teachers with particular knowledge and skills and appropriate instructional materials and facilities. However, the state’s policies...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5gx8b4f1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Koski, William</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Racial Isolation, Poverty and the Limits of Local Control as a Means for Holding Public Schools Accountable</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1v92k1z0</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Drawing on research in Oakland, California over a twenty-year period, Noguera considers how poverty and racial isolation have contributed to the problems confronted by schools in that district and other inner-city communities around the state. He illuminates the factors that hinder the development of social capital in low-income communities, and, in doing so, demonstrates why local control does not make it easier for school systems to address the academic needs of poor students. The wide variation in the ability of different communities to generate revenue and other support for schools at the local level creates inequalities in the learning conditions and opportunities that schools provide students. The design of the state’s public education system exacerbates these inequities. Specifically, the state’s current approaches to local control make it possible for advantaged parents and communities with a vested interest in the affairs of public schools to monitor conditions in...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1v92k1z0</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Noguera, Pedro</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access to Quality Teaching: An Analysis of Inequality in California’s Public Schools</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d20c58j</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Darling-Hammond’s paper tackles four key issues related to the state’s teaching force and its distribution among various groups of students: 1) What does the state of California expect of its students and its teachers? In particular, what qualifications does the state require of teachers so that they can support student learning? 2) How does teacher quality matter for equal educational opportunity? 3) Do California students have equal access to qualified teachers who can offer the instruction they need to master the state standards? 4) How might the discrepancies in students’ access to qualified teachers best be remedied, given the policy context and knowledge about successful policy elsewhere? Drawing on a wealth of empirical studies, the paper reveals the critical relationship between qualified teachers and student academic achievement. It also explains that new state standards, an increasingly diverse student population, together with the skills needed to participate in...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d20c58j</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Darling-Hammond, Linda</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>School Facility Conditions and Student Academic Achievement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5sw56439</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This paper shows that the condition of school facilities has an important impact on student performance and teacher effectiveness. In particular, research demonstrates that comfortable classroom temperature and noise level are very important to efficient student performance. The age of school buildings is a useful proxy in this regard, since older facilities often have problems with thermal environment and noise level. A number of studies have measured overall building condition and its connection to student performance; these have consistently shown that students attending schools in better condition outperform students in substandard buildings by several percentage points. School building conditions also influence teacher effectiveness. Teachers report that physical improvements greatly enhance the teaching environment. Finally, school overcrowding also makes it harder for students to learn; this effect is greater for students from families of low socioeconomic status. Analyses...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5sw56439</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Earthman, Glen I.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access to Textbooks, Instructional Materials, Equipment, and Technology:Inadequacy and Inequality in California’s Public Schools</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4ht4z71v</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Oakes and Saunders address four questions: 1) Are textbooks and curriculum materials essential to students’ education in California? 2) Do all students have access to these resources? 3) Has the State failed to correct (or even contributed to) gaps or inequalities in access to instructional materials? 4) Are there policies the State could follow that would lead to better access? Drawing both on empirical research and the analysis of current state policy, Oakes and Saunders show that, although textbooks and instructional materials are fundamentally important to students’ education, many California students do not have access to them. At many schools, instructional materials inadequacies converge with problems in staffing and facilities. Schools serving low-income students, English language learners, and/or non-white student majorities are most plagued by inadequacies in instructional materials. Furthermore, by not mandating that students be provided with instructional materials,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4ht4z71v</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Oakes, Jeannie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Saunders, Marisa</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Unending Search For Equity: California Policy and the"New" School</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4266c5cq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Grubb and Goe examine California’s funding policies through the lenses of established approaches to school finance and the “new” school finance perspective. They draw upon historical evidence, empirical research on school funding, and analyses of policies in other states. They find that while California has made some progress in equalizing funding across districts (largely through litigation and legislation), significant disparities remain. Additionally, the state’s use of categorical funding reduces flexibility, and creates a finance system unresponsive to particular school needs. The state’s funding decisions are often uncoordinated; they are usually made in isolation from other policy decisions and without regard to instructional conditions in classrooms. Consequently, funding policy changes meant to bring improvement are often undermined by school conditions that are not taken into account. In contrast, Grubb and Goe argue that California should adopt a “new” school finance...