<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/rpac_ucletters_hhs/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent rpac_ucletters_hhs items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/rpac_ucletters_hhs/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2026 03:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Draft OHRP Guidance on Use of a Single Institutional Review Board for Cooperative Research (Docket ID Number HHS-OASH-2022-0011, July 1, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vd827xq</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office for Human Research Protections’ draft guidance on the use of a single Institutional Review Board (IRB) for cooperative research. UC supports clearer guidance but recommends additional flexibility and clarification around single-IRB exceptions, selection of reviewing IRBs, local institutional review responsibilities, and reliance agreements, while urging OHRP to reduce administrative burden by developing resources such as a compendium of state laws relevant to human-subject research.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vd827xq</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on FDA's&amp;nbsp;Considerations for the Use of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence To Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products; Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability (Docket No. FDA-2021-D-1214, December 9, 2021)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9sn6m48b</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s draft guidance on the use of real-world data and real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for drugs and biological products. UC recommends clarifying that certain non-interventional studies using existing real-world data do not require IRB review and further aligning FDA requirements with the Common Rule by permitting appropriate exemptions from IRB review for minimal-risk research, thereby reducing administrative burden while maintaining human-subject protections.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9sn6m48b</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to FDA's Proposed Guidance for&amp;nbsp;Sponsors, Investigators,and Institutional Review Boards on Key Information and Facilitating Understanding in Informed Consent (Docket Number: FDA-2022-D-2997)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9mf9j9bq</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to&amp;nbsp;the FDA’s Guidance for&amp;nbsp;Sponsors, Investigators, and&amp;nbsp; Institutional Review Boards on Key Information and Facilitating&amp;nbsp;Understanding in Informed Consent.&amp;nbsp;UC generally supports FDA’s proposed guidance on key information and facilitating understanding in informed consent, including harmonization with the Revised Common Rule, use of plain language, conflict-of-interest disclosure, and flexibility for study-specific presentation. UC raises concerns that the suggested bubble format may create accessibility, equity, IRB-review, and administrative problems, and recommends adding contact information and clearer language on consent elements while deleting recommendations for glossaries, references, tables of contents, and page-number cross-references that could increase burden and undermine plain-language consent.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9mf9j9bq</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0286 for “Protection of Human Subjects and Institutional Review Boards” (September 28, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9h75q200</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s proposed rule revising human-subject protection and Institutional Review Board regulations to better align them with the Common Rule. UC supports harmonization but recommends closer alignment on definitions, informed consent, activities preparatory to research, waivers of consent documentation, and continuing IRB review, as well as a longer implementation period for the final rule.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9h75q200</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Request to FDA to Extend Comment Period for&amp;nbsp;Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0286 for “Protection of Human Subjects and Institutional Review Boards” (September 28, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8z99q8c0</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s proposed rule on the protection of human subjects and Institutional Review Boards, intended to harmonize FDA regulations with the Common Rule. UC requests a 60-day extension of the comment period, for a total of 120 days, to allow adequate consultation with researchers, administrators, and compliance and privacy experts regarding the proposal’s implications for human-subject research protections and oversight.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8z99q8c0</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the NIH Request for Public Comments on DRAFT Supplemental Information to the NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing: Protecting Privacy When Sharing Human Research Participant Data (NOT-OD-22-131)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8nj635p3</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s draft supplemental guidance on protecting the privacy of human research participants when sharing data under the NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy. UC supports a flexible, principles-based framework but recommends greater recognition of consent waivers, clearer and more consistent standards for de-identification and controlled access, broader consideration of legal protections and data-use agreements, and continued NIH investment in field-specific data repositories.