- Press, David J;
- Shariff-Marco, Salma;
- Lichtensztajn, Daphne Y;
- Lauderdale, Diane;
- Murphy, Adam B;
- Inamdar, Pushkar P;
- DeRouen, Mindy C;
- Hamilton, Ann S;
- Yang, Juan;
- Lin, Katherine;
- Hedeker, Donald;
- Haiman, Christopher A;
- Cheng, Iona;
- Gomez, Scarlett Lin
Background
Black men are more likely than Non-Hispanic White (NHW) men to be diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer. We examined the extent to which social factors were associated with differences in prostate cancer risk profiles between Black men and NHW men [using a modification to the original D'Amico risk groups based on prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), and TNM stage (stage)], based on individual and combined clinicopathologic characteristics.Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional population-based study of 23,555 Black men and 146,889 NHW men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the California Cancer Registry from 2004 to 2017. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of year of diagnosis, block group-level neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), marital status, and insurance type on differences in prostate cancer risk profiles between Black and NHW men.Results
High PSA (>20 ng/mL), GS, stage, individually and combined prostate cancer risk profiles were more common among Black men versus NHW men. In fully adjusted models, relative to NHW men, we observed a persistent 67% increased odds of high PSA among Black men. nSES was the factor most strongly associated with racial disparity in high PSA, accounting for 25% of the difference. Marital status was the factor that was second most associated with a racial disparity.Conclusions
nSES was the factor most strongly associated with racial disparities in high PSA prostate cancer.Impact
The influence of nSES on racial disparities in PSA, GS, stage, and prostate cancer risk profiles warrants further consideration.