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4266c5cq</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Grubb, Norton</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Goe, Laura</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Essential Learning Conditions for California Youth: Educational Facilities</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41d962k4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ortiz begins with research showing that safe, healthy, and uncrowded school facilities are a basic ingredient of a good educational program. When teachers work in well-designed and highly functional school buildings, they are able to be more effective than when they must teach in inadequate facilities. Ortiz sets these findings against the evidence that a high proportion of California’s educational facilities are inadequate because they are crowded, old, and in need of repair and modernization. She finds that pressures from increased enrollment in the state due to demographic changes and class size reduction, an average age of the state’s school buildings of over 25 years, and the high cost of facilities have all contributed to the current inadequacies. However, the State’s responses to the many problems with educational facilities have been severely limited by flaws in policies establishing the state’s relationships with local districts with regard to funding, inventory, and...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41d962k4</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ortiz, Flora Ida</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Concept 6 and Busing to Relieve Overcrowding: Structural Inequality in California Schools</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/30q9d8xn</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;About 6% of California’s students attend schools that operate on a multi-track calendar known as Concept 6. On this calendar, three tracks rotate throughout the school year, with two tracks in session at any given time and a third on vacation. This results in the school year being broken up into separate blocks by two two-month long vacations, which occur at different times for different tracks. This calendar provides for the maximum enrollment given a school’s existing space. However, students who attend schools operating on the Concept 6 calendar suffer several clear disadvantages. These schools remain large, even with the implementation of this calendar. Students at Concept 6 schools also lose instructional time, since they have fewer days of school compared to other students, fewer nights for teachers to assign homework, and delays due to the need to review material at the beginning of each block of instruction. Furthermore, because of uneven distribution of curriculum...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/30q9d8xn</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Oakes, Jeannie</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Educational Equity and School Structure: School Size, School Overcrowding, and Alternative Organizational Structures</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2zx2b0w5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Lee, Ready, and Welner focus on the interface between educational equity and the structure of schools, examining school size, school overcrowding, and two features of school organization: magnet schools and schools-within-schools. They provide an interpretive summary of existing studies of these topics, concentrating on how these structural issues relate to social stratification in student outcomes, particularly academic achievement. The evidence they provide is drawn from both national studies and, when available and appropriate, from research that discusses the effects of school structure in California's schools. Lee, Ready, and Welner use this evidence to define which size high schools are best for all students (under 1,000 students), which responses to school overcrowding are appropriate (building more schools rather than adding portable classrooms or multi-track year round schooling), how magnet schools can decrease rather than increase inequality (by making regular public...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2zx2b0w5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Lee, Valerie E.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ready, Douglas D.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Welner, Kevin G.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Civic Lessons</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ct0p7rw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle Fine examines how facilities’ problems, exposure to high levels of under-credentialed teachers, substantial teacher turnover, and inadequate books and materials produce adverse psychological and academic effects on children and adolescents attending schools with these characteristics. Using multiple methods of data collection across a diverse sample of elementary, middle school, high school, and college youth, Fine uses the voices of students to expose the adverse consequences of substandard schooling. She reveals that schools are not neutral institutions through which students pass without being affected. Indeed, the conditions in the schools that are the subject of Williams v. California have psychological, academic, and ultimately economic consequences that substantially worsen already existing social inequities. Despite the fact that poor and working class youth are asking for clean and safe school environments, quality educators, and rigorous instruction, the...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ct0p7rw</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Fine, Michelle</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State Oversight and the Improvement of Low-Performing School in California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1x81z03b</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Mintrop examines the degree to which California’s systems of public school accountability and state oversight enable the state to ensure that students in the state’s lowest performing schools have educational opportunities equal to those in other schools. He finds that California’s current system of state oversight lacks standards of adequacy for learning conditions that can potentially be evaluated statewide and that schools can use to evaluate themselves. While the state’s accountability system as currently constructed defines standards of student and school performance with the help of the academic performance index (API), the state lacks mechanisms to identify performance barriers systematically across schools that do not meet adequate performance standards, as defined by API growth targets. Many performance barriers encountered by schools are systemic, that is, caused by district (and state) policies, yet the current school-based accountability system ignores this. As...