<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/ucilr/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent ucilr items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/ucilr/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from UC Irvine Law Review </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 10:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Climate Last Resorts</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7fr855ng</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The United States faces a climate crisis, an affordable housing crisis, and, linking them both, an insurance crisis. At the intersection of these concurrent predicaments lie a set of little-known but surprisingly impactful policies: state Insurer of Last Resort (ILR) programs. ILRs are state policies that provide property insurance when private insurance is unavailable, such as when private insurers determine that climate hazards are too risky to underwrite.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Article argues that long-overlooked ILR programs are quickly becoming lynchpins for addressing some of today’s most pressing concerns around climate, housing, and insurance. Accordingly, ILRs bear urgent attention and reevaluation. In short, ILR progr ams are likely the most important policies that you’ve never heard of.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Building on this observation, the Article makes three main contributions. First, it identifies the power of ILR programs as intersectional policy responses to the concurrent insurance,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7fr855ng</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Pappas, Michael</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regulating Tech Titans</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7615r99g</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2025, regulating tech giants like Google and Amazon has emerged as a key issue on the U.S. government’s agenda, with antitrust law returning to the forefront. Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, Europe has introduced a new law, the Digital Markets Act (DMA), which regulates large online platforms, identified as “gatekeepers”. The DMA requires gatekeepers to adhere to specific obligations and prohibitions, typically subject to antitrust case-by-case scrutiny, to ensure fairness and contestability in digital markets. The European historical intellectual framework underpins the core features of the DMA, including its legal framework, approach, scope, and purpose. Since 2021, several antitrust bills have proposed a U.S. version of the DMA, aiming to reform antitrust law by adopting a similar legal framework, approach, scope, and purpose. However, this raises critical questions: Does the U.S. antitrust historical intellectual framework support the adoption of the DMA? Would a DMA...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7615r99g</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Massarotto, Giovanna</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Immigration Law’s Internal Dimension</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7086f70b</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Immigration law is typically conceived as a body of law governing when noncitizens may enter the United States from abroad. But as revealed by recent controversies over migrants bused from Texas to cities like New York and Chicago, immigration law is not only concerned with who may cross the country’s borders, but also where people go within those borders. Immigration law, broadly understood, is not limited to questions of admission and deportation. It also shapes the geographic dispersal of refugees and immigrant workers throughout the United States.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Article contends that a complete account of immigration law requires understanding the ways in which it regulates the internal migration of noncitizens. This account involves grappling with immigration law both within the federal statutory scheme, and across numerous state and local regulations of undocumented immigrants. Recognizing this internal dimension of immigration law today also reveals a much longer...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7086f70b</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hamburger, Jacob</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Military’s Abortion Crisis in the Aftermath of &lt;em&gt;Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization&lt;/em&gt;</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wb7b5vd</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Women in the military have not had access to abortion care since 1978, when Congress introduced an amendment to a Department of Defense (DoD) appropriations bill, later codified under 10 U.S.C. § 1093, that prohibited the use of DoD funds for abortions. While women have endured this second-class health care for over four decades, the Supreme Court’s decision in&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization&lt;/em&gt; has created new problems for servicewomen and the military writ large. Now military women must travel off-base and, in some instances, out-of-state or out-of-country, to seek an abortion. While women in and out of uniform share this burden, servicewomen must comply with military constraints that exacerbate their situation, including following orders that require them to be stationed in states that criminalize abortion, reporting their pregnancy up their chain of command, following leave protocols that require their commander’s approval when traveling for abortion...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wb7b5vd</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>McClean, Hugh</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abolitionist Community Economic Development: Dismantling Racial Capital and Forging Black Autonomous Futures</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5zg6t1pw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This Note explores Abolitionist Community Economic Development (ACED) as a potential model for radical reform aimed at addressing entrenched racial and economic injustices in Black communities. This Note argues that traditional Community Economic Development (CED) projects often fall short of addressing the root causes of social and economic injustice in Black communities, as they tend to rely on external investment, risk triggering gentrification, and lack focus on redistributing power and rectifying historical injustices. In contrast, ACED emphasizes community ownership, long-term resilience, and direct control over resources, providing a more sustainable and empowering approach to tackling systemic inequalities. Using the framework established by Mabre Stahly-Butts and Amna Akbar in &lt;em&gt;Reforms for Radicals? An Abolitionist Framework&lt;/em&gt;, this Note examines ACED initiatives like Cooperation Jackson and The Guild to assess their alignment with criteria for genuine radical...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5zg6t1pw</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mahoney, Rodrick B.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patenting Video Gameplay</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5gx3t8rv</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Gameplay is the core of video games, a two-hundred-billion-dollar business larger than the film and music industries combined. For years, commentators and public interest groups have claimed that video gameplay patents are stifling innovation—concerns that have garnered little attention from scholars or courts. That may soon change. Recent literature speculates that gameplay patents are rare and that challenges in acquiring them have forced companies to prioritize “copy-resistant” game elements such as high-definition graphics and sprawling open worlds. But advances in artificial intelligence are making such elements increasingly easy to recreate, prompting a renewed interest in gameplay innovation and a growing urgency to assess the merits of gameplay patents.&amp;nbsp;This Article provides the empirical and analytical foundation for understanding the existence and merits of video gameplay patents. It trains a naive Bayes classifier to provide novel insight into gameplay patenting...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5gx3t8rv</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwartz, Gregory D.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4182b17c</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4182b17c</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/38w7s22b</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/38w7s22b</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Social Costs of Health Care</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31h8907n</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Imagine you had to choose between your health and your freedom. Many Americans do. Choices to work, marry, retire, move, cohabitate—all are influenced by health care finance laws. Access to health insurance is not guaranteed, and eligibility comes with social costs. For the publicly insured, recipients forgo work, marriage, and security in old age to meet strict income and asset tests. People with disabilities, their medical needs pigeon-holed into public programs, are denied equal opportunity in this way. Employer-sponsored insurance presents its own costs, limiting the range of jobs people take, when they can retire, and whether to marry and divorce. Medicaid expansion and premium tax credits mitigate these harms by degrees but are diminished under the current presidential administration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Research is conclusive that social conditions shape our health. The inverse is also true, that the health care system shapes social conditions. This undermines goals of a health care...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31h8907n</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Blake, Valarie K.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From Proposition 209 to &lt;em&gt;SFFA v. Harvard&lt;/em&gt;: Affirmative Action in Higher Education</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1md45687</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Affirmative action is an active effort through policies aiming to provide opportunities for populations who have been historically underrepresented by allowing them to gain access to education, employment, and business contracting by using race as a factor. In California, the passage of Proposition 209 during the 1996 California ballot initiative created the end to affirmative action programs within the state. With the end of affirmative action programs in California, this Note explores the impact Proposition 209 left for underrepresented racial groups within higher education, specifically in the University of California (U.C.) system. Moreover, this Note addresses misconceptions created by opponents of affirmative action, such as the “mismatch theory” and harm towards the Asian American population. In 2023, the United States Supreme Court held in &lt;em&gt;Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard&lt;/em&gt; that race-based affirmative action programs would be unconstitutional. With the...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1md45687</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Lopez, Jose E.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masthead</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1b76243m</link>
