Background

The Reflux Band, an external upper esophageal sphincter (UES) compression device, reduces esophago-pharyngeal reflux events. This study aimed to assess device efficacy as an adjunct to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Methods

This two-phase prospective clinical trial enrolled adults with at least 8 weeks of laryngeal symptoms (sore throat, throat clearing, dysphonia) not using PPI therapy at two tertiary care centers over 26 months. Participants used double dose PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 1 and the external UES compression device nightly along with PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 2. Questionnaire scores and salivary pepsin concentration were measured throughout the study. The primary endpoint of symptom response was defined as reflux symptom index (RSI) score ≤ 13 and/or > 50% reduction in RSI.

Results

Thirty-one participants completed the study: 52% male, mean age 47.9 years (SD 14.0), and mean body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m² (5.1). Primary endpoint was met in 11 (35%) participants after Phase 1 (PPI alone) and 17 (55%) after Phase 2 (Device + PPI). Compared to baseline, mean RSI score (24.1 (10.9)) decreased at end of Phase 1 (PPI alone) (21.9 (9.7); p = 0.06) and significantly decreased at end of Phase 2 (Device + PPI) (15.5 (10.3); p < 0.01). Compared to non-responders, responders to Device + PPI had a significantly lower BMI (p = 0.02) and higher salivary pepsin concentration (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

This clinical trial highlights the potential efficacy of the external UES compression device (Reflux Band) as an adjunct to PPI for patients with LPR (ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03619811).

Background

Evidence for association between asthma and the unfolded protein response is emerging. Endoplasmic reticulum resident protein 57 (ERp57) is an endoplasmic reticulum-localized redox chaperone involved in folding and secretion of glycoproteins. We have previously demonstrated that ERp57 is upregulated in allergen-challenged human and murine lung epithelial cells. However, the role of ERp57 in asthma pathophysiology is unknown.

Objectives

Here we sought to examine the contribution of airway epithelium-specific ERp57 in the pathogenesis of allergic asthma.

Methods

We examined the expression of ERp57 in human asthmatic airway epithelium and used murine models of allergic asthma to evaluate the relevance of epithelium-specific ERp57.

Results

Lung biopsy specimens from asthmatic and nonasthmatic patients revealed a predominant increase in ERp57 levels in epithelium of asthmatic patients. Deletion of ERp57 resulted in a significant decrease in inflammatory cell counts and airways resistance in a murine model of allergic asthma. Furthermore, we observed that disulfide bridges in eotaxin, epidermal growth factor, and periostin were also decreased in the lungs of house dust mite-challenged ERp57-deleted mice. Fibrotic markers, such as collagen and α smooth muscle actin, were also significantly decreased in the lungs of ERp57-deleted mice. Furthermore, adaptive immune responses were dispensable for house dust mite-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and airways fibrosis.

Conclusions

Here we show that ERp57 levels are increased in the airway epithelium of asthmatic patients and in mice with allergic airways disease. The ERp57 level increase is associated with redox modification of proinflammatory, apoptotic, and fibrotic mediators and contributes to airways hyperresponsiveness. The strategies to inhibit ERp57 specifically within the airways epithelium might provide an opportunity to alleviate the allergic asthma phenotype.

Recent advances in rare disease research are accelerated by the work of consortia that have been supported by the National Institutes of Health. Development of such consortia rely on multidisciplinary relationships and engagement with patient advocacy groups, as well as the National Institutes of Health and industry and academic partners. In this rostrum we present the development of such a process that focuses on eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Principal investigators, patient advocacy groups, research assistants, and trainees work together to perform natural history studies that promote clinical trial readiness tools, conduct clinical trials, train a new generation of investigators, and perform innovative pilot studies.