Advanced visualization techniques such as maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume rendering (VR) are useful for evaluating neurovascular anatomy on CT angiography (CTA) of the brain; however, interference from surrounding osseous anatomy is common. Existing methods for removing bone from CTA images are limited in scope and/or accuracy, particularly at the skull base. We present a new brain CTA bone removal tool, which addresses many of these limitations. A deep convolutional neural network was designed and trained for bone removal using 72 brain CTAs. The model was tested on 15 CTAs from the same data source and 17 CTAs from an independent external dataset. Bone removal accuracy was assessed quantitatively, by comparing automated segmentation results to manual segmentations, and qualitatively by evaluating VR visualization of the carotid siphons compared to an existing method for automated bone removal. Average Dice overlap between automated and manual segmentations from the internal and external test datasets were 0.986 and 0.979 respectively. This was superior compared to a publicly available noncontrast head CT bone removal algorithm which had a Dice overlap of 0.947 (internal dataset) and 0.938 (external dataset). Our algorithm yielded better VR visualization of the carotid siphons than the publicly available bone removal tool in 14 out of 15 CTAs (93%, chi-square statistic of 22.5, p-value of < 0.00001) from the internal test dataset and 15 out of 17 CTAs (88%, chi-square statistic of 23.1, p-value of < 0.00001) from the external test dataset. Bone removal allowed subjectively superior MIP and VR visualization of vascular anatomy/pathology. The proposed brain CTA bone removal algorithm is rapid, accurate, and allows superior visualization of vascular anatomy and pathology compared to other available techniques and was validated on an independent external dataset.

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of simulated postcontrast T1-weighted brain MR images generated by using precontrast MR images in patients with brain glioma.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, a three-dimensional deep convolutional neural network was developed to simulate T1-weighted postcontrast images from eight precontrast sequences in 400 patients (mean age, 57 years; 239 men; from 2015 to 2020), including 332 with glioblastoma and 68 with lower-grade gliomas. Performance was evaluated by using quantitative image similarity and error metrics and enhancing tumor overlap analysis. Performance was also assessed on a multicenter external dataset (n = 286 from the 2019 Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge; mean age, 60 years; ratio of men to women unknown) by using transfer learning. A subset of cases was reviewed by neuroradiologist readers to assess whether simulated images affected the ability to determine the tumor grade.

Results

Simulated whole-brain postcontrast images were both qualitatively and quantitatively similar to the real postcontrast images in terms of quantitative image similarity (structural similarity index of 0.84 ± 0.05), pixelwise error (symmetric mean absolute percent error of 3.65%), and enhancing tumor compartment overlap (Dice coefficient, 0.65 ± 0.25). Similar results were achieved with the external dataset (Dice coefficient, 0.62 ± 0.27). There was no difference in the ability of the neuroradiologist readers to determine the tumor grade in real versus simulated images (accuracy, 87.7% vs 90.6%; P = .87).

Conclusion

The developed model was capable of producing simulated postcontrast T1-weighted MR images that were similar to real acquired images as determined by both quantitative analysis and radiologist assessment.Keywords: MR-Contrast Agent, MR-Imaging, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Contrast Agents-Intravenous, Neoplasms-Primary, Experimental Investigations, Technology Assessment, Supervised Learning, Transfer Learning, Convolutional Neural Network, Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Objective

Differentiate high- versus low-volume radiologists who interpret neurological (Neuro) MRI or musculoskeletal (MSK) MRI and measure the proportion of Neuro and MSK MRIs read by low-volume radiologists.

Methods

We queried the 2015 Medicare Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File for radiologists who submitted claims for Neuro or MSK MRIs. Radiologists were classified as high-volume versus low-volume based on their work relative value units (wRVUs) focus or volume of studies interpreted using three different methodologies: Method 1, percentage of wRVUs in Neuro or MSK MRI; Method 2, absolute number of Neuro or MSK MRIs interpreted; and Method 3, both percentage and absolute number. Multiple thresholds with each methodology were tested, and the percentage of Neuro or MSK MRIs interpreted by low-volume radiologists was calculated for each threshold.

Results

With Method 1, 33% of Neuro MRI and 50% of MSK MRI studies were interpreted by a radiologist whose wRVUs in Neuro or MSK MRI were less than 20% (Method 1). With Method 2, 22% of Neuro MRIs and 37% of MSK MRIs were interpreted by radiologists who read fewer than the mean number of Neuro or MSK MRIs interpreted by an "average full-time radiologist" whose wRVUs in Neuro or MSK MRI were approximately 20%. With Method 3, 38% of Neuro MRIs and 57% of MSK MRIs were interpreted by "low-volume" radiologists. If instead a 50% wRVU threshold is used for Methods One, Two, and Three, then 70%, 58%, and 77% of Neuro MRIs and 86%, 80%, and 90% of MSK MRIs are read by low-volume radiologists.

