<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/ucop/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent ucop items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/ucop/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from UC Office of the President</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2026 03:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on AAALAC International's&amp;nbsp;Draft Position Statement on "The 3Rs"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d17013p</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to AAALAC International's proposed&amp;nbsp;draft of their new position statement on "The 3Rs".&amp;nbsp;UC recommends that AAALAC revise the 3Rs position statement to use more precise and flexible language, including referring to “scientifically validated” non-animal models and saying reduction techniques should be “considered” rather than automatically “applied” in all animal activities. UC also asks AAALAC to better account for wildlife research by adding examples such as camera trapping and non-invasive sampling, and to clarify that 3Rs training should apply as appropriate to institutionally affiliated personnel involved in animal care and use.&amp;nbsp;The content of this letter was submitted through a comment portal and did not require a signature.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d17013p</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to 2024-16501 (89 FR 60980) &amp;amp; 2024-22041 (89 FR 78278), International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Revisions to Definition and Controls Related to Defense Services (July 29, 2024), RIN 0694-AI35</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5qq5413q</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Department of State Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)'s proposed amendments to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) originally issued on July 29, 2024.&amp;nbsp;UC supports DDTC’s proposed ITAR revisions as a helpful effort to clarify defense-services controls, distinguish controlled from non-controlled activities, and protect national security while preserving professional and academic exchanges. UC endorses AUECO and COGR requests for further clarification on exclusions for repair or maintenance of EAR-controlled commodities/software, routine academic activities, medical and translation services, and definitions related to intelligence activities, so low-risk academic and research activities are not unnecessarily affected.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5qq5413q</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on AAALAC International's Draft Position Statement on "The Culture of Care"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/59z9m16x</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to AAALAC International's proposed&amp;nbsp;draft of their new position statement on "The Culture of Care".&amp;nbsp;UC supports AAALAC’s effort to articulate Culture of Care as an institutional mindset and notes that UC has already adopted the concept, but asks AAALAC to clarify the intent of the position statement and how its key components should be implemented. UC recommends several wording changes, including removing the unnecessary qualifier “good,” consistently capitalizing Culture of Care, emphasizing communication with all institutionally affiliated people involved in animal care and use, clarifying the role of veterinary and animal care practices within the broader program, and promoting 3R approaches during protocol review as well as animal care activities.&amp;nbsp;The content of this letter was submitted through a comment portal and did not require a signature.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/59z9m16x</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on USPTO's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Terminal Disclaimer Practice to Obviate Nonstatutory Double Patenting (Docket No. PTO-P-2024-0003)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3x1637k7</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)'s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on terminal disclaimer practice to obviate nonstatutory double patenting.&amp;nbsp;UC endorses the Association of University Technology Manangers (AUTM)’s opposition to the USPTO’s proposed terminal-disclaimer rule, arguing that it would undermine the enforceability and presumed validity of issued patents, create due process and coercion concerns, and exceed the USPTO’s administrative rulemaking authority. UC warns that the proposal would harm university technology transfer, deter investment in federally funded inventions, weaken the Bayh-Dole innovation framework, and reduce the market introduction of new technologies, so it urges USPTO to withdraw the rule.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3x1637k7</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to OMB’s Request for Information for Revisions to 2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapters I and II (88 FR 8480)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3367v4kt</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)'s request for information on proposed revisions&amp;nbsp;to 2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapters I and II (Uniform Guidance). UC endorses COGR’s comments and recommends that OMB reduce administrative burden under 2 CFR by eliminating the DS-2 requirement, raising the subaward MTDC cap from $25,000 to $75,000 with regular reevaluation, and reconsidering the 26% cap on administrative F&amp;amp;A costs. UC also asks OMB to clarify that negotiated indirect cost rates must be accepted unless limited by statute or regulation, specify that § 200.112 concerns procurement-related conflicts rather than research COI, and rewrite subrecipient indirect-cost-rate rules in plain English so pass-through entities and subrecipients have clear, workable options.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3367v4kt</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Draft OHRP Guidance on Use of a Single Institutional Review Board for Cooperative Research (Docket ID Number HHS-OASH-2022-0011, July 1, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vd827xq</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office for Human Research Protections’ draft guidance on the use of a single Institutional Review Board (IRB) for cooperative research. UC supports clearer guidance but recommends additional flexibility and clarification around single-IRB exceptions, selection of reviewing IRBs, local institutional review responsibilities, and reliance agreements, while urging OHRP to reduce administrative burden by developing resources such as a compendium of state laws relevant to human-subject research.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vd827xq</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on FDA's&amp;nbsp;Considerations for the Use of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence To Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products; Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability (Docket No. FDA-2021-D-1214, December 9, 2021)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9sn6m48b</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s draft guidance on the use of real-world data and real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for drugs and biological products. UC recommends clarifying that certain non-interventional studies using existing real-world data do not require IRB review and further aligning FDA requirements with the Common Rule by permitting appropriate exemptions from IRB review for minimal-risk research, thereby reducing administrative burden while maintaining human-subject protections.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9sn6m48b</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to FDA's Proposed Guidance for&amp;nbsp;Sponsors, Investigators,and Institutional Review Boards on Key Information and Facilitating Understanding in Informed Consent (Docket Number: FDA-2022-D-2997)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9mf9j9bq</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to&amp;nbsp;the FDA’s Guidance for&amp;nbsp;Sponsors, Investigators, and&amp;nbsp; Institutional Review Boards on Key Information and Facilitating&amp;nbsp;Understanding in Informed Consent.&amp;nbsp;UC generally supports FDA’s proposed guidance on key information and facilitating understanding in informed consent, including harmonization with the Revised Common Rule, use of plain language, conflict-of-interest disclosure, and flexibility for study-specific presentation. UC raises concerns that the suggested bubble format may create accessibility, equity, IRB-review, and administrative problems, and recommends adding contact information and clearer language on consent elements while deleting recommendations for glossaries, references, tables of contents, and page-number cross-references that could increase burden and undermine plain-language consent.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9mf9j9bq</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0286 for “Protection of Human Subjects and Institutional Review Boards” (September 28, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9h75q200</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s proposed rule revising human-subject protection and Institutional Review Board regulations to better align them with the Common Rule. UC supports harmonization but recommends closer alignment on definitions, informed consent, activities preparatory to research, waivers of consent documentation, and continuing IRB review, as well as a longer implementation period for the final rule.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9h75q200</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on DOE's proposed "Financial Assistance Regulations-Conflict of Interest and Conflict of Commitment Policy Requirements"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/95s6f2pd</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to DOE's proposed&amp;nbsp;"Financial Assistance Regulations-Conflict of Interest and Conflict of Commitment Policy Requirements", published on June 18, 2024.&amp;nbsp;UC appreciates DOE’s effort to strengthen research integrity but urges DOE to align its final conflict-of-interest policy with the longstanding PHS COI regulations, preferably by finalizing the existing DOE Interim Policy with targeted changes rather than creating divergent requirements. UC specifically recommends removing conflict-of-commitment requirements from the COI policy, using existing biographical sketch/current and pending support disclosures for COC information, adopting PHS-style definitions and thresholds, shifting reporting to before expenditure of funds, clarifying disclosure obligations, and allowing one year for implementation.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/95s6f2pd</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Library as Campus Research Partner: UC San Diego Library's Research Outputs Dashboard</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/95r7x067</link>
