<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/ucr_chass_music_oapolicydeposits/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent ucr_chass_music_oapolicydeposits items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/ucr_chass_music_oapolicydeposits/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from Department of Music Open Access Policy Deposits</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 13:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Sound signature as paradigm: ecology, apparatus, and electroacoustic creation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/12h203jd</link>
      <description>Este artigo propõe o conceito de assinatura sonora como um paradigma para repensar a composição eletroacústica contemporânea na interseção entre ecologia, &amp;nbsp;filosofia e mediação tecnológica. Indo além do paradigma inicial do estúdio, centrado no objeto sonoro autônomo, o estudo argumenta que as práticas atuais – caracterizadas por eletrônica em tempo real, espacialização imersiva, integração audiovisual e sistemas orientados por inteligência artificial – privilegiam a organização relacional em vez de materiais sonoros isolados. A partir da teoria das paisagens sonoras ecológicas de Bernie Krause e do conceito de assinatura de Giorgio Agamben como operador paradigmático, o artigo reconceitua a composição como a construção e a revelação de campos sonoros relacionais. As assinaturas sonoras ecológicas emergem da distribuição dinâmica de nichos acústicos em sistemas vivos; de modo análogo, obras eletroacústicas geram ambientes estruturados nos quais a agência é distribuída entre...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/12h203jd</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chagas, Paulo C</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-5508</uri>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Collaborative Dynamics in Electroacoustic Music Creativity: Telematic Dialogues Across Apparatuses</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8h10d7q8</link>
      <description>This paper investigates the dynamics of electroacoustic music collaboration within complex techno- logical, social, and philosophical frameworks. Emphasizing the interplay between human creativity and technical apparatuses, it draws on theoretical concepts such as Vilém Flusser’s telematic dialogue, Jacques Attali’s notion of composition as resistance, Martin Heidegger’s ontology of art and technology, and Niklas Luhmann’s systemstheory. Through historical examples—including the WDR Electronic Music Studio—and recent works by composer Paulo C. Chagas and flutist Cássia Carrascoza, particularly 
 Sound Imaginations: Telematic Immersion
 , the paper examines how electroacoustic practices generate new forms of authorship, co-presence, and symbolic ritual. These practices challenge conventional boundaries between composer, performer, audience, and machine, proposing a participatory model of creative exchange instead. Ultimately, the study argues that electroacoustic collaboration...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8h10d7q8</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chagas, Paulo</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-5508</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lozo, Ivana Petković</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Moral Habitat, by Barbara Herman</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8zs26159</link>
      <description>The Moral Habitat, by Barbara Herman</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8zs26159</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Reath, Andrews</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finding Her Beat ed. by Dawn Mikkelson and Keri Pickett (review)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/61v6w5x7</link>
      <description>Finding Her Beat ed. by Dawn Mikkelson and Keri Pickett (review)</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/61v6w5x7</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wong, Deborah</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Drumming Through &lt;i&gt;Princess of China&lt;/i&gt;: Intercultural Encounters in a Hollywood Music Video</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4zq7p074</link>
      <description>Drumming Through &lt;i&gt;Princess of China&lt;/i&gt;: Intercultural Encounters in a Hollywood Music Video</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4zq7p074</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wong, Deborah</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Funeral of King Rama IX: Mourning and the Thai State</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2z10h0hb</link>
      <description>The Funeral of King Rama IX: Mourning and the Thai State</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2z10h0hb</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Adler, Supeena Insee</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Wong, Deborah</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does the Heart Revolt at Evil? The Case of Racial Atrocities</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9cg6236n</link>
      <description>Does the Heart Revolt at Evil? The Case of Racial Atrocities</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9cg6236n</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Imagining Yourself in Another's Shoes versus Extending Your Concern: Empirical &amp;amp; Ethical Differences</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/29d3t63n</link>
      <description>Abstract: 

               According to the Golden Rule, you should do unto others as you would have others do unto you. Similarly, people are often exhorted to “imagine themselves in another's shoes.” A related but contrasting approach to moral expansion traces back to the ancient Chinese philosopher Mengzi, who urges us to “extend” our concern for those nearby to more distant people. Other approaches to moral expansion involve attending to the good consequences for oneself of caring for others, expanding one's sense of self, expanding one's sense of community, attending to others’ morally relevant properties, and learning by doing. About all such approaches, we can ask three questions: To what extent do people in fact (for instance, developmentally) broaden and deepen their care for others by these different methods? To what extent do these different methods differ in ethical merit? And how effectively do these different methods produce appropriate care?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/29d3t63n</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Let's hope we're not living in a simulation</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8kb6j19z</link>
      <description>Abstract: 