Discussion

A large number of radiologists read a low volume of Neuro or MSK MRIs; these low-volume Neuro or MSK MRI radiologists read a substantial portion of Neuro or MSK MRIs. It is unknown which of the methods for distinguishing low-volume radiologists, combined with which threshold, may best correlate with high-performing or low-performing radiologists.

Background

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain malignancy, yet treatment options are limited, and prognosis remains guarded. Individualized tumor genetic assessment has become important for accurate prognosis and for guiding emerging targeted therapies. However, challenges remain for widespread tumor genetic testing due to costs and the need for tissue sampling. The aim of this study is to evaluate a novel artificial intelligence method for predicting clinically relevant genetic biomarkers from preoperative brain MRI in patients with glioblastoma.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed preoperative MRI data from 400 patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype or WHO grade 4 astrocytoma, IDH mutant who underwent resection and genetic testing. Nine genetic biomarkers were assessed: hotspot mutations of IDH1 or TERT promoter, pathogenic mutations of TP53, PTEN, ATRX, or CDKN2A/B, MGMT promoter methylation, EGFR amplification, and combined aneuploidy of chromosomes 7 and 10. Models were developed to predict biomarker status from MRI data using radiomics features, convolutional neural network (CNN) features, and a combination of both.

Results

Combined model performance was good for IDH1 and TERT promoter hotspot mutations, pathogenic mutations of ATRX and CDKN2A/B, and combined aneuploidy of chromosomes 7 and 10, with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) >0.85 and was fair for all other tested biomarkers with ROC AUC >0.7. Combined model performance was statistically superior to individual radiomics and CNN feature models for prediction chromosome 7 and 10 aneuploidy, MGMT promoter methylation, and PTEN mutation.

Conclusions

Combining radiomics and CNN features from preoperative MRI yields improved noninvasive genetic biomarker prediction performance in patients with WHO grade 4 diffuse astrocytic gliomas.

Background There is increasing interest in noncontrast breast MRI alternatives for tumor visualization to increase the accessibility of breast MRI. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of generating simulated contrast-enhanced T1-weighted breast MRI scans from precontrast MRI sequences in biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer with use of deep learning. Materials and Methods Women with invasive breast cancer and a contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination that was performed for initial evaluation of the extent of disease between January 2015 and December 2019 at a single academic institution were retrospectively identified. A three-dimensional, fully convolutional deep neural network simulated contrast-enhanced T1-weighted breast MRI scans from five precontrast sequences (T1-weighted non-fat-suppressed [FS], T1-weighted FS, T2-weighted FS, apparent diffusion coefficient, and diffusion-weighted imaging). For qualitative assessment, four breast radiologists (with 3-15 years of experience) blinded to whether the method of contrast was real or simulated assessed image quality (excellent, acceptable, good, poor, or unacceptable), presence of tumor enhancement, and maximum index mass size by using 22 pairs of real and simulated contrast-enhanced MRI scans. Quantitative comparison was performed using whole-breast similarity and error metrics and Dice coefficient analysis of enhancing tumor overlap. Results Ninety-six MRI examinations in 96 women (mean age, 52 years ± 12 [SD]) were evaluated. The readers assessed all simulated MRI scans as having the appearance of a real MRI scan with tumor enhancement. Index mass sizes on real and simulated MRI scans demonstrated good to excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73-0.86; P < .001) without significant differences (mean differences, -0.8 to 0.8 mm; P = .36-.80). Almost all simulated MRI scans (84 of 88 [95%]) were considered of diagnostic quality (ratings of excellent, acceptable, or good). Quantitative analysis demonstrated strong similarity (structural similarity index, 0.88 ± 0.05), low voxel-wise error (symmetric mean absolute percent error, 3.26%), and Dice coefficient of enhancing tumor overlap of 0.75 ± 0.25. Conclusion It is feasible to generate simulated contrast-enhanced breast MRI scans with use of deep learning. Simulated and real contrast-enhanced MRI scans demonstrated comparable tumor sizes, areas of tumor enhancement, and image quality without significant qualitative or quantitative differences. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Slanetz in this issue. An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on January 17, 2023.