      <description>This presentation will introduce UC San Diego Library's campus research outputs data dashboard. The interactive dashboard provides a novel, library-centric view of UC San Diego's scholarly ecosystem by consolidating and visualizing data from multiple sources across campus and the UC system.The dashboard began as a proof of concept to better visualize and advertise UC San Diego researcher outputs available in Dimensions, a campus-licensed research intelligence platform that aggregates metadata and metrics about publications, grants, datasets, and patents. The Library’s Research Data Curation group had been receiving questions from campus partners about researcher collaboration, departmental publication counts, and other research metrics, and while answers to these questions could be found in Dimensions, the process was time-consuming and required enough technical expertise to be challenging.We realized that what we needed was a flexible, multi-purpose dashboard that could address...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/95r7x067</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Labou, Stephanie</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on&amp;nbsp;Controls To Enhance the Cultivation of Marihuana for Research in the United States (Docket No. DEA-2020-0008, March 23, 2020)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g1s074</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Drug Enforcement Administration’s proposed rule governing the cultivation of marijuana for research in the United States. UC supports expanding the lawful supply of cannabis for research but urges faster approval of additional growers, access to a wider variety of research materials—including products legally available under state law—and clearer requirements concerning DEA possession, product testing and quality, costs, and the regulatory status of CBD.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g1s074</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Request to FDA to Extend Comment Period for&amp;nbsp;Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0286 for “Protection of Human Subjects and Institutional Review Boards” (September 28, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8z99q8c0</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s proposed rule on the protection of human subjects and Institutional Review Boards, intended to harmonize FDA regulations with the Common Rule. UC requests a 60-day extension of the comment period, for a total of 120 days, to allow adequate consultation with researchers, administrators, and compliance and privacy experts regarding the proposal’s implications for human-subject research protections and oversight.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8z99q8c0</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the NIH Request for Public Comments on DRAFT Supplemental Information to the NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing: Protecting Privacy When Sharing Human Research Participant Data (NOT-OD-22-131)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8nj635p3</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s draft supplemental guidance on protecting the privacy of human research participants when sharing data under the NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy. UC supports a flexible, principles-based framework but recommends greater recognition of consent waivers, clearer and more consistent standards for de-identification and controlled access, broader consideration of legal protections and data-use agreements, and continued NIH investment in field-specific data repositories.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8nj635p3</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-21-018, “Request for Information (RFI):Inviting Comments and Suggestions on the NIH-Wide Strategic Plan for COVID-19 Research”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8m65c5h9</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s request for input on its NIH-Wide Strategic Plan for COVID-19 Research. UC recommends expanding the plan to address additional research priorities in COVID-19 biology, testing, treatment, prevention, and health disparities, while calling for sustained federal investment in basic science, research infrastructure, data science, and workforce development to strengthen preparedness for future pandemics.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8m65c5h9</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments to NSF on Common Disclosure Forms for the Biographical Sketch and Current and Pending (Other) Support</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/89w7t4r0</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Science Foundation’s request for comments on proposed government-wide common disclosure forms for biographical sketches and current and pending support. UC supports standardized forms as a means of reducing administrative burden but recommends limiting agency-specific exceptions, simplifying certification requirements, harmonizing definitions and submission requirements across agencies, and allowing sufficient time and technological support for implementation.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/89w7t4r0</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on&amp;nbsp;Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Direct Grant Programs, State-Administered Formula Grant Programs, Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program, and Strengthening Institutions Program (Docket ID ED-2019-OPE-0080)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/89s69064</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Department of Education’s proposed rule conditioning certain federal funding on public universities’ compliance with First Amendment requirements and their treatment of religious student organizations. UC argues that the rule could unfairly jeopardize federal funding based on unrelated litigation, increase legal and administrative burdens, and conflict with Supreme Court precedent and institutional and state nondiscrimination requirements.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/89s69064</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on FDA Docket No. FDA-2019-N-2175 for “Institutional Review Boards; Cooperative Research.” (September 28, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7v11n0rm</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s proposed rule requiring single Institutional Review Board (IRB) review for cooperative research and harmonizing FDA requirements with the Common Rule. UC supports greater regulatory alignment but recommends updated analysis of the costs and administrative burden of single-IRB review, clearer exceptions for certain studies and circumstances, greater discretion for local IRBs, and streamlined reliance agreements.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7v11n0rm</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the Request for Information on Proposed Updates and Long-Term Considerations for the NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-22-029)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sz8s1zc</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s request for information on proposed updates and long-term considerations for its Genomic Data Sharing Policy. UC supports modernizing and harmonizing the policy with NIH’s broader Data Management and Sharing Policy but recommends additional public engagement and clearer guidance on genomic data de-identification, privacy risks, data linkage and consent, while seeking to minimize duplicative requirements and administrative burden.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sz8s1zc</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on DEA's Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Controlled Substance Destruction Alternatives to Incinceration (RIN 1117-AB84/Docket No. DEA-1144)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7f05k19f</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)'s&amp;nbsp;Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Controlled Substance Destruction Alternatives to Incinceration, issued on October 31, 2023.&amp;nbsp;UC explains that it currently uses reverse distributors to destroy controlled substances used in research and clinical care, but that limited reverse-distributor capacity can force institutions to store expired or unusable substances longer than intended. UC asks DEA to allow or clarify that controlled substances purchased or used for research or clinical care may be rendered non-retrievable on-site, including through hardening agents or activated carbon under documented chain-of-custody, two-witness handling, and DEA Form 41 recordkeeping procedures.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7f05k19f</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Certificates of Confidentiality; Draft Guidance for Sponsors, Sponsor-Investigators, Researchers, Industry, and Food and Drug Administration Staff: Availability (FDA-2019-D-3592)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vx692vq</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s draft guidance on Certificates of Confidentiality (CoCs) for protecting identifiable, sensitive information collected in human subjects research. UC supports the guidance’s privacy protections and streamlined CoC process but requests greater clarity on what qualifies as sensitive information, when individual investigators may obtain CoCs, appropriate informed consent language, and the circumstances and options associated with FDA denial of discretionary CoCs.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vx692vq</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Request for Public Comment on Draft Desirable Characteristics of Repositories for Managing and Sharing Data Resulting From Federally Funded Research (RFC Response: Desirable Repository Characteristics) (Docket ID OSTP-2020-0001)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6s53z1g1</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office of Science and Technology Policy’s draft characteristics for repositories used to manage and share data resulting from federally funded research. UC supports efforts to improve long-term stewardship and public access to research data while recommending greater consistency in data policies across federal agencies, adequate federal support for data curation and preservation costs, and clearer standards for repository functionality, security, and protection of human subjects data.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6s53z1g1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on California Department of Justice Notice of Modification to Text of Proposed Regulations regarding the Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES) at Title 11, Division 1, Chapter 8.5 Issued on January 16, 2020</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p60f04g</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the California Department of Justice’s proposed modifications to regulations governing researcher access to the Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES). UC argues that requiring individual patient consent would effectively prevent population-level research using identified CURES data and recommends restoring provisions that permit access under existing privacy, security, and human-subject protections, including the option to restrict access to DOJ’s secure laboratory.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p60f04g</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking "Schedules of Controlled Substances: Rescheduling of Marijuana" (Docket No. DEA-1362)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6815j3dq</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)'s&amp;nbsp;Notice of Proposed Rulemaking "Schedules of Controlled Substances: Rescheduling of Marijuana", published in the Federal Register on May 21, 2024.&amp;nbsp;UC supports DEA’s proposal to move marijuana, marijuana extracts, and naturally derived delta-9-THC from schedule I to schedule III as a step toward reducing research barriers, but argues that rescheduling alone will not let researchers study the real-world cannabis products available in state-regulated markets. UC urges DEA to allow universities to access state-legal cannabis products and fresh plant material for research, classify naturally and synthetically derived delta-9-THC consistently, assess THC isomers and derivatives through the eight-factor analysis, and issue updated guidance explaining the regulatory requirements for cannabis research.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6815j3dq</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Request for Information on the American Research Environment (RFI Response: JCORE) (Docket ID OSTP-2019-0006 and OSTP-2019-0007)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6755426q</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office of Science and Technology Policy’s request for information on strengthening the American research environment. UC recommends greater coordination and consistency across federal agencies in policies addressing research rigor and integrity, administrative burden, research security and foreign influence, and safe and inclusive research environments, while emphasizing the importance of preserving open international scientific collaboration.