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8nj635p3</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-21-018, “Request for Information (RFI):Inviting Comments and Suggestions on the NIH-Wide Strategic Plan for COVID-19 Research”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8m65c5h9</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s request for input on its NIH-Wide Strategic Plan for COVID-19 Research. UC recommends expanding the plan to address additional research priorities in COVID-19 biology, testing, treatment, prevention, and health disparities, while calling for sustained federal investment in basic science, research infrastructure, data science, and workforce development to strengthen preparedness for future pandemics.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8m65c5h9</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on FDA Docket No. FDA-2019-N-2175 for “Institutional Review Boards; Cooperative Research.” (September 28, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7v11n0rm</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s proposed rule requiring single Institutional Review Board (IRB) review for cooperative research and harmonizing FDA requirements with the Common Rule. UC supports greater regulatory alignment but recommends updated analysis of the costs and administrative burden of single-IRB review, clearer exceptions for certain studies and circumstances, greater discretion for local IRBs, and streamlined reliance agreements.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7v11n0rm</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the Request for Information on Proposed Updates and Long-Term Considerations for the NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-22-029)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sz8s1zc</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s request for information on proposed updates and long-term considerations for its Genomic Data Sharing Policy. UC supports modernizing and harmonizing the policy with NIH’s broader Data Management and Sharing Policy but recommends additional public engagement and clearer guidance on genomic data de-identification, privacy risks, data linkage and consent, while seeking to minimize duplicative requirements and administrative burden.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sz8s1zc</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Certificates of Confidentiality; Draft Guidance for Sponsors, Sponsor-Investigators, Researchers, Industry, and Food and Drug Administration Staff: Availability (FDA-2019-D-3592)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vx692vq</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s draft guidance on Certificates of Confidentiality (CoCs) for protecting identifiable, sensitive information collected in human subjects research. UC supports the guidance’s privacy protections and streamlined CoC process but requests greater clarity on what qualifies as sensitive information, when individual investigators may obtain CoCs, appropriate informed consent language, and the circumstances and options associated with FDA denial of discretionary CoCs.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vx692vq</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NIH's RFI on the NIH Draft Public Access Policy</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/637846c7</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds the NIH's RFI on their Draft Public Access Policy, issued on June 18, 2024. UC strongly supports NIH’s Draft Public Access Policy and supplemental guidance, especially the government use license language allowing broad reuse and derivative works, and urges HHS/NIH to harmonize this approach with federal grant regulations to support consistent zero-embargo access. UC also asks NIH to clarify and support publication-cost planning, preserve PubMed Central as a no-cost deposit route, create a mechanism for post-award publication costs, and work with universities and publishers to automate multi-repository deposits to reduce administrative burden and compliance risk.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/637846c7</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-20-013, “Request for Public Comments on a DRAFT NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing and Supplemental DRAFT Guidance”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wz509zr</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s draft Policy for Data Management and Sharing and supplemental guidance. UC supports NIH’s efforts to expand research data sharing but recommends clearer definitions and implementation standards, standardized data management plan templates and requirements, protections for sensitive data, and adequate funding for both short- and long-term data management, curation, preservation, and infrastructure costs.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wz509zr</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NIH/OLAW's RFI on Clarification of Animal&amp;nbsp;Activities Exempt from the PHS Policy Requirements for IACUC Review (NOT-OD-23-119)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wd6c2xg</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institute of Health (NIH) Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)'s request for information on the NIH Notice Clarification of Animal Activities Exempt from the PHS Policy Requirements for IACUC Review (NOT-OD-23-119).&amp;nbsp;UC supports OLAW’s effort to clarify which animal activities do not require IACUC review and approval, but recommends avoiding the term “exempt” because it may be confused with human-subjects research terminology. UC also asks OLAW to clarify several examples involving observational field studies, commercially available surgically modified animals, and reliance on another institution’s IACUC review, and urges OLAW and USDA-APHIS to harmonize field-study requirements and definitions to reduce administrative burden.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wd6c2xg</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on NIH's Framework for Discussion, dates June 2024, Seeking Input on Reforming the NIH</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ng1c3d5</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds the National Institute of Health (NIH)'s proposed Framework for Discussion for reforming NIH through structural and policy reform.