In Reality+, David Chalmers suggests that it wouldn't be too bad if we lived in a computer simulation. I argue on the contrary that if we live in a simulation, we ought to attach a significant conditional credence to its being a small or brief simulation. Our existence and the existence of many of the people and things we care about would then unfortunately depend on contingencies difficult to assess and beyond our control. Furthermore, all the badness of the world would appear to reflect the gods’ intentional cruelty or callous disregard. A large, stable rock is a more dependable and less axiologically troubling fundamental ground for reality.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8kb6j19z</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LAP 50 th Anniversary Reflection</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sd3s9w0</link>
      <description>LAP 50 th Anniversary Reflection</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sd3s9w0</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ritter, Jonathan</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Ethics of Life as It Could Be: Do We Have Moral Obligations to Artificial Life?</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tw7447b</link>
      <description>The field of Artificial Life studies the nature of the living state by modeling and synthesizing living systems. Such systems, under certain conditions, may come to deserve moral consideration similar to that given to nonhuman vertebrates or even human beings. The fact that these systems are nonhuman and evolve in a potentially radically different substrate should not be seen as an insurmountable obstacle to their potentially having rights, if they are sufficiently sophisticated in other respects. Nor should the fact that they owe their existence to us be seen as reducing their status as targets of moral concern. On the contrary, creators of Artificial Life may have special obligations to their creations, resembling those of an owner to their pet or a parent to their child. For a field that aims to create artificial life-forms with increasing levels of sophistication, it is crucial to consider the possible ethical implications of our activities, with an eye toward assessing potential...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tw7447b</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Witkowski, Olaf</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dehumanizing the Cognitively Disabled: Commentary on Smith’s Making Monsters</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fm9q8xn</link>
      <description>Dehumanizing the Cognitively Disabled: Commentary on Smith’s Making Monsters</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fm9q8xn</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Green, Amelie</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introspection in Group Minds, Disunities of Consciousness, and Indiscrete Persons</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nn9q1kt</link>
      <description>Kammerer and Frankish (this issue) challenge us to expand our conception of introspection beyond neurotypical human cases. This article describes a possible 'ancillary mind' modelled on a system envisioned in Leckie's (2013) science fiction novel Ancillary Justice. The ancillary
 mind constitutes a borderline case between a communicating group of individuals and a single, spatially distributed mind. It occupies a grey zone with respect to personal identity and subject individuation, neither determinately one person or subject nor determinately many persons or subjects,
 and thus some of its processes might be neither determinately introspection within a mind nor determinately communication between minds. If ancillary minds defy discrete countability, the same might be true for some actual minds on Earth. Kammerer and Frankish's research programme can be extended
 to include not only the study of possible forms of introspection, but also the study of possible mental activity intermediate...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nn9q1kt</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Nelson, Sophie R</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Music-Evoked Nostalgia and Charitable Giving: A Cross-Cultural Study in the United States and Mexico</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8235n4rp</link>
      <description>Music-Evoked Nostalgia and Charitable Giving: A Cross-Cultural Study in the United States and Mexico</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8235n4rp</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cho, Eun</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Duarte-Garcîa, Mario</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sefchovich, Jorge Rodrigo Sigal</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Chagas, Paulo C</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI systems must not confuse users about their sentience or moral status</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/460699z0</link>
      <description>One relatively neglected challenge in ethical artificial intelligence (AI) design is ensuring that AI systems invite a degree of emotional and moral concern appropriate to their moral standing. Although experts generally agree that current AI chatbots are not sentient to any meaningful degree, these systems can already provoke substantial attachment and sometimes intense emotional responses in users. Furthermore, rapid advances in AI technology could soon create AIs of plausibly debatable sentience and moral standing, at least by some relevant definitions. Morally confusing AI systems create unfortunate ethical dilemmas for the owners and users of those systems, since it is unclear how those systems ethically should be treated. I argue here that, to the extent possible, we should avoid creating AI systems whose sentience or moral standing is unclear and that AI systems should be designed so as to invite appropriate emotional responses in ordinary users.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/460699z0</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Students Eat Less Meat After Studying Meat Ethics</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2zr9v04t</link>
