Background

Traditional hookah smoking has grown quickly to become a global tobacco epidemic. More recently, electronic hookahs (e-hookahs)-vaped through traditional water pipes-were introduced as healthier alternatives to combustible hookah. With combustible tobacco smoking, oxidative stress, inflammation, and vascular stiffness are key components in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. The comparable effects of hookah are unknown.

Research question

What is the differential acute effect of e-hookah vaping vs combustible hookah smoking on oxidation, inflammation, and arterial stiffness?

Study design and methods

In a randomized crossover design study, among a cohort of 17 healthy young adult chronic hookah smokers, we investigated the effect of e-hookah vaping and hookah smoking on measures of conduit arterial stiffness, including carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index-corrected for heart rate before and after a 30-min exposure session. We assessed a panel of circulating biomarkers indicative of inflammation and oxidants and measured plasma nicotine and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) levels before and after the sessions.

Results

e-Hookah vaping tended to lead to a larger acute increase in PWV than hookah smoking (mean ± SE: e-hookah, +0.74 ± 0.12 m/s; combustible hookah, +0.57 ± 0.14 m/s [P < .05 for both]), indicative of large artery stiffening. Compared with baseline, only e-hookah vaping induced an acute increase in augmentation index (e-hookah, +5.58 ± 1.54% [P = .004]; combustible hookah, +2.87 ± 2.12% [P = not significant]). These vascular changes were accompanied by elevation of the proinflammatory biomarkers high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and tumor necrosis factor α after vaping (all P < .05). No changes in biomarkers of inflammation and oxidants were observed after smoking. Compared with baseline, exhaled CO levels were higher after smoking than after vaping (+36.81 ± 6.70 parts per million vs -0.38 ± 0.22 parts per million; P < .001), whereas plasma nicotine concentrations were comparable (+6.14 ± 1.03 ng/mL vs +5.24 ± 0.96 ng/mL; P = .478).

Interpretation

Although advertised to be "safe," flavored e-hookah vaping exerts injurious effects on the vasculature that are, at least in part, mediated by inflammation.

Trial registry

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03690427; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Background Electronic hookah (e-hookah) vaping has increased in popularity among youth, who endorse unsubstantiated claims that flavored aerosol is detoxified as it passes through water. However, e-hookahs deliver nicotine by creating an aerosol of fine and ultrafine particles and other oxidants that may reduce the bioavailability of nitric oxide and impair endothelial function secondary to formation of oxygen-derived free radicals. Methods and Results We examined the acute effects of e-hookah vaping on endothelial function, and the extent to which increased oxidative stress contributes to the vaping-induced vascular impairment. Twenty-six healthy young adult habitual hookah smokers were invited to vape a 30-minute e-hookah session to evaluate the impact on endothelial function measured by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD). To test for oxidative stress mediation, plasma total antioxidant capacity levels were measured and the effect of e-hookah vaping on FMD was examined before and after intravenous infusion of the antioxidant ascorbic acid (n=11). Plasma nicotine and exhaled carbon monoxide levels were measured before and after the vaping session. Measurements were performed before and after sham-vaping control experiments (n=10). E-hookah vaping, which increased plasma nicotine (+4.93±0.92 ng/mL, P<0.001; mean±SE) with no changes in exhaled carbon monoxide (-0.15±0.17 ppm; P=0.479), increased mean arterial pressure (11±1 mm Hg, P<0.001) and acutely decreased FMD from 5.79±0.58% to 4.39±0.46% (P<0.001). Ascorbic acid infusion, which increased plasma total antioxidant capacity 5-fold, increased FMD at baseline (5.98±0.66% versus 9.46±0.87%, P<0.001), and prevented the acute FMD impairment by e-hookah vaping (9.46±0.87% versus 8.74±0.84%, P=0.002). All parameters were unchanged during sham studies. Conclusions E-hookah vaping has adverse effects on vascular function, likely mediated by oxidative stress, which overtime could accelerate development and progression of cardiovascular disease. Registration URL: https://ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03690427.