- Abdalla, Safa;
- Weng, Yingjie;
- Mehta1, Kala M;
- Mahapatra, Tanmay;
- Srikantiah, Sridhar;
- Shah, Hemant;
- Ward, Victoria C;
- Pepper, Kevin T;
- Bentley, Jason;
- Carmichael, Suzan L;
- Creanga, Andreea;
- Wilhelm, Jess;
- Tarigopula, Usha Kiran;
- Nanda, Priya;
- Bhattacharya, Debarshi;
- Atmavilas, Yamini;
- Darmstadt, Gary L;
- Atmavilas, Yamini;
- Bentley, Jason;
- Bhattacharya, Debarshi;
- Borkum, Evan;
- Carmichael, Suzan L;
- Chaudhuri, Indrajit;
- Creanga, Andreea;
- Darmstadt, Gary L;
- Dutt, Priyanka;
- Delhi, New;
- Irani, Laili;
- Delhi, New;
- Krishnan, Suneeta;
- Mahapatra, Tanmay;
- Mehta, Kala M;
- Francisco, San;
- Mitra, Radhirani;
- Munar, Wolfgang;
- Nanda, Priya;
- Pepper, Kevin T;
- Raheel, Hina;
- Rangarajan, Anu;
- Saggurti, Niranjan;
- Sastry, Padmapriya;
- Schooley, Janine;
- Shah, Hemant;
- Srikantiah, Sridhar;
- Tarigopula, Usha Kiran;
- Ward, Victoria C;
- Walker, Dilys;
- Weng, Yingjie;
- Wilhelm, Jess
Background
The Ananya program in Bihar implemented household and community-level interventions to improve reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition (RMNCHN) in two phases: a first phase of intensive ancillary support to governmental implementation and innovation testing by non-government organisation (NGO) partners in eight focus districts (2012-2014), followed by a second phase of state-wide government-led implementation with techno-managerial assistance from NGOs (2014 onwards). This paper examines trends in RMNCHN indicators in the program's implementation districts from 2012-2017.Methods
Eight consecutive rounds of cross-sectional Community-based Household Surveys conducted by CARE India in 2012-2017 provided comparable data on a large number of indicators of frontline worker (FLW) performance, mothers' behaviours, and facility-based care and outreach service delivery across the continuum of maternal and child care. Logistic regression, considering the complex survey design and sample weights generated by that design, was used to estimate trends using survey rounds 2-5 for the first phase in the eight focus districts and rounds 6-9 for the second phase in all 38 districts statewide, as well as the overall change from round 2-9 in focus districts. To aid in contextualising the results, indicators were also compared amongst the formerly focus and the non-focus districts at the beginning of the second phase.Results
In the first phase, the levels of 34 out of 52 indicators increased significantly in the focus districts, including almost all indicators of FLW performance in antenatal and postnatal care, along with mother's birth preparedness, some breastfeeding practices, and immunisations. Between the two phases, 33 of 52 indicators declined significantly. In the second phase, the formerly focus districts experienced a rise in the levels of 14 of 50 indicators and a decline in the levels of 14 other indicators. There was a rise in the levels of 22 out of 50 indicators in the non-focus districts in the second phase, with a decline in the levels of 13 other indicators.Conclusions
Improvements in indicators were conditional on implementation support to program activities at a level of intensity that was higher than what could be achieved at scale so far. Successes during the pilot phase of intensive support suggests that RMNCHN can be improved statewide in Bihar with sufficient investments in systems performance improvements.Study registration
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02726230.