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6755426q</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Provisions Pertaining to Precenting Access to the U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern or Covered Persons (Docket No. NSD 104)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6546b70g</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds the DOJ's proposed rule on provisions pertaining to preventing access to U.S. sensitive personal data and government-related data by countries of concern or covered persons.&amp;nbsp;UC supports DOJ’s goal of protecting sensitive personal and government-related data, but urges the agency to avoid impairing academic research, especially by adding an exemption for covered data transactions in non-federally funded research. UC also endorses COGR’s recommendations for clearer definitions, more detailed compliance guidance, practical tools, and sufficient implementation time so universities can comply consistently without undermining global research collaboration.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6546b70g</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NIH's RFI on the NIH Draft Public Access Policy</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/637846c7</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds the NIH's RFI on their Draft Public Access Policy, issued on June 18, 2024. UC strongly supports NIH’s Draft Public Access Policy and supplemental guidance, especially the government use license language allowing broad reuse and derivative works, and urges HHS/NIH to harmonize this approach with federal grant regulations to support consistent zero-embargo access. UC also asks NIH to clarify and support publication-cost planning, preserve PubMed Central as a no-cost deposit route, create a mechanism for post-award publication costs, and work with universities and publishers to automate multi-repository deposits to reduce administrative burden and compliance risk.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/637846c7</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-20-013, “Request for Public Comments on a DRAFT NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing and Supplemental DRAFT Guidance”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wz509zr</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s draft Policy for Data Management and Sharing and supplemental guidance. UC supports NIH’s efforts to expand research data sharing but recommends clearer definitions and implementation standards, standardized data management plan templates and requirements, protections for sensitive data, and adequate funding for both short- and long-term data management, curation, preservation, and infrastructure costs.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wz509zr</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Assessing Contractor Implementation of Cybersecurity Requirements (DFARS Case 2019-D041/RIN 0750-AK81; Docket DARS-2020-0034)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ws0k723</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Department of Defense’s interim rule implementing new cybersecurity assessment and certification requirements for federal contractors. UC supports strengthened cybersecurity protections but requests clearer guidance on how the requirements apply to fundamental research, greater transparency regarding assessment levels, and confirmation that compliance costs are allowable as direct costs on DoD awards.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ws0k723</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NIH/OLAW's RFI on Clarification of Animal&amp;nbsp;Activities Exempt from the PHS Policy Requirements for IACUC Review (NOT-OD-23-119)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wd6c2xg</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institute of Health (NIH) Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)'s request for information on the NIH Notice Clarification of Animal Activities Exempt from the PHS Policy Requirements for IACUC Review (NOT-OD-23-119).&amp;nbsp;UC supports OLAW’s effort to clarify which animal activities do not require IACUC review and approval, but recommends avoiding the term “exempt” because it may be confused with human-subjects research terminology. UC also asks OLAW to clarify several examples involving observational field studies, commercially available surgically modified animals, and reliance on another institution’s IACUC review, and urges OLAW and USDA-APHIS to harmonize field-study requirements and definitions to reduce administrative burden.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wd6c2xg</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Docket No. 2012070327), “Rights to Federally Funded Inventions and Licensing of Government Owned Inventions”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5w46r8j9</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to NIST’s proposed revisions to regulations implementing the Bayh-Dole Act governing federally funded inventions and licensing of government-owned inventions. UC recommends clarifying that consumer pricing cannot be a basis for exercising federal march-in rights, providing greater flexibility in requirements related to small-business licensing preferences, and extending the period for converting provisional patent applications to non-provisional applications from ten to twelve months.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5w46r8j9</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on NIH's Framework for Discussion, dates June 2024, Seeking Input on Reforming the NIH</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ng1c3d5</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds the National Institute of Health (NIH)'s proposed Framework for Discussion for reforming NIH through structural and policy reform.&amp;nbsp;UC urges Congress to approach NIH reform cautiously, with meaningful scientific-community input and independent review before major structural changes, warning that consolidating institutes, capping F&amp;amp;A costs, limiting PI grant holdings, or broadly pausing gain-of-function research could create serious unintended consequences. UC recommends reducing administrative burden, preserving peer review and basic science, supporting early-career and diverse researchers, adjusting grant-size thresholds for inflation, avoiding duplicative research-security requirements, and using risk-based expert oversight for sensitive research areas.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ng1c3d5</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on the FDA-NIH Resource on Terminology for Clinical Research</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4p55d0x9</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s joint request for information on a glossary of terms related to clinical research and clinical study designs.&amp;nbsp;UC asks FDA and NIH to clarify whether the proposed clinical research terminology glossary applies only to FDA-regulated studies using real-world data for medical products, or more broadly to other clinical research and observational studies. If the glossary is intended to apply broadly, UC recommends revising certain observational-study definitions and adding definitions for real-world data and real-world evidence so the glossary can serve as a clearer one-stop reference for clinical research terminology.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4p55d0x9</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the HHS Regulations RFI, “Request for Information and Comments on the 2005 Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fb874mt</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Department of Health and Human Services’ request for input on potential revisions to the Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct. UC generally supports retaining the existing framework while recommending clearer standards for findings of misconduct, harmonized and flexible investigation timelines, expanded confidentiality protections, and additional guidance on inquiries, investigations, and the application of the six-year limitation on misconduct allegations.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fb874mt</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on California&amp;nbsp;Department of Justice Notice of Modification to Text of Proposed Regulations regarding the Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation (CURES) at Title 11, Division 1, Chapter 8 Issued on December 15, 2021</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4d06s3qs</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the California Department of Justice’s proposed modifications to regulations governing access to identified individual-level data in the Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES). UC recommends that researchers accessing CURES data through established research-review procedures not be required to use DOJ’s proposed consent form, arguing that the form is inconsistent with standard human-subject research practices, creates unnecessary participant burdens, and may increase privacy risks by requiring excessive identifying information.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4d06s3qs</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Letter Regarding Gender Diversity and Inclusion on the OHRP IRB Registration Form</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3rs8v26w</link>
      <description>This letter requests changes to the Office for Human Research Protections’ IRB Registration Form to allow more inclusive representation of IRB members’ gender identities. UC recommends replacing the form’s binary male/female designation with at least three gender identity options, arguing that the change would better reflect federal requirements emphasizing diversity and nondiscrimination in IRB membership.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3rs8v26w</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on GSA's Information Collection 3090-0291, FSRS Registration Requirements for Prime Grant Awardees (89 FR 14842)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qf4328f</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the General Services Administration (GSA)'s&amp;nbsp;Information Collection on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Sub-Award Reporting System Registration Requirements for Prime Grant Awardees (FFATA reporting requirements) published in the Federal Register on February 29, 2024.&amp;nbsp;UC acknowledges that FFATA subaward reporting is statutorily required, but says GSA’s estimated annual burden of 30 minutes per respondent is a major underestimate because UC submits reports monthly and campuses spend roughly 18 to 30 hours per report, or about 200 to 360 hours per year. UC recommends improving FSRS guidance and technical support, resolving recurring system errors, reducing duplicative data entry, carrying forward unchanged information for existing subawards, and limiting required FSRS fields to those actually required by FFATA.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qf4328f</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on SMART IRB's Revisions to the Reliance Agreement v3.0</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3mj4m7rm</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to SMART IRB's proposed revisions to their Reliance Agreement 3.0.&amp;nbsp;UC asks SMART IRB to preserve continuity for existing studies under prior reliance-agreement versions, clarify confusing withdrawal/reporting language, and allow flexibility for non-federally regulated research through agreed-upon commensurate protections rather than defaulting rigidly to SMART IRB SOPs or the Common Rule. UC also raises several deal-breaker legal and operational concerns, including overly broad liability and indemnification language, burdensome or unclear QA/QI and reporting obligations, lack of flexibility for DOE-managed labs, and governing-law/venue provisions that could complicate participation.