- Scheltens, Nienke ME;
- Tijms, Betty M;
- Koene, Teddy;
- Barkhof, Frederik;
- Teunissen, Charlotte E;
- Wolfsgruber, Steffen;
- Wagner, Michael;
- Kornhuber, Johannes;
- Peters, Oliver;
- Cohn‐Sheehy, Brendan I;
- Rabinovici, Gil D;
- Miller, Bruce L;
- Kramer, Joel H;
- Scheltens, Philip;
- van der Flier, Wiesje M;
- Network, German Dementia Competence;
- San Francisco Memory and Aging Center, University of California;
- Cohort, Amsterdam Dementia
Introduction
Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) show heterogeneity in profile of cognitive impairment. We aimed to identify cognitive subtypes in four large AD cohorts using a data-driven clustering approach.Methods
We included probable AD dementia patients from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (n = 496), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (n = 376), German Dementia Competence Network (n = 521), and University of California, San Francisco (n = 589). Neuropsychological data were clustered using nonnegative matrix factorization. We explored clinical and neurobiological characteristics of identified clusters.Results
In each cohort, a two-clusters solution best fitted the data (cophenetic correlation >0.9): one cluster was memory-impaired and the other relatively memory spared. Pooled analyses showed that the memory-spared clusters (29%-52% of patients) were younger, more often apolipoprotein E (APOE) ɛ4 negative, and had more severe posterior atrophy compared with the memory-impaired clusters (all P < .05).Conclusions
We could identify two robust cognitive clusters in four independent large cohorts with distinct clinical characteristics.