- Lang, Maximilian F;
- Tyson, Mark D;
- Alvarez, JoAnn Rudd;
- Koyama, Tatsuki;
- Hoffman, Karen E;
- Resnick, Matthew J;
- Cooperberg, Matthew R;
- Wu, Xiao-Cheng;
- Chen, Vivien;
- Paddock, Lisa E;
- Hamilton, Ann S;
- Hashibe, Mia;
- Goodman, Michael;
- Greenfield, Sheldon;
- Kaplan, Sherrie H;
- Stroup, Antoinette;
- Penson, David F;
- Barocas, Daniel A
Objective
To evaluate the influence of psychosocial factors such as prostate cancer (PCa) anxiety, social support, participation in medical decision-making (PDM), and educational level on patient decisions to discontinue PCa active surveillance (AS) in the absence of disease progression.Methods
The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation study is a prospective, population-based cohort study of men with localized PCa diagnosed in 2011-2012. PCa anxiety, social support, PDM, educational level, and patient reasons for discontinuing AS were assessed through patient surveys. A Cox proportional hazards model examined the relationship between psychosocial variables and time to discontinuation of AS.Results
Of 531 patients on AS, 165 (30.9%) underwent treatment after median follow-up of 37 months. Whereas 69% of patients cited only medical reasons for discontinuing AS, 31% cited at least 1 personal reason, and 8% cited personal reasons only. Patients with some college education discontinued AS significantly earlier (hazard ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 3.2) than patients with less education. PCa anxiety, social support, and PDM were not associated with seeking treatment.Conclusion
We found that 31% of men who choose AS for PCa discontinue AS within 3 years. Eight percent of men who sought treatment did so in the absence of disease progression. Education, but not psychosocial factors, seems to influence definitive treatment-seeking. Future research is needed to understand how factors unrelated to disease severity influence treatment decisions among patients on AS to identify opportunities to improve adherence to AS.