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3mj4m7rm</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Establishment of a Domestic Hemp Production Program (Docket No. AMS-SC-19-0042, October 31, 2019)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3f23p0r7</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s interim final rule establishing a domestic hemp production program. UC requests clearer and more flexible requirements for universities conducting hemp research, particularly regarding pre-harvest THC testing, use of DEA-licensed laboratories, negligence standards, disposal requirements, and distinctions between hemp grown for consumption and industrial or research purposes.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3f23p0r7</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on NIST's RFI&amp;nbsp;Regarding the Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights (Docket No.: 230831-0207)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36d5w13t</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the&amp;nbsp;National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)’s request for information&amp;nbsp;on the Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights (Draft Framework) issued on December 8, 2023.&amp;nbsp;UC strongly urges NIST not to issue the draft march-in framework, arguing that using Bayh-Dole march-in rights as a price-control tool would reinterpret the statute, conflict with congressional intent, and create uncertainty that could deter licensing, investment, public-private partnerships, and commercialization of federally funded university inventions. If NIST proceeds, UC asks it to revise and reissue the framework for public comment, including clear definitions and methods for terms such as “reasonable” price, “extreme,” “unjustified,” and “exploitative,” while ensuring the framework does not chill innovation across technology sectors.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36d5w13t</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments to AAALAC International's Proposed Revisions to Their Position Statement on "The Attending Veterinarian and Veterinary Care"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31h4n0qg</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to AAALAC International's proposed revisions to their position statement on&amp;nbsp;"The Attending Veterinarian and Veterinary Care".&amp;nbsp;UC generally supports AAALAC’s proposed revisions to the position statement, but recommends retaining language that makes surgical training/qualification and classification of major versus minor surgeries a shared responsibility of the IACUC and veterinary staff. UC also objects to using the undefined phrase “standards of veterinary practice,” urges AAALAC to reference regulatory expectations instead, and recommends adding clearer language on AV communication mechanisms, part-time AV oversight limits, and the AV’s role in animal husbandry. The content of this letter was submitted through a comment portal and did not require a signature.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31h4n0qg</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to 2024-16498 (89 FR 60998) &amp;amp; 2024-22145 (89 FR 78836), Export Administration Regulations: Crime Controls and Expansion/Update of U.S. Persons Controls (July 29, 2024), RIN 0694-AI35</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2vf29083</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)'s proposed&amp;nbsp;amendments to the Export Administration Regulations originally issued on July 29, 2024.&amp;nbsp;UC supports BIS’s proposed EAR amendments aimed at clarifying export controls and protecting privacy against unjustified government use of facial recognition and other mass-surveillance technologies. UC endorses AUECO and COGR recommendations for clearer Foreign-Security End User provisions and a more specific definition of facial recognition systems so regulators and institutions can better identify high-risk uses while excluding low-risk organizations and activities.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2vf29083</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Request for Information Regarding the Interagency Edison System for Reporting Federally Funded Inventions (Federal Register Docket No. 191126-0092)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rv788dm</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to NIST’s request for information on rebuilding the Interagency Edison (iEdison) system for reporting federally funded inventions. UC strongly supports modernizing the system and recommends greater consistency in invention-reporting requirements across federal agencies, improved functionality to address outdated and burdensome processes, and continued stakeholder engagement in developing and testing the replacement system.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rv788dm</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Response to HHS Notice of Committee Establishment, Notice of Intent To Convene, and Call for Nominations for the NIH Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board for Fiscal Year 2020</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ng1337v</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to HHS’s establishment of and call for nominations to the NIH Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board for FY 2020. UC nominates three faculty members based on their expertise and accomplishments in biomedical and stem cell research, science policy, ethics, bioethics, and law.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ng1337v</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to Request for Information (RFI) on Flexibilities for Streamlining IACUC Review of Protocols and Significant Changes (NOT-OD-23-152)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2db6h4gd</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institute of Health (NIH) Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)'s request for information on&amp;nbsp;Flexibilities for Streamlining IACUC Review of Protocols and Significant Changes (NOT-OD-23-152) issued on July 11, 2023.&amp;nbsp;UC supports efforts to streamline IACUC review but says OLAW’s proposed flexibilities mostly restate existing guidance or offer only minor clarifications, and UC recommends clearer wording on designated member review, accelerated three-year reviews, alternate member availability, and reporting expectations. UC urges OLAW to pursue more meaningful burden-reduction measures, such as longer or eliminated Assurance renewal cycles, less burdensome Assurance templates, five-year IACUC protocol approvals, and a more flexible NIH Just-in-Time process that allows certification of pending IACUC approval before animal work begins.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2db6h4gd</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on&amp;nbsp;Request for Information: Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications, Data and Code Resulting From Federally Funded Research (RFI Response: Public Access) (Docket ID OSTP-2020-0004)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2d78g9kf</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office of Science and Technology Policy’s request for information on public access to peer-reviewed publications, data, and code resulting from federally funded research. UC strongly recommends a zero-day embargo for federally funded peer-reviewed manuscripts, standardized data-sharing requirements across federal agencies, and continued federal support for open-access publishing and long-term research data management costs.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2d78g9kf</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science (Docket ID EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/29q041pz</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Environmental Protection Agency’s supplemental proposed rule on “Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science.” UC urges EPA to withdraw the proposal, arguing that its expanded data-transparency requirements could exclude rigorous scientific studies from regulatory decision-making, undermine protections for confidential human research data, and give EPA excessive discretion to favor or exclude particular studies rather than relying on the best available science.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/29q041pz</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Request for Extension to Comment Period: Docket No. FDA-2019-N-2175 for “Institutional Review Boards; Cooperative Research.” (September 28, 2022)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/28j9736p</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s proposed rule on Institutional Review Boards and cooperative research, which seeks to harmonize FDA human-subject protection regulations with the Common Rule. UC requests a 60-day extension of the comment period, for a total of 120 days, to allow sufficient consultation with researchers, administrators, and compliance and privacy experts regarding the proposal’s implications for human-subject research protections and oversight.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/28j9736p</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on California Department of Cannabis Control Proposed Regulation specific to the Medicinal and Adult-Use Commercial Cannabis Regulations issued on March 4, 2022</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2665z321</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the California Department of Cannabis Control’s proposed regulations governing research funding under the state’s Medicinal and Adult-Use Commercial Cannabis Regulations. UC recommends aligning the program with standard research administration practices by requiring peer review, providing feedback to unsuccessful applicants, using the California Model Agreement for UC and CSU awards, clarifying records-retention and personnel requirements, and leveraging UC’s existing grantmaking expertise.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2665z321</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improved Asphalt Bases and Slab-Base Engineered Interlayers for Rigid Pavements</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1w09d5c3</link>
      <description>Improved Asphalt Bases and Slab-Base Engineered Interlayers for Rigid Pavements</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1w09d5c3</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mateos, Angel</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Millan, Miguel Angel</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Harvey, John</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Paniagua, Fabian</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Yu, Justin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Nassiri, Somayeh</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Buscheck, Jeff</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Brotschi, Julian</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Foreign Gifts and Contracts Disclosures (Docket ID ED-2019-ICCD-0114)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1cz5808q</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the U.S. Department of Education’s proposed information collection requirements for reporting foreign gifts and contracts under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act. UC supports transparency regarding foreign relationships but argues that the proposed requirements exceed the statute, impose substantial administrative burdens, and raise privacy and confidentiality concerns, particularly regarding submission of complete agreements, information about individual donors, and reporting of foreign-affiliated entities.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1cz5808q</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to PTO-P-2020-0057, “Request for Comments on the National Strategy for Expanding American Innovation”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0xg8p774</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s request for comments on its National Strategy for Expanding American Innovation. UC supports increasing participation in invention and entrepreneurship and recommends federal support for educational programs, community partnerships and mentoring, improved access to capital, standardized data collection to measure participation and outcomes, and continued support for the Bayh-Dole Act and a strong patent system.