      <description>Masthead</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1b76243m</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TOC</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0x36z7kk</link>
      <description>TOC</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0x36z7kk</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Price of Disinformation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98x1w7xg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The general public is misinformed on a broad range of vitally important topics, such as what the true crime rates are, whether the COVID-19 vaccine is part of a conspiracy to control the population, and who won the last presidential election. There are myriad factors contributing to this epistemic crisis wherein large segments of the public form false belief on these and other major issues. One factor is the vast amount of intentionally false speech disseminated to mislead the public, often termed “disinformation.” Leaders in politics, industry, and the media spread disinformation for their own self-serving purposes. These purposes include turning a profit, growing an audience, and getting elected to office. Although the law prohibits “fraud,” the legal definition of that term—that determines to a great extent the scope of which deceptions are actionable and which are protected speech—is narrowly focused on personal fraud. Schemes to defraud that are aimed at the public at...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98x1w7xg</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Henricksen, Wes</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Algorithmic Personalization Features and Democratic Values: What Regulation Initiatives Are Missing</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96b9x2c4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;2024 was poised to be the largest election year in history, with pivotal elections in Asia, Europe, and the Americas encompassing regional, legislative, and presidential contests, capturing the attention of half the globe. In an era dominated by social media, these elections were influenced by information dissemination through digital platforms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the last two decades, the landscape of public discourse in matters of civic concern has undergone a transformative shift, moving from traditional media to personalized digital social media outlets. Algorithmic features now selectively match content to users, fostering engagement but also giving rise to issues such as echo chambers, filter bubbles, and sensationalized content. While much attention has been devoted to the challenges posed by personalized discourse, this paper sheds light on a critical aspect that has been overlooked in regulatory paradigms: the erosion of an open, public sphere for discourse due to individualized...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96b9x2c4</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Bassan, Sharon</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investor Coalitions Through an Antitrust Lens</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hn6j3s2</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This Article offers a novel—antitrust—perspective on a growing phenomenon in capital markets: institutional investor coalitions. In recent years, a large group of powerful institutional investors, who collectively own significant equity stakes in most public companies, have created alliances on various corporate governance issues. Traditionally, corporate law has encouraged investor cooperation on these issues, regarding it as the solution to the well-known collective-action problem facing shareholders in public companies. As this Article shows, however, the prevailing positive view underscores a crucial point: members of the coalition are not only co-owners of companies but also competitors in capital markets. In the primary markets, institutional investors are competing buyers of shares, vying for share allocation. In the secondary market, they compete as asset managers, using their portfolio performances to attract retail investors and sponsors. The concern raised in this...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hn6j3s2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chaim, Danielle A.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reevaluating Felon-in-Possession Laws After Bruen and the War on Drugs</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82x6g60j</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The legal landscape surrounding firearm possession is evolving rapidly. In 2022, the Supreme Court accelerated its expansion of the individual right to bear arms under the Second Amendment in New York Rifle &amp;amp; Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen. Since Bruen, courts around the country have struck down nearly all types of firearm regulations, with a notable exception: felon-in-possession laws. This Article examines the implications of a legal landscape where those who have prior felony convictions, and especially prior drug convictions, are punished harshly for the same behavior—possession of a firearm—that is constitutionally protected for nearly everyone else.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I argue that as the Second Amendment expands to protect more and more firearm possession, a dichotomy has arisen in which those who live in the communities most heavily targeted by the War on Drugs of the 1980s and 1990s are increasingly becoming virtually the only Americans for whom firearm possession is illegal. I examine...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82x6g60j</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Abelson, Laura G.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patient Autonomy, Public Safety, and Drivers with Cognitive Decline</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7242t6r8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With a growing elderly population, cognitive decline in drivers has become a significant public safety concern. Currently, over thirty-two million individuals who are seventy or older have driver’s licenses, and that number is growing quickly. In addition, almost 10 percent of seniors in the United States (those sixty-five and older) have dementia, and an additional twenty-two percent have mild cognitive impairment. Between a quarter and a half of individuals with mild to moderate dementia still drive. As cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, and decision-making skills deteriorate, a driver’s ability to operate a vehicle safely can be compromised. This not only puts the driver at risk but also endangers passengers, other motorists, and pedestrians. As the population ages, the number of drivers experiencing cognitive decline is increasing, escalating the risk of accidents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For many older adults, however, driving is a key aspect of independence and mobility. Losing...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7242t6r8</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hoffman, Sharona</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Robertson, Cassandra Burke</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ethical Horizons: Navigating the Complexities of Team-Based Legal Representation in Large Corporate Firms</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qm42216</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The legal profession requires the best of its members, asking them to act in ways that respect and prioritize the needs of clients, so long as those needs are ethical and legal. However, when an attorney works within a large law firm, they are faced with not only requirements from their clients, but also from their peers, supervisors, and client representatives. This Note focuses on (1) the origins and history of the large law firm structure that is so common today, (2) the ethics of practicing law in large law firms and how it impacts the individual, and (3) how to overcome ethical pitfalls common within the organizational structure. It concludes with a review of the literature that is most likely to find solutions to resolve these ethical dilemmas.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qm42216</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hermansen, Jake</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rehabilitating the Nonprofit Arts Sector: Healthy Board Governance as a Condition to Federal Tax Exemption</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/37b240k8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Americans celebrate the arts and how they increase our economic and collective well-being. Nonprofit arts and culture organizations are the primary vehicle by which individuals create art, attend events, and support millions of jobs in the industry. This has led to a perception that arts organizations have an effective framework for productivity and efficiency.&amp;nbsp;Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic uncovered tumultuous relationships between artists, staff, Board members, and executive leadership within several nonprofit arts organizations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although Americans regularly celebrate, support, and engage with the arts, the nonprofit arts industry is fraught with disconnected leaders, disgruntled staff and artists, and ineffective work environments. This Note explores why those issues persist and what can be done. First, I argue that the failures of nonprofit arts organizations’ Boards of Directors to uphold their responsibilities and manage stakeholder relationships are a key cause...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/37b240k8</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jones, Kanome’</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patent Semiotics</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2x17s7nc</link>
      <description>Patent Semiotics</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2x17s7nc</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Burk, Dan L.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Foreword - Remembering Professor Dan L. Burk</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2j06q0mt</link>
