INTRODUCTION: Although a major goal of preoperative evaluation is to identify risk factors and improve postoperative outcomes, current clinical guidelines in Mexico indicate that preoperative spirometry should only be performed on patients with pulmonary disease. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative complications (POC), mortality, and risk factors among adults who did or did not undergo preoperative spirometry, based on their Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) risk level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, retrospective and comparative study design was used to identify 2059 patients from the General Hospital of Mexico who had an ARISCAT assessment during 2013-2017. Patients were classified in two groups: ARISCAT with spirometry (n = 1306) and ARISCAT without spirometry (n = 753). Chi-square, Fishers exact test and the Students t-tests were used to compare groups. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with an increased risk of POC and mortality. RESULTS: In the ARISCAT with spirometry group, 11% of patients had POC, compared with 48% of patients in the ARISCAT without spirometry group. High-risk ARISCAT patients who did not receive spirometry had higher mortality (18%), than those who underwent spirometry (0.4%). Logistic regression results indicate that not performing preoperative spirometry increases the probability of POC and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the combined use of preoperative spirometry and ARISCAT is associated with reduced POC and mortality. Future clinical guidelines should recommend the use of preoperative spirometry for patients with a moderate or high ARISCAT level in Mexico.

Aim

Combining preoperative spirometry with the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalunia (ARISCAT) risk scale can reduce post-operative complications and improve patient survival. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of performing spirometry or not in conjunction with the ARISCAT scale, to reduce post-operative complications and improve survival among adult patients undergoing elective surgery in Mexico.

Methods

A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed to compare the specific cost and health outcomes associated with the combined use of the ARISCAT scale and preoperative spirometry (Group 1), and the use of the ARISCAT scale without preoperative spirometry (Group 2). The health outcomes evaluated were post-operative complications and survival. The perspective was from the health care provider (Hospital General de México) and direct medical costs were reported in 2019 US dollars. A decision tree with a time horizon of eight months was used for each health outcome and ARISCAT risk level.

Results

The combined use of the ARISCAT scale and spirometry is more cost-effective for reducing post-operative complications in the low and moderate-risk levels and is cost-saving in the high-risk level, than use of the ARISCAT scale without spirometry. To improve patient survival, ARISCAT and spirometry are also more cost-effective at the moderate risk level, and cost-saving for high-risk patients, than using the ARISCAT scale alone.

Conclusions

The use of preoperative spirometry among patients with a high ARISCAT risk level was cost-saving, reduced post-operative complications, and improved survival. Our findings indicate an urgent need to implement spirometry as part of preoperative care in Mexico, which is already the standard of care in other countries.