      <description>In the first controlled, non-self-report studies to show an influence of university-level ethical instruction on everyday behavior, Schwitzgebel et al. (2020) and Jalil et al. (2020) found that students purchase less meat after exposure to material on the ethics of eating meat. We sought to extend and conceptually replicate this research. Seven hundred thirty students in three large philosophy classes read James Rachels’ (2004) “Basic Argument for Vegetarianism”, followed by 50-min small-group discussions. Half also viewed a vegetarianism advocacy video containing factory farm footage. A few days after instruction, 54% of students agreed that “eating the meat of factory farmed animals is unethical”, compared to 37% before instruction, with no difference between the film and non-film conditions. Also, 39% of students anonymously pledged to avoid eating factory farmed meat for 24&amp;nbsp;h, again with no statistically detectable difference between conditions. Finally, we obtained 2828...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2zr9v04t</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cokelet, Bradford</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Singer, Peter</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Timescales of developmental toxicity impacting on research and needs for intervention</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6949z4b9</link>
      <description>Much progress has happened in understanding developmental vulnerability to preventable environmental hazards. Along with the improved insight, the perspective has widened, and developmental toxicity now involves latent effects that can result in delayed adverse effects in adults or at old age and additional effects that can be transgenerationally transferred to future generations. Although epidemiology and toxicology to an increasing degree are exploring the adverse effects from developmental exposures in human beings, the improved documentation has resulted in little progress in protection, and few environmental chemicals are currently regulated to protect against developmental toxicity, whether it be neurotoxicity, endocrine disruption or other adverse outcome. The desire to obtain a high degree of certainty and verification of the evidence used for decision-making must be weighed against the costs and necessary duration of research, as well as the long-term costs to human health...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6949z4b9</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Grandjean, Philippe</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Abdennebi‐Najar, Latifa</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Barouki, Robert</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cranor, Carl F</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Etzel, Ruth A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gee, David</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Heindel, Jerrold J</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hougaard, Karin S</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hunt, Patricia</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Nawrot, Tim S</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Prins, Gail S</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ritz, Beate</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Soffritti, Morando</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sunyer, Jordi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Weihe, Pal</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Unique About Kindness? Exploring the Proximal Experience of Prosocial Acts Relative to Other Positive Behaviors</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93q7h2ng</link>
      <description>Previous research has identified a robust connection between prosociality and happiness, suggesting that kindness has both hedonic and eudaimonic benefits—in the short term and in the long term. By contrast, our experiment aimed to examine people’s momentary eudaimonic feelings while engaging in kind acts for others. To that end, we randomly assigned participants to one of four positively valenced conditions that varied in their inclusion of potential “active ingredients” of prosocial behavior. Namely, engaging in kind acts for others was compared to engaging in kind acts for oneself (social element removed), extraverted behavior (kindness element removed), and open-minded behavior (both social and kindness elements removed). Participants were assessed five times over 2 weeks, each time reporting on how they felt during their assigned activities. Multilevel models revealed that relative to all other conditions, participants assigned to do kind acts for others reported a greater...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93q7h2ng</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Regan, Annie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Margolis, Seth</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ozer, Daniel J</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1052-3078</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lyubomirsky, Sonja</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0727-5595</uri>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A science-based agenda for health-protective chemical assessments and decisions: overview and consensus statement</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3h14z7bd</link>
      <description>The manufacture and production of industrial chemicals continues to increase, with hundreds of thousands of chemicals and chemical mixtures used worldwide, leading to widespread population exposures and resultant health impacts. Low-wealth communities and communities of color often bear disproportionate burdens of exposure and impact; all compounded by&amp;nbsp;regulatory delays to the detriment of public health. Multiple authoritative bodies and scientific consensus groups have called for actions to prevent harmful exposures via improved policy approaches. We worked across multiple disciplines to develop consensus recommendations for health-protective, scientific approaches to reduce harmful chemical exposures, which can be applied to current US policies governing industrial chemicals and environmental pollutants. This consensus identifies five principles and scientific recommendations for improving how agencies like the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approach and conduct...