      <description>Foreword - Remembering Professor Dan L. Burk</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2j06q0mt</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Parrish, Austen</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Democratic Value of Transnational Campaign Finance</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2gk1p576</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Democratic decision-making in the United States does not solely affect U.S. citizens. Indeed, many such decisions impact people living in other countries, as well as noncitizens residing within the United States. Decisions on U.S. policies regarding climate change, immigration, trade, and military aid—to name a few—can have major implications for the lives of many non-Americans. Yet, in being noncitizens, such people effectively have zero representation within the democratic process that results in these decisions. This phenomenon illustrates what has become known as the problem of “democratic externalities.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Theorists have proffered multiple democratic frameworks to resolve this problem—e.g., democratic cosmopolitanism, deliberative democracy, and epistemic aggregative democracy. Ultimately, though, none have managed to adequately mitigate the issue of underrepresentation that democratic externalities produce. Accordingly, this Article considers an alternative, albeit...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2gk1p576</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Martin, John J.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unpatenting Product Hops</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kg3s9p2</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On July 9, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden signed Executive Order 14036 (“Promoting Competition in the American Economy”), which directed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to collaborate on new approaches to increasing competition and lowering prices in the pharmaceutical marketplace. In response, the USPTO outlined several new initiatives, among them an intent to improve the robustness and reliability of issued patents.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A major impetus for the Executive Order was the pervasive nature of pharmaceutical product hopping, which occurs when manufacturers introduce new follow-on versions of lucrative pharmaceutical products to the market, versions of low added commercial value like extended-release forms of drugs, or modifications to device components of combination therapeutics. Product hops are usually intended to mitigate lost market share due to generic competition or thwart generic competition entirely....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kg3s9p2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Sinha, Michael S.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7wz01370</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7wz01370</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4z18f4s6</link>
      <description>Table of Contents</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4z18f4s6</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4k28s4cd</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4k28s4cd</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masthead</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2wn1s19m</link>
      <description>Masthead</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2wn1s19m</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Disparate Impact of the Coronavirus  Pandemic on People of Color and the Efficacy of Race-Based Health Policies</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jz9c7r6</link>
      <description>The coronavirus pandemic was, for all intents and purposes, a national emergency that highlighted the lack of quality healthcare for people of color and the overall lack of trust that communities of color, in general, have for medical professionals. In particular, Blacks, Latino/x, and Native Americans experienced higher hospitalization and death rates than White people. Part of the reason is because Black and Latino/x communities were overrepresented in essential service jobs during the pandemic, and these jobs did not allow for the ability to work from home. Other reasons stem from a lack of trust due to a history of discrimination in the medical field, lack of health insurance, and the quality of healthcare facilities in areas with diverse populations.

Given the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on people of color, states like Utah, Minnesota, and New York, implemented race-based health policies to decrease the hospitalization and mortality rate among people of color, effectively...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jz9c7r6</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gosey, Carmen</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reliance and Reliability</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9801z9d3</link>
      <description>As we move toward full electrification for household uses, we will need to change the perspective of how we look at reliability and the reliance we have on our utilities. Current measures of reliability are utility-centric, focus on averages and may exclude large-scale events which cause widespread and long-duration outages. Averages are not good enough now (if they ever were). Excluding large events from reliability metrics drives specific utility behavior: restoring densely populated areas quickly to keep averages down, even if some customers in other areas or customers in pockets of more densely populated areas are left without service for days or weeks; discounting compounding harms from long-duration outages; and claiming that reliability is improving when the customer experience clearly is not. 

To adequately measure customer impact as we electrify everything, the perspective that we measure reliability from should not be that of the utility or of the regulator—but rather...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9801z9d3</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Payne, Heather E.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Erie Taking: Tyler v. Hennepin County and the General Common Law Revival</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7t31n7g8</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tyler v. Hennepin County seemed unsurprising. But the Court’s opinion unabashedly adopted an approach to claims under the Takings Clause that looks to a general law of property, even when there was an available resolution resting on state law. This Article aims to elucidate the ways in which the Court’s opinion in Tyler effects a sea change in takings law. It also poses portentous questions about the effect the decision will have on the scope of the Takings Clause, the source of property law, and the viability of the general common law as a basis for rights claims in other areas of the Court’s jurisprudence.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7t31n7g8</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Lessnick, Jaden</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mason, T. Hunter</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6t5931ms</link>
      <description>Table of Contents</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6t5931ms</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judicial Relief Isn’t Enough: How Federal Protection of Native American Cultural  Landscapes Limit Religious Freedoms</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/60p7w5vd</link>
      <description>“Political freedom cannot exist in any land where religion controls the state, and religious freedom cannot exist in any land where the state controls religion.” — Sen. Sam J. Ervin Jr.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/60p7w5vd</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Keute, Jennifer</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5bc776rn</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5bc776rn</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vice Capital</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3nm378fv</link>
      <description>Academic and market interest in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing has grown markedly in recent years. Although less prominent, a substantial literature also explores whether “sin pays” in the public capital markets. This literature’s underlying theory is that social norms discourage the funding of businesses that promote vice. According to this theory, some investors—particularly institutions sensitive to social norms, such as pension funds and foundations—will shun vice investments. A consequence of this aversion is a “vice premium” for those investors who will invest in such companies. Largely unexplored, however, is what industries or business models qualify as “vice,” how this definition is constructed and changes, how vice aversion affects startup corporate governance and finance, and what consequences vice aversion holds for the real economy. We address these gaps through a series of interviews with startup founders, venturecapital (VC) and angel investors,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3nm378fv</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jennings, Andrew K.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Krawiec, Kimberly D.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI Artists on the Stand: Bias Against Artificial  Intelligence-Generated Works in Copyright Law</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/26t210mg</link>
      <description>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the creation of art, literature, and music—challenging the boundaries of intellectual property law. To date, scholars have primarily focused on AI’s authorship/entity status and the regulation of its use, overshadowing a critical issue: how AI’s involvement in creative processes influences legal judgments in copyright disputes. Our empirical research reveals systemic bias against AI-generated works in such legal matters. In our studies, participants read about a company that had hired either a human designer (condition one) or a generative AI art system (condition two) to produce works of art, and those works of art arguably infringed an existing copyright. Everything except for the identity of the hired creator (human vs. AI) was held constant, including the works of art: Participants saw identical works. The results showed that, when the works were produced by the AI (vs. the human), participants’ perception and behavior...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/26t210mg</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Avery, Joseph J.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Schuster, W. Michael</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masthead</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1x80r0wb</link>
      <description>Masthead</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1x80r0wb</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Redressing the Harm of Accelerated Approval</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g78r5tr</link>
