<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/ucwhw_ep/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent ucwhw_ep items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/ucwhw_ep/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from Essays and Positions</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 16:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Born Again: Globalization’s Sixteenth-Century Origins (Asian/Global versus European Dynamics)</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8zw088bj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A revised version of this paper appears in the Pacific Economic Review, 2008. By courtesy of Wiley Interscience and authors, an online version of the Pacific Economic Review paper is accessible at no charge at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118545351/home . Please refer to and cite the published version! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Globalization began when all heavily-populated land masses began interacting – both directly with each other and indirectly via other land masses – in a sustained manner with deep consequences for all interacting regions; global interactions emerged during the 16th century when modern globalization was born.  Dynamism emanating from within China played a pivotal role, while Europeans were (crucial) global intermediaries. Valid hypotheses concerning the emergence and sustenance of such a profound phenomenon as 'globalization' must accommodate evidence from numerous disciplinary debates.  Any attempt to limit discussion of globalization's birth to strictly...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8zw088bj</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Flynn, Dennis O</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Giraldez, Arturo</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Modernity’s Histories: Rethinking the Long Nineteenth Century, 1750-1950</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2k62f464</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The paper suggests that the UC Multi-Campus Research Group in World History should consider undertaking a collaborative research project aimed at rethinking the history of the long nineteenth century in comparative world historical perspective, suggesting some reasons why demarcating a research area on this scale might be productive, as well as some broad topics within it that appear to be potentially of interest. These days for a variety of reasons we are suspicious of large scale historical narratives and the uses to which they have been put. But faute de mieux, we continue to frame our work in terms of the dichotomous division between the West and the Rest, often without our being aware of it. It is the author's contention that by neglecting the larger frames in which our work might be inserted, we deprive it of larger resonances that will enable us to connect with broader audiences. Whether we like it or not, big narratives will inevitably be invoked by readers as they...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2k62f464</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Burke, Edmund, III</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
