Aims

To examine whether cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), delivered by telephone, improves sleep and non-sleep symptoms of Gulf War Illness (GWI).

Main methods

Eighty-five Gulf War veterans (21 women, mean age: 54 years, range 46-72 years) who met the Kansas GWI case definition, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) case definition for Chronic Multisymptom Illness (CMI), and research diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder were randomly assigned to CBT-I or monitor-only wait list control. Eight weekly sessions of individual CBT-I were administered via telephone by Ph.D. level psychologists to study participants. Outcome measures included pre-, mid-, and post-treatment assessments of GWI and insomnia symptoms, subjective sleep quality, and continuous sleep monitoring with diary. Outcomes were re-assessed 6-months post-treatment in participants randomized to CBT-I.

Key findings

Compared to wait list, CBT-I produced significant improvements in overall GWI symptom severity, individual measures of fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, depression and anxiety, insomnia severity, subjective sleep quality, and sleep diary outcome measures. The beneficial effects of CBT-I on overall GWI symptom severity and most individual GWI symptom measures were maintained 6-months after treatment.

Significance

GWI symptoms have historically been difficult to treat. Because CBT-I, which is associated with low stigma and is increasingly readily available to veterans, improved both sleep and non-sleep symptoms of GWI, these results suggest that a comprehensive approach to the treatment of GWI should include behavioral sleep interventions.

Study objectives

Our objective was to examine the ability of a consumer-grade wearable device (Basis B1) with accelerometer and heart rate technology to assess sleep patterns compared with polysomnography (PSG) and research-grade actigraphy in healthy adults.

Methods

Eighteen adults underwent consecutive nights of sleep monitoring using Basis B1, actigraphy, and PSG; 40 nights were used in analyses. Discrepancies in gross sleep parameters and epoch-by-epoch agreements in sleep/wake classification were assessed.

Results

Basis B1 accuracy was 54.20 ± 8.20%, sensitivity was 98.90 ± 2.70%, and specificity was 8.10 ± 15.00%. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for distinguishing between the different sleep stages were 60-72%, 48-62%, and 57-86%, respectively. Pearson correlations demonstrated strong associations between Basis B1 and PSG estimates of sleep onset latency and total sleep time; moderate associations for sleep efficiency, duration of light sleep, and duration of rapid eye movement sleep; and a weak association for duration of deep sleep. Basis B1 significantly overestimates total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and duration of light sleep and significantly underestimates wake after sleep onset and duration of deep sleep.

Conclusions

Basis B1 demonstrated utility for estimates of gross sleep parameters and performed similarly to actigraphy for estimates of total sleep time. Basis B1 specificity was poor, and Basis B1 is not useful for the assessment of wake. Basis B1 accuracy for sleep stages was better than chance but is not a suitable replacement for PSG assessment. Despite low cost, ease of use, and attractiveness for patients, consumer devices are not yet accurate or reliable enough to guide treatment decision making in clinical settings.

Study objectives

Our study aims were to examine (1) the association between fear of sleep and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, (2) the association between fear of sleep and subjective and objective insomnia symptoms and disruptive behaviors during sleep, and (3) whether fear of sleep decreases following cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I).

Methods

Forty-five adults with PTSD and insomnia participated in the study. Fear of sleep was assessed using the Fear of Sleep Inventory; PTSD symptoms were assessed using the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale; and sleep disturbance symptoms were assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index, polysomnography, sleep diaries, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Addendum for PTSD. Participants were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of CBT-I (n = 29) or a waitlist control condition (n = 16).

Results

Greater fear of sleep was associated with greater PTSD symptom severity, greater nightmare frequency, and greater hypervigilance intensity. Greater fear of sleep was associated with decreased wake after sleep onset (WASO), reduced total sleep time, and greater disruptive nocturnal behaviors. Following CBT-I, there was a significant reduction in fear of sleep compared to the waitlist condition. These improvements persisted 6 months later.

Conclusions

Fear of sleep was related to sleep disturbances specific to trauma rather than "classic" insomnia symptoms. Unexpectedly, greater fear of sleep was associated with reduced WASO. These results may be related to having a truncated sleep period and thus more consolidated sleep. Fear of sleep deceased following CBT-I despite not being a permissible target for this research protocol and not being related to insomnia symptoms.

Clinical trial registration

Registry: CinicalTrials.gov; Name: Treating People with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia; Identifier: NCT00881647; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00881647.

Patients exhibit poor memory for treatment. A novel Memory Support Intervention, derived from basic science in cognitive psychology and education, is tested with the goal of improving patient memory for treatment and treatment outcome. Adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) were randomized to 14 sessions of cognitive therapy (CT)+Memory Support (n = 25) or CT-as-usual (n = 23). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment and 6 months later. Memory support was greater in CT+Memory Support compared to the CT-as-usual. Compared to CT-as-usual, small to medium effect sizes were observed for recall of treatment points at post-treatment. There was no difference between the treatment arms on depression severity (primary outcome). However, the odds of meeting criteria for 'response' and 'remission' were higher in CT+Memory Support compared with CT-as-usual. CT+Memory Support also showed an advantage on functional impairment. While some decline was observed, the advantage of CT+Memory Support was evident through 6-month follow-up. Patients with less than 16 years of education experience greater benefits from memory support than those with 16 or more years of education. Memory support can be manipulated, may improve patient memory for treatment and may be associated with an improved outcome.

Patients exhibit poor memory for treatment. A novel Memory Support Intervention, derived from basic science in cognitive psychology and education, is tested with the goal of improving patient memory for treatment and treatment outcome. Adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) were randomized to 14 sessions of cognitive therapy (CT)+Memory Support (n = 25) or CT-as-usual (n = 23). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment and 6 months later. Memory support was greater in CT+Memory Support compared to the CT-as-usual. Compared to CT-as-usual, small to medium effect sizes were observed for recall of treatment points at post-treatment. There was no difference between the treatment arms on depression severity (primary outcome). However, the odds of meeting criteria for 'response' and 'remission' were higher in CT+Memory Support compared with CT-as-usual. CT+Memory Support also showed an advantage on functional impairment. While some decline was observed, the advantage of CT+Memory Support was evident through 6-month follow-up. Patients with less than 16 years of education experience greater benefits from memory support than those with 16 or more years of education. Memory support can be manipulated, may improve patient memory for treatment and may be associated with an improved outcome.