      <description>The accelerated approval pathway of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) enables drugs to come to market more quickly than would be possible under a traditional FDA approval pathway. Accelerated approval is based upon the agency’s determination that changes in a surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint are “reasonably likely” to predict a clinical benefit meaningful for patients. In essence, the pathway affords sick patients earlier access to potentially beneficial drugs while trials to confirm clinical benefit continue. Accelerated approval has been likened to a social compromise in which promising drugs enter the market sooner in exchange for a sponsor’s promise to undertake so-called confirmatory trials—that is, postmarketing trials to “verify and describe” the predicted clinical benefit. This Article argues that patients, too, are expected to engage in a compromise when they take drugs approved under the pathway: patients must accept the risk that a drug...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g78r5tr</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Karas, Laura</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/02n1801g</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/02n1801g</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Labor Strife and Peace</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xr7f6jx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This Article examines a significant yet underexplored feature in the decline of worker power: the gradual erosion of protections under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or the Act) for workplace protest by rank-and-file, nonunion workers. Rather than protect that protest as necessary to engender solidarity and organizing, current labor doctrine offers employers various opportunities to fire workplace agitators. Focusing on nonunion workers standing up to management, this Article offers three key insights into U.S. labor law. First, it draws on social movements to confirm strife’s vital but uneasy role in workplace solidarity. Second, it unearths the NLRA’s original intention to protect the co-constitutive roles of strife and industrial peace. The New Dealers viewed conflict as a short-term step toward achieving collective bargaining’s peaceful dispute resolution. Third, it shows how the United States Supreme Court and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) misconstrue the...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xr7f6jx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>LeClercq, Desirée</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Re)defining “Unnecessary Suggestion” in Evaluating Due Process Challenges to the Admission of Eyewitness Evidence</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9676d1sc</link>
      <description>In 2018, in Sexton v. Beaudreaux, the Supreme Court, while purporting merely to summarize prior caselaw, articulated a constitutional standard for assessing eyewitness
identification evidence that distorted the Court’s earlier due process jurisprudence and posed a serious—and until now largely unrecognized—threat to the truth-seeking function of the
criminal justice system. Previously, the Court had used a relatively straightforward, two-part test for evaluating the constitutional admissibility of eyewitness evidence: First, the defendant
was required to prove that police used an identification procedure that suggested the identity of the suspect and that police lacked any reasonable justification for failing to employ a more
reliable procedure; second, if the defendant succeeded in showing that law enforcement used an “unnecessarily suggestive” procedure, the court should evaluate a series of ostensibly
independent reliability factors to determine whether the suggestive procedure...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9676d1sc</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kahn-Fogel, Nicholas A.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fraudulent Families</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8775c0zx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld distinctions between unwed mothers and unwed fathers on the basis of sex. Unwed women are recognized as mothers automatically upon birth, while unwed men must undertake a series of affirmative steps before being recognized as fathers. One of the central rationales for this differential treatment is the Court’s concern with problems of proof and potential for fraud that plague paternity, but not maternity, determinations. Legal scholarship has been rightly critical of these enduring sex-based distinctions, but it has largely ignored the role that fraud plays in these cases and in the broader regulation of nonmarriage. That is the task of this Article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This Article engages in a close reading of the Supreme Court’s use of fraud across a range of opinions—from addressing state law rules setting out property rights at death to federal laws dictating the transmission of citizenship at birth. The presence of fraud in the Court’s reasoning...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8775c0zx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Antognini, Albertina</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dimensions of Prosecutor Decisions: Revealing Hidden Factors with Correspondence Analysis</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/71j3w5mg</link>
      <description>Despite the significant impact of prosecutorial discretion on criminal justice outcomes, there are very few large-scale studies of state and local prosecutor decision-making. Our
previous empirical research demonstrated that a defendant’s race and class do not affect prosecutorial charging decisions and revealed a gap in the literature about factors that do
influence prosecutorial charging decisions and sentencing recommendations. Accordingly, we designed a study to obtain more information about prosecutor discretion and decision-making.
Over 500 prosecutors from across the United States completed our vignette-based experiment and survey, which produced quantitative and qualitative data. We transformed these data to
use Correspondence Analysis (CA), an empirical method that allowed us to identify associations between prosecutors’ charging decisions and sentencing recommendations for a
hypothetical defendant and the prosecutors’ individual characteristics, office and jurisdiction...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/71j3w5mg</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wright, Megan S</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cain, Cindy L</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Baughman, Shima Baradaran</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6dm9m5rm</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6dm9m5rm</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Autonomizing Outer Space: Updating the Liability Convention for the Rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n97x3hs</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping numerous industries, and the Outer Space sector is no exception. This Article examines the transformative implications that AI technologies will have on this domain’s liability framework as established by the Liability Convention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Article begins with an in-depth overview of this international treaty, followed by an exploration of how AI technologies can enhance various space activities through autonomous decision-making. It then examines how these advancements are challenging Outer Space’s existing liability regime. Here, the Article spotlights how incidents caused by AI-driven space objects can raise complex accountability issues. Specifically, it identifies critical gaps, including ambiguities in the concept of the “launching State,” the suitability of the “absolute liability” regime, and the applicability of “fault-based liability” standards to
AI systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To address these complexities, this Article...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n97x3hs</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Li, Alex S.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mf7d1kn</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mf7d1kn</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masthead</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3tv939g4</link>
      <description>Masthead</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3tv939g4</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3np1343d</link>
      <description>Table of Contents</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3np1343d</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Antibody Equivalents: Considering Clinical Data</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dj4w30m</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In June 2023, the Supreme Court published its opinion in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi. The Court unanimously affirmed the Federal Circuit’s holding that certain functional patent claims directed to a class of monoclonal antibodies were invalid for lack of enablement under 35 U.S.C. §112(a). After Amgen, innovators of these astounding medicines are caught between a rock and a hard place: The Court’s enablement standard is clear enough, but the current state of the art, saddled with inherent unpredictability, makes it operationally impossible for applicants to satisfy that standard when they attempt to claim more than a handful of discrete antibodies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The upshot is an antibody patent singularity—applicants can enable, and thus claim, only the individual antibody structures they actually make, test, and disclose. And yet, a routine practice in the art called conservative replacement permits scientists to exploit known antibody structures to create literally noninfringing competitor...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dj4w30m</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Elberfeld, J.P.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regulating Social Media Through Family Law</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1531853h</link>
