Objective

To build radiomics models using features extracted from DCE-MRI and mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer.

Materials and methods

266 patients receiving MRI and mammography, who had well-enhanced lesions on MRI and histologically confirmed diagnosis were analyzed. Training dataset had 146 malignant and 56 benign, and testing dataset had 48 malignant and 18 benign lesions. Fuzzy-C-means clustering algorithm was used to segment the enhanced lesion on subtraction MRI maps. Two radiologists manually outlined the corresponding lesion on mammography by consensus, with the guidance of MRI maximum intensity projection. Features were extracted using PyRadiomics from three DCE-MRI parametric maps, and from the lesion and a 2-cm bandshell margin on mammography. The support vector machine (SVM) was applied for feature selection and model building, using 5 datasets: DCE-MRI, mammography lesion-ROI, mammography margin-ROI, mammography lesion+margin, and all combined.

Results

In the training dataset evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, the diagnostic accuracy of the individual model was 83.2% for DCE-MRI, 75.7% for mammography lesion, 64.4% for mammography margin, and 77.2% for lesion+margin. When all features were combined, the accuracy was improved to 89.6%. By adding mammography features to MRI, the specificity was significantly improved from 69.6% (39/56) to 82.1% (46/56), p<0.01. When the developed models were applied to the independent testing dataset, the accuracy was 78.8% for DCE-MRI and 83.3% for combined MRI+Mammography.

Conclusion

The radiomics model built from the combined MRI and mammography has the potential to provide a machine learning-based diagnostic tool and decrease the false positive diagnosis of contrast-enhanced benign lesions on MRI.

Rationale and objectives

Computer-aided methods have been widely applied to diagnose lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The first step was to identify abnormal areas. A deep learning Mask Regional Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN) was implemented to search the entire set of images and detect suspicious lesions.

Materials and methods

Two DCE-MRI datasets were used, 241 patients acquired using non-fat-sat sequence for training, and 98 patients acquired using fat-sat sequence for testing. All patients have confirmed unilateral mass cancers. The tumor was segmented using fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm to serve as the ground truth. Mask R-CNN was implemented with ResNet-101 as the backbone. The neural network output the bounding boxes and the segmented tumor for evaluation using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). The detection performance, and the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, was analyzed using free response receiver operating characteristic.

Results

When the precontrast and subtraction image of both breasts were used as input, the false positive from the heart and normal parenchymal enhancements could be minimized. The training set had 1469 positive slices (containing lesion) and 9135 negative slices. In 10-fold cross-validation, the mean accuracy = 0.86 and DSC = 0.82. The testing dataset had 1568 positive and 7264 negative slices, with accuracy = 0.75 and DSC = 0.79. When the obtained per-slice results were combined, 240 of 241 (99.5%) lesions in the training and 98 of 98 (100%) lesions in the testing datasets were identified.

Conclusion

Deep learning using Mask R-CNN provided a feasible method to search breast MRI, localize, and segment lesions. This may be integrated with other artificial intelligence algorithms to develop a fully automatic breast MRI diagnostic system.

Background

A wide variety of benign and malignant processes can manifest as non-mass enhancement (NME) in breast MRI. Compared to mass lesions, there are no distinct features that can be used for differential diagnosis. The purpose is to use the BI-RADS descriptors and models developed using radiomics and deep learning to distinguish benign from malignant NME lesions.

Materials and methods

A total of 150 patients with 104 malignant and 46 benign NME were analyzed. Three radiologists performed reading for morphological distribution and internal enhancement using the 5th BI-RADS lexicon. For each case, the 3D tumor mask was generated using Fuzzy-C-Means segmentation. Three DCE parametric maps related to wash-in, maximum, and wash-out were generated, and PyRadiomics was applied to extract features. The radiomics model was built using five machine learning algorithms. ResNet50 was implemented using three parametric maps as input. Approximately 70% of earlier cases were used for training, and 30% of later cases were held out for testing.

Results

The diagnostic BI-RADS in the original MRI report showed that 104/104 malignant and 36/46 benign lesions had a BI-RADS score of 4A-5. For category reading, the kappa coefficient was 0.83 for morphological distribution (excellent) and 0.52 for internal enhancement (moderate). Segmental and Regional distribution were the most prominent for the malignant group, and focal distribution for the benign group. Eight radiomics features were selected by support vector machine (SVM). Among the five machine learning algorithms, SVM yielded the highest accuracy of 80.4% in training and 77.5% in testing datasets. ResNet50 had a better diagnostic performance, 91.5% in training and 83.3% in testing datasets.

Conclusion

Diagnosis of NME was challenging, and the BI-RADS scores and descriptors showed a substantial overlap. Radiomics and deep learning may provide a useful CAD tool to aid in diagnosis.

Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) and diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) are model-based near-infrared (NIR) methods that measure tissue optical properties (broadband absorption, ? a , and reduced scattering, ? s ? ) and blood flow (blood flow index, BFI), respectively. DOSI-derived ? a values are used to determine composition by calculating the tissue concentration of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin ( HbO 2 , HbR), water, and lipid. We developed and evaluated a combined, coregistered DOSI/DCS handheld probe for mapping and imaging these parameters. We show that uncertainties of 0.3 ?? mm ? 1 (37%) in ? s ? and 0.003 ?? mm ? 1 (33%) in ? a lead to ? 53 % and 9% errors in BFI, respectively. DOSI/DCS imaging of a solid tissue-simulating flow phantom and