PURPOSE: There is variability in clinical outcomes with vertebral body tethering (VBT) partly due to a limited understanding of the growth modulation (GM) response. We used the largest sample of patients with 3D spine reconstructions to characterize the vertebra and disc morphologic changes that accompany growth modulation during the first two years following VBT. METHODS: A multicenter registry was used to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with 2 years of follow-up. Calibrated biplanar X-rays obtained at longitudinal timepoints underwent 3D reconstruction to obtain precision morphological measurements. GM was defined as change in instrumented coronal angulation from post-op to 2-years. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age: 12.5 ± 1.3yrs) were analyzed over a mean of 27.7 months. GM was positively correlated with concave vertebra height growth (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), 3D spine length growth (r = 0.36, p = 0.008), and decreased convex disc height (r = - 0.42, p = 0.002). High modulators (patients experiencing GM > 10°) experienced an additional 1.6 mm (229% increase) of mean concave vertebra growth during study period compared to the Poor Modulators (GM < - 10°) group, (2.3 vs. 0.7 mm, p = 0.039), while convex vertebra height growth was similar (1.3 vs. 1.4 mm, p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: When successful, VBT enables asymmetric vertebra body growth, leading to continued postoperative coronal angulation correction (GM). A strong GM response is correlated with concave vertebral body height growth and overall instrumented spine growth. A poor GM response is associated with an increase in convex disc height (suspected tether rupture). Future studies will investigate the patient and technique-specific factors that influence increased growth remodeling.

Background

We analyzed preoperative CT scans of hips with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) for characteristics that could be predictive of intraoperative epiphyseal stability and developed a set of imaging criteria for stable and unstable SCFE. We then compared this grading system with the Loder classification.

Methods

We reviewed preoperative CT imaging to develop a SCFE stability classification system. Three orthopaedic surgeons used the classification system to grade stability on a series of SCFE hips. Kappa was used to evaluate intra- and interobserver reliability among the observers. A series of SCFE hips treated with open procedures in which intraoperative stability was determined under direct visualization was evaluated. Intraoperative stability was compared with stability ratings as determined by the CT classification system and the Loder classification system.

Results

Interobserver reliability among our three observers was κ = 0.823 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.414 to 1.0; p < 0.001). Intraobserver reliability was κ = 0.901 (95% CI 0.492 to 1.31; p < 0.001). In all, 27 hips were used in the comparison of intraoperative stability with the Loder and CT classification systems. CT-predicted stability exhibited 78% concordance with intraoperative stability. The sensitivity and specificity of CT-predicted stability was 75% and 82%, respectively, versus Loder sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 91%.

Conclusion

The CT evaluation method provided is easy to use and can help to improve the accuracy in determining preoperative epiphyseal stability, which may lead to improved treatment outcomes for this population.

Level of evidence

III.