      <description>Social media afflicts minors with depression, anxiety, sleeplessness, addiction, suicidality, and eating disorders. States are legislating at a breakneck pace to protect children. Courts strike down every attempt to intervene on First Amendment grounds. This Article clears a path through this stalemate by leveraging two underappreciated frameworks: the latent regulatory power of parental authority arising out of family law and a hidden family law within First Amendment jurisprudence. These two projects yield novel insights. First, the recent cases offer a dangerous understanding of the First Amendment, one that should not survive the family law reasoning we provide. First Amendment jurisprudence routinely defers to parental decisions, in contrast to emerging case law. Second, existing legislation fails to leverage family law to bypass First Amendment barriers. Lawmakers should refocus on legislating to empower parents to supervise their children meaningfully on social media, instead...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1531853h</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Silbaugh, Katharine</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Caplan-Bricker, Adi</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The More You Avoid AI, the More You Violate the Model Rules</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0x53c3sf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This Note explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in law and how it will transform what is deemed reasonable for lawyers to accomplish. It explores the present introduction of AI into law firm workflows, the anticipation of its increasing prevalence, and its potential to enhance efficiency, accuracy, and time management. I argue that the increased capabilities and utilization of AI will change what is reasonable for lawyers to do under the American Bar Association’s Model Rules.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0x53c3sf</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Iñiguez, Jorge A.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Procedural Innovation, the Rule of Law, and Civil Rights Justice</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vn077vj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Among the most inscrutable and plaguing roadblocks to implementing the Rule of Law in the United States and abroad has been delay—both postponement required by legal substance and procedure and delaying tactics offensively employed by parties and jurists who oppose clearly established law. The results include denial of justice and destabilization of our democratic legal system. This Article proposes the key of courts employing innovative and courageous procedural mechanisms to thwart delay and breakthrough the logjam of resistance to the Rule of Law. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals governing six Southern states—Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas—during the post-Brown v. Board of Education (1954) years provides an exemplar of how court systems can surmount dilatory and obstructive tactics to deliver justice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;This six-state circuit—then known as the Fifth Circuit—included officials, jurists, and communities vehemently opposed to desegregation...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vn077vj</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Thompson, Elizabeth Lee</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/81v0w8bj</link>
      <description>Table of Contents</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/81v0w8bj</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masthead</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6q3184c3</link>
      <description>Masthead</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6q3184c3</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unionizing the Food Industry in California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6301s0fg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This Note situates the labor rights movement between two stories: that of the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Union’s (HERE) waitress locals and that of Genwa, a Korean barbecue (KBBQ) restaurant that organized with the help of the Koreatown Immigrant Worker Alliance (KIWA), a worker center. Highlighting the rise and fall of HERE’s waitress locals from the late 1800s to the mid-twentieth century provides historical context for why unions became dominant as a source of worker rights. Limited state labor protections made workers more dependent on outside sources of power to enforce better working conditions. Union membership brought pride and protection to the average worker. But during the early 1900s, shifts in legislation and Supreme Court precedent brought the downfall of waitress unions and unions generally. Since then, organizers in the food industry have had to get creative. The tactics utilized by Genwa employees to successfully organize are the products of today’s...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6301s0fg</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Fortenbach, Solange</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gene Stewards: Rethinking Genome Governance</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/56t5x4sg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Various entities, such as genetic testing and biotech companies, biobanks, research institutions, and government agencies, collect, analyze, and share human genetic material and information. When maximizing the benefits they obtain from these resources, such entities frequently employ exploitative practices that take advantage of power and information asymmetries. For example, they require individuals to waive property rights over genetic material and information, use these resources for purposes other than those for which they were obtained without the individuals’ knowledge or comprehension of the implications, or collect these resources surreptitiously. Exploitative practices steer genetic material and information toward the ends of powerful entities while undermining individuals’ property and privacy interests. They result in “appropriative harms.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;The existing legal framework in the United States is fragmented, excessively narrow, and riddled with inconsistencies....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/56t5x4sg</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Simana, Shelly</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mq380db</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mq380db</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Modern Orthodoxy is a Failed Experiement: Toward a Race Sensitive, Hard Look at Firearms Policy and the Black Community</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3x86f2h9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This article extends the work on firearms and the Black community through an expanded critique of Black allegiance to the progressive gun control agenda. I have argued that this “modern orthodoxy” is at odds with the history of, and longstanding justifications for, Black distrust of the state. This article extends that argument in light of more recent developments. It contends that racially biased enforcement of contemporary gun regulations adds a new layer to the case for Black distrust of the state and further undercuts the modern orthodoxy. It further argues that the shrinking efficacy and relevance of the gun control agenda similarly undercut the modern orthodoxy. This article concludes that the modern orthodoxy is a failed experiment and should be replaced with a race-sensitive, hard-look approach to firearms policy and the Black community.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3x86f2h9</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Johnson, Nicholas J</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vh0d7rr</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vh0d7rr</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Race-Based Tax Weapons</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3cn7g0cj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the United States, the term “poll tax” often refers to a very specific tactic of white supremacy: the use of tax policy to prevent voting by Black citizens. While “poll tax” is an accurate descriptor of these taxes, poll taxes have a much more expansive history within the twentieth century. Following in the rich tradition of comparative tax scholarship that looks at multiple jurisdictions to arrive at broader tax policy conclusions, this Article examines four distinct poll taxes applied by Anglophone governments in the twentieth century to illustrate a broad phenomenon I call “tax weapons”—the use of tax policy to harm specific groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The primary contribution of this comparative research on twentieth-century poll taxes is to further demonstrate how universal language in tax statutes can be used to effectively target specific taxpayers, with a focus on the targeting of taxpayers by race, ethnicity, or ancestry. By contrasting two poll taxes where race, ethnicity, or...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3cn7g0cj</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Bearer-Friend, Jeremy</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate Secrecy and a Due Process Right to Access</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/14t9771n</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Americans are in a crisis of information access. While government and corporations are producing more data than ever before, we have shockingly little access to it, leading to serious, if not fatal, injuries. In 1964 Charles Reich wrote The New Property, a seminal article that led to the expansion of due process rights in the United States that may offer a solution to this problem. Reich argued that the United States’ government and commercial sectors had amassed incredible power, creating a societal imbalance that could be rectified if citizens were granted some form of “new property”.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Such circumstances—where corporate and government overlap has gravely diminished individuals’ rights to data—are eerily reminiscent of a half century ago, when Reich and his contemporaries were concerned with growing corporate and governmental powers. Today the power imbalance is largely due to government privatizing essential government functions and sweeping up unfathomably granular...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/14t9771n</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Baranetsky, D. Victoria</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HIPAA: Can the Privacy Rule Save the Patient-Physician Relationship in a Post-Dobbs World?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0px3w0js</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With the repealing of Roe v. Wade and the elimination of abortion as a constitutionally guaranteed right, new statutes have been passed all throughout the United States prohibiting abortions, with some states encouraging private citizens to report those who “aid and abet” abortions in the state. These statutes come into direct conflict with medical ethical obligations, which, in turn, damage the patient-physician relationship by instilling in patients a fear that their physician will report their friends and family and bring a lawsuit under those statutes. This Note analyzes the effects of the repealing of Roe v. Wade and considers how the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), specifically the Privacy Rule, maintains the patient-physician relationship and allows patients to be candid with their health-care providers without fear that their physician will voluntarily disclose information and bring a lawsuit against them or their friends and family....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0px3w0js</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Lee, Lance S</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"If I See a Burmese Python, I'm Gonna Kill That Shit": How Changing the Object of the Law Affects Support for Legal Regulation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8b43c9mr</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Half a century ago, the legal doctrine of informed consent was presumably transformed in order to enshrine the ethical goals of ensuring autonomous, voluntary, and informed decision- making in medicine into law. The reasonable patient standard introduced in Canterbury v. Spence and Cobbs v. Grant sought to center the patient by requiring that the physician disclose all information that a reasonable person in the patient’s position would consider material to her decision-making. However, those efforts, while laudable, have proven inadequate to achieving the ethical principles they were intended to achieve.