- Edelson, R
- Gelbord, J
- Cackett, E
- Connolly, S
- Done, C
- Fausnaugh, M
- Gardner, E
- Gehrels, N
- Goad, M
- Horne, K
- McHardy, I
- Peterson, BM
- Vaughan, S
- Vestergaard, M
- Breeveld, A
- Barth, AJ
- Bentz, M
- Bottorff, M
- Brandt, WN
- Crawford, SM
- Dalla Bontà, E
- Emmanoulopoulos, D
- Evans, P
- Jaimes, RF
- Filippenko, AV
- Ferland, G
- Grupe, D
- Joner, M
- Kennea, J
- Korista, KT
- Krimm, HA
- Kriss, G
- Leonard, DC
- Mathur, S
- Netzer, H
- Nousek, J
- Page, K
- Romero-Colmenero, E
- Siegel, M
- Starkey, DA
- Treu, T
- Vogler, HA
- Winkler, H
- Zheng, W
- et al.
© 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Swift monitoring of NGC 4151 with an ∼6 hr sampling over a total of 69 days in early 2016 is used to construct light curves covering five bands in the X-rays (0.3-50 keV) and six in the ultraviolet (UV)/optical (1900-5500 Å). The three hardest X-ray bands (>2.5 keV) are all strongly correlated with no measurable interband lag, while the two softer bands show lower variability and weaker correlations. The UV/optical bands are significantly correlated with the X-rays, lagging ∼3-4 days behind the hard X-rays. The variability within the UV/optical bands is also strongly correlated, with the UV appearing to lead the optical by ∼0.5-1 days. This combination of ≳3 day lags between the X-rays and UV and ≲1 day lags within the UV/optical appears to rule out the "lamp-post" reprocessing model in which a hot, X-ray emitting corona directly illuminates the accretion disk, which then reprocesses the energy in the UV/optical. Instead, these results appear consistent with the Gardner & Done picture in which two separate reprocessings occur: first, emission from the corona illuminates an extreme-UV-emitting toroidal component that shields the disk from the corona; this then heats the extreme-UV component, which illuminates the disk and drives its variability.