Doximity, currently the largest online social networking service for United States (US) health care professionals and medical students, provides a wide variety of content to a large audience. In fact, its database includes 1,078,305 physicians in the US. It is therefore important to evaluate this content from time to time. Our objective is to analyze both the residency rankings and news content presented in Doximity, with respect to dermatology. The study compared the residency rankings created by Doximity to another dermatology residency ranking system that used a different algorithm. In terms of dermatology content, seven dermatology-related search terms were entered into the Doximity search query and data was collected on the first 20 “relevant” articles. Our study evaluated a total of 140 articles. The search term “skin cancer” yielded the most articles totaling 6,001. Informative articles were the most common type of article for each content item searched except for “dermatology”, yielding research articles as the most common content type (70%). The search term “melanoma awareness” had the largest number of shares (19,032). In comparing dermatology residency rankings on Doximity with another ranking system that accounted for scholarly achievement, there was 50% overlap. In conclusion, it is vital to evaluate content on social media websites that are utilized by US medical students and health care professionals. We hope this information presented provides an up-to-date analysis on the quality of one particular social media platform.

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare delayed drug reaction that often occurs 2-6 weeks after initiation of therapy and may develop into a life-threatening systemic reaction. Besides immediate discontinuation of the suspected inciting drug, initiation of high dose systemic corticosteroids has long been the mainstay of treatment for severe cases. Nevertheless, significant drawbacks associated with systemic corticosteroid therapy, such as the requirement of a long tapering period post resolution and extensive adverse side effects profile, have motivated clinicians to seek alternative treatment options. Over the past decade, an undisputed increasing number of favorable case reports has highlighted cyclosporine as an emerging, safe, and effective alternative despite inconsistent dosing regimens reported. Herein, we report a severe case of vancomycin-induced DRESS syndrome in which the patient failed initial intervention with cyclosporine and needed rescue with methylprednisolone. To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes the first unsuccessful report of cyclosporine treatment for DRESS syndrome.

Background: Internet resources play an important role in how medical students access information related to residency programs.Evaluating program websites is necessary in order to provide accurate information for applicants and provide information regarding areas of website improvement for programs. To date, dermatology residency websites (D  WS) have not been evaluated.This paper evaluates dermatology residency websites based on availability of predefined measures.Methods: Using the FREIDA (Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database) Online database, authors searched forall accredited dermatology program websites. Eligible programs were identified through the FREIDA Online database and had a functioning website. Two authors independently extracted data with consensus or third researcher resolution of differences. This data was accessed and archived from July 15th to July 17th, 2015.Primary outcomes measured were presence of content on education, resident and faculty information, program environment, applicant recruitment, schedule, salary, and website quality evaluated using an online tool (WooRank.com).Results: Out of 117 accredited dermatology residencies, 115 had functioning webpages. Of these, 76.5% (75) had direct links found on the FRIEDA Online database. Most programs contained information on education, faculty, program environment, and applicant recruitment. However, website quality and marketing effectiveness were highly variable; most programs were deemed to need improvements in the functioning of their webpages. Also, additional information on current residents and about potential away rotations were lacking from most websites with only 52.2% (60) and 41.7% (48) of programs providing this content, respectively.Conclusions: A majority of dermatology residency websites contained adequate information on many of the factors we evaluated. However, many were lacking in areas that matter to applicants. We hope this report will encourage dermatology residencyprograms to improve their websites and provide adequate content to attract the top residents for their respective programs.