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The legal doctrine of informed consent’s focus on the adequacy of physician disclosures— both in documents and conversations—emphasizes ritual over relationships. It has proven to be both needlessly adversarial and backward-looking, leading physicians to assume more disclosure is better for the purposes of preventing liability. In effect, the law’s onerous legal requirements...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8b43c9mr</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Albrecht, Kat</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reimagining Traffic Fines and Fees</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vf096vn</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Traffic tickets can be big business for government. Every year, traffic tickets generate hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars in revenue for state and local governments nationwide. That revenue is then allocated to support a wide variety of government programs, some of which have nothing to do with traffic violations. The burdens of financial penalties in traffic cases (including base fines, court costs and fees, and surcharges) fall disproportionately on the most financially vulnerable individuals and communities, including low-income people and overpoliced communities of color.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The main contribution of this Article is that it sketches core elements of a more just and equitable legal framework to guide traffic penalty systems. As explained, current traffic penalty systems rest on a false choice between fines and incarceration—namely, that fines are a necessary and practical alternative to avoid the social costs of incarceration for violations of minor traffic...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vf096vn</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Woods, Jordan Blair</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6dk5t4h6</link>
      <description>Table of Contents</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6dk5t4h6</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Privacy—to Antitrust Law</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4dm8p6wk</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;From President Biden to the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission, there is dramatic new attention to the overlap between data privacy and competition. Our personal data now fuels the online world, from search and social media to applications and algorithms. While privacy law limits the processing of such data, antitrust law often encourages it to drive online competition. This is creating new interactions—and tensions—between these powerful areas of law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This Article argues that antitrust law has been too singular in its treatment of data privacy. Antitrust scholars, courts, and agencies cast data privacy the same way across this variety of new interactions: as a quality-like factor that rises and falls with competition. Yet privacy is notoriously pluralistic in its identity. No single definition of data privacy has coalesced in the law, nor is a unitary conception likely to emerge. The Article contends that the cramped antitrust view of data privacy is a significant...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4dm8p6wk</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Douglas, Erika M</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Social Status Theory of Defamation Law</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31d979db</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Despite deep inequality in social status and social capital in American society, legal scholarship has done relatively little to understand the structures that produce status and maintain its distribution. The Article argues that defamation law plays such a role.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The orthodox view is that defamation law’s goal is to protect dignity. This view was expressed in a famous Supreme Court holding in 1966, which held that defamation law is necessary to protect “the essential dignity” of “every human being.” The later seminal work of Robert Post cemented it. Seemingly unrelated, scholars of defamation law have found its structure mystifying, claiming for decades that it is “full of anomalies and absurdities.” This Article argues that the two positions are connected. The problem lies not so much in the law but in our perspective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dignity, while truly important to human flourishing, cannot function as defamation’s linchpin because it is, at bottom, an individualistic concept,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31d979db</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Arbel, Yonathan A</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tahkim: Why We Should Create an American Muslim Arbitration Tribunal</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2668b2d2</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This Note navigates the complex relationship between the U.S. legal system and Islamic law, particularly focusing on the challenges faced by U.S. courts. Examining judicial struggles in applying Islamic law, it critiques the limitations of expert witnesses and proposals for reform by legal scholars. Three prominent proposals—Peter W. Beauchamp’s hands-off approach, Eun-Jung Katherine Kim’s tiered system, and Eugene Volokh’s endorsement of existing legal provisions—are analyzed in their efficacy in incorporating Islamic law into U.S. legal proceedings. The Note provides an alternative: the establishment of a Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) within the U.S. legal framework. Drawing on successful models like the Beth Din in the Jewish community, it argues that a MAT, staffed by arbiters versed in both U.S. and Islamic law, could provide a nuanced approach to disputes involving Islamic principles. Historical, statutory, and Islamic support for religious tribunals in the U.S. is...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2668b2d2</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Muhammad, Talha</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masthead</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g90m2sh</link>
      <description>Masthead</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g90m2sh</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rm3m4h7</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rm3m4h7</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reimagining Informed Consent: From Disclosure to Comprehension</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0ds225pz</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Half a century ago, the legal doctrine of informed consent was presumably transformed in order to enshrine the ethical goals of ensuring autonomous, voluntary, and informed decision- making in medicine into law. The reasonable patient standard introduced in Canterbury v. Spence and Cobbs v. Grant sought to center the patient by requiring that the physician disclose all information that a reasonable person in the patient’s position would consider material to her decision-making. However, those efforts, while laudable, have proven inadequate to achieving the ethical principles they were intended to achieve.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The legal doctrine of informed consent’s focus on the adequacy of physician disclosures— both in documents and conversations—emphasizes ritual over relationships. It has proven to be both needlessly adversarial and backward-looking, leading physicians to assume more disclosure is better for the purposes of preventing liability. In effect, the law’s onerous legal requirements...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0ds225pz</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Koch, Valerie Gutmann</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/051533s5</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/051533s5</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Antitrust Deterrence of Patent Holdup: Refocusing on Competition as a Driver of Technological Innovation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zs0q2th</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Traditionally, antitrust law has served as both deterrent against and remedy for the monopolistic behavior known as patent holdup. Yet those who profit from patent holdup not only deny its existence but also until very recently wielded an enticing critique of the role of antitrust law in its deterrence—namely, that antitrust law (1) disincentivizes technological innovation and (2) incentivizes infringement.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;After exploring patent holdup and why the modern and historical goals of antitrust law are well suited to combatting it, this Note provides direct and circumstantial evidence of the existence of patent holdup as a real-world problem. It also looks at how a sociopolitical power imbalance at work from 2017 until 2021 bolstered attempts to immunize standard-essential patents from antitrust scrutiny. Next, it covers why contract law alone is insufficient to remedy or deter patent holdup. Additionally, this Note debunks the misguided admonition that innovation...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zs0q2th</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Emeterio, Michelle</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masthead</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vh1g9vc</link>
      <description>Masthead</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vh1g9vc</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tt8g013</link>
