Background

Cellular senescence is a stable arrest of proliferation and is considered a key component of processes associated with carcinogenesis and other ageing-related phenotypes. Here, we perform methylome analysis of actively dividing and deeply senescent normal human epithelial cells.

Results

We identify senescence-associated differentially methylated positions (senDMPs) from multiple experiments using cells from one donor. We find that human senDMP epigenetic signatures are positively and significantly correlated with both cancer and ageing-associated methylation dynamics. We also identify germline genetic variants, including those associated with the p16INK4A locus, which are associated with the presence of in vivo senDMP signatures. Importantly, we also demonstrate that a single senDMP signature can be effectively reversed in a newly-developed protocol of transient senescence reversal.

Conclusions

The senDMP signature has significant potential for understanding some of the key (epi)genetic etiological factors that may lead to cancer and age-related diseases in humans.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported two errors in Fig. 1B and Fig. 2B. 1. The two EP + siGLO and DS + siGLO brightfield/β-gal images from Fig. 2A were accidentally duplicated in Fig. 1B. The images in Fig. 2A are correct. The images in Fig. 1B are replaced with representative images of untransfected EP and DS cells. The incorrect and the correct figure are given below. The incorrect Fig. 1: (Figure presented.) The correct Fig. 1: (Figure presented.) The replacement of these images does not change any of the other data in this figure, nor the conclusion of this figure. 2. The authors also noticed that the panels in Fig. 2B labelled with “DS” were incorrectly labelled. The bar charts and figure legend correctly state that these images are “DS + siGLO” images. These panels are now relabelled as “DS + siGLO”. This proposed relabelling does not change any of the other data in this figure, nor the conclusion of Fig. 2B. The incorrect and the correct figure are given below. The incorrect Fig. 2: (Figure presented.) The correct Fig. 2: (Figure presented.) In both instances, these errors do not change any data associated with these figures, nor do they change the conclusions of the corresponding figures and the paper.