In late 2015 and early 2016, work done by the AmeriFlux Management Project Technical Team (amerilfux.lbl.gov) helped to uncover an issue with Gill WindMaster and WindMaster Pro sonic anemometers used by many researchers for eddy covariance flux measurements. Gill has addressed this issue and has since sent out a notice that the vertical wind speed component (a critical piece of all eddy covariance fluxes) was being erroneously computed and reported. The problem (known as the “w-boost” bug) resulted in positive (upward) wind speeds being under-reported by 16.6% and negative (downward) wind speeds being under-reported by 28.9%. This has the potential to cause similar under estimates in fluxes derived from measurements using these instruments. Additionally, the bug affects corrections for angle of attack as derived by Nakai and Shimoyama, rendering them invalid. While the manufacturer has offered a firmware upgrade for existing instruments that will fix this issue, many existing data sets have been affected by it and are currently in use by the scientific community.To address the issue of affected data, currently in use, we analyzed multi-year and short-term data sets from a variety of ecosystems to assess methods of correcting existing flux data. We found that simple multiplicative correction factors (∼1.18) may be used to remove most of the “w-boost” bias from fluxes in existing data sets that do not include angle of attack corrections.

Data quality control is one of the most time consuming activities within Research Infrastructures (RIs), especially when involving observational data and multiple data providers. In this work we report on our ongoing development of data rogues, a scalable approach to manage data quality issues for observational data within RIs. The motivation for this work started with the creation of the FLUXNET2015 dataset, which includes carbon, water, and energy fluxes plus micrometeorological and ancillary data measured in over 200 sites around the world. To create an uniform dataset, including derived data products, extensive work on data quality control was needed. The unpredictable nature of observational data quality issues makes the automation of data quality control inherently difficult. Developed based on this experience, the data rogues methodology allows for increased automation of quality control activities by systematically identifying, cataloging, and documenting implementations of solutions to data issues. We believe this methodology can be extended and applied to others domains and types of data, making the automation of data quality control a more tractable problem.