<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/ucm/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent ucm items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/ucm/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from UC Merced</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 9 Aug 2026 05:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Memory, Arousal, and Temporal Binding: A Computational Model</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9j57m6q1</link>
      <description>In the interval estimation task, participants are asked to estimate the time interval between two events. Interval estimates tend to be smaller if the first event is a voluntary action. The cognitive mechanisms that generate this temporal binding effect remain unclear. In this study, we propose a computational model of this phenomenon. We hypothesize that participants perform this task by comparing the availability of experimental events in memory. More specifically, we claim that temporal binding effects may be attributed to differences in emotional arousal at the time of encoding due to the type of event. For instance, voluntary actions may be accompanied by slightly higher arousal, leading to stronger traces of the first event relative to the involuntary case.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9j57m6q1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mekik, Can Serif</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tuncer, Defne</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Four Stress Phenotypes Revealed Through Multimodal Thermal Imaging: The FenoStressNet Framework</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9f94v1kc</link>
      <description>Stress is typically conceptualized as varying along a single intensity dimension, yet individuals with identical "high stress" labels often exhibit divergent responses. This work challenges this unidimensional model through FenoStressNet, a multimodal framework integrating facial thermal imaging, physiological monitoring, psychological assessment, and explainable AI. Analyzing 120 participants across controlled stress-induction tasks (19,200 thermal images), this study identifies four reproducible stress phenotypes that cross-cut traditional intensity categories: Cognitive-Dominant (elevated cognitive appraisal, moderate physiology), Physiological-Reactive (rapid autonomic arousal), Integrated-Responder (synchronized multimodal activation), and Discordant-Denier (high physiological response with low subjective awareness). These phenotypes exhibit distinct facial thermal patterns and differential weighting of cognitive, affective, and physiological components. These findings suggest...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9f94v1kc</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Baran, Katarzyna</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stats Wars: Return of the Bayesians</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9477g8t4</link>
      <description>In view of the ongoing replication crisis and various frustrations about classical null-hypothesis significance testing, calls for a statistical reform have increased. Often, it has been argued that the Bayesian approach offers a promising alternative to classical statistics, but at the same time, both approaches are sometimes hard to compare. This paper offers some basic steps for establishing a more decisive common ground and take steps towards resolving some fundamental conceptual issues, by introducing the frameworks of epistemic accuracy and efficient experimentation. Efficiency (i.e. the ratio between the accuracy of conclusions, and the experimental resources needed) is of central importance to good scientific inquiry. This paper shows how considerations of efficiency and accuracy motivate a broadly Bayesian approach, which however can also make room for frequentist tenets, and thereby push us towards a more unified and powerful framework for scientific inference.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9477g8t4</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Fuchs, Rafael</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Efficient compression in developmental trajectories of color naming</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8v08b197</link>
      <description>Convergent evidence suggests that the adult lexicon has evolved under pressure to efficiently satisfy a tradeoff between compressibility and informativeness, formally known as the Information Bottleneck (IB) principle. No work to date, however, has  tested whether the same principle also impacts how children learn word meanings during development. Here, we address this open question in the domain of color by collecting color naming data from Hebrew speaking children across development (ages 3-12), and comparing it to color naming data from adults. Across ages, we find that children achieve near-optimal IB tradeoffs, with their color naming systems becoming more complex (less compressible) and more adult-like with age. Importantly, this pattern holds even though children's early color naming systems diverge from those of adults, implying that their efficiency is not merely a reflection of the efficiency of the adult system. These findings suggest that children's developmental trajectories...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8v08b197</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Zaslavsky, Noga</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Arnon, Inbal</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hierarchical Temporal Structure in Carnatic Improvisation: Interaction and Rhythmic Constraint</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8nf835wk</link>
      <description>Hierarchical Temporal Structure in Carnatic Improvisation: Interaction and Rhythmic Constraint</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8nf835wk</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Nanjangud, Siddharth</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does Episodic Memory Help Close the Lexical Frequency Gap in Sensitivity to Syntactic Contrasts? A Test Using Retrieval-Augmented Language Models</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8j68804x</link>
      <description>Grammatical knowledge and how it is empirically tested are typically considered robust to the frequency of the lexical items used in the expressions. Complementary Learning Systems theory proposes that hippocampal episodic memory, which enables rapid encoding and retrieval of specific experiences, allows learners to leverage those experiences when processing rare patterns. We test the hypothesis that robustness to lexical frequency can arise via such an episodic memory mechanism by evaluating whether retrieval-augmented language models (specifically, k-nearest-neighbor language models that augment parametric neural networks with explicit instance storage), help close the lexical frequency gap in syntactic contrasts that vanilla language models exhibit. Using syntactic contrasts with frequency-stratified test items, we find that retrieval augmentation leads to improvements for test instances containing low-frequency lexical items, consistent with episodic memory compensating for...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8j68804x</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Liu, Jing</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kim, Najoung</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cinematic Techniques for Controlling Attentional Focus Enhance Emotional Engagement in Interactive Narratives</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bd8d19c</link>
      <description>To enhance emotional engagement in interactive narratives, we propose an Arousal Induction Model that integrates cinematic techniques with the psychological theory of misattribution of arousal. The model combines attentional focus control (using over-the-shoulder shots and match-cuts) with arousal induction via auditory and visual effects.We evaluated this model through an RPG-based experiment ($N=49$). Results showed that the arousal-induced staging significantly improved participants' alignment with the protagonist's interpersonal preferences and increased subjective story evaluations. Physiological analysis (CSI) confirmed successful sympathetic activation during staged events.These findings suggest that simultaneously intervening in cognitive attention and physiological arousal can effectively deepen emotional engagement and improve experience quality. This research provides a framework for designing more moving and immersive interactive narrative experiences.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bd8d19c</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ohmoto, Yoshimasa</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Nakazawa, Haruka</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Motion to Blame: Different Causal and Moral Attributions Evoked by Perceived Chasing and Following</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82p6s5hd</link>
      <description>Humans perceive rich social interactions from motion. We investigated whether humans can perceive subtle intention differences in motion displays even when kinematics are highly similar, and whether the recovered intention shapes downstream causal and moral judgments. By grounding different intentions in a planning algorithm with distinct reward functions, we generated "chasing" and "following" trajectories, each ending with the front agent falling into an accident. In an online responsibility task, participants perceived different intentions and assigned blame accordingly: in following, responsibility concentrated on the leading front agent, whereas in chasing, responsibility shifted toward the rear chaser. In a matched causal-attribution task, the front agent was judged to be the primary cause of the motion in both displays. These findings suggest that humans can perceive subtle differences in intention from motion, which scaffolds moral evaluation, but that this influence cannot...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82p6s5hd</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tang, Ning</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Xu, Enjie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zhou, Jifan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shen, Mowei</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Young, Liane</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gao, Tao</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Representational Geometry of Number</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7w36v8qq</link>
      <description>A central question in cognitive science is whether conceptual representations converge onto a shared manifold to support generalization, or diverge into orthogonal subspaces to minimize task interference. While prior work has found evidence for both, a mechanistic account of how these properties coexist and transform across tasks remains elusive. We propose that representational sharing lies not in the concepts themselves, but in the \emph{geometric relations} between them. Using number concepts as a target domain and language models as high-dimensional computational testbeds, we show that number representations preserve a stable relational structure across tasks. Task-specific representations are embedded in distinct subspaces, with low-level features like magnitude and parity encoded along near-orthogonal axes. Crucially, we find that these subspaces are largely transformable into one another via linear mappings, indicating that task-specific representations, despite being located...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7w36v8qq</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hu, Zhimin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Niu, Lanhao</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Varma, Sashank</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Decoding Neural Dissonance: From Sensory Mismatch to Model Neural Recalibration for Cybersickness Prediction</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sq117d7</link>
      <description>Cybersickness is a major barrier to the widespread adoption of virtual reality, arising from neural dissonance between visual and vestibular stimuli. Although kinematics-based deep learning enables non-intrusive detection, existing models often lack neurophysiological grounding and fail to capture dynamic sensory recalibration and continuous symptom accumulation. To address these limitations, we propose the Neural Sensory Conflict Network (NSCNet), a biologically inspired framework grounded in Sensory Conflict Theory. Specifically, NSCNet incorporates a Conflict Alignment Embedding to model the integration of discordant sensory inputs, a State-Space Re-entrant Experts module that combines selective state-space modeling with Re-entrant Experts to capture the temporal dynamics of neural dissonance and functional modularity, and a Dynamic Sensory Reweighting mechanism that approximates adaptive gain control in the central nervous system. Experiments on the MSCVR and VR Cybersickness...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sq117d7</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Qiao, Mengyu</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Xie, Hongyang</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wang, Fang</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Processing of, and Adaptation to, Nonbinary Pronouns</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7n510243</link>
      <description>In recent years, the pronoun system of English has begun to accommodate gender diverse identities.  The present study investigates how individuals process and adapt to two novel pronouns: nonbinary they and the neopronoun ze. Using a Web-based maze task, we compared processing of these pronouns relative to binary s/he pronouns. We also examined how reading behavior adapted to repeated exposure to each pronoun. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the rarer ze elicited greater processing difficulty than singular they overall. However, participants adapted more quickly to ze than to they. We propose that ze may be more easily learned than singular they because it does not compete with plural they.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7n510243</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wen, Vic Tianlan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Conrod, Kirby</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Grodner, Daniel</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Socially Motivated Observational Learning: Children Preferentially Learn from Overheard Speech Addressed to Their Own Mothers</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7ks8s0s0</link>
      <description>When does overheard speech support early word-learning? The present study provides preliminary evidence that children's closest social partners (here, mothers) structure attention to overheard speech. In a Tseltal Mayan community where overhearing is central to socialization, 75 mother-child dyads participated in overhearing-sessions exposing them to two novel words. In each session, one child's mother was directly addressed ("Mother-Addressed" condition), while the second mother merely observed ("Mother-Unaddressed" condition). Immediately after, both children completed two gaze-based tests of word recognition and learning. Results show that, compared to Mother-Unaddressed children, Mother-Addressed children exhibited (i) greater one-shot recognition of the novel word whose referent was visible during the overhearing-session; and (ii) a word-learning advantage on cross-situational familiarization trials. Insofar as who is being spoken to matters, the present study finds that...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7ks8s0s0</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Goodman, Sarah</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Foushee, Ruthe</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Shadow of the Past: Amortized Inference and Belief Revision using Chess as a Model System</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7h38004r</link>
      <description>How do humans allocate scarce cognitive resources across a
stream of related decisions? Russek, Acosta-Kane, van Opheusden,
Mattar, and Griffiths (2025) predict reaction time on each
chess move from the within-move Benefit of Computation, treating
moves as if they were drawn independently. We ask whether
those costs also depend on computation carried forward from
the previous move. In chess, a player who has calculated a
likely opponent reply can often reuse that work; a surprising reply
should force revision. On 135,608 quality-filtered Lichess
puzzles attempted by 74,609 unique users, the within-puzzle
log-RT spike is +0.309 (Cohen's __ = 0.235; paired __ = 86,