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3h14z7bd</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Woodruff, Tracey J</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-1297</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rayasam, Swati DG</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3589-1638</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Axelrad, Daniel A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Koman, Patricia D</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Chartres, Nicholas</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Bennett, Deborah H</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-2316</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Birnbaum, Linda S</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Brown, Phil</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Carignan, Courtney C</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cooper, Courtney</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3530-9863</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cranor, Carl F</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Diamond, Miriam L</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Franjevic, Shari</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gartner, Eve C</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hattis, Dale</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hauser, Russ</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Heiger-Bernays, Wendy</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Joglekar, Rashmi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lam, Juleen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Levy, Jonathan I</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>MacRoy, Patrick M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Maffini, Maricel V</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Marquez, Emily C</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Morello-Frosch, Rachel</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-7287</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Nachman, Keeve E</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Nielsen, Greylin H</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Oksas, Catherine</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Abrahamsson, Dimitri Panagopoulos</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Patisaul, Heather B</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Patton, Sharyle</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Robinson, Joshua F</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rodgers, Kathryn M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rossi, Mark S</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rudel, Ruthann A</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-4127</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sass, Jennifer B</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sathyanarayana, Sheela</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Schettler, Ted</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shaffer, Rachel M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shamasunder, Bhavna</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shepard, Peggy M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shrader-Frechette, Kristin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Solomon, Gina M</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-0387</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Subra, Wilma A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Vandenberg, Laura N</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Varshavsky, Julia R</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>White, Roberta F</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zarker, Ken</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Zeise, Lauren</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Current practice and recommendations for advancing how human variability and susceptibility are considered in chemical risk assessment</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/04k9k3ch</link>
      <description>A key element of risk assessment is accounting for the full range of variability in response to environmental exposures. Default dose-response methods typically assume a 10-fold difference in response to chemical exposures between average (healthy) and susceptible humans, despite evidence of wider variability. Experts and authoritative bodies support using advanced techniques to better account for human variability due to factors such as in utero or early life exposure and exposure to multiple environmental, social, and economic stressors.This review describes: 1) sources of human variability and susceptibility in dose-response assessment, 2) existing US frameworks for addressing response variability in risk assessment; 3) key scientific inadequacies necessitating updated methods; 4) improved approaches and opportunities for better use of science; and 5) specific and quantitative recommendations to address evidence and policy needs.Current default adjustment factors do not sufficiently...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/04k9k3ch</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Varshavsky, Julia R</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rayasam, Swati DG</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3589-1638</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sass, Jennifer B</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Axelrad, Daniel A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cranor, Carl F</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hattis, Dale</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hauser, Russ</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Koman, Patricia D</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Marquez, Emily C</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Morello-Frosch, Rachel</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-7287</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Oksas, Catherine</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Patton, Sharyle</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Robinson, Joshua F</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sathyanarayana, Sheela</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shepard, Peggy M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Woodruff, Tracey J</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-1297</uri>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kantian Constructivism and Kantian Constitutivism: Some Reflections</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2pz7h5f3</link>
      <description>Abstract: 

               Is moral constructivism an account of the basis of the content of morality or of its authority? In fact, different writers have understood constructivism to be addressing different issues. In this paper I argue that Kant should be understood as a constructivist about the content of morality – or better about a limited set of general substantive principles – and as a constititutivist about its authority. After some general remarks in Section 1 about contemporary discussions of constructivism, in Section 2 I discuss Rawls’s understanding of Kant’s constructivism; Rawls takes Kantian constructivism to be a view about the content of morality. In Section 3, I give an overview of Kant’s moral conception as constructivist about the content of morality and as constitutivist about its authority. In Section 4 I address a worry whether certain features of Kant’s constitutivism rest his constructivism on a realist foundation, arguing that they do not.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2pz7h5f3</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Reath, Andrews</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Autonomy and the Idea of Freedom: Some Reflections on Groundwork III</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/10d3d7cp</link>
