Objectives

The impact of social determinants of health on the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients requiring hemodialysis (HD) arteriovenous (AV) access creation have not been well-characterized. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a validated measure of aggregate community-level social determinants of health disparities experienced by members living within a community. Our goal was to examine the effect of ADI on health outcomes for first-time AV access patients.

Methods

We identified patients who underwent first-time HD access surgery in the Vascular Quality Initiative between July 2011 to May 2022. Patient zip codes were correlated with an ADI quintile, defined as quintile 1 (Q1) to quintile 5 (Q5) from least to most disadvantaged. Patients without ADI were excluded. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes considering ADI were analyzed.

Results

There were 43,292 patients analyzed. The average age was 63 years, 43% were female, 60% were of White race, 34% were of Black race, 10% were of Hispanic ethnicity, and 85% received autogenous AV access. Patient distribution by ADI quintile was as follows: Q1 (16%), Q2 (18%), Q3 (21%), Q4 (23%), and Q5 (22%). On multivariable analysis, the most disadvantaged quintile (Q5) was associated with lower rates of autogenous AV access creation (OR, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.90; P < .001), preoperative vein mapping (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.71; P < .001), access maturation (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.95; P = .007), and 1-year survival (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91; P = .001) compared with Q1. Q5 was associated with higher 1-year intervention rates than Q1 on univariable analysis, but not on multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

The patients undergoing AV access creation who were most socially disadvantaged (Q5) were more likely to experience lower rates of autogenous access creation, obtaining vein mapping, access maturation, and 1-year survival compared with the most socially advantaged (Q1). Improvement in preoperative planning and long-term follow-up may be an opportunity for advancing health equity in this population.

Objective

During the COVID-19 pandemic, central venous access line teams were implemented at many hospitals throughout the world to provide access for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the structure, practice patterns, and outcomes of these vascular access teams during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, self-reported study of central venous access line teams in hospitals afflicted with the COVID-19 pandemic. To participate in the study, hospitals were required to meet one of the following criteria: development of a formal plan for a central venous access line team during the pandemic; implementation of a central venous access line team during the pandemic; placement of central venous access by a designated practice group during the pandemic as part of routine clinical practice; or management of an iatrogenic complication related to central venous access in a patient with COVID-19.

Results

Participants from 60 hospitals in 13 countries contributed data to the study. Central venous line teams were most commonly composed of vascular surgery and general surgery attending physicians and trainees. Twenty sites had 2657 lines placed by their central venous access line team or designated practice group. During that time, there were 11 (0.4%) iatrogenic complications associated with central venous access procedures performed by the line team or group at those 20 sites. Triple lumen catheters, Cordis (Santa Clara, Calif) catheters, and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters were the most common types of central venous lines placed by the teams. Eight (14%) sites reported experience in placing central venous lines in prone, ventilated patients with COVID-19. A dedicated line cart was used by 35 (59%) of the hospitals. Less than 50% (24 [41%]) of the participating sites reported managing thrombosed central lines in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-three of the sites managed 48 iatrogenic complications in patients with COVID-19 (including complications caused by providers outside of the line team or designated practice group).

Conclusions

Implementation of a dedicated central venous access line team during a pandemic or other health care crisis is a way by which physicians trained in central venous access can contribute their expertise to a stressed health care system. A line team composed of physicians with vascular skill sets provides relief to resource-constrained intensive care unit, ward, and emergency medicine teams with a low rate of iatrogenic complications relative to historical reports. We recommend that a plan for central venous access line team implementation be in place for future health care crises.