D,L-alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) was synthesized over 20 years ago. It was hoped that this enzyme-activated, irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, the first enzyme in polyamine synthesis, would be effective as a chemotherapy for hyperproliferative diseases, including cancer and/or infectious processes. DFMO was generally found to exert cytostatic effects on mammalian cells and tissues, and its effectiveness as a therapeutic agent has been modest. DFMO was also found to cause treatment-limiting (but reversible) ototoxicity at high doses. This side effect, along with its minimal therapeutic activity, contributed to the loss of interest by many clinicians in further developing DFMO as a cancer therapeutic agent. However, DFMO was subsequently shown to inhibit carcinogen-induced cancer development in a number of rodent models, and interest in developing this compound as a preventive agent has increased. The rationale for the inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase as a cancer chemopreventive agent has been strengthened in recent years because this enzyme has been shown to be transactivated by the c-myc oncogene in certain cell/tissue types and to cooperate with the ras oncogene in malignant transformation of epithelial tissues. Recent clinical cancer chemoprevention trials, using dose de-escalation designs, indicate that DFMO can be given over long periods of time at low doses that suppress polyamine contents in gastrointestinal and other epithelial tissues but cause no detectable hearing loss or other side effects. Current clinical chemoprevention trials are investigating the efficacy of DFMO to suppress surrogate end point biomarkers (e.g., colon polyp recurrence) of carcinogenesis in patient populations at elevated risk for the development of specific epithelial cancers, including colon, esophageal, breast, cutaneous, and prostate malignancies.

Experimental studies have demonstrated that carcinogenesis is a multistep process in which inappropriate proliferation of cells is a critical determinant. Polyamines support sustained growth and are highly regulated in all cells. The rate limiting enzyme for this pathway is ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), an enzyme that exhibits rapid turnover, and converts the amino acid ornithine to putrescine, which in turn is converted to the longer chain amines spermidine and spermine. In animal models of colon carcinogenesis, inhibition of ODC by difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), an enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitor, reduces the number and size of colon adenomas and carcinomas. DFMO was first ineffective when used clinically to treat acute leukemia or melanoma and caused clinically significant but reversible ototoxicity. Subsequently, we performed a series of analyses demonstrating that hearing loss was rare below a total cumulative dose of 150 gm/m2 and increased with total cumulative dose of DFMO. The hearing loss was reversible with rapid reversion to baseline hearing. We and others have conducted Phase IIa trials to determine the lowest dose at which DFMO can decrease colon mucosa polyamine content, and found that an oral dose as low as 0.25 gm/m2 per day (perhaps lower) decreases colon tissue putrescine content and lowers the spermidine/spermine ratio. We are currently conducting a long-term randomized Phase IIb trial which serially measures the long-term effect of several low doses (and placebo) of DFMO on sustaining polyamine depletion in colon mucosa, as well as carefully monitoring hearing by audiometry and other sophisticated tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Polyamine metabolic genes are downstream targets of several genes commonly mutated in colon adenomas and cancers. Inhibitors of ornithine decarboxylase, such as difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), and agents that stimulate polyamine acetylation and export, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), act at least additively to arrest growth in human cell models and suppress intestinal carcinogenesis in mice. These preclinical studies provided the rationale for colon cancer prevention trials in humans. A Phase IIb clinical study comparing the combination of DFMO and the NSAID sulindac versus placebo was conducted. Endpoints were colorectal tissue polyamine and prostaglandin E2 contents and overall toxicity to participants. Participants in the Phase IIb study served as a vanguard for a randomized, placebo-controlled prospective Phase III trial of the combination of DFMO and sulindac with the primary study endpoint the prevention of colon polyps. Seventy percent of participants will have completed the three years of treatment in December 2006.

Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) is an investigational chemopreventive agent that inhibits ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity, lowers cellular polyamine concentrations, and decreases cell proliferation in vivo and in vitro. In five subjects we have compared the polyamine concentrations in rectal mucosal biopsies and in exfoliated buccal mucosal cells (EBM) before and after DFMO treatment to assess the suitability of EBM as an easily accessible marker tissue for DFMO suppression of polyamine synthesis in the rectal mucosa. One month of 3 g/m2/day of DFMO treatment caused a statistically significant decrease in putrescine and spermidine concentrations in rectal mucosa biopsy specimens but not in EBM samples. ODC activity in EBM was high (approximately 1 mumol/min/mg protein), resistant to DFMO inhibition (Ki = 4200 microM), dependent on GTP concentration (maximal at 0.1 mM), and was reduced concomitantly with bacterial concentration by antiseptic mouthwashing. Bacteria adherent to EBM were visible by electron microscopy. Forty bacterial colonies/ng protein were culturable from washed EBM samples. Oral bacteria preclude the use of EBM samples as a marker tissue of DFMO effect in the rectal mucosa, but oral DFMO therapy is effective in depleting polyamines in rectal mucosa.

The polyamine-inhibitory regimen difluoromethylornithine (DFMO)+sulindac has marked efficacy in preventing metachronous colorectal adenomas. Polyamines are synthesised endogenously and obtained from dietary sources. Here we investigate dietary polyamine intake and outcomes in the DFMO+sulindac colorectal adenoma prevention trial.

Dietary polyamine data were available for 188 of 267 patients completing the study. Total dietary polyamine content was derived by the sum of dietary putrescine, spermine and spermidine values and categorised into two groups: highest (>75-100%) vs the lower three quartiles (0-25, 25-50 and 50-75%). Baseline tissue polyamine concentration and ODC1 genotype were determined. Logistic regression models were used for risk estimation.

A significant interaction was detected between dietary polyamine group and treatment with regard to adenoma recurrence (P=0.012). Significant metachronous adenoma risk reduction was observed after DFMO+sulindac treatment in dietary polyamine quartiles 1-3 (risk ratio (RR) 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.42; P<0.0001) but not in quartile 4 (RR 1.51; 95% CI 0.53-4.29; P=0.44). However, a lower number of events in the placebo group within dietary quartile 4 confound the aforementioned risk estimates.

These preliminary findings reveal complex relationships between diet and therapeutic prevention, and they support further clinical trial-based investigations where the dietary intervention itself is controlled.