Background

Intrathecal (IT) enzyme replacement therapy with recombinant human α-L-iduronidase (rhIDU) has been studied to treat glycosaminoglycan storage in the central nervous system of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) I dogs and is currently being studied in MPS I patients.

Methods

We studied the immune response to IT rhIDU in MPS I subjects with spinal cord compression who had been previously treated with intravenous rhIDU. We measured the concentrations of specific antibodies and cytokines in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected before monthly IT rhIDU infusions and compared the serologic findings with clinical adverse event (AE) reports to establish temporal correlations with clinical symptoms.

Results

Five MPS I subjects participating in IT rhIDU trials were studied. One subject with symptomatic spinal cord compression had evidence of an inflammatory response with CSF leukocytosis, elevated interleukin-5, and elevated immunoglobulin G. This subject also complained of lower back pain and buttock paresthesias temporally correlated with serologic abnormalities. Clinical symptoms were managed with oral medication, and serologic abnormalities were resolved, although this subject withdrew from the trial to have spinal decompressive surgery.

Conclusion

IT rhIDU was generally well tolerated in the subjects studied, although one subject had moderate to severe clinical symptoms and serologic abnormalities consistent with an immune response.

© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Enzyme replacement therapy with laronidase (recombinant human alpha-l-iduronidase) is successfully used to treat patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I). However, the intravenously-administered enzyme is not expected to treat or prevent neurological deterioration. As MPS I patients suffer from spinal cord compression due in part to thickened spinal meninges, we undertook a phase I clinical trial of lumbar intrathecal laronidase in MPS I subjects age 8. years and older with symptomatic (primarily cervical) spinal cord compression. The study faced significant challenges, including a heterogeneous patient population, difficulty recruiting subjects despite an international collaborative effort, and an inability to include a placebo-controlled design due to ethical concerns. Nine serious adverse events occurred in the subjects. All subjects reported improvement in symptomatology and showed improved neurological examinations, but objective outcome measures did not demonstrate change. Despite limitations, we demonstrated the safety of this approach to treating neurological disease due to MPS I.