&amp;nbsp;UC urges Congress to approach NIH reform cautiously, with meaningful scientific-community input and independent review before major structural changes, warning that consolidating institutes, capping F&amp;amp;A costs, limiting PI grant holdings, or broadly pausing gain-of-function research could create serious unintended consequences. UC recommends reducing administrative burden, preserving peer review and basic science, supporting early-career and diverse researchers, adjusting grant-size thresholds for inflation, avoiding duplicative research-security requirements, and using risk-based expert oversight for sensitive research areas.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ng1c3d5</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on the FDA-NIH Resource on Terminology for Clinical Research</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4p55d0x9</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s joint request for information on a glossary of terms related to clinical research and clinical study designs.&amp;nbsp;UC asks FDA and NIH to clarify whether the proposed clinical research terminology glossary applies only to FDA-regulated studies using real-world data for medical products, or more broadly to other clinical research and observational studies. If the glossary is intended to apply broadly, UC recommends revising certain observational-study definitions and adding definitions for real-world data and real-world evidence so the glossary can serve as a clearer one-stop reference for clinical research terminology.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4p55d0x9</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the HHS Regulations RFI, “Request for Information and Comments on the 2005 Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fb874mt</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Department of Health and Human Services’ request for input on potential revisions to the Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct. UC generally supports retaining the existing framework while recommending clearer standards for findings of misconduct, harmonized and flexible investigation timelines, expanded confidentiality protections, and additional guidance on inquiries, investigations, and the application of the six-year limitation on misconduct allegations.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fb874mt</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Letter Regarding Gender Diversity and Inclusion on the OHRP IRB Registration Form</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3rs8v26w</link>
      <description>This letter requests changes to the Office for Human Research Protections’ IRB Registration Form to allow more inclusive representation of IRB members’ gender identities. UC recommends replacing the form’s binary male/female designation with at least three gender identity options, arguing that the change would better reflect federal requirements emphasizing diversity and nondiscrimination in IRB membership.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3rs8v26w</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Response to HHS Notice of Committee Establishment, Notice of Intent To Convene, and Call for Nominations for the NIH Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board for Fiscal Year 2020</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ng1337v</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to HHS’s establishment of and call for nominations to the NIH Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board for FY 2020. UC nominates three faculty members based on their expertise and accomplishments in biomedical and stem cell research, science policy, ethics, bioethics, and law.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ng1337v</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to Request for Information (RFI) on Flexibilities for Streamlining IACUC Review of Protocols and Significant Changes (NOT-OD-23-152)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2db6h4gd</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institute of Health (NIH) Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)'s request for information on&amp;nbsp;Flexibilities for Streamlining IACUC Review of Protocols and Significant Changes (NOT-OD-23-152) issued on July 11, 2023.&amp;nbsp;UC supports efforts to streamline IACUC review but says OLAW’s proposed flexibilities mostly restate existing guidance or offer only minor clarifications, and UC recommends clearer wording on designated member review, accelerated three-year reviews, alternate member availability, and reporting expectations. UC urges OLAW to pursue more meaningful burden-reduction measures, such as longer or eliminated Assurance renewal cycles, less burdensome Assurance templates, five-year IACUC protocol approvals, and a more flexible NIH Just-in-Time process that allows certification of pending IACUC approval before animal work begins.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2db6h4gd</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Request for Extension to Comment Period: Docket No. FDA-2019-N-2175 for “Institutional Review Boards; Cooperative Research.” (September 28, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/28j9736p</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s proposed rule on Institutional Review Boards and cooperative research, which seeks to harmonize FDA human-subject protection regulations with the Common Rule. UC requests a 60-day extension of the comment period, for a total of 120 days, to allow sufficient consultation with researchers, administrators, and compliance and privacy experts regarding the proposal’s implications for human-subject research protections and oversight.