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0xg8p774</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-AT-22-026, “Request for Information (RFI): Investigators’ Interests in and Barriers to Research Studies on the Health Effects of Cannabis and its Constituents”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0r54j9xv</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s request for information on research interests and barriers related to studying the health effects of cannabis and its constituents. UC calls for increased and broader research funding, a streamlined federal regulatory framework, improved access to cannabis products representative of those actually used by the public, and coordinated federal resources, infrastructure, training, and regulatory support to expand cannabis research.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0r54j9xv</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on FDA Final Order regarding Designating Additions to the Current List of Tropical Diseases in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Acton [FDA-2008-N-0567-0055]</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0p60d992</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the FDA’s Final Order expanding the list of tropical diseases eligible for the Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher (PRV) Program. UC supports the announced additions but urges FDA to also include coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever), arguing that it meets the program’s eligibility criteria and that PRV incentives could encourage development of urgently needed diagnostics, treatments, vaccines, and cures.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0p60d992</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to the NIH Request for Information: Developing Consent Language for Future Use of Data and Biospecimens (NOT-OD-21-131)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gr9367z</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health’s request for information on developing consent language for the future use and sharing of research data and biospecimens. UC recommends that NIH provide flexible guidance rather than standardized sample language, clarify how the proposal relates to broad consent requirements, avoid a default opt-out approach to future sharing, and address the varying federal, state, and local laws governing informed consent and research privacy.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gr9367z</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to 2024-16496 (89 FR 60985) &amp;amp; 2024-22146 (89 FR 78835), End-Use and End-User Based Export Controls, Including U.S. Persons Activities Controls: Military and Intelligence End Use and End Users (July 29, 2024), RIN 0694-AJ43</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06g5v1tp</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)'s proposed amendments to the Export Administration Regulations originally issued on July 29, 2024.&amp;nbsp;UC supports BIS’s proposed amendments to the Export Administration Regulations as a careful effort to advance national security and foreign policy goals while recognizing the need to protect academic research and collaboration. UC endorses AUECO and COGR recommendations seeking additional exclusions for routine academic activities and clearer definitions of Military-Support End Users and Intelligence End Users to avoid unnecessary disruption to international research while still safeguarding critical technologies.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06g5v1tp</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on NIH/OLAW's RFI on Update to NOT-OD-05-034 Guidance on Prompt Reporting of Noncompliances to OLAW (NOT-OD-23-063)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vw6z5h0</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)'s RFI (NOT-OD-23-063) on updating NOT-OD-05-034, Guidance on Prompt Reporting of Noncompliances to OLAW.&amp;nbsp;UC supports OLAW’s effort to clarify reporting expectations and reduce administrative burden while maintaining animal welfare protections, but raised concerns that the proposed reporting exception for injuries among socially housed animals is overly broad and ambiguous. UC recommends removing the exception or narrowing and defining the covered species, situations, injury severity, separation period, reporting detail, and rationale to avoid unnecessary reporting and misinterpretation.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9vw6z5h0</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Response to NIH Pause on New Submissions to the NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry and Request for Information on Reducing Reliance on Human Embryonic Stem Cells in NIH-Supported Research (NOT-OD-26-031)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9st228b4</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Pause on New Submissions to the NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry and Request for Information on Reducing Reliance on Human Embryonic Stem Cells in NIH-Supported Research. The University of California (UC) opposes reducing reliance on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) at this time, arguing that hESCs remain essential research tools and critical benchmarks for evaluating alternative stem cell technologies. UC recommends that any future transition be evidence-based, adequately funded, and phased in gradually, while also urging NIH to continue accepting new hESC lines into the Registry to support scientific progress, reproducibility, and clinical translation.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9st228b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on&amp;nbsp;Third Notice of Proposed Regulation Amendments: Addition of Section 100650 to Chapter 6 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, and the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”) IP Policy incorporated by reference into Section 100650</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gk3c9s4</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)'s Third Notice of Proposed Regulation Amendments regarding the revised CIRM Intellectual Property (IP) Policy. The University of California (UC) expresses support for CIRM’s continued revisions to the policy, recommends adoption of “Option A” for the definition of “Collaborator,” and commends CIRM for its collaborative engagement with stakeholders throughout the rulemaking process.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gk3c9s4</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on the Senate HELP Committee Letter, Dated September 29, 2023, Seeking Input on Modernizing NIH</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bs081jb</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee letter, dated September 29, 2023, that seeks input on modernizing the NIH.&amp;nbsp;UC urged Congress to modernize NIH carefully by preserving peer-driven, broad-based scientific participation while avoiding sweeping mandates that could disrupt the biomedical research enterprise. UC recommended incremental, piloted reforms that support early-career scientists, reduce administrative burden, reform IDeA eligibility, protect full F&amp;amp;A cost recovery, improve clinical-trial diversity, strengthen research workforce diversity, and maintain essential research methods where no adequate alternatives exist.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bs081jb</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on NIH/OLAW's RFI on Proposed Guidance to Assured Insitutions on Cephalopod Care and Use (NOT-OD-23-176)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/99n0x1kk</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health, Office of Laboratory Welfare (NIH/OLAW)'s Request for Information on proposed guidance to assured institutions on cephalopod care and use. UC expresses concern on whether OLAW has the authority to expand the application of the U.S. Government Principles or revise the PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (PHS Policy). UC recommends several changes to the proposed language to allow for PI input when developing institutional cephalopod policies and SOPs, as well as allowing for flexibility with cephalopod care staff qualifications.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/99n0x1kk</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-23-091, "Request for Information on the NIH Plan to Enhance Public Access to the Results of NIH-Supported Research"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93x6z1b4</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the NIH Notice NOT-OD-23-091, "Request for Information on the NIH Plan to Enhance Public Access to the Results of NIH-Supported Research".&amp;nbsp;UC supports NIH’s plan to eliminate publication embargoes and expand public access, but emphasizes that implementation must reduce author burden, preserve equitable publication opportunities, and address open-access costs for early-career, under-resourced, and underrepresented researchers. UC recommends automated multi-repository deposits, continued and supplemental funding for publication and data costs, accessibility guidance for figures, pressure on excessive publisher fees, institutional infrastructure support, open licensing tools, and broader adoption of persistent identifiers and open metadata.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93x6z1b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on Helium Supply Risk (DOI-2022-0012)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8k93x8wq</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) request for comments on Helium Supply Risk.&amp;nbsp;UC emphasizes that helium is essential for patient care and federally funded research because MRI, NMR, MEG, and other ultra-cold scientific instruments depend on reliable liquid helium supplies and can be damaged or taken offline by shortages. UC warns that repeated shortages and rising costs threaten healthcare, research, and U.S. strategic capacity, and recommends federal policies to protect, expand, and maintain affordable domestic helium production for the research community.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8k93x8wq</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Strategies for Improving Community College Access in California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8910f379</link>
      <description>In California, transportation plays a key role in community college access because many community college districts have satellite campuses, have limited transportation options, and tend to not have on-campus housing. To better understand the mobility challenges students face accessing community colleges and provide potential policy strategies to overcome these challenges, the researchers interviewed local transportation agencies, community college administrators, and students at five California community colleges between September 2022 and October 2023. Participants were asked about available transportation options for community college students, typical student travel patterns, and the resources needed to support improved community college transportation access. Small group discussions with students focused on student travel patterns, mobility challenges, and opinions on potential strategies to improve access. In addition, we reviewed state legislation on student transportation...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8910f379</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Shaheen, Susan</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Broader, Jacquelyn</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cohen, Adam</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wolfe, Brooke</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9429-4992</uri>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis of California Senate Bill 331: Hearing Aids - Letter</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7p32b22n</link>