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1x81z03b</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mintrop, Heinrich</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Role of California’s Parents in Insuring Quality Schooling For All</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rw8d9bf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Rogers explores the role of parents, ordinary citizens, and local school boards in preventing or detecting and thus helping to correct substandard conditions in California’s schools. California has constructed an elaborate accountability system for insuring school quality and promoting school improvement that includes substantial references to parent participation. Rogers seeks to make sense of the State’s commitment to and practice of engaging parents in its accountability system. It answers the following questions: Does the State of California offer a clear vision of how parents can help insure that their children’s schools offer the full range of learning opportunities promised by the State? What conditions are necessary for parents to play such a role? Does the State provide for these conditions? Rogers’ offers a four-part analysis. He first considers the meaning of parent involvement in educational accountability, focusing on the role of parents in accessing, contributing...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rw8d9bf</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Rogers, John</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Education Inadequacy, Inequality, and Failed State Policy: A Synthesis of Expert Reports Prepared for Williams v. State of California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8727d11z</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report synthesizes the findings of a set of expert reports analyzing the plaintiffs’ claims in Williams v. State of California, and it presents the implications of those reports for changes in state policy and practice. It examines California students’ access to three basic requirements for educational quality and opportunity: qualified teachers; adequate textbooks and other relevant instructional materials; and clean, safe, and educationally appropriate facilities. It reviews the role of these resources and conditions in providing or limiting access to students’ opportunities for achievement, and, more specifically, it places the availability of these basic requirements in the context of California’s current standards-based education policies. This report considers both the overall availability of these essential conditions to California students and patterns in their distribution among schools serving different student groups. This synthesis also supplements the material...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8727d11z</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Oakes, Jeannie</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You Can't Always Get What You Want: School Governance In California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/050609xs</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Timar examines the institutional framework for California’s educational governance from historical and contemporary perspectives. While the Court has affirmed the state’s responsibility for the quality of educational services in schools, the state has delegated to schools the responsibility for delivery of educational services. The conditions alleged in the Williams case raise concerns about the capacity of this governance structure to provide California’s students with an adequate and equal education. Consequently, the question that frames this study is how do state structures and policies support or constrain the capacity of schools to deliver an adequate and equal education. Specifically, the paper addresses the following questions: Who is responsible for ensuring that schools have adequate resources? What means are available to determine if schools’ curriculum, personnel, facilities, and instructional materials are inadequate? What means exist for determining if a school...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/050609xs</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Timar, Thomas</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>California's Public School Accountability System</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/22m920fm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Russell examines the extent to which California’s test based policies promote and/or inhibit California students’ access to basic learning resources and conditions. Russell reviews the history of California’s assessment systems and describes the current Academic Performance Index (API), analyzes recent survey data on the impact of testing, considers the experiences of other states, and simulates results under an alternative design for accountability in California. He finds that California’s accountability system has numerous technical shortcomings that prevent it from being a valid and useful indicator for either holding schools accountable for student learning or determining which schools are “low-performing” and warrant state intervention. The design of the system sets a target for schools that far exceeds national averages in student performance. The standardized test on which the API rankings are based is not aligned to state standards; in addition, problems in calculating...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/22m920fm</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Russell, Michael</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Inequitable Treatment of English Learners in California's Public Schools</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/03b7k2km</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Gandara and Rumberger investigate the extent to which California’s English Learners—one-fourth of the state’s public school population—have access to the teachers, instructional materials, and facilities that will enable them to succeed in an English-only, standards-based policy system in which they must learn and compete for grade-to-grade promotion and high school graduation along side (and on the same terms as) their English speaking peers. Gandara and Rumberger conclude that that these students receive a substantially inequitable education vis-à-vis their English-speaking peers, even when those peers are similarly economically disadvantaged. They demonstrate that California has failed in its duty to guarantee that EL students have the teachers, the curriculum, the instruction, the assessment, and the support services they need to achieve meaningful access to the same academic content as native English speaking students. Furthermore, when the state has become aware of specific...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/03b7k2km</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gandara, Patricia</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rumberger, Russell</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
