Setting

Systematic screening for active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is recommended for high-risk populations, including people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV); however, currently recommended TB screening tools are inadequate for most high-burden settings.

Objective

To determine whether C-reactive protein (CRP) possesses the necessary test characteristics to screen individuals for active PTB.

Design

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (10 mg/l cut-off point) for culture-positive PTB. Pooled diagnostic accuracy estimates were generated using random-effects meta-analysis for out-patients and in-patients, and for pre-specified subgroups based on HIV status and test indication.

Results

We identified nine unique studies enrolling 1793 adults from out-patient (five studies, 1121 patients) and in-patient settings (five studies, 672 patients), 72% of whom had confirmed HIV infection. Among out-patients, CRP had high sensitivity (93%, 95%CI 88-98) and moderate specificity (60%, 95%CI 40-75) for active PTB. Specificity was lowest among in-patients (21%, 95%CI 6-52) and highest among out-patients undergoing TB screening (range 58-81%). There was no difference in summary estimates by HIV status.

Conclusion

CRP, which is available as a simple, inexpensive and point-of-care test, can be used to screen PLHIV presenting for routine HIV/AIDS (acquired immune-deficiency syndrome) care for active TB.

The identification of easily measured, accurate diagnostic biomarkers for active tuberculosis (TB) will have a significant impact on global TB control efforts. Because of the host and pathogen complexities involved in TB pathogenesis, identifying a single

Background

Implementation of new tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic strategies in resource-constrained settings is challenging. We measured the impact of solid and liquid mycobacterial cultures on treatment practices for patients undergoing TB evaluation in Kampala, Uganda.

Methods

We enrolled consecutive smear-negative, human immunodeficiency virus positive adults with cough of ⩾2 weeks from September 2009 to April 2010. Laboratory technicians performed mycobacterial cultures on solid and liquid media. We compared empiric treatment decisions with solid and liquid culture in terms of diagnostic yield and time to results, and assessed impact on patient management.

Results

Of 200 patients enrolled, 26 (13%) had culture-confirmed TB: 22 (85%) on solid culture alone, 2 (8%) on liquid culture alone, and 2 (8%) on both solid and liquid culture. Thirty-four patients received empiric anti-tuberculosis treatment, but only 10 (29%) were culture-positive. Median time to a positive result on solid culture was 92 days (interquartile range [IQR] 69-148) compared to 106 days (IQR 66-157) for liquid culture. No patients initiated treatment following a positive result on liquid culture.

Conclusion

The introduction of mycobacterial culture did not influence care for patients undergoing evaluation for TB in Kampala, Uganda. Attention to contextual factors surrounding implementation is needed to ensure the effective introduction of new testing strategies in low-income countries.

© 2015 Chaisson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credite

Objective

To assess the feasibility of a streamlined strategy for improving tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic evaluation and treatment initiation among patients with presumed TB.

Design

Single-arm interventional pilot study at five primary care health centers of a streamlined, SIngle-saMPLE (SIMPLE) TB diagnostic evaluation strategy: 1) examination of two smear results from a single spot sputum specimen using light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy, and 2) daily transportation of smear-negative sputum samples to Xpert® MTB/RIF testing sites.

Results

Of 1212 adults who underwent sputum testing for TB, 99.6% had two smears examined from the spot sputum specimen. Sputum was transported for Xpert testing within 1 clinic day for 83% (907/1091) of the smear-negative patients. Of 157 (13%) patients with bacteriologically positive TB, 116 (74%) were identified using sputum smear microscopy and 41 (26%) using Xpert testing of smear-negative samples. Anti-tuberculosis treatment was initiated in 142 (90%) patients with bacteriologically positive TB, with a median time to treatment of 1 day for smear-positive patients and 6 days for smear-negative, Xpert-positive patients.

Conclusion

The SIMPLE TB strategy led to successful incorporation of Xpert testing and rapid treatment initiation in the majority of patients with bacteriologically confirmed TB in a resource-limited setting.