      <description>Analysis of California Senate Bill 331: Hearing Aids - Letter</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7p32b22n</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Health Benefits Review Program</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-23-034, "Request for Information (RFI) on Proposed Simplified Review Framework for NIH Research Project Grant Application"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7br0n9jb</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to NIH's RFI on&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;proposed simplified review framework for NIH research project grant application.&amp;nbsp;UC supports NIH’s goals of reducing administrative burden and reputational bias in peer review, but questioned whether the simplified framework would actually reduce funding disparities for underrepresented groups. UC recommends real-time outcomes monitoring, robust training and guidance for reviewers and applicants, more diverse study sections, greater funding-transparency data, and added review criteria for team diversity and health-disparities relevance.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7br0n9jb</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on&amp;nbsp;Agency Information Collection Request - Foreign Gifts and Contracts Disclosures</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/79k487nr</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the U.S. Department of Education's revised Information Collection Request (ICR) on Foreign Gifts and Contracts Disclosures under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act (HEA). The University of California (UC) strongly opposes the Department’s use of an emergency review process and argues that the revised reporting requirements exceed statutory requirements, impose substantial administrative burdens, and create significant privacy and confidentiality concerns. UC recommends that the Department withdraw the emergency review request, delay implementation, and limit reporting requirements to those expressly required by Section 117.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/79k487nr</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Request for A 60-day Extension to Submit Comments on Proposed Revisions to the OMB Guidance for Grants and Agreements</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74v35572</link>
      <description>This comment letter requests that OMB extend the comment period for the proposed revisions to the Guidance for Grants and Agreements by 60 days. OMB's Proposed Rule on Guidance for Grants and Agreements was published in the Federal Register on February 9, 2023 and only provided a 30-day comment period.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74v35572</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on&amp;nbsp;Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Foreign Gifls and Contracts Disclosures</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7388t27t</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the U.S. Department of Education's proposed information collection requirements for implementing Section 117 of the Higher Education Act (HEA) regarding disclosure of foreign gifts and contracts. The University of California (UC) supports transparency in foreign relationships but expresses concern that the proposed requirements substantially exceed the statutory requirements of Section 117, impose significant administrative and compliance burdens, raise privacy and confidentiality concerns, and introduce unclear reporting obligations. UC recommends scaling back the proposal, clarifying key definitions, protecting confidential information, maintaining the existing reporting threshold, and pursuing implementation through a more robust rulemaking and stakeholder engagement process.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7388t27t</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reduce Emissions and Improve Traffic Flow Through Collaborative Autonomy</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/726964qq</link>
      <description>This report explores opportunities for employing autonomous driving technology to dampen stop-and-go waves on freeways. If successful, it could reduce fuel consumption and emissions. This technology was tested in an on-road experiment with 100 vehicles over one week. Public stakeholders were engaged to assess the planning effort and feasibility of taking the technology to the next level: a pilot involving 1000+ vehicles over several months. Considerations included the possible geographical boundaries, target fleets of vehicles, and suitable facilities such as bridges or managed lanes. Flow smoothing technology may improve the user experience and operations of managed lanes or bridges, however it may require external incentives such as reduced tolls to entice the traveling public to use it. This must be matched with other goals such as verifying vehicle occupancy. It might be possible for some hybrid solution that addresses both challenges to provide a way forward. A concept of...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/726964qq</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Patire, Anthony D., PhD</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-4164</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Dion, Francois, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bayen, Alexandre M., PhD</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-222X</uri>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments in Response to 88 FR 8374, "OMB Guidance for Grants and Agreements"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6th4n833</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to OMB's request for comments on OMB's Proposed Rule on Guidance for Grants and Agreements issued on February 9, 2023.&amp;nbsp;UC supports OMB’s implementation of Build America, Buy America requirements but said the proposed guidance lacks clarity on when BABA applies to federal awards that are not primarily infrastructure projects. UC recommends adding language specifying that BABA applies only to infrastructure-project spending under covered awards, not to non-infrastructure spending, to reduce compliance costs, avoid conflicting “Buy America” rules, and prevent project delays.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6th4n833</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments NIH's RFI on Developing Consent Language for Research Using Digital Health Technologies (NOT-OD-24-002)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bk2s9gf</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Request for Information on developing consent language for research using Digital Health Technologies. UC expresses concern that&amp;nbsp;NIH’s sample consent language is too long, too complex, duplicative, and includes issues beyond informed consent, such as DHT terms of use, data ownership, and third-party sharing.&amp;nbsp;UC recommends shortening and simplifying the language, removing technical or out-of-scope content, aligning consent with data management and IRB materials, and offering guidance without a template.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bk2s9gf</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on OSTP RFI on NSPM 33 Research Security Program Standard Requirement (88 FR 14187)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5dt1t3xd</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) RFI on the proposed Research Security Program Standard Requirements, published March 7, 2023.&amp;nbsp;UC supports stronger research security standards but said implementation is not feasible without federal funding, clearer scope, and more time, especially for institutions managing broad federally funded research portfolios. UC recommends limiting requirements to risk-based federally funded science and engineering R&amp;amp;D, funding compliance costs, extending implementation to at least two years, narrowing travel and training obligations, clarifying cybersecurity expectations, and simplifying export-control and covered-individual definitions.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5dt1t3xd</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>University of California System Comments on Draft NSF Guidance on FinancialAssistance, Information Collection No. 3145-0058, Docket ID No. NSF-2026-OTR-0001</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5bv354tk</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)'s proposed Guidance on Financial Assistance (GFA), which would replace the current Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG). The University of California (UC) urges NSF not to finalize the draft guidance in its current form, expressing concern that it introduces significant policy changes affecting merit review, international collaboration, research security, publication and data-sharing requirements, indirect cost recovery, award administration, and termination authorities. UC recommends substantial revisions to preserve merit-based funding decisions, support international scientific collaboration, maintain allowable research dissemination costs, protect award stability and institutional flexibilities, reduce administrative burden, and provide a transparent, prospective implementation process.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5bv354tk</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis of California Assembly Bill 1570: Diagnostic Imaging</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5999016j</link>
      <description>Analysis of California Assembly Bill 1570: Diagnostic Imaging</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5999016j</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Health Benefits Review Program</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>University of California System Comments on Proposed Rule, Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance, 91 Fed. Reg. 32198, published May 29, 2026 (Docket ID No. OMB-2026-0034)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/52s372wx</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)'s proposed revisions to the Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance (Uniform Guidance). The University of California (UC) urges OMB to withdraw the proposed rule, arguing that it would weaken merit-based research funding, restrict international scientific collaboration, limit dissemination of federally funded research, expand agency authority to suspend or terminate awards, and significantly increase administrative and compliance burdens. If OMB proceeds, UC recommends substantial revisions to preserve peer review, support research collaboration and public access, maintain allowable research costs, protect award stability, and ensure a prospective, well-planned implementation process.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/52s372wx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on&amp;nbsp;Notice of Proposed Regulation Amendments: Addition of Section 100650 to Chapter 6 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, and the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”) IP Policy incorporated by reference into Section 100650</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5193z036</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)'s proposed amendments to its Intellectual Property (IP) Policy, including the addition of Section 100650 to the California Code of Regulations. The University of California (UC) expresses significant concern that the proposed policy imposes overly broad intellectual property, data-sharing, licensing, and commercialization obligations that extend beyond CIRM-funded research and could discourage research collaborations, technology transfer, commercialization, and scientific dissemination. UC recommends narrowing the policy's scope, limiting obligations to technologies directly resulting from CIRM-funded projects, preserving academic freedom and open scientific exchange, and avoiding retroactive application of new requirements to existing awards.