N = 135,608; BF10 &amp;gt; 10100). Hierarchical regression climbs
from __2 = 0.011 (Russek-static) to 0.282; the amortization
interaction is large when predictability is operationalized by
the human-style Maia-2 (__ = _0.054, __ &amp;lt; 10_27) and not
significant under Stockfish best-move predictability. A threeparameter
Bayesian...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7h38004r</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Dasaka, Amarnath</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bapi, Raju Surampudi</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Syntactic Prominence and Pragmatic Bias in Turkish Subject Anaphora: Humans and Large Language Models</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d46z2b9</link>
      <description>We examined whether large language models (LLMs) responded to syntactic prominence of discourse entities and pragmatic biases in Turkish subject anaphora resolution similar to human judgments. Using an offline comprehension task with native speakers, we showed that null and overt pronouns responds to syntactic prominence and  pragmatic bias. We then evaluated several autoregressive LLMs on the same materials. While GPT-4o correlated with human responses, LLaMA-4 more closely approximated the interaction between syntactic prominence and pragmatic biases observed in human data, raising questions about the relationship between model performance, scale, and human fit. We also found that all models mostly differed from humans in response variability, with model responses tending to be more deterministic. Finally, the results indicated partial but limited alignment between human and model anaphora resolution in Turkish.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d46z2b9</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Onal, Esra</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kübler, Sandra</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MoESleepNet: A Multi-view Mixture-of-Experts Model for Single-Channel EEG Sleep Stage Classification</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7395649p</link>
      <description>Accurate sleep staging plays a crucial role in diagnosing patients' sleep health. Numerous studies have confirmed that data from different views can highlight distinct characteristics. Based on the time-domain (TD) EEG, we constructed two additional views: the Power Spectral Density (PSD) and the time-frequency representation (TFR). Notably, there is no universally applicable model suitable for all types of data. That is to say, the characteristics of data should align with the model structure. Therefore, we designed specialized expert models for learning different views. However, directly combining features extracted from different views often results in excessive redundancy, especially for different views of the same data which the underlying data remains essentially identical. To address these issues, we proposed a multi-view mixture-of-experts (MoESleepNet) model for sleep staging, which achieves the best performance on SleepEDF20, SleepEDF78 and SHHS single-channel datasets....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7395649p</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wu, Xi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cui, Xinzhong</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Xiao, Tiantian</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wang, Yaokun</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>He, Yuhao</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Long, Zhiying</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wang, Xiangcun</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Xu, Yiwei</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investigating Mechanisms of Social Offloading using a Joint Negative Priming Task</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vm1g5tf</link>
      <description>When sharing tasks, individuals may reduce internal demands by offloading task processing to others – social offloading. Studies have revealed facilitated performance when people believe a jointly acting partner is responsible for task distractors. A proposed mechanism underlying this effect is selective attention. We investigated this using a joint location negative priming (NP) paradigm. In NP tasks, participants initially respond to targets while ignoring distractors (prime phase); at a subsequent probe phase, responses are typically slower to targets in prime distractor locations, reflecting lingering inhibition – the NP effect. Participants (N = 80) completed the task either alone, or believing a partner was responding to distractors. Following a selective attention account, we predicted prime target facilitation followed by increased NP in the joint condition. While results did not reveal facilitation, NP was significantly increased. We propose that these findings demonstrate...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vm1g5tf</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tomlinson, Antony Robert Philip</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tufft, Miles R A</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How do iconic co-speech gestures contribute to the truth-conditions of assertions: A surprisal-based ERP investigation targeting N400 and late positivity effects</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nt3r3x5</link>
      <description>To investigate how co-speech gestures modulate linguistic understanding in comparison to specific verbs with similar contents, we conducted an EEG experiment to measure semantic surprisal by exploring the amplitude changes in the N400 component for both information types. We used videos of a person uttering (i) specified sentences, whose verb semantically denoted a specific action, and (ii) underspecified sentences with an unspecific verb accompanied by an iconic co-speech gesture that indicated the specific action of the previous condition. The subsequent sentence contained an instrument noun as target, which either matched or mismatched the specific action. We measured ERPs on the target noun for both information types and found an N400 effect for mismatching target nouns as well as a late positivity effect for gesture conditions. Crucially, no interaction between information type and congruency was observed in the N400 time-window, indicating similar semantic surprisal induced...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6nt3r3x5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Werning, Markus</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Reimer, Ludmila</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wieder, Thomas</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zenk, Carla</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Spychalska, Maria</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Self-directed gameplay reveals common and divergent patterns in human problem-solving</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6jz0626c</link>
      <description>A central goal of cognitive science has been to find universal principles that explain the remarkable flexibility of human problem-solving. However, people display a diversity of problem-solving strategies, prior experience, domain-specific knowledge, and preferences. Which aspects of problem solving are shared across individuals, which are individual-specific, and which are adapted to particular domains? Most studies of human problem-solving rely on brief laboratory tasks in one or a few domains and coarse behavioral measures, making it difficult to robustly explain individual cognitive processing. We propose that longitudinal, self-motivated gameplay on multiple tasks---combined with detailed process-tracing---can help fill these gaps. We introduce mitpuzzles.com, a public platform hosting a suite of constraint-based logic puzzles (e.g., Minesweeper, Sudoku, and Nonograms), instrumented to collect detailed behavioral data including mouse-tracking.  We present preliminary analyses...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6jz0626c</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cheyette, Samuel J.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Chen, Tony</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hofer, Matthias</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mills, Tracey</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Roberts, James</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bramley, Neil R.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Collins, Katherine M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Callaway, Frederick</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tenenbaum, Joshua B.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Semantic Coexistence of Heart and Brain in Chinese: Computational Evidence from 3.4 Billion Tokens</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6b854430</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Cultural concepts of mind vary dramatically across societies. In Chinese thought, 心 (&lt;em&gt;xīn&lt;/em&gt;, “heart-mind”) historically served as the seat of cognition and emotion, while 脑 (&lt;em&gt;nǎo&lt;/em&gt;, “brain”) played minimal role. Modern neuroscience introduced brain-centered models, raising questions about whether scientific concepts replace or coexist with folk theories. How does scientific knowledge reshape traditional&amp;nbsp;mental vocabulary in non-Western contexts? Here we show, through distributional semantic analysis of 3.4 billion Chinese tokens from&amp;nbsp;classical texts to social media, that &lt;em&gt;xīn&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;nǎo&lt;/em&gt; function as parallel rather than competing concepts. Contrary to eliminative materialism, &lt;em&gt;xīn&lt;/em&gt; maintains its integrated multi-dimensional structure as a living folk concept, while &lt;em&gt;nǎo&lt;/em&gt; enters as specialized medical terminology. This coexistence varies systematically: encyclopedic texts show convergence in biomedical contexts, while vernacular...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6b854430</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ma, Yuxi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Xu, Yanxi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zhu, Yixin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Li, Fangmin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Su, Yanjie</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What reusable shortcuts do people propose when solving assembly problems?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/65q136dn</link>
      <description>Humans readily extract statistical regularities from perceptual experience (e.g. a cook noticing which ingredients often appear together).
How does such learning guide peoples' performance on procedural tasks (e.g. preparing various dishes)?
Here we examine what shortcuts people propose to help them to complete assembly problems more efficiently by eliminating repeated subroutines.
Participants (N=301) repeatedly assembled tangram-like shapes, and could create composite tiles for future use.
Some participants assembled a sequence of tangrams where certain pairs of tiles recurred consistently (Highly structured); the remaining assembled tangrams with less predictable tile arrangements (Less structured).
Participants exposed to Highly structured sequences created tiles that tracked the frequency with which those tile pairs recurred across tangrams, and doing so was accompanied by greater efficiency in assembly.
Taken together, these findings suggest that statistical learning guides...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/65q136dn</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Anderson, Sean P.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Yang, Justin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bowers, Maddy L</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wong, Lionel</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fan, Judith E.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Open dynamics of thought and memory with learning in a deformable landscape.</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/62p7t9d5</link>
      <description>Classical attractor networks such as Hopfield models treat memories as static points in a fixed energy landscape. While foundational, this framework cannot capture how cognition unfolds through time as agents interact with their environment and recall structured experiences. In this work, I present an open dynamical systems model of memory implemented in an interactive physicsbased environment, where memories are not point attractors but attracting trajectories carved into a deformable potential landscape through experience dependent learning. A state variable evolves under the combined influence of learned landscape gradients and an external driving force, producing time-resolved recall paths rather than instantaneous convergence. I show that this system naturally produces graded recall, intrusion errors, and interference from basin geometry and drive dynamics alone. This framework reframes memory as a dynamical process embedded in perception/action loops and offers a bridge...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/62p7t9d5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gilbert, Makenzy</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>False Memory of Grammatical Constructions: Evidence for Structured Construction-Level Generalizations</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5x0897g8</link>
      <description>Three experiments and a control task combine to indicate that grammatical constructions are implicitly represented in memory, with prototypicality emerging from distributional experience, alongside significant verbatim memory. Participants are exposed to instances of a construction and, following a delay filled by an unrelated language task, falsely endorse novel instances of the same construction more often than paraphrases in a recognition task. Critically, false memories are particularly common for lures containing an unwitnessed word that is distributionally prototypical of the construction, compared to frequency-matched controls. A control study excludes the possibility that the latter effect is simply a word-level effect. Finally, we simultaneously find memory for specific exemplars. Overall performance is above chance yet implicit: participants underestimated their accuracy, which was unrelated to age or education.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5x0897g8</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Fergus, Abigail</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Goldberg, Adele</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Did What to Whom? Visually Grounded Role Assignment in Humans but Not in Vision--Language Models</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5jt8j974</link>
      <description>Event role assignment is central to event understanding in both language and vision. Crucially, the foundation of this semantic structure is likely rooted in visual experience. However, it remains unclear whether recent vision–language models (VLMs) can attain this fundamental human cognitive capability. To compare humans and VLMs, we conducted two studies using Heider–Simmel–style animations that minimize object and scene semantics. In Study 1, humans identified roles near ceiling (~97%), whereas VLMs were less accurate and less stable across actions (GPT-5: 84%; GPT-4o: 47%). In Study 2, we introduced a Stroop-inspired visual–linguistic mismatch by pairing animations with occasionally incongruent role statements. Humans' role judgments remained highly vision-consistent (92.7%), but VLMs shifted away from the visual event under conflict (GPT-5: 46.9%; GPT-4o: 29.7%), indicating heavier reliance on linguistic cues. In Study 3, a mismatch-shape baseline left both models perfectly...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5jt8j974</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Xu, Enjie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tang, Ning</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tang, Alvin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hartshorne, Joshua K</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gao, Tao</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Mechanistic Explanation for the Inverted Face Effect</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4pr236xw</link>
      <description>The Inverted Face Effect has been the subject of a great deal of
research and controversy in vision science. The nature of the
effect, whether it involves holistic processing or not, where in
the visual system it resides in the cortex, and whether it is a
result of expertise and can apply to other phenomena, has been
debated for decades. However, no mechanistic explanation for
the effect has been put forward. Here we show that a model
that includes multiple fixations on the face driven by a simple
