BACKGROUND: There are many described techniques for the placement of posterior iliac screws for extension of lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation to the pelvis. However, each one has its limitations. We describe our technique for fluoroscopic guidance of iliac screw placement utilizing the obturator inlet and iliac oblique views as well as a detailed review of how to obtain and interpret these views for safe iliac screw placement. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing iliac screw placement utilizing the obturator inlet and iliac oblique views as part of spine instrumentation between January 2019 and March 2022. Screw length and bony breaches are reported utilizing this technique. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent posterior lumbopelvic fixation with a total of 23 screws placed via either open or percutaneous technique. The mean screw length was 96.5 mm (Range 80-110, standard dev 7.75). There were no recorded breaches or recannulation attempts. CONCLUSIONS: We show how this technique is a much more convenient alternative to the placement of iliac screws under the obturator outlet oblique (teardrop view) which necessitates that the C-arm is in line with the instruments being placed. These described views can be used to place screws with either open or percutaneous techniques and with either the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) or S2 alar iliac (S2AI) starting points.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Understanding the management of lumbar spinal fractures and return to play (RTP) criteria is an essential component of care for adult athletes. Appropriate management of lumbar spinal fractures must balance minimizing time away from physical activity while also minimizing risk of reinjury. The purpose of this review is to summarize current recommendations on lumbar spinal fracture management and RTP guidelines and to provide expert opinion on areas of discrepancy in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a paucity of high-level evidence on the management and return to play criteria for adult lumbar spine fractures in athletes. Much of the data and recommendations are based on expert opinion and studies in pediatric or osteoporotic patients, which may not be applicable to adult athletes. These data presented here may be used to aid patient-physician conversations and provide guidance on expectations for patients, coaches, and athletic trainers. In general, we recommend that patients be free of lumbar pain, neurologically intact, and have full strength and motion of the lumbar spine and lower extremities before returning to play. Adequate protective equipment is recommended to be worn at all times during practice and play.

Introduction

Academic trauma institutions rely on fracture databases as research and quality control tools. Frequently, these databases are populated by trainees, but the completeness and accuracy of such databases has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study is to determine the capture rate of a resident-populated database in collecting extremity fractures and to determine the accuracy of assigned Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classifications.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was performed at a level 1 trauma center of all adult patients who underwent treatment for extremity fractures after an emergency department or inpatient consultation. A 20% random sample was taken from these entries and compared to a resident-populated fracture database designed to capture the same patients. For all matching records containing a resident-assigned OTA classification, relevant imaging was blindly reviewed by a trauma fellowship-trained orthopedic attending surgeon for fracture pattern classification. Resident OTA classifications were compared to this gold standard to determine overall accuracy rate.

Results

Three hundred eighteen (80%) out of 400 entries were captured by the resident-populated database. Two hundred thirty-one of these 318 entries contained an OTA classification. One hundred fifty-three (66%) of these 231 entries demonstrated concordance between resident and attending assigned OTA classifications. On subgroup analysis, 133 (70%) of the 190 lower extremity classifications were accurately identified as compared to just 20 (49%) of the 41 upper extremity classifications (p = 0.009). Seventy-nine (65%) of the 121 end segment fractures showed agreement versus 42 (67%) of the 63 diaphyseal injury patterns (p = 0.85). Accuracy of classification did not significantly vary by resident year of training (p = 0.142).

Conclusion

Trainee generated databases at academic institutions may be subject to incomplete data entry and inaccurate fracture classifications. Quality control measures should be instituted to ensure accuracy in such databases if efforts are invested with the expectation of useful information.

Background

Social determinants of health (SDOH), have been demonstrated to significantly impact health outcomes in spine patients. There may be interaction between opioid use and these factors in spine surgical patients. We aimed to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOH) which are associated with perioperative opioid use among lumbar spine patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing spine surgery for lumbar degeneration in 2019. Opioid use was determined based on prescription records from the electronic medical records. Preoperative opioid users (OU) were compared with opioid-naïve patients regarding SDOH including demographics like age and race, and clinical data such as activity and tobacco use. Demographics and surgical data, including age, comorbidities, surgical invasiveness, and other variables were also collected from the records. Multivariate logistic regression was used for analysis of these factors.

Results

Ninety-eight patients were opioid-naïve and 90 used opioids preoperatively. All OU had ≥3 months of use, had more prior spine surgeries (1.07 vs. 0.44, p<.001) and more comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and depression (p=.021, 0.043, 0.017). Patients from lower community median income areas, unemployed, or with lower physical capacity (METS<5) were more likely to use opioids preoperatively. Postoperative opioid use was strongly associated with preoperative opioid use, as well as alcohol use, and lower community median income. At one year postoperatively, OU had higher rates of opioid use [72.2% vs. 15.3%, p<.001].

Conclusions

Unemployment, low physical activity level, and lower community median income were associated with preoperative opioid use and longer-term opioid use postoperatively.

Background: The aim of this study was to quantify the stabilizing properties of a 3-dimensional (3D)-printed short-arm cast and compare those properties with traditional fiberglass casts in a cadaveric subacute distal radius fracture model. Methods: A cadaveric subacute fracture model was created in 8 pairs of forearms. The specimens were equally allocated to a fiberglass cast or 3D-printed cast group. All specimens were subjected to 3 biomechanical testing modalities simulating daily life use: flexion and extension of digits, pronation and supination of the hand, and 3-point bending. Between each loading modality, radiological evaluation of the specimens was performed to evaluate possible interval displacement. Interfragmentary motion was quantified using a 3D motion-tracking system. Results: Radiographic assessment did not reveal statistically significant differences in radiographic parameters between the 2 groups before and after biomechanical testing. A statistically significant difference in interfragmentary motion was calculated with the 3-point bending test, with a mean difference of 0.44 (±0.48) mm of motion. Conclusions: A statistically significant difference in interfragmentary motion between the 2 casting groups was only identified in 3-point bending. However, the clinical relevance of this motion remains unclear as the absolute motion is less than 1 mm. The results of this study show noninferiority of the 3D-printed casts compared with the traditional fiberglass casts in immobilizing a subacute distal radius fracture model. These results support the execution of a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing both casting techniques.

Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) frequently occur in combination with other major organ injuries, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) and injuries to the chest, abdomen, and musculoskeletal system (e.g., extremity, pelvic, and spine fractures). However, the effects of appendicular fractures on SCI recovery are poorly understood. We investigated whether the presence of SCI-concurrent appendicular fractures is predictive of a less robust SCI recovery. Patients enrolled in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in SCI (TRACK-SCI) prospective cohort study were identified and included in this secondary analysis study. Inclusion criteria resulted in 147 patients, consisting of 120 with isolated SCIs and 27 with concomitant appendicular fracture. The primary outcome was American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) neurological grades at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and AIS grade improvement during hospitalization. Multivariable binomial logistical regression analyses assessed whether SCI-concomitant appendicular fractures associate with SCI function and secondary outcomes. These analyses were adjusted for age, gender, injury severity, and non-fracture polytrauma. Appendicular fractures were associated with more severe AIS grades at hospital discharge, though covariate adjustments diminished statistical significance of this effect. Notably, non-fracture injuries to the chest and abdomen were influential covariates. Secondary analyses suggested that appendicular fractures also increased hospital length of stay. Our study indicated that SCI-associated polytrauma is important for predicting SCI functional outcomes. Further statistical evaluation is required to disentangle the effects of appendicular fractures, non-fracture solid organ injury, and SCI physiology to improve health outcomes among SCI patients.