Background and purpose

The aging HIV-infected (HIV⁺) population has increased vascular comorbidities, including stroke, and increased cognitive deficits compared with the general population. Arterial spin-labeling is a technique to measure cerebral blood flow and is more sensitive than regional volume loss in assessing neurodegenerative diseases and cognitive aging. Previous studies have found global cerebral perfusion abnormalities in the HIV⁺ participants. In this study, we evaluated the specific regional pattern of CBF abnormalities in older HIV⁺ participants using quantitative whole-brain arterial spin-labeling.

Materials and methods

CBF data from the UCSF HIV Over 60 Cohort and the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative were retrospectively evaluated to identify 19 HIV⁺ older adults, all with plasma viral suppression (including 5 with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder); 13 healthy, age-matched controls; and 19 participants with early mild cognitive impairment. CBF values were averaged by ROI and compared among the 3 groups using generalized linear models.

Results

When we accounted for age, education, sex, and vascular risk factors, the HIV⁺ participants demonstrated alterations in regional cerebral perfusion, including hypoperfusion of bilateral temporal, parietal, and occipital brain regions compared with both clinically healthy participants and those with mild cognitive impairment. Arterial spin-labeling showed reasonable test characteristics in distinguishing those with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder from healthy controls and participants with mild cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

This study found specific CBF patterns associated with HIV status despite viral suppression-data that should animate further investigations into the pathobiologic basis of vascular and cognitive abnormalities in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.

Background and purpose

Automated CTP software is increasingly used for extended window emergent large-vessel occlusion to quantify core infarct. We aimed to assess whether RAPID software underestimates core infarct in patients with an extended window recently receiving IV iodinated contrast.

Materials and methods

We reviewed a prospective, single-center data base of 271 consecutive patients who underwent CTA ± CTP for acute ischemic stroke from May 2018 through January 2019. Patients with emergent large-vessel occlusion confirmed by CTA in the extended window (>6 hours since last known well) and CTP with RAPID postprocessing were included. Two blinded raters independently assessed CT ASPECTS on NCCT performed at the time of CTP. RAPID software used relative cerebral blood flow of <30% as a surrogate for irreversible core infarct. Patients were dichotomized on the basis of receiving recent IV iodinated contrast (<8 hours before CTP) for a separate imaging study.

Results

The recent IV contrast and contrast-naïve cohorts comprised 23 and 15 patients, respectively. Multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that recent IV contrast administration was independently associated with a decrease in the RAPID core infarct estimate (proportional increase = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.96; P = .04).

Conclusions

Patients who received IV iodinated contrast in proximity (<8 hours) to CTA/CTP as part of a separate imaging study had a much higher likelihood of core infarct underestimation with RAPID compared with contrast-naïve patients. Over-reliance on RAPID postprocessing for treatment disposition of patients with extended window emergent large-vessel occlusion should be avoided, particularly with recent IV contrast administration.