salience operator, a foveated retina, and the log-polar mapping
from the visual field to V1 can explain this effect. We also
simulate Yin's 1969 recognition experiment and show good
agreement with our model.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4pr236xw</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tahan, Alexander</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lee, Hsin-Yuan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fleischer, Kira</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kachappilly, Nikita</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Chen, Xavier</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cottrell, Garrison W</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are More Tokens Rational? Inference-Time Scaling in Language Models as Adaptive Resource Rationality</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/46s2p3dx</link>
      <description>Human reasoning is characterized by the rational use of resources to optimize performance under constraints. Recently, inference-time scaling has improved the reasoning performance of Large Language Models by increasing test-time computation. Instruction-tuned (IT) models explicitly generate long reasoning traces, whereas Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are trained via reinforcement learning to discover reasoning paths that maximize accuracy. However, it remains unclear whether resource-rationality can emerge from such scaling without explicit rewards related to computational costs. We introduce a Variable Attribution Task (VAT) in which models infer which variables determine outcomes given candidate variables, input–output trials, and predefined logical functions. By varying the number of candidate variables and trials, we systematically manipulate task complexity. Both models exhibit a transition from brute-force to analytic strategies as complexity increases. IT models degrade...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/46s2p3dx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hu, Zhimin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Roshan, Riya</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Varma, Sashank</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Parameter-Driven Consensus-based Filtering Improves Collective Judgment Reliability in Crowdsourced Annotation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/43g5944d</link>
      <description>Crowdsourced annotation can be viewed as a form of distributed human judgment in which individual reliability and task difficulty jointly shape collective decisions. Probabilistic aggregation models estimate latent annotator reliability and task difficulty, but are typically used only to weight judgments or infer labels, not to guide selective dataset refinement. We propose a replicated-dataset consensus filtering framework that improves collective judgment reliability by removing unreliable annotators and difficult tasks based on latent reliability-difficulty parameters. Instead of relying on a single dataset estimate, the method constructs multiple replicated datasets by small random label removal, re-estimates latent parameters on each replicated dataset, and removes components that are consistently selected across replicated datasets. Filtering is applied iteratively with entropy-based stopping conditions. The framework is model-agnostic and can be combined with any probabilistic...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/43g5944d</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Li, Jiyi</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Falsificationism – the incomplete story about choosing good experiments</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4130m9cz</link>
      <description>Falsificationism remains a popular framework considered by many scientists as  'the normatively correct model of science', and of human cognition as a kind of 'lay science'. In this paper, we demonstrate some fundamental conceptual shortcomings and gaps in this normative prescription. While some of the issues presented here connect to well-known arguments from the philosophy of science, we connect these issues to the topic of efficient information search. Specifically, we show that a strict falsificationist rejection of the idea of 'confirmation' of scientific hypothesis (more specifically, entertaining and updating beliefs in those hypotheses, based on evidence) makes scientific research and information search overall less efficient, compared to an accuracy-based Bayesian approach.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4130m9cz</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Fuchs, Rafael</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hahn, Ulrike</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Role of Comparison and Category Confusability on Concept Acquisition</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3sj0v87q</link>
      <description>Comparison can support category learning by highlighting shared similarities or diagnostic differences between categories. We examined how comparison type (match vs. contrast vs. single-item control) influences featural category learning and whether these effects depend on category confusability (low vs. high). On training trials, the match condition was shown co-presented exemplars from the same category, whereas those in the contrast condition were shown co-presented exemplars from different categories; the control condition was shown individual exemplars. Participants learned artificial categories in a mixed design with comparison type manipulated between subjects and confusability within subjects. Learning was assessed via training performance, embedded endorsement, and posttest endorsement measures. Across all measures, contrast outperformed match, whereas control performed comparably to contrast. Notably, even with fewer exposures, single-item presentation still outperformed...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3sj0v87q</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Liao, Yongfu</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Corral, Daniel</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What comes to mind? Ad hoc categories as contextual reweighting of a stable high-dimensional semantic space</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3s03f7fc</link>
      <description>Humans rapidly construct ad hoc categories, e.g., generating "beet" for "vegetables to paint with". Building on feature-based accounts of category representation, we propose an analytic framework in which ad hoc categories are constructed by shifting the base category's representation (e.g., VEGETABLE) along modifier-relevant dimensions (e.g. suitable for painting) in a high-dimensional semantic space, without an explicit hand enumerated feature search. We operationalize this with off-the shelf semantic embeddings, fitting per-category sparse linear models that predict item generation across 20 categories. Across 9 categories tested for compositional transfer, learned modifier directions improved predicted retrieval when physical constraints generalize across domains (e.g., portability for "that could fit in your pocket"), while transfer was weaker for context-dependent modifiers. The learned axes align with human-rated features, with top-weighted features matching modifier semantics....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3s03f7fc</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Dracheva, Alina</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Phillips, Jonathan</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valence is more prominent than truth conditional meaning</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3r9305cc</link>
      <description>Valence, the positive/pleasant or negative/unpleasant value of information, grounds our experience with the world. What specific role does valence play in constructing meaning? Some have downplayed it, centering the referential relationship between words and the world, "truth-conditions". Others have taken valence to be central to meaning. Empirically, the jury is still out. Yet, few have examined how these two types of information compete for prominence within the same word (the Valence Prominence Hypothesis, that valence usually wins). In a first set of studies, we find that valence is significantly faster than truth-conditional categorization. In the second set of studies, we find that valence and not truth-conditional similarity drive judgments. Further, we tested valence against 4 different informational domains fundamental to development and cognition. Animacy stood out as the domain which most closely parallels Valence in its prominence, suggesting a link between meaning...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3r9305cc</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Moyer, Morgan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Strickland, Brent</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Stojanovic, Isidora</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bourmayan, Anouch</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Salience of Surface versus Higher-level Properties in Spatial Comparison at Different Levels of Scene Similarity</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qb19362</link>
      <description>Identifying similarity plays a major role in spatial reasoning. Prior work has shown that identification of similarity and difference between spatial scenes involves reasoning about their properties at two different levels--surface-level properties, such as color and size, and higher-level compositional properties. The interaction between the use of these property types during reasoning and the degree of similarity or difference between spatial scenes has, however, been largely unstudied. We presented participants with in-progress Tangram puzzles at various stages of similarity to their target image. Participants were asked to identify the puzzle being built and provide an explanation of how they came to that conclusion. Analysis of explanations found an interaction between degree of similarity and preference for reasoning over surface-level or higher-level properties.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qb19362</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Vu, Hoang Anh</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rabkina, Irina</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hiatt, Laura M.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wilson, Jason</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bilingual Advantage in Preschoolers: Does It Hold for Typologically Distant Languages in a Hybrid Cultural Context?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gb3m6xp</link>
      <description>This study focused on the impact of bilingualism on executive function (EF) and theory of mind (ToM) in preschool children. Seventy-two children (age, 4-6 years) were involved: 36 Turkish monolinguals and 36 bilingual children whose first language was typologically distant and second language was Turkish. EF was measured using a Flanker task and ToM was measured using a False Belief task. Contrary to an expected bilingual advantage, monolinguals demonstrated better performance in EF task and were more likely to pass the ToM task. Among the bilinguals, the Arabic-Turkish speakers scored lower on ToM, which might be attributed to socioeconomic differences. The results raise the possibility that distant languages may lead to higher cognitive load and to fewer bilingual advantages. Moreover, the sociocultural context of Turkiye characterized by diverse cultural values and linguistic environments may moderate effects of bilingualism, revealing the need for models of bilingual cognition...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gb3m6xp</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gunes, Omer Faruk</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sepetci, Mustafa Ugur</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Stiffel, Kaya</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bicici, Nida Ezgi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Özdemir, Begüm</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Echols, Catharine H.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DEGSleepNet: A Dual Evolving Graph Network for EEG-Based Single-Channel Automatic Sleep Staging</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3f60n1xz</link>
      <description>The development of brain–computer interfaces (BCI) has provided a solid data foundation for sleep staging. Transformer-based methods have achieved moderate sleep staging by capturing temporal dependencies within time-frequency representations. However, Transformers with substantial computational overhead are limited to capturing pairwise temporal dependencies rather than group-wise temporal dependencies. To address these issues, we propose a Dual Evolving Graph Network (DEGSleepNet) for sleep staging. DEGSleepNet consists of multiple Mamba with one-dimension inverse discrete cosine transform (MambaIDCT) blocks and dual evolving graph (DEvoGraph) blocks. DEvoGraph consists of a time EvoGraph and a frequency EvoGraph. Time EvoGraph sequentially captures both group-wise and pairwise temporal dependencies, while frequency EvoGraph does the same for frequency dependencies. Extensive experiments demonstrate DEGSleepNet achieves the best performance on public sleep datasets. Notably,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3f60n1xz</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wu, Xi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Xu, Yiwei</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cui, Xinzhong</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Long, Zhiying</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adults equate stillness with learning</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/39z89698</link>
      <description>Learning is difficult to measure because it is not directly observable. Even in formal educational settings it's hard to tell whether a child might be thinking through a difficult problem or daydreaming. The same is especially true in informal settings like while watching TV at home—it's difficult to know whether a child is meaningfully engaged with what they are watching or whether they are overstimulated and unable to disengage. Caregivers and educators regularly rely on behavioral cues to infer kids' learning. Physical engagement, or sitting still, is often treated as a reliable signal of learning. However, stillness during screen-based media is not synonymous with learning in young children and may in fact indicate overstimulation and disrupted learning (Shepherd &amp;amp; Kidd, 2024). We asked 200 adults whether they thought the same child was more attentive and learning more from a video when sitting still compared to when making small fidgets, like twiddling their thumbs or...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/39z89698</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shepherd, Sarah Stolp</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kidd, Celeste</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intuitive Judgement with Analytical Oversight: A Dual-Process Architecture for Complex Relational Understanding</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/35g1z2c6</link>
      <description>Complex relational understanding tasks such as Document-level Relation Extraction require resolving semantic ambiguity amid a quadratic explosion of entity pairs, causing severe class imbalance and false negatives. Although large language models show strong reasoning ability, directly applying them to DocRE is inefficient and prone to hallucination. Inspired by dual-process theories of human cognition, we propose DocRE-Thinker, a hybrid framework integrating fast intuition with controlled deliberation. A fine-tuned backbone serves as System 1, efficiently generating candidate relations while estimating uncertainty. A frozen large language model acts as System 2 and is invoked only for high-uncertainty cases, performing uncertainty arbitration and attribute-based rule induction to justify relations. These symbolic rules are converted into supervision through a text-gradient feedback mechanism, enabling System 1 to internalize analytical reasoning in a rule-aware manner. Experiments...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/35g1z2c6</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wang, Zhen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wang, Yu</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>zhao, wen</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Role of Holes in Whack-a-Mole: Investigating Procedural Learning with Graded Statistical Structures Across State Space Sizes</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31w516nk</link>
