Introduction: We sought to determine the association of abnormal vital signs with emergency department (ED) process outcomes in both discharged and admitted patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of five years of operational data at a single site. We identified all visits for patients 18 and older who were discharged home without ancillary services, and separately identified all visits for patients admitted to a floor (ward) bed. We assessed two process outcomes for discharged visits (returns to the ED within 72 hours and returns to the ED within 72 hours resulting in admission) and two process outcomes for admitted patients (transfer to a higher level of care [intermediate care or intensive care] within either six hours or 24 hours of arrival to floor). Last-recorded ED vital signs were obtained for all patients. We report rates of abnormal vital signs in each group, as well as the relative risk of meeting a process outcome for each individual vital sign abnormality.

Results: Patients with tachycardia, tachypnea, or fever more commonly experienced all measured process outcomes compared to patients without these abnormal vitals; admitted hypotensive patients more frequently required transfer to a higher level of care within 24 hours.

Conclusion: In a single facility, patients with abnormal last-recorded ED vital signs experienced more undesirable process outcomes than patients with normal vitals. Vital sign abnormalities may serve as a useful signal in outcome forecasting.

Introduction: Bacterial urinary tract infections (UTI) and some sexually transmitted infections (STI) can have overlapping signs and symptoms or nonspecific findings, such as pyuria on urinalysis. Furthermore, results from the urine culture and the nucleic acid amplification test for an STI may not be available during the clinical encounter. We sought to determine whether gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis are associated with bacteriuria, information that might aid in the differentiation of STIs and UTIs.

Methods: We used multinomial logistic regression to analyze 9,650 encounters of female patients who
were aged ≥18 years and who underwent testing for STIs. The ED encounters took place from April 18, 2014–March 7, 2017. We used a multivariable regression analysis to account for patient demographics, urinalysis findings, vaginal wet-mount results, and positive or negative (or no) findings from the urine culture and testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, or Trichomonas vaginalis.

Results: In multivariable analysis, infection with T vaginalis, N gonorrhoeae, or C trachomatis was not associated with having a urine culture yielding 10,000 or more colony-forming units per mililiter (CFU/mL) of bacteria compared with a urine culture yielding less than 10,000 CFU/mL or no urine culture obtained. The diagnosis of a UTI in the ED was not associated with having a urine culture yielding 10,000 or more CFU/mL compared with a urine culture yielding less than 10,000 CFU/mL.

Conclusion: After adjusting for covariates, no association was observed between urine culture results and testing positive for trichomoniasis, gonorrhea, or chlamydia. Our results suggest that having a concurrent STI and bacterial UTI is unlikely.

Introduction: Emergency departments (ED) are rapidly replacing conventional troponin assays with high-sensitivity troponin tests. We sought to evaluate emergency physician utilization of troponin tests before and after high-sensitivity troponin introduction in our ED.

Methods: We retrospectively examined 9,477 ED encounters, identifying the percentage in which physicians ordered a serum troponin both before and after our institution adopted a high-sensitivity troponin test.

Results: After introduction of high-sensitivity troponin testing, the percentage of ED encountersin which physicians ordered troponin studies decreased (28.3% before vs 22% after; P <.001),with the drop most pronounced in admitted patients (decrease of 10.9% [95% confidenceinterval [CI]: 7.3%- 14.5%] in admitted patients vs decrease of 3.6% [95% CI: 1.7%- 5.4%]in discharged patients; P<.001)

Conclusion: Introduction of high-sensitivity troponin testing was associated with a decrease in troponin ordering. While the reasons for this are unclear, it is possible that physicians became more selective in their ordering behavior because of the lower specificity of high-sensitivity troponin.