      <description>AbstractThis article explores a set of questions about the ‘idea of freedom’ that Kant introduces in the fourth paragraph ofGroundworkIII. I develop a reading that supports treating it as a normative notion and brings out its normative content in some detail. I argue that we should understand the idea as follows: that it is a general feature of reasoning and judgement that it understands itself to be a correct or sound application of the normative standards of the relevant domain of cognition, not influenced by irrelevant or external factors. Reasoning and judgement are thus normatively committed to these standards of correctness. A second and related concern is to explore connections between the idea of freedom and Kant’s conception of autonomy and to identify different points at which autonomy plays a role in the argument ofGroundworkIII. In the final section, I mine the idea of freedom for a set of normative commitments specific to rational agency that play a foundational role...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/10d3d7cp</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Reath, Andrews</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intertemporal Arbitrage of Water and Long‐Term Agricultural Investments: Drought, Groundwater Banking, and Perennial Cropping Decisions in California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1b21x6h1</link>
      <description>In arid areas, irrigation water is an essential input into agricultural production. However, rainfall and, correspondingly, surface water supplies are often highly variable, creating uncertainty over the value of long‐term, water‐dependent investments in these cropping systems. Moreover, climate change is expected to increase both crop water requirements and the variability of seasonal rainfall, meaning the constraints imposed by variable water supplies are likely to grow in cost as climate change progresses. In this setting, storing water in wet years for use in dry years is valuable. In particular, it would be expected to increase the value of perennial crops, which require large up‐front investments that pay off gradually over the life of the tree. We first show, in a simple theoretical model, that given the timing of returns to investments in perennial crops, there is always some level of drought risk above which annual crops will be preferred to perennials. We then demonstrate...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1b21x6h1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Arellano‐Gonzalez, Jesus</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Moore, Frances C</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-9642</uri>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do ethics classes influence student behavior? Case study: Teaching the ethics of eating meat</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00g7c186</link>
      <description>Do university ethics classes influence students' real-world moral choices? We aimed to conduct the first controlled study of the effects of ordinary philosophical ethics classes on real-world moral choices, using non-self-report, non-laboratory behavior as the dependent measure. We assigned 1332 students in four large philosophy classes to either an experimental group on the ethics of eating meat or a control group on the ethics of charitable giving. Students in each group read a philosophy article on their assigned topic and optionally viewed a related video, then met with teaching assistants for 50-minute group discussion sections. They expressed their opinions about meat ethics and charitable giving in a follow-up questionnaire (1032 respondents after exclusions). We obtained 13,642 food purchase receipts from campus restaurants for 495 of the students, before and after the intervention. Purchase of meat products declined in the experimental group (52% of purchases of at least...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00g7c186</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cokelet, Bradford</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Singer, Peter</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New science of climate change impacts on agriculture implies higher social cost of carbon</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1hv0g0dg</link>
      <description>Despite substantial advances in climate change impact research in recent years, the scientific basis for damage functions in economic models used to calculate the social cost of carbon (SCC) is either undocumented, difficult to trace, or based on a small number of dated studies. Here we present new damage functions based on the current scientific literature and introduce these into an integrated assessment model (IAM) in order to estimate a new SCC. We focus on the agricultural sector, use two methods for determining the yield impacts of warming, and the GTAP CGE model to calculate the economic consequences of yield shocks. These new damage functions reveal far more adverse agricultural impacts than currently represented in IAMs. Impacts in&amp;nbsp;the agriculture increase from net benefits of $2.7 ton−1 CO2 to net costs of $8.5 ton−1, leading the total SCC to more than double.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1hv0g0dg</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Moore, Frances C</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-9642</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Baldos, Uris</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hertel, Thomas</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Diaz, Delavane</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Climate adaptation by crop migration</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/20f7s03q</link>