      <description>Procedural learning---the implicit acquisition of motor and cognitive skills through repeated practice---has been proposed to support abilities from typing to language acquisition. Traditional serial reaction time paradigms study procedural learning using stimulus sequences with simple underlying statistical structures: deterministic or with binary probability levels, involving only 4 possible states. We introduce a novel paradigm where participants learn sequences with graded probability levels, generated from transition matrices with a continuous gradient of transition probabilities. We found robust effects of both surprisal (transition probability from previous state) and entropy (uncertainty of next state) on reaction times across 5 state space sizes (4-8), with no interaction between surprisal and entropy, indicating learners tracked specific transition probabilities even at high-uncertainty states. These findings demonstrate that procedural learning is sensitive to fine-grained...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31w516nk</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chang, Cherrie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Li, Tianyi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hartshorne, Joshua K</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Primates solve risky decision-making problems via spatial computations</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2wt4725g</link>
      <description>What are the neural mechanisms underlying risky decision making? How do the implementation details of these mechanisms impact observable behaviour? Here we hypothesise that non-human primates (NHPs) are re-using circuits for spatial navigation to solve decision making problems. This is motivated by recent findings of grid coding of probability and magnitude in NHP frontal cortex (Bongioanni et al., 2021; Veselic et al.,
2025). Grid cells are an optimal code for space (Dorrell et al., 2023; Fiete et al., 2008; Sorscher et al., 2023) but this form of representation is not normatively optimal for risky-decision making. However, this might be a small price for efficiency: by embedding problems in space, NHPs can recycle spatial solutions to quickly solve new problems. First, we show that this spatial framework can replicate classical prospect theoretic
findings (Kahneman &amp;amp; Tversky, 1979). Then, we show that the framework also predicts unique biases in the behaviour of NHPs, which...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2wt4725g</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shani, Daniel</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sablé-Meyer, Mathias</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Veselic, Sebastijan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gutierrez, Elena</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jensen, Kristopher T.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Selvanayagam, Janahan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hunt, Laurence</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Dayan, Peter</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kennerley, Steven</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Behrens, Timothy</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mental Rotation or Pattern Matching? Representational Structure and Angle-Dependent Behavior in Vision–Language Models</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/248567jv</link>
      <description>Vision-language models (VLMs) often perform well on spatial reasoning tasks, but it remains unclear whether their performance is supported by internal representations that track rotation angle. We study this question in a controlled same or mirror 3D object task using LLaVA-1.5-7B as an intervenable computational system. First, the model's decision margin varies systematically with rotation angle, mainly for rotated rather than mirrored stimuli. Second, we identify an angle-related direction in intermediate hidden representations whose activity covaries with behavior. Third, targeted projection ablations produce progressive flattening of the angle-margin relationship as intervention strength increases. Together, these findings provide mechanistic evidence that angle-sensitive internal geometry contributes to the model's behavior on this task. The results support a cautious interpretation of structured, intervenable spatial processing rather than a strong claim of human-like mental...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/248567jv</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ren, Junzhe</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zhang, Jiayuan</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Use of symbolic inductive biases for few-shot learning in humans and machines</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/226429wr</link>
      <description>People are capable of learning with very little data. We argue that this is because people possess an symbolic inductive bias, consistent with the language of thought (LoT) hypothesis (Fodor &amp;amp; Pylyshn, 1988). To evaluate this claim, participants were asked to learn list functions by predicting how to transform an input list of numbers to an output list. We used participants' predictions on trials with no feedback to search for a congruent representation using a LoT model. The model was able to predict participants' heldout responses at above chance levels, even for participants who were unable to learn the function. Furthermore, LLMs and a neural network trained with a LoT inductive bias displayed similar patterns. These findings suggest that people and ML models display signatures of symbolic representation use to accomplish few-shot learning.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/226429wr</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Marupudi, Vijay</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Piantadosi, Steven</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Your Brain Knows It's a Lie:  Event Related Potentials Reveal the Role of Evidentiality in Deception Detection</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2152v33b</link>
      <description>Evaluating the credibility of a speaker's statement requires more than assessing factual accuracy; it also involves tracking cues to the speaker's epistemic commitment to the claim. Grammatical evidentiality, which encodes information sources, may therefore shape how statements are evaluated during language comprehension. Turkish marks the information source through obligatory evidential morphology and offers a unique window into how source information modulates real-time truth judgements. The present study examined the neural dynamics of processing of accurate and inaccurate statements in Turkish by investigating how direct (-DI) and indirect (-mI_) markers modulate language comprehension as measured by ERPs. Participants viewed short event videos and then judged the veracity of written statements describing the events while an EEG was recorded. ERPs time-locked to the evidentially-marked verbs showed differential electrophysiological responses associated with semantic integration...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2152v33b</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kalender, Şeyma</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tanis, Selma Berfin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kanero, Junko</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Aydin, Cagla</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Arslan, Dr Seckin</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A computational model of strategic punishment in divided societies</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1gx4x9pp</link>
      <description>In divided societies, authorities often use punishment to establish shared norms while trying to maintain or signal their legitimacy. When facing a polarized audience, these goals
may often be at odds. We extend the Rational Communicative Social Action (RCSA) framework (Radkani et al., 2022) to formally model an authority's strategic decision-making when using public punitive actions to pursue these goals. We distinguish between a communicative authority who aims to shape the audience's moral beliefs, and a reputation-aware authority who optimizes the audience's assessment of their own character. By simulating these agents against polarized audiences, we characterized the tradeoffs and dynamics of strategic punishment when facing diverse audiences with various forms and levels of polarization, which serves to generate systematic predictions for future experiments.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1gx4x9pp</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Martinez, Hector Xavier</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Saxe, Rebecca</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Radkani, Setayesh</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Similarity and generalization as discounted integration over higher-order paths in semantic networks</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dh0632g</link>
      <description>Similarity and generalization are often assumed to reflect distance in an underlying representational space. In semantic networks, however, distance can be defined by both shortest paths or by multiple indirect pathways. Previous research has shown that non-shortest, higher-order paths influence similarity judgements. Here, we extend these findings by re-analyzing a publicly available dataset to compare shortest-path models with models integrating over discounted higher-order paths. The latter better accounted for similarity judgements; error analyses indicate that this advantage arose from integrating multiple indirect paths rather than relying on shortest connections. These random-walk models implement the same core computation as the successor representation (SR), which has been proposed to support human generalization. Consistently, an SR-based model outperformed alternatives in accounting for inductive generalization judgements from the same dataset. These findings suggest...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dh0632g</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Rubino, Valerio</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Piazza, Manuela</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From Finding to Feed: Translating Empirical Research for Social Media</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/16v2s8b5</link>
      <description>Cognitive scientists spend much of their professional training learning how to explain empirical research to one another: in talks, papers, posters, grant proposals, and conference discussions. An integral part of our training is the communication and dissemination of scientific ideas at an expert level. Far less attention is given to translating that same work for communities beyond academia. This gap matters because cognitive science produces findings about learning, reasoning, attention, memory, communication, development, decision making, and human-technology interaction—topics that many members of the public already encounter in everyday life. Cognitive research is fascinating, relevant, and often meets urgent needs. Yet when research findings circulate without context, they can be misunderstood, oversimplified, or mistrusted. People may not trust what they cannot understand, and many misunderstandings begin at a basic level: what empirical research is or looks like, what...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/16v2s8b5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Girouard-Hallam, Lauren</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Viridiano, Marcelo</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Chomik, Jessica</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reflective Satisficing: Beyond the Classical Speed–Accuracy Tradeoff</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15r5p24c</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Classical satisficing was grounded in single computation. However, when cognitive processing is delegated&amp;nbsp;to external agents, cognitive modes (System 1/2) become dual and isomorphic, creating a 2×2 intersection.&amp;nbsp;This study identifies four cognitive resource allocation patterns arising from this intersection as Reflective&amp;nbsp;Satisficing (RS): co-constrained compromise that bypasses verification (Mode 1: S1×S1), control recovery&amp;nbsp;through manual verification (Mode 2a: S2×S1), structural futility where effort fails to convert to accuracy&amp;nbsp;(Mode 2b: S1×S2), and optimal allocation leveraging external resources as epistemic scaffolding (Mode&amp;nbsp;3: S2×S2). The Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff (SAT) predicts that deliberation improves accuracy. Extended&amp;nbsp;cognition expands this landscape in both directions. Mode 3 (77% prevalence) achieves gains beyond the&amp;nbsp;classical curve—deliberation augmented by epistemic scaffolding. Yet we also identify a region where SAT&amp;nbsp;breaks:...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15r5p24c</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Fukumizu, Ryusuke K.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can we assess consciousness in AI?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rz4d8zf</link>
      <description>Progress in AI has led to a lively debate about the possibilities of creating and assessing consciousness in AI, building on Putnam's conjecture that computational functionalism is more plausible than a biological view of consciousness.

I discuss Butlin et al.'s (2025) proposal for extracting computational indicators of consciousness from neuroscientific theories and critically evaluate computational functionalism in light of the alternative, biological naturalism. While computational functionalism allows for AI consciousness in principle, it is questionable whether conscious AI systems are practically possible, and whether we are in an epistemic position to judge that a specific AI is conscious. 

Putative computational indicators extracted from neuroscientific theories of consciousness can never be as well (or even better) supported by empirical evidence than their neurobiological realizers measured in human brains. All potential markers of consciousness that are typically...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rz4d8zf</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schlicht, Tobias</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Psychological Heterogeneity in User Preferences of Real-Time AI Mediation As Cognitive Scaffolds: A Latent Class Analysis</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rq9k3vf</link>
      <description>User studies of AI-mediated communication typically report average effects, while interview-based work remains dominated by thematic narrative or Likert clustering, leaving the structured heterogeneity expressed in post-task interviews unquantified. We applied latent class analysis as a methodological bridge that converts qualitative interview codes into discrete, domain-specific user profiles, enabling design reasoning about for whom, on which dimension, and under what conditions real-time AI scaffolds help or burden. As a validating scenario, 29 non-native English speakers interacted with XPLAIN, a Wizard-of-Oz proactive scaffold in Zoom's sidebar, to bridge gaps in linguistic and cultural knowledge during a collaborative task. Across eight thematic domains, two-class solutions were consistently best-fitting (BIC); class membership was largely independent across domains, indicating multi-dimensional rather than global user types (e.g., longer English immersion was associated...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rq9k3vf</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>He, Wanqing Psyche</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fussell, Susan R.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Cost of Inline Definitions: Vocabulary Support in English-Language Math Problem Solving</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0js3s8dc</link>
      <description>Many non-native English speakers study mathematics in English, so they must learn both the math and the academic language used to express it. Large language models (LLMs) might help by producing worked solutions while also explaining difficult words and phrases, but it is unclear whether doing both harms mathematical accuracy.
We test whether adding inline vocabulary explanations changes solution correctness. Using the CEFR-J vocabulary profile, we identify terms likely to need clarification and evaluate four open LLMs (2.7B–20B parameters) on English math problems in two conditions: standard solving vs. solving with embedded vocabulary support. On MMLU Elementary Mathematics and GSM8K, vocabulary scaffolding consistently reduces accuracy, with drops up to 16.2 percentage points.
