- Luo, Y
- Ahlström, A
- Allison, SD
- Batjes, NH
- Brovkin, V
- Carvalhais, N
- Chappell, A
- Ciais, P
- Davidson, EA
- Finzi, A
- Georgiou, K
- Guenet, B
- Hararuk, O
- Harden, JW
- He, Y
- Hopkins, F
- Jiang, L
- Koven, C
- Jackson, RB
- Jones, CD
- Lara, MJ
- Liang, J
- McGuire, AD
- Parton, W
- Peng, C
- Randerson, JT
- Salazar, A
- Sierra, CA
- Smith, MJ
- Tian, H
- Todd-Brown, KEO
- Torn, M
- Van Groenigen, KJ
- Wang, YP
- West, TO
- Wei, Y
- Wieder, WR
- Xia, J
- Xu, X
- Xu, X
- Zhou, T
- et al.
©2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. Soil carbon (C) is a critical component of Earth system models (ESMs), and its diverse representations are a major source of the large spread across models in the terrestrial C sink from the third to fifth assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Improving soil C projections is of a high priority for Earth system modeling in the future IPCC and other assessments. To achieve this goal, we suggest that (1) model structures should reflect real-world processes, (2) parameters should be calibrated to match model outputs with observations, and (3) external forcing variables should accurately prescribe the environmental conditions that soils experience. First, most soil C cycle models simulate C input from litter production and C release through decomposition. The latter process has traditionally been represented by first-order decay functions, regulated primarily by temperature, moisture, litter quality, and soil texture. While this formulation well captures macroscopic soil organic C (SOC) dynamics, better understanding is needed of their underlying mechanisms as related to microbial processes, depth-dependent environmental controls, and other processes that strongly affect soil C dynamics. Second, incomplete use of observations in model parameterization is a major cause of bias in soil C projections from ESMs. Optimal parameter calibration with both pool- and flux-based data sets through data assimilation is among the highest priorities for near-term research to reduce biases among ESMs. Third, external variables are represented inconsistently among ESMs, leading to differences in modeled soil C dynamics. We recommend the implementation of traceability analyses to identify how external variables and model parameterizations influence SOC dynamics in different ESMs. Overall, projections of the terrestrial C sink can be substantially improved when reliable data sets are available to select the most representative model structure, constrain parameters, and prescribe forcing fields.