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5193z036</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>University of California Response to NIH Request for Information on Draft NIHControlled-Access Data Policy and Proposed Revisions to NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy(NOT-OD-26-023)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rw9g2k6</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Request for Information on the Draft NIH Controlled-Access Data Policy and Proposed Revisions to the NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS) Policy. The University of California (UC) supports NIH’s goals of strengthening participant protections, harmonizing data-sharing requirements, and promoting responsible data stewardship, but recommends substantial clarification and additional stakeholder engagement before finalization. UC expresses concern about ambiguous policy scope, implementation costs, consent requirements, security obligations, and treatment of de-identified, legacy, and genomic data, and urges NIH to adopt clearer, risk-based, and operationally feasible approaches.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rw9g2k6</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on the Notice of Proposed Regulation Adoption: Addition of Section100505 (CIRM Award Management Policy) to Chapter 5 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4bm8874s</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)'s proposed adoption of Section 100505 (CIRM Award Management Policy). The University of California (UC) generally supports the proposed policy but recommends revisions to ensure facilities and indirect cost reimbursement accurately reflects the true costs of conducting research, simplify implementation timelines for existing awards, clarify liability and indemnification provisions, and provide more practical requirements for returning unobligated funds, in order to promote fair, efficient, and sustainable research administration.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4bm8874s</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC&amp;nbsp;Comments on OSTP's RFI on Proposed Changes to DURC and P3CO Policies [Docket ID (EOP-2023-0001)]</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/49w3t150</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)'s RFI on proposed changes to Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) and Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) policies.&amp;nbsp;UC supports updating DURC and P3CO oversight but warns that a broad risk-based framework could overburden institutions, dilute attention from the highest-risk research, and slow important biomedical, surveillance, vaccine, and in silico work. UC recommends maintaining a clear list-based approach, combining related biosafety programs where efficient, giving federal agencies a larger role in risk assessment, preserving rapid-response pathways, and providing detailed guidance, training, examples, decision trees, and agency contacts for institutions.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/49w3t150</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Request for a 60-day Extension to Submit Comments on NASA "New Conflict of Interest and Conflict of Commitment Policy for Recipients of NASA Financial Assistance Awards"</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/47w4329h</link>
      <description>This comment letter requests that NASA extend the comment period for the&amp;nbsp;"New Conflict of Interest and Conflict of Commitment Policy for Recipients of NASA Financial Assistance Awards" by 60 days. NASA's&amp;nbsp;proposed policy was published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2023 and only provided a 30-day comment period.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/47w4329h</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Response to Comment Request on NIH Electronic Application System for NIH Certificates of Confidentiality (CoC) [90 FR 30652]</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3pm6d220</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s request for comment on the NIH Electronic Application System for discretionary Certificates of Confidentiality (CoC). The University of California strongly supports NIH’s continued issuance of discretionary CoCs and recommends reinstating the existing electronic application system without changes, emphasizing that these protections are vital for safeguarding sensitive research participant data, supporting ethical human subjects research, and maintaining public trust while minimizing administrative delays.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3pm6d220</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Request for a 60-day Extension to Submit Comments on OMB's Request for Information for Revisions to 2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapters I and II</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gg7b6cs</link>
      <description>This comment letter requests that OMB extend the comment period for the proposed revisions to 2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapters I and II (Uniform Guidance) by 60 days.&amp;nbsp;OMB's proposed revisions to the Uniform Guidance&amp;nbsp;was published in the Federal Register on February 9, 2023 and only provided a 30-day comment period.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gg7b6cs</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>National Aeronautics and Space Administration Reporting Requirements Regarding Findings ofHarassment, Sexual Harassment, Other Forms of Harassment, or Sexual Assault (FR Doc. 2019-15088)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36w0q7bp</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)'s proposed Reporting Requirements Regarding Findings of Harassment, Sexual Harassment, Other Forms of Harassment, or Sexual Assault. The University of California (UC) supports NASA’s goal of addressing harassment and ensuring oversight of federally funded projects, but recommends revisions to align NASA’s requirements with existing National Science Foundation (NSF) policies, protect privacy and due process, clarify reporting obligations, and reduce administrative burden and confusion created by inconsistent federal agency requirements.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36w0q7bp</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on&amp;nbsp;2nd Notice of Proposed Regulation Amendments: Addition of Section100650 to Chapter 6 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations,and the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”) IP Policyincorporated by reference into Section 100650</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3656b1x3</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)'s Second Notice of Proposed Regulation Amendments concerning the revised CIRM Intellectual Property (IP) Policy. The University of California (UC) expresses appreciation that CIRM addressed many concerns raised in UC’s earlier comments, but recommends several additional clarifications to improve the policy’s implementation, including narrowing and clarifying the definition of collaborators, correcting inconsistencies in publication-related materials provisions, aligning public-access requirements with NIH standards, facilitating material-transfer requests, and clarifying appeal procedures under CIRM’s march-in rights framework. UC’s recommendations are intended to promote research collaboration, technology transfer, and practical compliance with the policy.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3656b1x3</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on FDA Guidance Document: Investigator Responsibilities – Safety Reporting for Investigational Drugs and Devices (FDA-2021-D-0368)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3591b3jz</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s guidance document, Investigator Responsibilities – Safety Reporting for Investigational Drugs and Devices. The University of California (UC) expresses concern that the guidance appears to require investigators to report all IND safety reports and certain serious adverse events to Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) as unanticipated problems. UC recommends that FDA clarify that only safety reports meeting the established criteria for an unanticipated problem should be submitted to IRBs, preserving a risk-based approach that focuses oversight on actionable safety concerns and avoids overwhelming investigators and IRBs with excessive reporting.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3591b3jz</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>National Science Foundation Proposal/Award Information – NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2s80v71k</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Science Foundation (NSF)'s proposed revisions to the Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG). The University of California (UC) generally supports the proposed updates but expresses concern that expanded Current and Pending Support and Biosketch requirements would increase administrative burden, create ambiguity regarding disclosure obligations, and lack consistency with other federal agencies. UC recommends greater federal harmonization, development of a common disclosure system, clearer definitions and accountability standards, and implementation approaches that reduce burden on researchers and institutions.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2s80v71k</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>University of California Response to Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Request for Information on Accelerating the American Scientific Enterprise (Docket ID No. OSTP-TECH-2025-0100)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/24b9t00t</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)'s Request for Information on Accelerating the American Scientific Enterprise. The University of California (UC) strongly supports policies that strengthen U.S. research competitiveness and recommends stable and predictable federal research funding, preservation of the Bayh-Dole Act, strong intellectual property protections, expanded technology transfer and commercialization programs, streamlined research administration, and sustained investments in scientific talent, infrastructure, and regional innovation ecosystems to accelerate the translation of research into societal and economic benefits.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/24b9t00t</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on OMB's Proposed Rule to Revise Sections of 2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapters I and II (88 FR 69390)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dn5f0vm</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the&amp;nbsp;Office of Management and Budget (OMB)'s Proposed Rule to revise sections of 2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapters I and II (the Uniform Guidance). UC expresses support for OMB’s burden-reducing changes but said the rule still leaves uncertainty and unrecovered costs around indirect-cost rates, agency IDC limits, outdated caps, DS-2 reporting, COI scope, and subaward rules. UC recommends clearer language, stronger enforcement of negotiated IDC rates, eliminating or updating outdated requirements, clarifying procurement COI, and preserving administrative flexibility.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dn5f0vm</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>University of California Response to NIH Request for Information on Maximizing Research Funds by Limiting Allowable Publishing Costs (NOT-OD-25-138)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19t30344</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Request for Information on Maximizing Research Funds by Limiting Allowable Publishing Costs. The University of California (UC) expresses concern that blanket bans or caps on publication costs could restrict researchers' ability to publish in the most appropriate venues and disproportionately burden investigators with fewer resources; instead, UC recommends transparent, federally coordinated negotiations with publishers to reduce publication costs while preserving author choice, research visibility, and broad dissemination of federally funded research.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19t30344</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UC Comments on ED's Request for Comments on&amp;nbsp;Agency Information Collection Activities: Foreign Gifts and Contracts Disclosures (HEA Section 117) (Docket ID Number ED-2022-SCC-0159)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rw2x9gj</link>