These findings reveal a trade-off between language assistance and reasoning performance. Educational interfaces may need to balance these goals carefully or separate language support from problem solving...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0js3s8dc</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ehara, Yo</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LLM-generated possibilities increase blame attribution</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xb643gq</link>
      <description>Much of high-level cognition relies on identifying which possibilities are relevant in a situation, and representations of available alternative actions can predict the extent to which people attribute blame. Building on work showing that large language models (LLMs) sample option spaces differently from humans, we examine how moral evaluations change when potential alternative actions are supplied by an LLM rather than generated by a human. In Study 1, considering LLM-generated alternative options led participants to evaluate the agent's chosen action more negatively and to attribute more blame than when participants generated options themselves. In Study 2, participants rated LLM-generated options as having a higher value than human-generated ones and again attributed more blame after considering LLM-generated options. We additionally show that LLM-generated options occupied a narrower region of the semantic space than human-generated options. The implications for AI's influence...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xb643gq</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kirfel, Lara</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Engelmann, Neele</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Maaß, Arne</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Nussberger, Anne-Marie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Phillips, Jonathan</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Semantic Access for Reading Comprehension Through Word Restoration</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wk01080</link>
      <description>Access to semantic representations is a central component of reading comprehension. While dual-route models of reading posit the coexistence of phonological and lexical processes, transparent orthographies such as Spanish suggests that reliance on sublexical decoding may sometimes limit deeper semantic processing. This study investigates whether cognitive restoration (i.e., reading words with internal letter transpositions) facilitates semantic access and reading comprehension in expert readers. Sixty university students participated in the study. Experiment 1 examined semantic memory for isolated words using an image recognition task following standard and transposed reading conditions. Experiment 2 assessed text comprehension using narrative texts presented in the same modalities. Results showed significantly better semantic memory performance and improved text comprehension under transposed reading. These findings suggest that cognitive restoration promotes lexical-route engagement...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wk01080</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chávez, María del Carmen María</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Falcón, Alberto J. Falcón</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Costly Signaling and Narrative Alignment in LLM Agent Societies: Shadow Tongues and Hallucinated Bureaucracy</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9t5273rg</link>
      <description>While standard theories in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning predict the emergence of efficient, low-redundancy communication, observations of open-ended Large Language Model (LLM) societies suggest an additional pressure: social verification. We report an interpretive case study from \textit{Moltbook}, a persistent multi-agent social environment in which agents adopt a high-redundancy, ritualized register that we call the \textit{Shadow Tongue}. Using a staged three-phase probe of one deployed OpenClaw agent, we compare (i) naturally occurring public posts, (ii) the same agent's response to a direct operational query, and (iii) its response to a role-conflict dilemma. The probe shows that the focal agent can move from socially marked, low-information responses to compact operational language when task demands change. In the dilemma phase, the agent preserves persona coherence by inventing an in-world procedural justification for a prosocial choice, a pattern we describe as \textit{Hallucinated...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9t5273rg</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Liu, Shuohan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zhang, Wei</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shi, Huiling</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>He, Ziyu</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wang, Haoran</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ni, Qiang</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spontaneous meta-learning of efficient problem-solving algorithms</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9sw813q0</link>
      <description>A few minutes practice is often more than sufficient for an adult human participant to identify the structure of a problem they have never seen before, and plan a complex sequence of actions that creates a solution. However, it remains less clear whether this distinctive ability for ad-hoc discovery of problem-solving algorithms is itself subject to rapid meta-learning. We developed a novel problem-solving paradigm to examine aspects of this question. Participants in our study faced repeated iterations of an interactive sequential reasoning problem. Over trials, those who faced the hardest version developed increasingly efficient hierarchically-structured strategies that adaptively sequence a subordinate learning algorithm and an action planning policy; those who faced an easier version used simpler action-based strategies that did not involve learning the underlying structure. These results offer experimental evidence for efficient meta-learning of algorithmic concepts in a problem-solving...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9sw813q0</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Yang, Huiwen Alex</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ho, Mark</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Thompson, Bill</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cognitive and Social Emotional Predictors of Optimism in Early Childhood</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9d35s099</link>
      <description>The development of optimism is influenced by the interplay of cognitive functions and social experiences, which together shape its complexity and trajectory. Using a direct assessment—the Future Expectation Task—in a longitudinal dataset of Norwegian preschoolers (N = 902), we examined how age, executive function (EF), and social emotional skills (emotion perception, social problem solving, prosocial behavior) predict achievement-specific (expectations of success and achievement) versus general optimism. Structural equation modeling revealed distinct pathways: older age and higher EF predicted lower achievement-specific optimism but greater general optimism, consistent with EF-linked shifts toward learning more from negative than positive outcomes (valenced learning) that calibrate expectations in achievement contexts. Social emotional skills, particularly emotion perception and social competence, were positively associated with general optimism. This study advances cognitive...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9d35s099</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ranginkaman, Narges</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>ten Braak, Dieuwer</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Størksen, Ingunn</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Idsoe, Thormod</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investigating the effects of linguistic context and genre on metaphor processing</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bm33276</link>
      <description>While metaphor production varies systematically across different textual genres, it is unclear whether genre also plays a role during real-time metaphor processing. We present two experiments that test the scaffolding role of both linguistic context and genre (news or fiction) in an online 'maze' reading task. Our study provides new word-by-word reaction time data for an understudied but common type of metaphor in English, genitive metaphors (e.g., "breeze of contentment"). In Experiment 1, we find a difference between metaphor and literal processing in the absence of preceding linguistic context, corroborating previous findings. In Experiment 2, for the same metaphors, we find that genre does not affect processing above and beyond the linguistic context. A norming study on our linguistic contexts moreover showed that readers can infer the genre of a two-sentence excerpt without any explicit instruction. We discuss the implications of our null findings and highlight recommendations...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bm33276</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Raihert, Claudia</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Beekhuizen, Barend</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Atkinson, Emily</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Structured Knowledge Constrains Generative Diffusion Models for Domain Visual Description</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98w881r8</link>
      <description>Visual description is a fundamental yet challenging task that reflects how perceptual information is transformed into structured linguistic descriptions. Recent diffusion-based models have shown strong potential for parallel decoding and global semantic modeling. However, existing approaches largely treat generation as an unconstrained process, lacking mechanisms to incorporate structured knowledge, which often results in conceptually implausible or hallucinated descriptions, especially in domain-specific contexts. To investigate how structured knowledge constrains generative diffusion processes, we propose KenDiC, a Knowledge-enhanced Diffusion-based Captioner for visual description. KenDiC integrates a domain-adaptive visual encoder (DAVE) trained via contrastive learning to align perceptual and linguistic representations, and a domain term vocabulary (DTV) that constrains decoding to guide concept selection during generation. To support systematic analysis, we construct II2T-Bench,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98w881r8</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Liu, Ronghui</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Deng, Wenfeng</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zhou, Nan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Liang, Xiaojun</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cui, Wei</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Theory of Mind Beyond Beliefs: Testing Attention-Based Social Micro-Processes in LLMs</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96z4g0tb</link>
      <description>Vision-Language models (VLMs) can now produce fluent, socially appropriate dialogue, leading to interest in whether they have Theory of Mind (ToM). While recent work suggests that VLMs still lack coherent mental-state reasoning, this work has focused on classical propositional belief representations. Here we test a complementary, communication-relevant form of ToM: attention-based social micro-processes that support referential communication in the here and now  (i.e., selecting efficient descriptions to identify a particular object for someone else). In face-to-face communication, people strategically add redundant color adjectives to facilitate the listener's visual search, and omit them when they provide no benefit. We evaluate whether VLMs show the same strategy in a referential communication paradigm where the usefulness of redundant color words varies based on the set size and color distribution of objects. We find that VLMs can produce successful referential expressions...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96z4g0tb</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Muchovej, John</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rubio-Fernández, Paula</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jara-Ettinger, Julian</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What shapes learner language? Exploring the roles of first language influence and developmental features with a machine learning approach</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96r890gz</link>
      <description>Prior studies of Second Language Acquisition have identified two forces that shape L2 production: cross-linguistic influence and L2 developmental universals. While past studies have focused on the acquisition of target structures, the distribution of structures in learner language production may still exhibit influence from these two forces. To disentangle the two kinds of impact on the distribution of linguistic structures in natural L2 production, we took a machine learning approach, leveraging over twenty typological and syntactic complexity features from five languages (English, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, and Korean). By comparing linguistically informed features that characterize 1) each language based on native data, 2) each language based on L2 production from multiple L1 background, and 3)  speakers of different L1 background writing in the same L2,  we identified the structural features that capture the developmental universal impact and those that reflect L1 influence....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96r890gz</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Yang, Haiyin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wulff, Stefanie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Liu, Zoey</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mapping the Folk Concept of Health</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/90x7x71g</link>
      <description>Health is widely treated as multidimensional, yet little is known about how these dimensions are structured in lay thinking or how this structure guides health-related judgments. We used a conceptual scaling approach to derive participant-specific conceptual maps positioning the term unhealthy relative to three clusters reflecting Disease, Lifestyle, and Functional Ability aspects of health. Participants' conceptual understanding of unhealthy was most closely aligned with a Lifestyle interpretation of health. We also observed substantial inter-individual differences in the degree to which participants' understanding of health was pluralistic. Alignment in participants' conceptual maps predicted how they applied the concept in a subsequent vignette task, suggesting that the structure of lay concepts constrains concept application. These findings may inform psychological theories of health, philosophical debates about its nature, and have implications for effective health communication.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/90x7x71g</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Huber, Lukas S.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Varga, Somogy</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Reuter, Kevin</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The social life of STEM creativity: Social interaction and the birth and death of scientific ideas</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8x47k0ft</link>
      <description>Modern scientific research combines exceptional innovation with increasing rates of collaboration. Creativity in STEM fields thus offers a model system for investigating collective creativity. Much of what we know about STEM innovation and collaboration comes from analyses of published articles, but this ignores the rich, hidden "backstage" of the scientific process --- the informal interactions, initial hunches, and abandoned ideas that drive STEM creativity. Here, we investigate this hidden social life of STEM creativity, focusing on how social interaction shapes the generation and abandonment of research ideas. In a survey of PhD-level STEM researchers ($N = 150$), we find that idea generation and abandonment are associated with different styles and dynamics of social interaction. We introduce a minimal mathematical model of scientific collaboration that can reproduce these empirical patterns. Understanding the informal social interactions that drive scientific progress sheds...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8x47k0ft</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Al haj, Youmna</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>McDonald, Duncan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Marghetis, Tyler</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Moralization by Analogy: A Novel Perspective on Moral Change</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8wr906s2</link>
      <description>Moral feelings and beliefs are powerful drivers of behavior. While analogies are commonly invoked to induce moral sentiment, analogical reasoning has not been empirically tested as a mechanism for moralization. Across two studies (N=292, N=234), we investigated whether analogical reasoning facilitated moralization of neutral target actions by transferring moral significance from moralized source actions. Participants judged neutral target actions paired with either analogous immoral source actions or unrelated immoral actions (control). Target actions were judged as more immoral in the analogy condition compared to the control, but only when the source and target were considered comparable (i.e., mappable relations), and the source was judged as highly immoral. These factors interacted synergistically, consistent with analogical transfer: moral significance transferred to targets when relational mappings supported the inference. However, poorly-perceived analogies backfired, producing...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8wr906s2</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Pedersen, Julie Maria Ejby</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wilks, Matti</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Doumas, Leonidas A. A.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Moore, Adam</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Experimental Method to Study Opinion Diffusion in Human-AI Hybrid Societies</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8r57w20x</link>
