Non-medical use of prescription stimulants amongst college students is common, with claims of cognitive and academic benefits. The mechanism, magnitude, and pervasiveness of the cognitive enhancing effects of stimulants in healthy adults remain poorly understood however. The present study determined the effects of dextroamphetamine (D-amp) on the 5-choice continuous performance test (5C-CPT) of attention in healthy young adult humans and mice. A mixed gender sample received placebo (n = 29), 10 (n = 17) or 20 mg D-amp (n = 25) in a double-blind fashion before 5C-CPT testing. In addition, male C57BL/6J mice were trained on a touchscreen adaptation of the 5C-CPT and tested after receiving saline or D-amp (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg; n = 8/dose). In humans, D-amp significantly improved 5C-CPT performance. Both doses improved signal detection driven by increased hit rate (reduced omissions). Both doses also improved response accuracy and reduced hit reaction time (HRT) variability. In mice, similar effects (improved signal detection, hit rate, and response accuracy) were observed at the moderate dose (0.3 mg/kg). In contrast to human participants however, no effect on HRT variability was detected in mice, with no effect on HRT in either species. Human 5C-CPT performance was consistent with prior studies and consistent with alternative CPT paradigms. The performance of C57BL/6J mice on the touchscreen 5C-CPT mirrored performance of this strain on 5-hole operant chambers. Importantly, comparable facilitation of attention with D-amp was observed in both species. The 5C-CPT provides a cross-species paradigm by which the cognitive enhancing properties of stimulants and the neural underpinnings of attention can be assessed.

There has been a fundamental failure to translate preclinically supported research into clinically efficacious treatments for psychiatric disorders. One of the greatest impediments toward improving this species gap has been the difficulty of identifying translatable neurophysiological signals that are related to specific behavioral constructs. Here, we present evidence from three paradigms that were completed by humans and mice using analogous procedures, with each task eliciting candidate a priori defined electrophysiological signals underlying effortful motivation, reinforcement learning, and cognitive control. The effortful motivation was assessed using a progressive ratio breakpoint task, yielding a similar decrease in alpha-band activity over time in both species. Reinforcement learning was assessed via feedback in a probabilistic learning task with delta power significantly modulated by reward surprise in both species. Additionally, cognitive control was assessed in the five-choice continuous performance task, yielding response-locked theta power seen across species, and modulated by difficulty in humans. Together, these successes, and also the teachings from these failures, provide a roadmap towards the use of electrophysiology as a method for translating findings from the preclinical assays to the clinical settings.

The poor translatability between preclinical and clinical drug trials has limited pro-cognitive therapeutic development. Future pro-cognitive drug trials should use translatable cross-species cognitive tasks with biomarkers (1) relevant to specific cognitive constructs, and (2) sensitive to drug treatment. Here, we used a difficulty-modulated variant of a cross-species cognitive control task with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) to identify neurophysiological biomarkers sensitive to the pro-cognitive effects of dextroamphetamine (d-amp) (10 or 20 mg) in healthy adults (n = 23), in a randomized, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, double blind, within-subject study, conducted across three test days each separated by one week. D-amp boosted d-prime, sped reaction time, and increased frontal P3a amplitude to non-target correct rejections independent of task difficulty. Task difficulty did however, moderate d-amp effects on EEG during target performance. D-amp suppressed frontal theta power during easy target responses which negatively correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate while d-amp-induced changes in P3b amplitude during hard target trials strongly correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate. In summary, d-amp affected both behavioral and neurophysiological measures of cognitive control elements. Under low-demand, d-amp diminished cognitive control by suppressing theta, yet under high-demand it boosted control in concert with higher P3b amplitudes. These findings thus appear to reflect a gain-sharpening effect of d-amp: during high-demand processes were boosted while during low-demand processes were neglected. Future studies will use these neurophysiological measures of cognitive control as biomarkers to predict d-amp sensitivity in people with cognitive control deficits, including schizophrenia.