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/28j9736p</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-AT-22-026, “Request for Information (RFI): Investigators’ Interests in and Barriers to Research Studies on the Health Effects of Cannabis and its Constituents”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0r54j9xv</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s request for information on research interests and barriers related to studying the health effects of cannabis and its constituents. UC calls for increased and broader research funding, a streamlined federal regulatory framework, improved access to cannabis products representative of those actually used by the public, and coordinated federal resources, infrastructure, training, and regulatory support to expand cannabis research.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0r54j9xv</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on FDA Final Order regarding Designating Additions to the Current List of Tropical Diseases in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Acton [FDA-2008-N-0567-0055]</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0p60d992</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s Final Order expanding the list of tropical diseases eligible for the Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher (PRV) Program. UC supports the announced additions but urges FDA to also include coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever), arguing that it meets the program’s eligibility criteria and that PRV incentives could encourage development of urgently needed diagnostics, treatments, vaccines, and cures.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0p60d992</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the NIH Request for Information: Developing Consent Language for Future Use of Data and Biospecimens (NOT-OD-21-131)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gr9367z</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s request for information on developing consent language for the future use and sharing of research data and biospecimens. UC recommends that NIH provide flexible guidance rather than standardized sample language, clarify how the proposal relates to broad consent requirements, avoid a default opt-out approach to future sharing, and address the varying federal, state, and local laws governing informed consent and research privacy.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gr9367z</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on NIH/OLAW's RFI on Update to NOT-OD-05-034 Guidance on Prompt Reporting of Noncompliances to OLAW (NOT-OD-23-063)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vw6z5h0</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)'s RFI (NOT-OD-23-063) on updating NOT-OD-05-034, Guidance on Prompt Reporting of Noncompliances to OLAW.&amp;nbsp;UC supports OLAW’s effort to clarify reporting expectations and reduce administrative burden while maintaining animal welfare protections, but raised concerns that the proposed reporting exception for injuries among socially housed animals is overly broad and ambiguous. UC recommends removing the exception or narrowing and defining the covered species, situations, injury severity, separation period, reporting detail, and rationale to avoid unnecessary reporting and misinterpretation.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vw6z5h0</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Response to NIH Pause on New Submissions to the NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry and Request for Information on Reducing Reliance on Human Embryonic Stem Cells in NIH-Supported Research (NOT-OD-26-031)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9st228b4</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Pause on New Submissions to the NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry and Request for Information on Reducing Reliance on Human Embryonic Stem Cells in NIH-Supported Research. The University of California (UC) opposes reducing reliance on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) at this time, arguing that hESCs remain essential research tools and critical benchmarks for evaluating alternative stem cell technologies. UC recommends that any future transition be evidence-based, adequately funded, and phased in gradually, while also urging NIH to continue accepting new hESC lines into the Registry to support scientific progress, reproducibility, and clinical translation.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9st228b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on NIH/OLAW's RFI on Proposed Guidance to Assured Insitutions on Cephalopod Care and Use (NOT-OD-23-176)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/99n0x1kk</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health, Office of Laboratory Welfare (NIH/OLAW)'s Request for Information on proposed guidance to assured institutions on cephalopod care and use. UC expresses concern on whether OLAW has the authority to expand the application of the U.S. Government Principles or revise the PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (PHS Policy). UC recommends several changes to the proposed language to allow for PI input when developing institutional cephalopod policies and SOPs, as well as allowing for flexibility with cephalopod care staff qualifications.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/99n0x1kk</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-23-091, "Request for Information on the NIH Plan to Enhance Public Access to the Results of NIH-Supported Research"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93x6z1b4</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the NIH Notice NOT-OD-23-091, "Request for Information on the NIH Plan to Enhance Public Access to the Results of NIH-Supported Research".&amp;nbsp;UC supports NIH’s plan to eliminate publication embargoes and expand public access, but emphasizes that implementation must reduce author burden, preserve equitable publication opportunities, and address open-access costs for early-career, under-resourced, and underrepresented researchers. UC recommends automated multi-repository deposits, continued and supplemental funding for publication and data costs, accessibility guidance for figures, pressure on excessive publisher fees, institutional infrastructure support, open licensing tools, and broader adoption of persistent identifiers and open metadata.