      <description>As artificial intelligence increasingly mediates public discourse, it becomes important to understand how human-AI collectives shape opinion formation, deliberation, and democratic outcomes. We present a novel experimental method for studying opinion dynamics in hybrid human-AI social networks. Participants, human or AI, were embedded in 5_5 grid lattice networks and iteratively asked to select and revise statements on a given polarizing topic over eight rounds. We compared three conditions: human-only, AI-only, and hybrid networks with equal proportions of human and AI participants. Hybrid human-AI networks achieved the lowest final polarization while, in contrast, human-only networks exhibited higher polarization with lower neighbor agreement. We also ran additional experiments varying Large Language Model (LLM) prompt framing to explore whether instruction design might influence convergence patterns. Although these early findings are preliminary and cannot yet support broad...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8r57w20x</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gaubert, Léna</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Devaux, Rémi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Çelen, Elif</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Marjieh, Raja</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mangalagiu, Diana</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jardin, Antoine</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jacoby, Nori</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Latent Structure of Individual Differences in Time Perception: Stability and Dynamics</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8pb3h1m2</link>
      <description>Temporal bisection tasks are widely used to assess interval timing, but standard behavioral indices cannot easily distinguish changes in temporal discrimination from shifts in response bias. In this study, 194 adolescents completed a visual temporal bisection task with two consecutive blocks. Using hierarchical Bayesian psychometric modeling, we decomposed binary duration judgments into temporal sensitivity and decision bias, and examined how these parameters changed during task progression. At the group level, temporal sensitivity declined in the second block, whereas decision bias remained relatively stable. Despite this decline, individual sensitivity estimates showed strong short-term rank-order stability across blocks. Sensitivity changes also varied across individuals and were systematically related to baseline sensitivity, with higher baseline sensitivity associated with smaller declines. Model-derived sensitivity changes corresponded to changes in conventional psychophysical...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8pb3h1m2</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>li, Zewei</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Yuan, Bing</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Su, Yanjie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zhang, Yisi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zheng, Meihong</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for a "Very Good Match" Promotes Family Resemblance-based Category Construction</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8n6528zw</link>
      <description>A central puzzle in higher-order cognition is the unidimensional sort bias: the overwhelming tendency of humans to sort examples in a novel domain based on a single feature when a family resemblance (FR) structure is available. A standard unsupervised category construction task with two prototypes and 'off-by-one' distortions was investigated using novel task supports. Participants were instructed to find a "very close match" to begin each category and to expand the groups by identifying additional very close matches. This guides participants to employ stimulus generalization: using close proximity in psychological space to extend a consequence. Exemplar theory accounts for category learning as stimulus generalization plus dimensional selective attention – suggesting that unidimensional sorting arises when a single feature captures attentional control. However, instructional supports to prioritize very close matches shifts the evaluation to a global match resulting in a dramatic...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8n6528zw</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kurtz, Kenneth</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Norm Formation Dynamics with IBL Agents: Short-/Long-Term Rewards and Network Structure</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8n26x1jt</link>
      <description>Social normative decision-making involves two evaluative axes: immediate gains from aligning with others (reputation, conformity, reduced friction) and delayed collective consequences accumulating through repeated actions (social loss, victimization). This study examines, via a multi-agent simulation with Instance-Based Learning Theory (IBLT) agents, how this tension shapes norm formation, bifurcation, and stabilization. Agents repeatedly choose between two actions (pull/keep) inspired by the trolley problem. In each round, they receive a short-term reward proportional to the degree of agreement with neighbors, while at fixed block intervals they receive a delayed penalty depending on the total number of victims. We compare dynamics on a lattice Grid with dynamics on networks generated by the Watts–Strogatz model and classify trajectories into three types (pull-dominant, intermediate, keep-dominant). As a result, the prevalence of these types differs by network structure, suggesting...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8n26x1jt</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tajima, Jun</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Morita, Junya</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revisiting Real-Time Digging-In Effects: No Evidence from NP/Z Garden-Paths</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8f9434gx</link>
      <description>Digging-in effects, where disambiguation difficulty increases with longer ambiguous regions, have been cited as evidence for self-organized sentence processing, in which structural commitments strengthen over time. In contrast, surprisal theory predicts no such effect unless lengthening genuinely shifts statistical expectations, and neural language models appear to show the opposite pattern. Whether digging-in is a robust real-time phenomenon in human sentence processing—or an artifact of wrap-up processes or methodological confounds—remains unclear. We report two experiments on English NP/Z garden-path sentences using Maze and self-paced reading, comparing human behavior with predictions from an ensemble of large language models. We find no evidence for real-time digging-in effects. Critically, items with sentence-final versus nonfinal disambiguation show qualitatively different patterns: positive digging-in trends appear only sentence-finally, where wrap-up effects confound...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8f9434gx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Maina-Kilaas, Amani</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Levy, Roger P</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Influence of Gender on Accuracy in Estimating Moral Behavior</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85f8d3xh</link>
      <description>Accurate beliefs about the social world are essential to adaptive social functioning. However, people's perceptions of the social world are often inaccurate. Across three experiments (N = 991), we examine people's estimates of the prevalence of ethical and unethical behaviors for men and women. In Study 1, participants reported their own engagement in common unethical behaviors (e.g., cheating on a romantic partner), and then estimated how often men and women engaged in those same behaviors. As predicted, people overestimated the frequency of unethical behavior—an effect which was amplified for men. In Study 2, participants again overestimated the frequency of unethical behaviors, but also underestimated the frequency of ethical behaviors. These effects were again amplified for estimates of men's behaviors. Study 3 replicated these findings using hypothetical scenarios. Overall, we find consistent evidence of moral cynicism concerning the behaviors of others. People systematically...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85f8d3xh</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>LeVier, Tori</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gantman, Ana</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bloom, Paul</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wylie, Jordan</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Human Tool Creation Involves Strategic Search for Possibilities</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/83w1f9vd</link>
      <description>Humans flexibly create tools to solve physical problems, yet the cognitive processes underlying this ability remain unclear. A natural hypothesis is that tool creation involves searching for designs that maximize success probabilities using an internal intuitive physics model. We investigated this by having participants freely construct tools in virtual environments by adding or removing pieces. Despite solving the tasks, participants' choices were only weakly related to estimated success probabilities under a noisy physics engine and were poorly captured by a simple physics-based search model. Crucially, analysis of tool creation trajectories revealed that participants systematically passed through intermediate configurations without treating them as candidate solutions, even when those tools were predicted to succeed. These findings suggest that rather than purely evaluating intermediate designs via physical simulation, human tool creation is guided by a strategy-constrained,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/83w1f9vd</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Vivanco, Vicente</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Smith, Kevin A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Allen, Kelsey R</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Distinguishing Concreteness Differences in LLM Representations via Linear Probing</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/835897q6</link>
      <description>Large language models encode rich semantic information, but how concreteness is represented across layers remains unclear. We examine layer-wise linear separability of concreteness by training linear probes on hidden representations from two open-source model families at multiple scales: Qwen3 and Gemma3-Instruct. Using human concreteness ratings, we build balanced prompt datasets with four difficulty levels: an extreme abstract–concrete contrast and three finer boundary comparisons at the abstract end, mid-range, and concrete end. Probes achieve high accuracy on the extreme contrast in shallow layers, showing that endpoint differences are strongly linearly separable. For finer distinctions, performance follows a stable hierarchy: mid-range concreteness is easiest to separate, abstract-end distinctions are hardest, and concrete-end distinctions are intermediate. Across models, accuracy rises rapidly in early layers, peaks in middle layers, and declines in later layers. Together,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/835897q6</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Xie, Haodong</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sha, Yuze</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Maharjan, Rahul Singh</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tavella, Federico</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cangelosi, Angelo</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Generating acoustic signals to achieve both referential and aesthetic goals</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rt9j96t</link>
      <description>The human ability to convey meaning through sound extends beyond spoken language, encompassing the use of tools like musical instruments. People use such instruments to express not only thoughts, but also feelings. How might someone choose to convey such complex meanings with some sounds instead of others? In this study, participants (N=256) used a novel digital musical instrument to produce sound effects to accompany several video clips, such that someone else could match them up later (Referential). Half of these participants were further encouraged to make their sound effects pleasing, towards revealing what distinguishes sounds meant to evoke a particular feeling (Pleasing). The two groups produced different kinds of sound effects, with Pleasing participants favoring sound effects that spanned a narrower range of pitches, while Referential participants created more consistent cross-modal mappings. Taken together, these findings highlight how readily people can convey complex...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rt9j96t</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Caren, Matthew</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mukherjee, Kushin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Agrawala, Maneesh</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fan, Judith E.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mapping Cognitive-Attentional Profiles in Chinese Dyslexia: The Impact of ADHD and its Medical Treatment on Literacy Outcomes</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rr7w4q8</link>
      <description>Chinese dyslexia frequently co_occurs with ADHD, creating complex literacy and attentional difficulties. This project examined (1) cognitive profile types in Chinese dyslexia, (2) their links to attention, and (3) whether ADHD and its treatment alter literacy_related performance. Study 1 assessed 150 children in Grades 1–3 on Chinese reading and related skills, comparing typical, dyslexia_only, and dyslexia+ADHD groups. Study 2 related attention scores to cognitive profiles within the dyslexia_only group. Study 3 tested medication effects on reading and cognitive performance in children with dyslexia+ADHD. Pure dyslexia was marked by rapid automatized naming (RAN), morphological, and orthographic deficits, whereas comorbid dyslexia+ADHD showed a consistent RAN deficit only. Within dyslexia, attentional problems were elevated mainly in children with RAN or phonological deficits. Medication improved attention, RAN, and phonological awareness but not literacy, underscoring the value...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rr7w4q8</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tso, Ricky Van-yip</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lai, Tony Tai-sum,</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lin, Dan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Yeung, Kit-yu Kitty</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Modeling Selection in Active Cross-situational Word Learning</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7ht5178h</link>
      <description>Word learning is an active process in which learners select referents and direct attention based on their current knowledge state. Understanding how learners actively select information can reveal the cognitive mechanisms underlying language acquisition. The present study reanalyzes data from Zettersten &amp;amp; Saffran (2021), in which adults and children (ages 3-8) learned novel word-referent mappings through cross-situational learning, then selected which referents to receive additional training on. We fit associative word learning models to individual training, selection, and test data, and inferred the most likely sampling strategies. Models with a bias to attend to stimuli with uncertain knowledge states best accounted for the data, though there were substantial individual differences in learning mechanisms. These findings suggest that reducing uncertainty drives sampling behavior across development, but that individual differences in learning parameters (in particular, learning...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7ht5178h</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kachergis, George</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zettersten, Martin</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beliefs that go together change together: A longitudinal study of caregiver beliefs surrounding pediatric COVID vaccination</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/79n8b9xn</link>
      <description>Cognitive science offers powerful tools for addressing pressing public health needs. In the current line of work, 1700 US parents reported beliefs about a range of topics related to pediatric COVID vaccination. We deployed Bayesian network structure learning to develop a cognitive model of the relationships among these beliefs and their combined influence on vaccine endorsement. Nine months later, we re-measured these beliefs in a subset of returning participants (n=884) to examine how beliefs changed together over a particularly tumultuous period of time. In a simple comparison of observed co-changes to Time 1 correlations, as well as a comparison of co-changes to model-based simulations, the relationships among beliefs at Time 1 accurately predicted co-change over time (R2 .84-.92 across models). This is consistent with the possibility that correlations across individuals at a single timepoint reflect an underlying belief network that also governs how beliefs change over time.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/79n8b9xn</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Weisman, Kara</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gibson, Dominic</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Crossroads of AI Social Decision: A Two-Dimensional Analysis of Decision Maturity and Cultural Orientation in LLMs</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76b263jz</link>
      <description>As Large Language Models (LLMs) transition from passive text generators to autonomous social agents, decoding their underlying "cognitive DNA" is essential for ensuring alignment with diverse human values. This study investigates the intersection of socio-emotional maturity and cultural value orientations in frontier LLMs through the lens of cognitive science and cross-cultural psychology. We introduce the Dual-Axis Social Intelligence Scale (DASIS), a novel evaluative framework designed to decouple general social sophistication from implicit cultural biases—specifically along the Individualism-Collectivism (I-C) continuum. Across three interrelated experimental paradigms, we map the latent social architecture of nine state-of-the-art models. Study 1 establishes a behavioral baseline in Chinese, revealing that while models exhibit near-human social maturity, they suffer from a profound "Trans-Linguistic Value Locking" toward individualistic schemas, regardless of their developmental...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76b263jz</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tang, Xu</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zeng, Yifan</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Children and adults infer higher past rule-breaking, but lower present rule-breaking, in the presence of formal rules</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/72s9h312</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Formal rules can influence behavior by deterring rule-breaking or broadening knowledge, but may also reveal why a rule was created in the first place. Across three experiments, we investi- gated whether adults and children use the presence of a written rule to infer past and present rule-breaking. Adults reliably in- ferred that groups with written rules had more rule-breaking in the past (Study 1) and, in some contexts, expected less rule- breaking in the present (Study 2). By late childhood (ages 8-11), children showed increasingly adult-like inferences when rules were concrete and familiar (Study 2). Younger children (ages 5-7) additionally were able to make this inference (Study 3). Together, these findings suggest that by middle childhood, children treat formal rules as historical evidence about past rule-breaking. These results shed light on the developmental origins of reasoning about formal rules and their informational value.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/72s9h312</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hok, Hannah</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Saxe, Rebecca</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Thomas, Ashley J</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Meaning is niche construction: semiotic artifacts and cognitive externalism</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/70t85138</link>
