From birth, humans make decisions about what to look at and for how long. A classic framework proposes encoding as a key driver of looking behavior in development - in early stages of encoding, infants and young children prefer to engage with familiar stimuli, while at later stages of encoding they prefer novel stimuli. Though this framework is often invoked when interpreting looking time studies, it is rarely validated empirically. Here, we test these predictions by explicitly manipulating exposure durations within-subjects. While we found robust evidence for habituation and novelty preferences, limiting exposure to visual concepts did not result in familiarity preferences in any age group. Our findings suggest that limited exposure does not generically lead to familiarity preferences, and that interpretations of observed familiarity preferences should be made with care. We argue for the development of formal frameworks which link the learning problem faced by participants to their attentional preferences.

Early abstract reasoning follows qualitatively different developmental trajectories in the US and China (Carstensen et al., 2019), but the causal mechanisms for these differences are unknown. Existing accounts implicate several potential factors that differ between the US and China, including language (Hoyos et al., 2016), executive function (Richland et al., 2010), visual attention (Christie et al., 2020), and social reasoning (Jurkat et al., 2022). While there is extensive work documenting both language and executive function in US and Chinese children, much less is known about the development of cross-cultural differences in visual attention and social reasoning. We document abstract reasoning about relations (Ambiguous cRMTS, Carstensen et al., 2019) alongside the potential moderating factors of visual attention (Free Description; Imada et al., 2013), and social reasoning (Causal Attribution, Seiver et al., 2013; Uniqueness Preference, Kim & Markus, 1999) in a cross-sectional sample of 240 3-12-year-olds, and observe both similarities and differences.

Outward differences between cultures are very salient, with Western and East Asian cultures as a prominent comparison pair. A large literature describes cross-cultural variation in cognition, but relatively less research has explored the developmental origins of this variation. This study helps to fill the empirical gap by replicating four prominent findings documenting cross-cultural differences in children's reasoning, visual attention, and social cognition in a cross-sectional sample of 240 3-12-year-olds from the US and China. We observe cross-cultural differences in three of the four tasks and describe the distinct developmental trajectory that each task follows throughout early and middle childhood.