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93x6z1b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-23-034, "Request for Information (RFI) on Proposed Simplified Review Framework for NIH Research Project Grant Application"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7br0n9jb</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to NIH's RFI on&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;proposed simplified review framework for NIH research project grant application.&amp;nbsp;UC supports NIH’s goals of reducing administrative burden and reputational bias in peer review, but questioned whether the simplified framework would actually reduce funding disparities for underrepresented groups. UC recommends real-time outcomes monitoring, robust training and guidance for reviewers and applicants, more diverse study sections, greater funding-transparency data, and added review criteria for team diversity and health-disparities relevance.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7br0n9jb</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments NIH's RFI on Developing Consent Language for Research Using Digital Health Technologies (NOT-OD-24-002)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bk2s9gf</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Request for Information on developing consent language for research using Digital Health Technologies. UC expresses concern that&amp;nbsp;NIH’s sample consent language is too long, too complex, duplicative, and includes issues beyond informed consent, such as DHT terms of use, data ownership, and third-party sharing.&amp;nbsp;UC recommends shortening and simplifying the language, removing technical or out-of-scope content, aligning consent with data management and IRB materials, and offering guidance without a template.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bk2s9gf</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>University of California Response to NIH Request for Information on Draft NIHControlled-Access Data Policy and Proposed Revisions to NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy(NOT-OD-26-023)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rw9g2k6</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Request for Information on the Draft NIH Controlled-Access Data Policy and Proposed Revisions to the NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS) Policy. The University of California (UC) supports NIH’s goals of strengthening participant protections, harmonizing data-sharing requirements, and promoting responsible data stewardship, but recommends substantial clarification and additional stakeholder engagement before finalization. UC expresses concern about ambiguous policy scope, implementation costs, consent requirements, security obligations, and treatment of de-identified, legacy, and genomic data, and urges NIH to adopt clearer, risk-based, and operationally feasible approaches.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rw9g2k6</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Response to Comment Request on NIH Electronic Application System for NIH Certificates of Confidentiality (CoC) [90 FR 30652]</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3pm6d220</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s request for comment on the NIH Electronic Application System for discretionary Certificates of Confidentiality (CoC). The University of California strongly supports NIH’s continued issuance of discretionary CoCs and recommends reinstating the existing electronic application system without changes, emphasizing that these protections are vital for safeguarding sensitive research participant data, supporting ethical human subjects research, and maintaining public trust while minimizing administrative delays.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3pm6d220</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on FDA Guidance Document: Investigator Responsibilities – Safety Reporting for Investigational Drugs and Devices (FDA-2021-D-0368)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3591b3jz</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s guidance document, Investigator Responsibilities – Safety Reporting for Investigational Drugs and Devices. The University of California (UC) expresses concern that the guidance appears to require investigators to report all IND safety reports and certain serious adverse events to Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) as unanticipated problems. UC recommends that FDA clarify that only safety reports meeting the established criteria for an unanticipated problem should be submitted to IRBs, preserving a risk-based approach that focuses oversight on actionable safety concerns and avoids overwhelming investigators and IRBs with excessive reporting.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3591b3jz</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>University of California Response to NIH Request for Information on Maximizing Research Funds by Limiting Allowable Publishing Costs (NOT-OD-25-138)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19t30344</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Request for Information on Maximizing Research Funds by Limiting Allowable Publishing Costs. The University of California (UC) expresses concern that blanket bans or caps on publication costs could restrict researchers' ability to publish in the most appropriate venues and disproportionately burden investigators with fewer resources; instead, UC recommends transparent, federally coordinated negotiations with publishers to reduce publication costs while preserving author choice, research visibility, and broad dissemination of federally funded research.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19t30344</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