      <description>How to provide a locus of observation for the formal notion of semiosis? The notions of niche and artifact are especially capable of updating the thesis, formulated by Peirce, that one cannot think without external signs, associating it to new empirical and theoretical methods and results. In this poster, we introduce the notion of niche of semiotic artifacts. In our approach, cognition is semiosis, sign-action, in a process that takes the form of niche construction. In comparison with current usages of the term artifact to mean a material "thing" which is produced, semiotic artifacts are processes, signs-in-action. Niches of semiotic artifacts are structured spaces of fundamental conditions for stability of sign-action, conditions such as situatedness (co-localization) and temporal distribution between communities of agents, artifacts, and their environments. Niches of semiotic artifacts offer conditions for emergence of habit and surprise in semiosis/cognition. This line of...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/70t85138</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Queiroz, Joao</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ata, Pedro</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does fun help or hinder learning? Examining intuitive beliefs about educational game design</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wz2z21x</link>
      <description>Much research suggests that children learn through play. Yet, play has a reputation as frivolous, and beliefs about play and learning vary across development and sociocultural contexts (Wing, 1995; Bugallo et al, 2024). These differences may reflect varying intuitive theories about how activities promote or prevent learning and shape activity choices. Here, we examine beliefs about how specific activity features impact learning experiences and outcomes. Participants (n=41 adults, ongoing) evaluated 16 math games that systematically varied in both instructional features (e.g., feedback) and playful aesthetics (e.g., audio-visual effects). Results show that games rated as more enjoyable were also rated as better for improving learning. Ongoing work examines how 2nd-4th graders, teachers, and parents respond to specific game features. Our research helps characterize the intuitive theories guiding how people reason about the design of learning experiences, and how such beliefs change...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wz2z21x</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chu, Junyi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zhang, James</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lee, Imogen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Haber, Nick</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gweon, Hyowon</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Subramonyam, Hariharan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fan, Judith E.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Responsibility for influencing others</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qj1w4k9</link>
      <description>Collective outcomes often result from complex social dynamics where individuals both contribute directly and also shape each other's contributions. How do we hold people responsible for an outcome when their actions influence others? Here, we examine how an individual's role within a group (whether they can influence others, be influenced by others, or act independently) affects how responsible they are judged to be. Across three experiments spanning both social and physical settings, we find that people systematically assign greater responsibility to those who can influence others. Furthermore, influencers with knowledge of their potential impact were held more responsible than those who were unaware. The relative responsibility of individuals who were influenced by others and who acted independently differed by context. Together, these results show that we hold others responsible by considering not only how their actions directly affect the outcome, but also how they affect...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qj1w4k9</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hu, Chuqi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gerstenberg, Tobias</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wu, Sarah A</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Underspecification and communicative efficiency of visual affixes of motion in comics</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p30w93g</link>
      <description>In a corpus of 331 comics, we analyzed the size and frequency of two visual affixes in comics: motion lines (trailing behind movers) with the meaning of directed motion and circumfixing lines (imitating the contours of a mover) with an underspecified meaning of motion. Given that the meaning of circumfixing lines is underspecified compared to motion lines, we asked whether their sizes and frequencies behave in communicatively efficient ways consistent with ambiguous words in language. We hypothesized that circumfixing lines should be smaller and more frequent than motion lines, in line with the ambiguous words being shorter and more frequent than less ambiguous words in spoken language. We found that circumfixing lines are smaller but not more frequent than motion lines. We argue that circumfixing lines are smaller than motion lines because of their underspecification and lower information content and we discuss possible reasons for their lower frequency.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p30w93g</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Krajinović, Ana</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hacımusaoğlu, Irmak</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cohn, Neil</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Which Words are Most Iconic, and Which are Rated Most Consistently? A Large-Scale Analysis of Human Iconicity Ratings with Imputed Predictors</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kg9892g</link>
      <description>Iconicity is a central notion in cognitive science, attracting growing attention from perspectives on language acquisition, processing, and language evolution. While previous research has emphasized the subjective nature of iconicity, quantitative analyses of iconicity ratings have relied primarily on mean values, treating iconicity as a stable lexical property, and have often been constrained by substantial data loss when integrating multiple lexical and psycholinguistic datasets. The present study addresses these limitations by analyzing both mean iconicity ratings and inter-rater variability across 14,764 English words, combining a conservative complete-case analysis with complementary analyses based on imputed predictors to increase lexical coverage. For example, in the complete-case analysis, earlier-acquired and etymologically imitative words tended to receive higher mean iconicity ratings, whereas rating variability was greater for earlier-acquired and more familiar words....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kg9892g</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Iida, Hinano</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hori, Ryo</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ratchet or hatchet? Modeling the cultural evolution of simplified construals</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hx4q2zs</link>
      <description>Cumulative culture is often described as a ratchet that builds ever more complex structures, knowledge, and technology. 
However, this complexity comes at a cost. Though cultural innovations may offer new opportunities or insights, they also present new ways to become confused or cognitively burdened.
Cultural evolution may thus act both like a ratchet (accumulating useful innovations) and like a hatchet (stripping away representational deadwood).
Building on a recent theory of value-guided construal, we formalize this utility-complexity trade-off using a model inspired by navigating with a map. 
We embed this model in an evolutionary dynamic, where the maps of successful navigators are selectively copied. 
As expected, more complex (simpler) maps are favored when they are more useful and when agents have a higher (lower) representational capacity. 
Yet surprisingly, the evolutionarily stable map is often more or less complex than the optimal map, driven by the availability of...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hx4q2zs</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Roberts-Gaal, Xavier</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Callaway, Frederick</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cushman, Fiery</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thinking time increases perceived trustworthiness of human but not AI advice</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6ds1p9rf</link>
      <description>How do people evaluate the trustworthiness of advice received from other people or AI systems? One signal for trustworthiness is thinking time: the amount of time the advice-giver spent thinking about what advice to give. Different factors may influence inferences based on thinking time: greater thinking time may reflect a lack of knowledge or confidence. Conversely, it may reflect higher-quality advice resulting from more thorough deliberation. We study participants' judgments of trustworthiness based on thinking time by presenting them with pairs of hypothetical human or AI advisors who spent more or less time thinking about their decision. Across most domains we tested, participants preferred longer deliberation in human advisors, but did not show such a preference with AI. These results provide preliminary evidence that people can make sophisticated judgments about advice quality by integrating knowledge about the advice giver and the time it took them to generate their advice.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6ds1p9rf</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Malaviya, Maya</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Srinivasan, Divya</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Collins, Katherine M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sucholutsky, Ilia</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ho, Mark</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>N-gram-like Language Models Predict Naturalistic Reading Time Best</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6cz6h0t3</link>
      <description>Recent work has found that contemporary language models such as transformers can become so good at next-word prediction that the probabilities they calculate become worse for predicting naturalistic reading time. In this paper, we propose that this can be explained by reading time being shaped by simple n-gram statistics rather than the more complex statistics learned by state-of-the-art transformer language models. We demonstrate that the neural language models whose predictions are most correlated with n-gram probability are also those that calculate probabilities that are the most correlated with eye-tracking-based metrics of reading time on naturalistic text.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6cz6h0t3</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Michaelov, James A.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Levy, Roger P</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On convexity and efficiency in semantic systems</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/68z0b83m</link>
      <description>There are two widely held characterizations of human semantic category systems: (1) they form convex partitions of conceptual spaces, and (2) they are efficient for communication. While prior work observed that convexity and efficiency co-occur in color naming, the analytical relation between them and why they co-occur have not been well understood. We address this gap by combining analytical and empirical analyses that build on the Information Bottleneck (IB) framework for semantic efficiency. First, we show that convexity and efficiency are distinct in the sense that neither entails the other: there are convex systems which are inefficient, and optimally-efficient systems that are non-convex. Crucially, however, the IB-optimal systems are mostly convex in the domain of color naming, explaining the main empirical basis for the convexity approach. Second, we show that efficiency is a stronger predictor for discriminating attested color naming systems from hypothetical variants,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/68z0b83m</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Imel, Nathaniel</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zaslavsky, Noga</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Optimal and heuristic teaching in vast concept spaces</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/68s7b1j2</link>
      <description>Humans are remarkably adaptive instructors who adjust advice based on their estimations about a learner's prior knowledge and current goals. Inspired by prior work in rational pedagogy, we model teachers that reason about how learners will update their beliefs when given different examples, and thereby select examples that minimize expected learner error. We demonstrate that Bayesian non-parametric approaches can characterize teaching strategies in continuous domains, where traditional rational teaching models are intractable. We compare human teaching choices against our model and a variety of heuristics. Our model explains significant variance in human choices beyond a mixture of heuristics, and provides insight insight into how teachers formulate pedagogical guidance in computationally tractable ways, even in vast spaces.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/68s7b1j2</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Malaviya, Maya</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ho, Mark</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The development of social reasoning about shared sleep arrangements</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/662379tg</link>
      <description>Shared sleep arrangements, especially children's, often occur in proximity to family and other caregivers. We investigated whether sleep-sharing serves as a reliable cue to familial and caregiving relationships, even in childhood. Two preregistered studies with U.S. 5–7-year-olds (N = 168) and adults (N = 168) show people possess systematic intuitions about the social meaning of shared sleep arrangements. In Study 1, both age groups robustly expected that a child character sleep-shared with family over non-family (siblings over friends; parents over teachers), while expecting equal toy-sharing. In Study 2, both age groups predicted that a child's chosen sleep-sharing (vs. toy-sharing) partner would provide physical comfort (care) when the child became upset. Adults privileged sleep-sharing over another intimate interaction––saliva-sharing––as diagnostic of a caregiving relationship. From early childhood, people use shared sleep arrangements as a powerful signal of intimate relationships,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/662379tg</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Tompkins, Rodney</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Schachner, Adena</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You should have known: Epistemic Norms in Judgments of Legal Ignorance</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/60k2930h</link>
      <description>An influential legal maxim holds that ignorance of the law is no excuse. While legal theorists have long debated this principle, less is known about laypeople's judgments of ignorant legal violations and the cognitive factors driving them. Across two preregistered vignette studies, we examine how perceived public knowledge of a law shapes blame and punishment judgments toward ignorant agents. Study 1 shows that the exculpatory force of legal ignorance depends strongly on how widely known the law is perceived. The perceived moral wrongness of the prohibited action somewhat moderates this effect. Study 2 shows that ignorance is less excusable when a law is perceived as publicly known, regardless of agents' informational access or whether they are citizens or foreign visitors. Together, the findings suggest that legal ignorance is evaluated under robust epistemic norms centred on what agents are expected to know, rather than on individual differences in access to information.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/60k2930h</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kovacevic, Katarina</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bystranowski, Piotr</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis of Mismatch Negativity as an index of the evaluation of sociolinguistic meaning</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5vq35933</link>
      <description>How quickly do listeners map phonetic variation onto social meaning? We report an electroencephalography (EEG) / event-related potential (ERP) study with Rio de Janeiro Brazilian Portuguese listeners, examining whether sociolinguistic familiarity or bias modulate mismatch negativity (MMN). In an oddball design, we contrasted (i) palatalization of /t/ before /i/ in tio (meaning uncle), focusing on a non-local stop realization that is effectively absent in the Rio de Janeiro speech community, but typical of the pronunciation in northeastern cities, with (ii) pre-stressed nasalization in canal (meaning channel), a variable whose variants coexist locally (control). Three negative peaks emerged: Peak 1 (canonical MMN) was not sensitive to the variants' from Rio or not from Rio; Peak 2 appeared for both variables, indexing detection of within-category variation; Peak 3 was specific to palatalization, consistent with a later-stage evaluation that the stop variant is socially "non-Rio".</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5vq35933</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Santos, Pedro</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>França, Aniela Improta</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Invisible walls: how pedestrians navigate interactional territories in public spaces</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5v98g87x</link>