      <description>Table of Contents</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tt8g013</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reimagining American Policing</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9t18s27n</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Current efforts at police reform focus on heightening the legal accountability of police officers when they engage in questionable behavior. While valuable, such reforms do not address the underlying problems in police organizations that lead to problems with the use of force. This paper highlights the desirability of shifting from a warrior culture, one built around gaining compliance through the threat or use of force, to a guardian- or service-oriented culture, one focused on gaining acceptance by building trust and confidence among people in the community. Beyond changing the dynamics of authority in police-civilian encounters, this new model of policing promotes a climate of reassurance within communities that promotes their social, economic, and political vitality. Instead of focusing on harm reduction via crime control, the police can have a positive role in helping communities develop their way out of crime. Taking up that role requires the police to move from a harm...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9t18s27n</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tyler, Tom</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Progressive Algorithms</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9rn8f88h</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Our criminal justice system is broken. Problems of mass incarceration, racial disparities, and susceptibility to error are prevalent in all phases of the criminal process. Recently, two dominant trends that aspire to tackle these fundamental problems have emerged in the criminal justice system: progressive prosecution—a model of prosecution adopted by elected reform-minded prosecutors that advance systemic change in criminal justice—and algorithmic decision-making—characterized by the adoption of statistical modeling and computational methodology to predict outcomes in criminal contexts.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;While there are growing bodies of literature on each of these two trends, thus far, they have not been discussed in tandem. This Article is the &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;fi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;rst to argue that scholarship on criminal justice reform must consider both developments and strive to reconcile them. We argue that while both trends promise to address similar key flaws in the criminal justice...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9rn8f88h</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ravid, Itay</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Haim, Amit</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digitizing The Warranty of Habitability</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9pt9n2cf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The warranty of habitability was touted fifty years ago as a gamechanger in rebalancing power between tenants and landlords. Under the warranty, a residential tenant’s duty to pay rent is conditioned on a landlord’s obligation to make repairs. Scholars who have studied the warranty of habitability have focused on its defensive use, primarily when a tenant is already in eviction proceedings. Consensus has emerged that the warranty as a defensive shield has failed to deliver meaningful benefits to tenants living in poor housing conditions. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This Article explores whether an affirmative use of the warranty, coupled with a new technology and community organizing approach, can improve tenant outcomes. Specifically, the authors designed, built, and implemented a novel tool available for tenants to bring pro se actions for money damages in small claims courts for breaches of the warranty of habitability. The Warranty of Habitability Abatement of Rent Mathematical...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9pt9n2cf</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>De Barbieri, Edward W.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fruchter, Jordan</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Due Process and the Right to an Individualized Hearing</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9f8928ns</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Due process requires the government to provide notice and a hearing before depriving individuals of protected rights. This right—the right to an individualized hearing—is powerful. It gives individuals the ability to know why the government is taking action that affects them; and it lets them oppose the government’s plans, often by presenting facts and arguments to a neutral decision-maker. As a result, the right to an individualized hearing can help shape the government’s substantive aims—and it even can prevent the government from acting at all. But, despite its importance, there is a longstanding exception to the right to an individualized hearing. Individualized procedures normally are not required when the government acts on more than a few people at the same time. Although the right to an individualized hearing and its exception are fundamental to due process doctrine, scholars disagree about this right’s origin, and courts have struggled to delineate its contours....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9f8928ns</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Zoldan, Evan C</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Embracing Crimmigration to Curtail Immigrant Detention</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bp8v4mb</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Immigration advocates have long objected to both the constitutionality and conditions of immigration detention. However, legal challenges to the practice have been largely unsuccessful due to immigration law’s “exceptionality.” Placing recent litigation carried out against immigration detention during the COVID-19 pandemic within the context of the judiciary’s approach to immigration, this Article argues that litigation is an extremely limited strategic avenue to curtail the use of immigration detention. I then argue that anti-immigration detention advocates should attempt to incorporate their agenda into criminal legal reform and decarceration efforts. This is important for both movements. Normatively, immigration detention raises comparable issues: Namely, that jailing people is, on the one hand, an extreme and cost-ineffective form of social control, and on the other, a tool to marginalize or “otherize” entire communities. Furthermore, there is evidence that ongoing...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bp8v4mb</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gerson, Pedro</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98d9p92g</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98d9p92g</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masthead</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94g063jv</link>
      <description>Masthead</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94g063jv</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Right to Delete: Protecting Consumer Autonomy in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94c86365</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;We often think of DNA as a unique personal identifier. Yet, as of 2019, direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing companies have amassed the genetic data of more than twenty-six million consumers. This raises the concern that companies do not uniformly protect consumers’ genetic privacy. Substantiating such concerns are complaints that companies permit law enforcement access to their databases, sell consumer genetic information to third parties, pursue drug development, and suffer data breaches. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Regulators have been slow to respond to this emerging privacy issue. The current legal framework is largely inadequate: there is no federal data-privacy law; courts and agencies are ill-equipped or lack directive to tackle a privacy issue of this magnitude; and current genetic-related laws focus on notice, informed consent, and antidiscrimination. However, recently enacted state data-privacy laws like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94c86365</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gassner, Angela S</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9473962b</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9473962b</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Limits to Prison Reform</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/91z6q4dr</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Central to prison reform is the idea that prisons can be humane. Abolitionist scholarship has raised one challenge to this idea, in the form of a structural critique. Prisons, on this account, are social institutions that reflect and reinforce inequality; reform does not disturb those broader injustices, and so cannot cure the problems with prisons. Yes, and prison reform has another problem: there are limits to how humane any prison can be. Prisons are, by de&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;finition, instruments of punishment that inflict extreme isolation and control, which are dehumanizing experiences. And reforming prisons is, in some ways, an aesthetic project that is more concerned with the sensibilities of the punishers than the experience of the punished. I develop this argument using Norwegian prisons as a case study—prisons that reformists consider models of humane punishment, but which I describe differently through interviews with people incarcerated there. Part I of this Article situates...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/91z6q4dr</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Angelis, Sophie</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8xb8066n</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8xb8066n</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8w2679rc</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8w2679rc</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8tn3j1nw</link>
      <description>Table of Contents</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8tn3j1nw</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Now Sits atop the Pyramid of Violence?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hg1s3tg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This Note seeks to provoke a conversation about the rise in power of federal prosecutors at the expense of district court judges, focusing on the controlled-substances context. While referencing Robert Cover’s portrayal of the justice system as a “pyramid of violence,” this Note shows how the federal mandatory-minimum sentencing laws and the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Sentencing Guidelines brought about this change. These sentencing schemes have anchored what prosecutors and judges deem an appropriate sentence. Prosecutors are thinking about sentences while deciding what charges to bring. After a discussion about sentencing legislation and current sentencing procedures, this Note identifies a need for reform in the federal criminal justice system. The elimination of mandatory sentencing laws, the normalization of departure from the Guidelines, and the creation of the executive prosecutor role are reforms identified in this Note.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hg1s3tg</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Weimer, Harrison</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Administrative State and the Executive Establishment of Religion</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8gc5k8f1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This Article argues that the widespread incorporation of religion across the federal government constitutes the executive establishment of religion in violation of the First Amendment because it favors certain religious tenets or beliefs over others. The structural and substantive restraints imposed on presidential power have been inadequate to prevent executive establishment, and, in some ways, they have facilitated it. The rise of the modern administrative state coincided with a time of doctrinal flux in Establishment Clause jurisprudence and the enactment of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The absence of a clear, workable constitutional standard invited presidential interpretations that strained the meaning of precedent. The APA facilitated uniform policymaking and left room for the adoption of substantive policy lenses that helped to streamline the incorporation of religious tenets across executive agencies and programs.