Single-ion conducting block copolymers, such as poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly[(styrene-4-sulfonyltrifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide lithium] (PEO-P[(STFSI)Li]), represent an exciting new class of materials capable of improving the performance of solid-state batteries with metal anodes. In this work, we report on the synthesis and characterization of a matched set of lithiated (PEO-P[(STFSI)Li]) and magnesiated (PEO-P[(STFSI)2Mg]) single-ion conducting diblock copolymers. We measure the temperature dependence of ionic conductivity, and through analysis using the Vogel-Tamman-Fulcher (VTF) relation, demonstrate that ion dissociation is significantly lower for all PEO-P[(STFSI)2Mg] samples when compared to their PEO-P[(STFSI)Li] counterparts. The VTF parameter characterizing the activation barrier to ion hopping was similar for both cations, but the VTF prefactor that reflects effective charge carrier concentration was higher in the lithiated samples by an order of magnitude. We study the melt morphology of the single-ion conducting block copolymers using temperature-dependent X-ray scattering and use the mean-field theory of Leibler to extract the effective Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (χ) for PEO/P[(STFSI)Li] and PEO/P[(STFSI)2Mg] from the X-ray scattering data. We demonstrate a linear relationship between the charge-concentration-related VTF parameter and the parameter quantifying the enthalpic contribution to χ. It is evident that ion dissociation and block copolymer thermodynamics are intimately coupled; ion dissociation in these systems suppresses microphase separation.

Single-ion-conducting polymers are ideal electrolytes for rechargeable lithium batteries as they eliminate salt concentration gradients and concomitant concentration overpotentials during battery cycling. Here we study the ionic conductivity and morphology of poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(styrenesulfonyllithium(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide) (PEO-b-PSLiTFSI) block copolymers with no added salt using ac impedance spectroscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering. The PEO molecular weight was held fixed at 5.0 kg mol^-1, and that of PSLiTFSI was varied from 2.0 to 7.5 kg mol^-1. The lithium ion concentration and block copolymer composition are intimately coupled in this system. At low temperatures, copolymers with PSLiTFSI block molecular weights ≤4.0 kg mol^-1 exhibited microphase separation with crystalline PEO-rich microphases and lithium ions trapped in the form of ionic clusters in the glassy PSLiTFSI-rich microphases. At temperatures above the melting temperature of the PEO microphase, the lithium ions were released from the clusters, and a homogeneous disordered morphology was obtained. The ionic conductivity increased abruptly by several orders of magnitude at this transition. Block copolymers with PSLiTFSI block molecular weights ≥5.4 kg mol^-1 were disordered at all temperatures, and the ionic conductivity was a smooth function of temperature. The transference numbers of these copolymers varied from 0.87 to 0.99. The relationship between ion transport and molecular structure in single-ion-conducting block copolymer electrolytes is qualitatively different from the well-studied case of block copolymers with added salt.

We explore the relationship between the morphology and ionic conductivity of block copolymer electrolytes over a wide range of salt concentrations for the system polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (PS-b-PEO, SEO) mixed with lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide salt (LiTFSI). Two SEO polymers were studied, SEO(16-16) and SEO(4.9-5.5), over the salt concentration range r = 0.03-0.55. The numbers x and y in SEO(x-y) are the molecular weights of the blocks in kg mol-1, and the r value is the molar ratio of salt to ethylene oxide moieties. Small-angle X-ray scattering was used to characterize morphology and grain size at 120 °C, differential scanning calorimetry was used to study the crystallinity and the glass transition temperature of the PEO-rich microphase, and ac impedance spectroscopy was used to measure ionic conductivity as a function of temperature. The most surprising observation of our study is that ionic conductivity in the concentration regime 0.11 ≤ r ≤ 0.21 increases in SEO electrolytes but decreases in PEO electrolytes. The maximum in ionic conductivity with salt concentration occurs at about twice the salt concentration in SEO (r = 0.21) as in PEO (r = 0.11). We propose that these observations are due to the effect of salt concentration on the grain structure in SEO electrolytes.