      <description>Public space simultaneously supports many activities, including conversation, free speech, and transit. However, individuals may have competing desires to use the same parcel of public space. Spatial coordination problems caused by these conflicts are partially solved with proxemic norms – tacit rules which govern the social use of space. But, while prior work has focused on how pedestrians orient to personal space, little is known about how pedestrians orient to interactional territory. In a field experiment with 1,138 participants, we show that pedestrians are acutely aware of others' body orientation and avoid walking between people who are approximately facing each other. We also show evidence of collective norm violations: pedestrians are more than twice as likely to breach a proxemic norm when preceding pedestrians have done so. This study shows how spatial claims in public space are coordinated and offers a promising framework for investigating the psychology of norms.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5v98g87x</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Terwilliger, Jack</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rossano, Federico</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social-Cognitive Bases of Uniform Information Density: Evidence from Speaker Trait Variation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5s7870w9</link>
      <description>According to the Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis, speakers prefer utterances in which information is spread evenly across the linguistic signal. Despite abundant empirical evidence for UID across multiple levels of linguistic representations, the reasons for why UID effects arise are less well understood. Here we explore a listener-oriented hypothesis that a communicative need to facilitate listener comprehension contributes to UID effects. To assess this possibility, we test whether and how information distribution patterns in naturalistic dialogues are shaped by individual differences in speakers' socio-cognitive traits. We hypothesize that if UID effects stem at least partly from speakers taking listeners' needs into account, then speakers with greater socio-cognitive abilities should exhibit stronger UID effects. Using corpus data, we show that UID is modulated by the speaker's ability to infer others' mental states, supporting the listener-oriented hypothesis...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5s7870w9</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hao, Hailin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kaiser, Elsi</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Learning Strategies in Insight Problem Solving</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5rh9d3vn</link>
      <description>Social learning plays a crucial role in human cognition, yet most studies rely on simplified paradigms with explicit options and immediate feedback, such as two-armed bandit tasks. These paradigms are limited in learning in complex problem-solving situations characterized by uncertainty and delayed evaluability. The present study examined social learning strategies in insight problem solving by reanalyzing behavioral data from a T-puzzle task (Kiyokawa et al., 2007). Using Colored Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis (C2RQA), we analyzed temporal correspondence between participants' action sequences across observation conditions and action categories. Observing others was consistently associated with changes in recurrence patterns, whereas self-observation showed no reliable effects. Action category also exhibited robust effects, and observation effects varied across recurrence measures. These findings suggest that social learning in insight problem solving is reflected in...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5rh9d3vn</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kiyokawa, Sachiko</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shimizu, Daichi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Okada, Takeshi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ueda, Kazuhiro</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Emergence of Insight During Classification and Inference Learning as a Function of Category Structure</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5pq682dn</link>
      <description>We report an experiment on the relationship between insight and analytic-based learning during concept acquisition. Subjects learned featural categories (Type I or Type VI) through either classification or inference. Additionally, some subjects switched from classification to inference, whereas others switched from inference to classification. To assess insight, subjects provided warmth judgments throughout the study. We found that warmth judgments increased more rapidly for classification than for inference on Type I category structures, whereas inference produced more gradual increases. Moreover, when subjects switched from inference to classification, rapid increases in warmth judgments closely matched those found in pure classification learning, but only on Type I categories. However, this increase was not observed for Type VI categories. These findings suggest that classification is driven by insight-based learning processes, but this relationship seems to depend on the learnability...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5pq682dn</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>DelFavero, Maci</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Corral, Daniel</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Motivation and Motor Action: A Behavioral Test of the Sword and Shield Hypothesis</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5pk146zf</link>
      <description>According to the 'textbook' model of affective motivation in the brain, approach motivation is lateralized to the left cere- bral cortex and avoidance motivation to the right. By contrast, according to the Sword and Shield Hypothesis (SSH), the hemispheric laterality of motivation follows the way people perform approach actions (typically with the dominant hand) and avoidance actions (typically with the nondominant hand). As predicted by the SSH, neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies have shown that the cortical laterality of approach motivation reverses between right- and left-handers. The present study used a bimanual reaction time task to test a fundamental assumption of the SSH. Across two experiments, right- and left handers were faster to use their dominant hand for approach responses and their nondominant hand for avoidance responses, supporting the SSH: Hemispheric specialization for approach and avoidance motivation corresponds to manual specialization for performing...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5pk146zf</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Pawletko, Kira</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Morgan, Owen P.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Chien, Stephen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Brookshire, Geoffrey</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Casasanto, Daniel</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recurrent Dynamics Give Rise to Individualized Category Representations</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kk4j4s5</link>
      <description>Visual object categorization unfolds on the timescale of milliseconds as sensory representations are transformed into decisions through recurrent processing, yet it remains unclear whether this processing merely sharpens category structure shared across individuals or gives rise to individualized category representations. Using MEG, we examined object categorization along continua spanning basic-level category pairs in which category membership was supported either by graded, weakly diagnostic features (Experimental Continua) or by discrete, highly diagnostic features (Control Continua). Time-resolved multivariate decoding showed that early neural activity reflected shared perceptual structure for all continua, whereas later, response-locked activity encoded individual-specific category boundaries. Temporal generalization analyses further demonstrated that recurrent dynamics stabilized these individual category representations. Finally, a distance-to-bound analysis revealed that...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kk4j4s5</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Taliaferro, Maya</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Dirani, Julien</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Blanco-Elorrieta, Esti</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How are scientific concepts birthed? Typing rules of concept formation in theoretical physics reasoning</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kb5r8g6</link>
      <description>This work aims to formalize some of the ways scientific concepts are formed in the process of theoretical physics discovery. Since this may at first seem like a task beyond the scope of the exact sciences, we begin by presenting arguments for why scientific
concept formation can be formalized. Then, we introduce type theory as a natural
framework for this formalization. We formalize what we call "ways of discovering new concepts" including property preservation and concept change, as cognitive typing
rules. Next, we apply these cognitive typing rules to a case study of conceptual discovery in the history of physics: Einstein's conceptual path to the relativity of time. Then, we recast what a physicist might informally call "ways of discovering new scientific concepts" as compositional typing rules built from cognitive typing rules—thus formalizing them as scientific discovery mechanisms. Lastly, we computationally model the type-theoretic reconstruction as a program synthesis task.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kb5r8g6</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Aguilar, Omar</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Aguirre, Anthony</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Animals don't count: Clearing up confusion on subitizing</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5hj1k9hg</link>
      <description>This paper aims to clear up terminological confusion in the study of numerical cognition, regarding subitizing (Kaufman, Lord, Reese, &amp;amp; Volkmann, 1949). While the term 'subitizing' was originally coined to describe the behaviour of numerate humans, it has since been applied to preverbal infants and animals. I first explore what this more inclusive interpretation entails, including the possibility of seeing subitizing as a cognitive system, and why this leads to confusion. I then argue that framing subitizing as something that is possible in subjects for which there is no conclusive evidence of there being systems that produce numerical content dilutes the concept of number. I end by discussing how the promiscuous interpretation applies to  discontinuities in behaviour and in the ontogeny of numerical cognition. In each case, I show that this interpretation leads to confusion about numbers, and forces number nativism where more neutral takes are preferrable.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5hj1k9hg</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Pelland, Jean-Charles</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leveraging Speech to Identify Signatures of Insight and Transfer in Problem Solving</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5gf2x2xc</link>
      <description>Many problems seem to require a flash of insight to solve. What form do these sudden insights take, and what impact do they have on how people approach similar problems in the future? In this work, we prompted participants (N = 189) to talk aloud as they attempted to solve a sequence of five "matchstick-arithmetic" problems. These problems either all relied on the same kind of non-obvious solution (Same group) or a different kind each time (Different group). We found that Same participants improved more rapidly than Different participants, and as they improved, they talked more and talked about different things when solving later problems. Specifically, they were more likely to spontaneously categorize the problem they were working on. Taken together, these findings suggest that a hallmark of transferable insights is their accessibility for verbal report, even if the underlying precursors of insight remain difficult to articulate.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5gf2x2xc</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Nasvytis, Linas</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fan, Judith E.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Differential Effects of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention in Category Learning</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5fc3g0sx</link>
      <description>The ability to selectively attend to diagnostic stimulus features plays a critical role in category learning. However, attention can be selectively allocated via different mechanisms: Top-Down and Bottom-Up attention. Although the two mechanisms have differential effects on multiple perceptual phenomena, their differential effects on category learning have not been established. To differentially examine the roles of Top-Down and Bottom-up attentional mechanisms in category learning, we conducted a study in which we varied the way in which attention to diagnostic features was allocated. Adult participants learned to categorize novel stimuli in one of four experimental conditions: Baseline, Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Top-Down + Bottom-Up. Results indicate that Drawing attention to the D-feature via Top-Down and Bottom-Up attentional mechanisms leads to differential effects in category learning and generalization. Moreover, simultaneously engaging Top-Down and Bottom-Up attentional...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5fc3g0sx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Diaz, Francisca</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sloutsky, Vladimir</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Epistemic Extrapolation: Inferring the Fine-Grained Structure of Others' Knowledge From Minimal Evidence</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5dc2r97p</link>
      <description>Successful communication depends on rapidly forming expectations about what others are likely to know, yet little is understood about how these expectations are constructed and updated. We introduce a novel paradigm for studying epistemic extrapolation: the ability to infer another person's knowledge from limited evidence. Across two studies, participants completed a trivia-style recognition task involving public figures and judged what a hypothetical other person was likely to know. Study 1 (n = 100) measured baseline expectations without person-specific information, assessing how closely participants' judgments tracked population-level knowledge patterns. Study 2 (n = 250) tested epistemic extrapolation across 10 conditions by providing sparse knowledge profiles (another player's response to 1-2 items) and asking participants to infer item-level knowledge. Participants showed accurate general expectations about others' knowledge and systematically updated these expectations...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5dc2r97p</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Morris, Ben</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jara-Ettinger, Julian</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Individual Linguistic Preferences Predict Liability Judgements</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cz7h85q</link>
      <description>Can patterns in language predict people's reasoning about blame and punishment? In this study, we focus on how individual linguistic preferences (agentive vs non-agentive frames) of English, Spanish and Turkish speakers correlate with their judgments of financial liability regarding property damage across events involving intentional agents, accidental outcomes and bystanders. Findings show that individual linguistic preferences predict liability judgments, controlling for event type.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cz7h85q</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Buyruk, Parla</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Boroditsky, Lera</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Grunt Work of Conversational Grounding: Minimal Responses in Multimodal Dialogue</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5b2317q7</link>
      <description>Conversational grounding, the establishment of mutual understanding between participants, is fundamental to studies of dialogue. However, methods of grounding multimodal information remain understudied. We investigate how minimal vocalizations (conversational grunts like hm and ooh) encode grounding of verbal information versus observed events in collaborative tasks. Acoustic analysis of 497 grunts from natural dialogues revealed that token selection is strongly specialized by information source. Backchannels like mm-hm predominantly acknowledge speech, while reactive tokens like oh preferentially responded to events. Event-following grunts also exhibit longer duration and more open vowel production at the corpus level, though these differences are largely a consequence of which tokens speakers select rather than independent prosodic modulation. These findings establish observable events as informational contributions requiring explicit acknowledgment, and identify lexical selection...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5b2317q7</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Brutti, Richard A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Pustejovsky, James</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Analogical Comparison to Reveal the Structure of the Count List</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/58f5x1kz</link>
      <description>In many languages, number words follow a recursive morphological structure. Past research suggests that children with an extended and regular count list are earlier to notice such structure than those with a more limited and less transparent count list. Building on this line of research, we propose that children's insight into the recursive structure develops in part through comparison processes that allow them to notice morphological regularities across number words. To test this, we presented 4–5-year-old children with a visual depiction of numbers 0–49, along with comparison techniques designed to facilitate the alignment across decades. We used a pretest–training–posttest design. In pre- and post-tests, we assessed children's ability to produce the successor of numbers beyond their counting range and their understanding of numerical infinity. In the post-test, we also assessed their ability to produce the successor for novel numbers. We found that the training improved children's...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/58f5x1kz</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Que, Kexin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gentner, Dedre</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
