Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common form of heart failure and frequently is associated with pulmonary hypertension (PH). HFpEF associated with PH may be difficult to distinguish from precapillary forms of PH, although this distinction is crucial because therapeutic pathways are divergent for the two conditions. A comprehensive and systematic approach using history, clinical examination, and noninvasive and invasive evaluation with and without provocative testing may be necessary for accurate diagnosis and phenotyping. After diagnosis, HFpEF associated with PH can be subdivided into isolated postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (IpcPH) and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH) based on the presence or absence of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. CpcPH portends a worse prognosis than IpcPH. Despite its association with reduced functional capacity and quality of life, heart failure hospitalizations, and higher mortality, therapeutic options focused on PH for HFpEF associated with PH remain limited. In this review, we aim to provide an updated overview on clinical definitions and hemodynamically characterized phenotypes of PH, pathophysiologic features, therapeutic strategies, and ongoing challenges in this patient population.

Objectives

This study sought to evaluate if diastolic pulmonary gradient (DPG) can predict survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD).

Background

Patients with combined post- and pre-capillary PH-LHD have worse prognosis than those with passive pulmonary hypertension. The transpulmonary gradient (TPG) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) have commonly been used to identify high-risk patients. However, these parameters have significant shortcomings and do not always correlate with pulmonary vasculature remodeling. Recently, it has been suggested that DPG may be better a marker, yet its prognostic ability in patients with cardiomyopathy has not been fully assessed.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 1,236 patients evaluated for unexplained cardiomyopathy at Johns Hopkins Hospital was studied. All patients underwent right heart catheterization and were followed until death, cardiac transplantation, or the end of the study period (mean time 4.4 years). The relationships between DPG, TPG, or PVR and survival in subjects with PH-LHD (n = 469) were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results

DPG was not significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02, p = 0.10) in PH-LHD whereas elevated TPG and PVR predicted death (HR: 1.02, p = 0.046; and HR: 1.11, p = 0.002, respectively). Similarly, DPG did not differentiate survivors from non-survivors at any selected cut points including a DPG of 7 mm Hg.

Conclusions

In this retrospective study of patients with cardiomyopathy and PH-LHD, an elevated DPG was not associated with worse survival.

Background Prior studies suggested lower risk of heart failure (HF) in individuals taking H₂ receptor antagonists (H2RA) compared with H2RA nonusers in relatively small studies. We evaluated the association of H2RA use and incident HF in postmenopausal women in the large-scale WHI (Women's Health Initiative) study. Methods and Results This study included postmenopausal women from the WHI without a history of HF at baseline. HF was defined as first incident hospitalization for HF and physician adjudicated. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated the association of H2RA use as a time-varying exposure with HF risk, after adjustment for demographic, lifestyle, and medical history variables. Sensitivity analyses examined (1) risk of HF stratified by the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) score, (2) propensity score matching on H2RA use, (3) use of proton pump inhibitors rather than H2RA nonuse as the referent, and (4) exclusion of those taking diuretics at baseline. The primary analysis included 158 854 women after exclusion criteria, of whom 9757 (6.1%) were H2RA users. During median 8.2 years of follow-up, 376 H2RA users (4.9 events/1000 person-years) and 3206 nonusers (2.7 events/1000 person-years) developed incident HF. After multivariable adjustment, there was no association between H2RA use and HF in the primary analysis (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94-1.22; P=0.31) or in any of the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Clinical H2RA use was not associated with incident HF among postmenopausal women. Future studies are needed to evaluate potential effect modification by sex, HF severity, or patterns of use on H2RA exposure and HF risk. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00000611.