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The executive establishment...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8gc5k8f1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Maril, Robin</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Solving the “King Lear Problem”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/88s852r4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In Shakespeare’s play, King Lear, an aging ruler relinquished control to two of his three daughters. The succession failed miserably, destroying his family and destabilizing his kingdom. King Lear shows why few family businesses survive beyond three generations. Understanding Lear’s failure is crucial to avoiding Lear’s fate, whether the family business in question is a monarchy, a media empire, or a hardware store. The conventional wisdom is that Lear gave away his kingdom too soon and left himself vulnerable to predatory heirs. This has been referred to as the “King Lear Problem.” &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The conventional wisdom is wrong. Lear’s succession plan failed because he waited too long. Like Lear, those who control family businesses are often reluctant to step aside. For example, until he was well into his nineties, Sumner Redstone declared that his succession plan was to never die. The predictable consequence was litigation that engulfed the companies he controlled,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/88s852r4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Means, Benjamin</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/81p3281n</link>
      <description>Mission Statement</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/81p3281n</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Myth-Busting Restorative Justice: Uncovering the Past and Finding Lessons in Community</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xb6444w</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;A common narrative about modern restorative justice is that it is a revival of historic and indigenous justice practices that have been practiced around the world. Critics of this narrative call it a myth, arguing that the claim is overbroad and unsupported by existing evidence. Embedded in this conversation are questions about how to respect the contributions of indigenous traditions and avoid whitewashing. Such an overwhelmingly broad claim tends to lead to romanticization and whitewashing of indigenous traditions, serving the needs of largely white, Western advocates in yet another colonial endeavor. But ignoring the indigenous contribution to restorative justice altogether is whitewashing by a different route.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This Article offers three main contributions. First, it reveals the current lack of empirical grounding for the common narrative. This descriptive insight motivates the second contribution: the creation of a methodology for better ascertaining...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xb6444w</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Polavarapu, Aparna</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Law of Disposable Children: Searches in Schools</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7wz7m5wh</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It’s the forgotten, discarded, disposable people. That’s so often who you find in jail—the forgotten.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;—Rev. David Kelly, explaining why he devotes himself to working with children coming out of the juvenile detention system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Many schools treat children as “disposable.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;—Francisco Arenas, Juvenile Probation Officer at Cook County Juvenile Probation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Schoolchildren are being strip-searched based on little or no reasonable suspicion, and schoolchildren are being targeted for searches based on their race, disability status, gender, or homelessness. This is possible because the Supreme Court has issued only two opinions in its history about the right of schoolchildren to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures in schools. With those two cases, the Court has established a special test for schoolchildren, far more permissive than that applied to those suspected of serious criminal wrongdoing. Two cases in thirty-&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;five years are not...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7wz7m5wh</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jacobi, Tonja</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Clafton, Riley</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Solving the Pandemic Vaccine Product Liability Problem</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7v3064t8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The global rollout of COVID-19 vaccines is underway, and with it the inevitable occurrence of severe side effects that accompany, rarely, even the safest and most effective vaccines. Governments have invested billions of dollars in supporting research, development, logistics, and supply chains, as well as supporting the creation of networks of healthcare providers to deliver vaccines to recipients all over the world. The European Commission and several international organizations have established the COVAX Facility to pool resources in promising vaccine candidates and to subsidize their procurement by low- and middle-income countries. Yet up-front investment in vaccine development and delivery solves only half the problem with respect to vaccine access. Risks of legal liabilities, particularly product liability for severe side effects, will serve as an important, if not decisive, factor in how vaccine manufacturers participate in the response with Emergency Use Authorized...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7v3064t8</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Halabi, Sam F</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tg7n8j6</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tg7n8j6</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Immigration Law for Abolitionists (and Reactionaries)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rk5t5fs</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Immigration law gets most things wrong and satisfies no one—not immigrants, not moderates, not restrictionists, and not abolitionists (the #AbolishICE crowd). It is bad law premised on skewed epistemic inputs—the fantasies of U.S. citizens—and enforced by a national agency with bloated resources tasked with solving a problem (illegal immigration) that causes no material harm. Migration law’s biggest failing is that it admits far fewer immigrants than our country has the capacity to take in, as the decades-long, peaceful, and productive presence of twelve million undocumented immigrants definitively proves. The bankruptcy of immigration law has been obvious for a few decades at least, yet comprehensive immigration reform has been impossible to enact over the same time frame. Now, with the death of the most promising legislative reform effort in a generation at the hands of the unelected Senate parliamentarian, it’s past time for a reassessment of immigration law and the...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rk5t5fs</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Morales, Daniel I</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trafficking and the Shallow State</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jq9r6k7</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;More than two decades ago, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) established new, robust protections for immigrant victims of trafficking. In particular, Congress created the T visa, a special form of immigration status, to protect immigrant victims from deportation. Despite lofty ambitions, the annual cap of 5,000 T visas has never been reached, with fewer than 1,200 approved each year. In recent years, denial rates also have climbed. For example, in fiscal year 2020, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services denied 42.79% of the T visa applications that the agency adjudicated, compared with just 28.12% in fiscal year 2015. These developments came as former president Donald J. Trump proclaimed a deep commitment to end the “epidemic” of human trafficking and to protect “innocent” victims. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Though scholars have critiqued the general protection framework for immigrant victims of trafficking, this Article unearths an understudied problem: the often-unseen...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jq9r6k7</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Dahlstrom, Julie</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jg8h7pj</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jg8h7pj</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cover</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7hc5x3q2</link>
      <description>Cover</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7hc5x3q2</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mobility Matters: Where Higher Education Meets Transportation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7ck7p165</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Higher education has long been hailed as the key to social and economic mobility. And yet, mobility itself is one of the greatest barriers to equity in higher education. Although scholars and policymakers have thus far paid scant attention to the role of transportation in higher education, this Article establishes why that oversight undermines educational equity. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Grounding its arguments in both interdisciplinary literature and rich original data from a multi-year mixed-methods research study, this Article demonstrates how transportation law and infrastructure affect college completion, disproportionately hindering completion for students of color. It further argues that higher education law and policy exacerbate, rather than alleviate, systemic transportation barriers for students, reinforcing education inequities. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This Article adds important dimensions to scholarship on both transportation and higher education. By focusing on the interaction...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7ck7p165</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Elengold, Kate S.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
