Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are commonly observed in Glioblastoma (GBM) and have long posed as a target for new therapies. Trials involving erlotinib have shown mixed results, likely owing to a mechanism of the mutation that may instead favor other EGFR inhibitors, such as lapatinib. We aimed to determine whether or not pulse high-dose lapatinib was a safe and tolerable regimen in addition to standard therapy. We recruited adult patients with newly-diagnosed GBM who had Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60, normal baseline hematological, hepatic, and renal function tests, and no prior history of radiation or treatment with EGFR inhibitor. Lapatinib was administered at 2500 mg twice daily for two consecutive days per week on a weekly basis throughout concomitant and adjuvant standard therapy. The primary endpoints were tolerability and safety. 12 patients were enrolled in this study over 2 years. Of the non-hematological adverse events, there were 2 grade 3 events, fatigue and post-radiation cystic brain necrosis. The most common adverse events in general were fatigue, rashes, and diarrhea. Of the hematological adverse events, there were 13 grade 3 events, all of which were due to lymphopenia and affected 6 of 12 patients. Pulse high-dose lapatinib in addition to standard therapy for newly-diagnosed GBM is a tolerable and safe regimen, but higher rates of lymphopenia should be noted. However, further investigations will be required to evaluate the efficacy of this combination for the treatments of GBM. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01591577.

Purpose

To assess the safety and efficacy of upfront treatment using bortezomib combined with standard radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ), followed by adjuvant bortezomib and TMZ for ≤24 cycles, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

Methods and materials

Twenty-four patients with newly diagnosed GBM were enrolled. The patients received standard external beam regional RT with concurrent TMZ beginning 3 to 6 weeks after surgery, followed by adjuvant TMZ and bortezomib for ≤24 cycles or until tumor progression. During RT, bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 29, 32, 36, and 39. After RT, bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 4 weeks.

Results

No unexpected adverse events occurred from the addition of bortezomib. The efficacy analysis showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-8.8), with promising PFS rates at ≥18 months compared with historical norms (25.0% at 18 and 24 months; 16.7% at 30 months). In terms of overall survival (OS), the median OS was 19.1 months (95% CI 6.7-31.4), with improved OS rates at ≥12 months (87.5% at 12, 50.0% at 24, 34.1% at 36-60 months) compared with the historical norms. The median PFS was 24.7 months (95% CI 8.5-41.0) in 10 MGMT methylated and 5.1 months (95% CI 3.9-6.2) in 13 unmethylated patients. The estimated median OS was 61 months (95% CI upper bound not reached) in the methylated and 16.4 months (95% CI 11.8-21.0) in the unmethylated patients.

Conclusions

The addition of bortezomib to current standard radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed GBM patients was tolerable. The PFS and OS rates appeared promising, with more benefit to MGMT methylated patients. Further clinical investigation is warranted in a larger cohort of patients.