      <description>This comment letter responds to the Education Department (ED)'s&amp;nbsp;request for comments on the collection of information required under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act (HEA)(20 §U.S.C. 1011f), as published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2022.&amp;nbsp;UC is concerned that ED significantly underestimates the burden of HEA Section 117 foreign gift and contract reporting, noting that the PEBC portal’s manual-entry process is cumbersome, repetitive, and far more time-consuming than the agency’s estimate. UC recommends allowing single-file uploads, reducing repetitive screens and manual data entry, auto-populating institutional fields, improving review and correction features, expanding institutional access to submitted data, and aligning login requirements with the six-month reporting cycle.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rw2x9gj</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>UC Office of the President</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis of California Assembly Bill 1843:&amp;nbsp;Communicable Diseases: Hepatitis B and C</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0jb4d1dd</link>
      <description>Analysis of California Assembly Bill 1843:&amp;nbsp;Communicable Diseases: Hepatitis B and C</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0jb4d1dd</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Health Benefits Review Program</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Advanced Air Mobility: Opportunities, Challenges, and Research needsfor the State of California (2023-2030)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0656t0dh</link>
      <description>Advanced air mobility (AAM) is a broad concept that enables consumers access to air mobility, goods delivery, and emergency services through an integrated and connected multimodal transportation network. AAM can provide short-range urban, suburban, and rural flights of about 50-miles and mid-range regional flights up to a several hundred miles. State law delegates responsibility for oversight in aviation primarily to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). This white paper presents an overview of the state of the market, such as the aircraft under development and forecast market growth and discusses factors that could facilitate the development of AAM or pose risks to its deployment or to the public, including the safety and the regulatory environment, airspace and air traffic management, security, environmental impacts, weather, infrastructure and multimodal integration, workforce and economic development, social equity, and community engagement and social acceptance....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0656t0dh</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cohen, Adam, MS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shaheen, Susan, PhD</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X</uri>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Curbing the car or charging at the curb?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7mz0z9qv</link>
      <description>Do electric vehicles (EVs), and the expansion of curbside charging infrastructure in particular, undermine efforts to reduce vehicle travel? As EVs gain market share, decisionmakers may be less inclined to support policies such as bicycle lanes and reduced parking if they compete for space with EV chargers. We find no evidence, however, of policy substitution. Surveys in Los Angeles indicate that public support for policies to reduce driving is not swayed by the availability of EV charging. Furthermore, interviews in North American cities reveal that local officials are cautious about locking in scarce curbspace for EVs, and universally prioritized curb uses such as bicycle and bus lanes, street trees, and parklets. In our sample of early adopter cities, EV charging is not currently diminishing the political will for policies to reduce driving. However, this caution has slowed the rollout of curbside charging in North America.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7mz0z9qv</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Millard-Ball, Adam</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2353-8730</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Law, Jasmine</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reclaiming Public Parks and Public Health: Community-Led Safe Passages and Physical Activity in South Los Angeles, California.</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qh313h9</link>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Safe passage interventions aim to enhance public safety and improve access to community resources, including public parks, in underserved communities. However, no studies have directly compared community- and police-led safety interventions with respect to park-based moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). To address this gap, we compared associations between Community-led Safe Passage Services (SPS) and the Los Angeles Police Department Community Safety Partnership (CSP) program with MVPA in South Los Angeles public parks.
METHODS: We conducted structured observations of 3997 park users across 8 SPS and 9 CSP parks in South Los Angeles using the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities and the Physical Activity Resource Assessment. We applied t tests, analysis of variance, and hierarchical linear models to examine MVPA across park intervention types.
RESULTS: Overall, MVPA was higher in SPS parks (P &amp;lt; .001). Black, male, teen, and adult park...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qh313h9</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Douglas, Jason A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Huo, Shutong</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ruiz Malagon, Juan Carlos</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Delgado, Valeria</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ramos, Melissa</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Owens, Ben Taco</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Orange, Kevin Twin</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Equity and Road Pricing: Fairness and Affordability</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p03t9fz</link>
      <description>This white paper reconsiders the equity of road pricing by distinguishing between fairness and affordability—two concepts that are otherwise often conflated. A fair price assigns costs in proportion to the burdens a user imposes on others; an affordable price is one that users can pay without hardship. While both are important, these are distinct objectives, and treating them as interchangeable can obscure judgments about whether pricing is morally or ethically correct. Applying this framework suggests congestion pricing is more equitable than flat VMT charges because it better aligns payments with the social costs of driving. While congestion pricing may raise affordability concerns for some users, these concerns can be addressed through targeted redistribution of toll revenues. By contrast, unpriced roads and poorly targeted charges allow drivers to impose substantial external costs on others, undermining fairness even as they appear more affordable.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p03t9fz</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Manville, Michael, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>California and USA Pricing Strategy Experiences</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6gh3f3qw</link>
      <description>This white paper examines the successes and failures of road pricing strategies in California and the United States, with implications for congestion pricing across California. It evaluates nine case studies spanning feasibility studies, operational HOT lane programs, and the country's first large-scale cordon pricing zone. We address the conditions that favor pricing, barriers, outcomes, and how costs and benefits are distributed using case studies in Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo County, Alameda County, New York City, and Northern Virginia. We find that successful pricing programs have sustained political champions, state enabling legislation, and benefits visible to identifiable users. Revenue allocation, not toll structure, is the primary determinant of whether pricing is regressive or progressive. No pricing program reviewed was repealed after implementation. We conclude that advancing road pricing in California will require clear state leadership and supportive...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6gh3f3qw</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Huang, Emma</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Barry, Erin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Schank, Joshua L., PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Terplan, Egon, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Twenty-Year Performance Review of Asphalt Concrete Long-LifePavements with Performance-Related Specifications</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8b52q3s4</link>
      <description>The first asphalt concrete long-life (AC Long Life) project was constructed in Los Angeles County on Route 710 (LA-710) near Long Beach in 2001/2004 and is now over 20 years old. Four more AC Long Life projects have been completed in California since then, three between 2011 and 2014 (TEH-5, SIS-5, SOL-5), and one in 2021/2022 (SAC-5). The goal of these AC Long Life projects was to achieve design lives of 30 years or 40 years (the standard Caltrans asphalt pavement design life was 20 years at the time). Measures taken to achieve those lives included the use of performance-related specifications for job mix formula approvals, higher compaction requirements, and the use of a three-layer asphalt concrete system for structural capacity. These measures required additional costs. Calculations indicate that the longer lives will result in life cycle cost reductions if they achieve the design lives. Hence, periodic performance evaluations are important, which is the purpose of this technical...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8b52q3s4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wu, Rongzong</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lea, Jeremy</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Harvey, John</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Guada, Irwin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rahman, Mohammad</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis of California Assembly Bill 1887: Prescription Drug Coverage for Rare Diseases</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6291s66s</link>
      <description>Analysis of California Assembly Bill 1887: Prescription Drug Coverage for Rare Diseases</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6291s66s</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Health Benefits Review Program</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Systems Approach Can Lower Costs and Protect the Grid as Freight Electrifies</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vk9j24v</link>
      <description>California is transitioning heavy-duty freight trucks from diesel to battery-electric vehicles to help meet its climate and air quality goals. Unlike passenger vehicles, electric trucks require much larger batteries and high-powered chargers, creating concentrated demands on the electric grid. At the same time, freight carriers operate under strict schedules that leave little flexibility in when and how long trucks can charge. As freight electrification expands, coordinating truck operations, charging infrastructure, and grid planning will become increasingly important.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vk9j24v</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jaller, Miguel, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
