BACKGROUND: Safety events and technical success (TS) have been previously reported for aortic and pulmonary valvuloplasty, but a composite performance measure as a novel, patient-centered strategy has neither been developed nor been studied. This study aims to refine a procedural performance (PP) variable, a composite of TS and procedural safety, for isolated, standard-risk aortic and pulmonary valvuloplasty. METHODS: A multicenter review was performed using data from the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes registry. Data were collected for all cases of isolated balloon aortic and pulmonary valvuloplasty from 2014 through 2017. Patients were excluded if they were aged <1 month, were inpatient at the time of the procedure, or had significant comorbidities, such as Williams or Noonan syndrome. Criteria for TS were developed and categorized (optimal, satisfactory, and unsatisfactory) by expert consensus based on previous outcome research. Adverse events (AE) were categorized by severity (level 1-5) using established criteria. Level 4 and 5 severity AE were considered high-severity AE. Using criteria of TS and AE severity, PP was divided into 3 composite outcome classes. Factors correlating with class III (suboptimal) PP were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 169 cases of aortic and 270 cases of pulmonary valvuloplasty in the cohorts. In the aortic valvuloplasty cohort, a suboptimal PP (class III) occurred in 14% of cases, mostly due to high-severity AE (7%). No significant correlation between patient or case characteristics and PP was demonstrated. In the pulmonary valvuloplasty cohort, class III PP occurred in 9% of cases, predominantly due to residual valve gradient, which correlated with lower weight (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: We designed a composite variable of PP consisting of TS and safety as a comprehensive measure of outcome. Incorporating both TS and AE may better reflect patient outcome than each metric measured separately. PP indices may identify areas for further investigation and quality improvement.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed tremendous stress on the health care system. Its effects on pediatric/congenital catheterization program practice and performance have not been described. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how case volumes, risk-profile, and outcomes of pediatric/congenital catheterization procedures changed in response to the first wave of COVID-19 and after that wave. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational study was performed using Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes Registry (C3PO) data to study changes in volume, case mix, and outcomes (high-severity adverse events [HSAEs]) during the first wave of COVID (March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020) in comparison to the period prior to (January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2020) and after (June 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020) the first wave. Multivariable analyses adjusting for case type, hemodynamic vulnerability, and age group were performed. Hospital responses to the first wave were captured with an electronic study instrument. RESULTS: During the study period, 12,557 cases were performed at 14 C3PO hospitals (with 8% performed during the first wave of COVID and 32% in the postperiod). Center case volumes decreased from a median 32.1 cases/month (IQR: 20.7-49.0 cases/month) before COVID to 22 cases/month (IQR: 13-31 cases/month) during the first wave (P = 0.001). The proportion of cases with risk factors for HSAE increased during the first wave, specifically proportions of infants and neonates (P < 0.001) and subjects with renal insufficiency (P = 0.02), recent cardiac surgery (P < 0.001), and a higher hemodynamic vulnerability score (P = 0.02). The observed HSAE risk did not change significantly (P = 0.13). In multivariable analyses, odds of HSAE during the first wave of COVID (odds ratio: 0.75) appeared to be lower than that before COVID, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased case-mix complexity, C3PO programs maintained, if not improved, their performance in terms of HSAE. Exploratory analyses of practice changes may inform future harm-reduction efforts.