<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/issr_wps/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent issr_wps items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/issr_wps/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from ISSR Working Paper Series</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Organized Workers and the Making of Los Angeles, 1890-1915</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0s21q78c</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Three social forces set out to grow Los Angeles as the 19th  century ended: free- market capitalists clustered around L.A. Times publisher Harrison Gray Otis, a coterie of entrepreneurs and professionals who called themselves "progressives," and organized workers. Each group strove to direct the rewards of growth to classes it favored, and each pursued a competing vision of the city.  The story of Otis and his free-market allies has often been told. So has the story of L.A.'s progressives. Both celebratory accounts have been shaped by the hardy American  mega-narrative that privileges elites as the makers of history. Skewed by the same mega-narrative, the story of L.A.'s unions has also been told and retold as a tale of defeat,  inconsequence, and woe. The conventional wisdom about progressive-era Los Angeles  thus overcredits elites for the city's achievements, submerging the equally powerful role of organized workers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This dissertation resurrects the political legacy...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0s21q78c</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Stansbury, Jeffrey D</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