Purpose

To assess how well a brain MRI lesion segmentation algorithm trained at one institution performed at another institution, and to assess the effect of multi-institutional training datasets for mitigating performance loss.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, a three-dimensional U-Net for brain MRI abnormality segmentation was trained on data from 293 patients from one institution (IN1) (median age, 54 years; 165 women; patients treated between 2008 and 2018) and tested on data from 51 patients from a second institution (IN2) (median age, 46 years; 27 women; patients treated between 2003 and 2019). The model was then trained on additional data from various sources: (a) 285 multi-institution brain tumor segmentations, (b) 198 IN2 brain tumor segmentations, and (c) 34 IN2 lesion segmentations from various brain pathologic conditions. All trained models were tested on IN1 and external IN2 test datasets, assessing segmentation performance using Dice coefficients.

Results

The U-Net accurately segmented brain MRI lesions across various pathologic conditions. Performance was lower when tested at an external institution (median Dice score, 0.70 [IN2] vs 0.76 [IN1]). Addition of 483 training cases of a single pathologic condition, including from IN2, did not raise performance (median Dice score, 0.72; P = .10). Addition of IN2 training data with heterogeneous pathologic features, representing only 10% (34 of 329) of total training data, increased performance to baseline (Dice score, 0.77; P < .001). This final model produced total lesion volumes with a high correlation to the reference standard (Spearman r = 0.98).

Conclusion

For brain MRI lesion segmentation, adding a modest amount of relevant training data from an external institution to a previously trained model supported successful application of the model to this external institution.Keywords: Neural Networks, Brain/Brain Stem, Segmentation Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Neural networks were trained for segmentation and longitudinal assessment of posttreatment diffuse glioma. A retrospective cohort (from January 2018 to December 2019) of 298 patients with diffuse glioma (mean age, 52 years ± 14 [SD]; 177 men; 152 patients with glioblastoma, 72 patients with astrocytoma, and 74 patients with oligodendroglioma) who underwent two consecutive multimodal MRI examinations were randomly selected into training (n = 198) and testing (n = 100) samples. A posttreatment tumor segmentation three-dimensional nnU-Net convolutional neural network with multichannel inputs (T1, T2, and T1 postcontrast and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) was trained to segment three multiclass tissue types (peritumoral edematous, infiltrated, or treatment-changed tissue [ED]; active tumor or enhancing tissue [AT]; and necrotic core). Separate longitudinal change nnU-Nets were trained on registered and subtracted FLAIR and T1 postlongitudinal images to localize and better quantify and classify changes in ED and AT. Segmentation Dice scores, volume similarities, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distances ranged from 0.72 to 0.89, 0.90 to 0.96, and 2.5 to 3.6 mm, respectively. Accuracy rates of the posttreatment tumor segmentation and longitudinal change networks being able to classify longitudinal changes in ED and AT as increased, decreased, or unchanged were 76%-79% and 90%-91%, respectively. The accuracy levels of the longitudinal change networks were not significantly different from those of three neuroradiologists (accuracy, 90%-92%; κ, 0.58-0.63; P > .05). The results of this study support the potential clinical value of artificial intelligence-based automated longitudinal assessment of posttreatment diffuse glioma. Keywords: MR Imaging, Neuro-Oncology, Neural Networks, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Segmentation, Quantification, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

The purpose of this study was to assess whole brain and regional patterns of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) abnormalities in HIV-infected women using quantitative whole brain arterial spin labeling (ASL). We hypothesized that HIV-infected women would demonstrate decreased regional brain CVR despite viral suppression. This cross-sectional study recruited subjects from the Bay Area Women's Interagency Health Study (WIHS)-a cohort study designed to investigate the progression of HIV disease in women. In addition to conventional noncontrast cerebral MRI sequences, perfusion imaging was performed before and after the administration of intravenous acetazolamide. CVR was measured by comparing quantitative ASL brain perfusion before and after administration of intravenous acetazolamide. In order to validate and corroborate ASL-based whole brain and regional perfusion, phase-contrast (PC) imaging was also performed through the major neck vessels. FLAIR and susceptibility weighted sequences were performed to assess for white matter injury and microbleeds, respectively. Ten HIV-infected women and seven uninfected, age-matched controls were evaluated. Significant group differences were present in whole brain and regional CVR between HIV-infected and uninfected women. These regional differences were significant in the frontal lobe and basal ganglia. CVR measurements were not significantly impacted by the degree of white matter signal abnormality or presence of microbleeds. Despite complete viral suppression, dysfunction of the neurovascular unit persists in the HIV population. Given the lack of association between CVR and traditional imaging markers of small vessel disease, CVR quantification may provide an early biomarker of pre-morbid vascular disease.