Purpose

To develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL) model to assess fundus photograph quality, and quantitatively measure its impact on automated POAG detection in independent study populations.

Methods

Image quality ground truth was determined by manual review of 2815 fundus photographs of healthy and POAG eyes from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (DIGS/ADAGES), as well as 11,350 from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Human experts assessed a photograph as high quality if of sufficient quality to determine POAG status and poor quality if not. A DL quality model was trained on photographs from DIGS/ADAGES and tested on OHTS. The effect of DL quality assessment on DL POAG detection was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC).

Results

The DL quality model yielded an AUROC of 0.97 for differentiating between high- and low-quality photographs; qualitative human review affirmed high model performance. Diagnostic accuracy of the DL POAG model was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in good (AUROC, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92) compared with poor quality photographs (AUROC, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88).

Conclusions

The DL quality model was able to accurately assess fundus photograph quality. Using automated quality assessment to filter out low-quality photographs increased the accuracy of a DL POAG detection model.

Translational relevance

Incorporating DL quality assessment into automated review of fundus photographs can help to decrease the burden of manual review and improve accuracy for automated DL POAG detection.

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic accuracy and explainability of a Vision Transformer deep learning technique, Data-efficient image Transformer (DeiT), and ResNet-50, trained on fundus photographs from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) to detect primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and identify the salient areas of the photographs most important for each model's decision-making process.

Design

Evaluation of a diagnostic technology.

Subjects participants and controls

Overall 66 715 photographs from 1636 OHTS participants and an additional 5 external datasets of 16 137 photographs of healthy and glaucoma eyes.

Methods

Data-efficient image Transformer models were trained to detect 5 ground-truth OHTS POAG classifications: OHTS end point committee POAG determinations because of disc changes (model 1), visual field (VF) changes (model 2), or either disc or VF changes (model 3) and Reading Center determinations based on disc (model 4) and VFs (model 5). The best-performing DeiT models were compared with ResNet-50 models on OHTS and 5 external datasets.

Main outcome measures

Diagnostic performance was compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and sensitivities at fixed specificities. The explainability of the DeiT and ResNet-50 models was compared by evaluating the attention maps derived directly from DeiT to 3 gradient-weighted class activation map strategies.

Results

Compared with our best-performing ResNet-50 models, the DeiT models demonstrated similar performance on the OHTS test sets for all 5 ground-truth POAG labels; AUROC ranged from 0.82 (model 5) to 0.91 (model 1). Data-efficient image Transformer AUROC was consistently higher than ResNet-50 on the 5 external datasets. For example, AUROC for the main OHTS end point (model 3) was between 0.08 and 0.20 higher in the DeiT than ResNet-50 models. The saliency maps from the DeiT highlight localized areas of the neuroretinal rim, suggesting important rim features for classification. The same maps in the ResNet-50 models show a more diffuse, generalized distribution around the optic disc.

Conclusions

Vision Transformers have the potential to improve generalizability and explainability in deep learning models, detecting eye disease and possibly other medical conditions that rely on imaging for clinical diagnosis and management.

Purpose

To compare the differences in retinal vessel density (VD) between topical administration of latanoprostene bunod (LBN) ophthalmic solution 0.024% and timolol maleate 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) and normal subjects.

Design

Randomized, single center, crossover clinical trial.

Methods

Eligible subjects were examined during 6 study visits over 12 weeks. All subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to LBN dosed once daily or timolol dosed twice daily in both eyes (OU) for a duration of 4 weeks each, separated by a 2-week washout period. A comprehensive eye examination OU was performed at each visit. Testing was performed with optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography (optic nerve and macula), as well as visual field examination, on the study eye at baseline and before and after each treatment.

Results

One eye from each of 50 patients was enrolled (10 healthy patients, 26 patients with OHT, and 14 patients with OAG). After administration of LBN there was significantly increased macular VD (0.76% [0.20%-1.33%], P = 0.009) and a trend in increasing peripapillary VD in patients with OAG and patients with OHT. In contrast, after administration of timolol, there were no differences in macular VD, and a decrease in peripapillary VD only was observed in the nasal inferior sector (-0.56% [-1.08% to -0.03%], P = .04) in patients with OAG and patients with OHT. No change in peripapillary or macular VD was observed in the normal subjects (P > .05 for all).

Conclusions

Topical administration of LBN enhanced macular VD in patients with OAG or patients with OHT. In contrast, timolol administration did not have any effect on VD.

Purpose

To compare optic nerve head (ONH) ovality index and rotation angle measurements based on semi-automated delineation of the clinical ONH margin derived from photographs and automated BMO configuration derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images in healthy and glaucomatous eyes with high-, mild- and no axial myopia.

Methods

One hundred seventy-five healthy and glaucomatous eyes of 146 study participants enrolled in the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) with optic disc photographs and Spectralis OCT ONH scans acquired on the same day were stratified by level of axial myopia (non-myopic [n = 56, axial length (AL) <24 mm], mild-myopic [n = 58, AL 24-26 mm] and high-myopic [n = 32, AL >26 mm]. The clinical disc margin of each photograph was manually annotated, and semi-automated measurements were recorded of the ovality index and rotation angle based on a best-fit ellipse generated using ImageJ software. These semi-automated photograph-based measurements were compared to ovality index and rotation angle generated from custom automated BMO-based analysis using segmented OCT ONH volumes. R ² values from linear mixed effects models were used to describe the associations between semi-automated, photograph-based and automated OCT-based measurements.

Results

Average (95% CI) axial length was 23.3 (23.0, 23.3) mm, 24.8 (24.7, 25.0) mm and 26.8 (26.6, 27.0) mm in non-myopic, mild-myopic and high-myopic eyes, respectively (ANOVA, p ≤ 0.001 for all). The R ² association (95% CI) between semi-automated photograph-based and automated OCT-based assessment of ONH OI for all eyes was [0.26 (0.16, 0.36); p < 0.001]. This association was weakest in non-myopic eyes [0.09 (0.01, 0.26); p = 0.02], followed by mild-myopic eyes [0.13 (0.02, 0.29); p = 0.004] and strongest in high-myopic eyes [0.40 (0.19, 0.60); p < 0.001]. No significant associations were found between photography- and OCT-based assessment of rotation angle with R ² values ranging from 0.00 (0.00, 0.08) in non-myopic eyes to 0.03 (0.00, 0.21) in high-myopic eyes (all associations p ≥ 0.33).

Conclusions

Agreement between photograph-based and automated OCT-based ONH morphology measurements is limited, suggesting that these methods cannot be used interchangeably for characterizing myopic changes in the ONH.