      <description>Many studies have estimated the adverse effects of climate change on crop yields, however, this literature almost universally assumes a constant geographic distribution of crops in the future. Movement of growing areas to limit exposure to adverse climate conditions has been discussed as a theoretical adaptive response but has not previously been quantified or demonstrated at a global scale. Here, we assess how changes in rainfed crop area have already mediated growing season temperature trends for rainfed maize, wheat, rice, and soybean using spatially-explicit climate and crop area data from 1973 to 2012. Our results suggest that the most damaging impacts of warming on rainfed maize, wheat, and rice have been substantially moderated by the migration of these crops over time and the expansion of irrigation. However, continued migration may incur substantial environmental costs and will depend on socio-economic and political factors in addition to land suitability and climate.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/20f7s03q</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Sloat, Lindsey L</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Davis, Steven J</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9338-0844</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gerber, James S</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Moore, Frances C</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-9642</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ray, Deepak K</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>West, Paul C</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nathaniel D</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A New Measure of Life Satisfaction: The Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/99q2717f</link>
      <description>The Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, &amp;amp; Griffin, 1985) has been the dominant measure of life satisfaction since its creation more than 30&amp;nbsp;years ago. We sought to develop an improved measure that includes indirect indicators of life satisfaction (e.g., wishing to change one's life) to increase the bandwidth of the measure and account for acquiescence bias. In 3 studies, we developed a 6-item measure of life satisfaction, the Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale, and obtained reliability and validity evidence. Importantly, the Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale retained the high internal consistency, test-retest stability, and unidimensionality of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. In addition, the Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale correlated with other well-being measures, Big Five personality traits, values, and demographic information in expected ways. Although the Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale correlated highly with the Satisfaction With Life Scale,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/99q2717f</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Margolis, Seth</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Schwitzgebel, Eric</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ozer, Daniel J</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1052-3078</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lyubomirsky, Sonja</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0727-5595</uri>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economic impacts of climate change on agriculture: a comparison of process-based and statistical yield models</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1fp6x87j</link>
      <description>A large number of studies have been published examining the implications of climate change for agricultural productivity that, broadly speaking, can be divided into process-based modeling and statistical approaches. Despite a general perception that results from these methods differ substantially, there have been few direct comparisons. Here we use a data-base of yield impact studies compiled for the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (Porter et al 2014) to systematically compare results from process-based and empirical studies. Controlling for differences in representation of CO2 fertilization between the two methods, we find little evidence for differences in the yield response to warming. The magnitude of CO2 fertilization is instead a much larger source of uncertainty. Based on this set of impact results, we find a very limited potential for on-farm adaptation to reduce yield impacts. We use the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) global economic model to estimate welfare consequences...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1fp6x87j</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Moore, Frances C</name>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-9642</uri>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Baldos, Uris Lantz C</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hertel, Thomas</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Graying of the Immigrant Dream The Sounds of Latinidad: Immigrants Making Music and Creating Culture in a Southern City . (Social Transformations in American Anthropology). By Samuel K. Byrd. New York: New York University Press, 2015.</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0cs6q58z</link>
      <description>The Graying of the Immigrant Dream The Sounds of Latinidad: Immigrants Making Music and Creating Culture in a Southern City . (Social Transformations in American Anthropology). By Samuel K. Byrd. New York: New York University Press, 2015.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0cs6q58z</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chávez, Xóchitl C</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sound, Silence, Music: Power</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cg2t3pq</link>
      <description>Abstract
               One afternoon in the mid-1990s, I walked past a bookstore in Berkeley, California and stopped to look at the window display. It featured a group of at least twenty books with wildly divergent subjects that were clearly meant to be viewed together, and I stared, puzzled, until I suddenly saw that each book title had the word "power" in it. They bore titles like Power and Accountability, Power and Beauty, Power and Civil Society, Power and Community, Power and Difference, Power and Empowerment, Power and Everyday Life, Power and Gender, and so on. Power was everywhere: Foucault had gone off like a bomb in the humanities and the social sciences.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cg2t3pq</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wong, Deborah</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ethnomusicology without Erotics</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06w700c6</link>
      <description>Ethnomusicology without Erotics</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06w700c6</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Wong, Deborah</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>“Autonomy, Taking One’s Choices to be Good, and Practical Law: Replies to Critics”</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6mf816zz</link>
      <description>“Autonomy, Taking One’s Choices to be Good, and Practical Law: Replies to Critics”</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6mf816zz</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Reath, A</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
