Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Scholarly Works (16 results)

  • Article
  • Peer Reviewed
UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2015)

Objective

The objective of the study was to examine the association between labor and delivery practice model and cesarean delivery rates at a community hospital.

Study desgin

This was a retrospective cohort study of 9381 singleton live births at 1 community hospital, at which women were provided labor and delivery care under 1 of 2 distinct practice models: a traditional private practice model and a midwife-physician laborist practice model. Cesarean rates were compared by practice model, adjusting for potential sociodemographic and clinical confounders. Statistical comparisons were performed using the χ(2) test and multivariable logistical regression.

Results

Compared with women managed under the midwife/laborist model, women in the private model were significantly more likely to have a cesarean delivery (31.6% vs 17.3%; P < .001; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73-2.58). Women with nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex gestations also were more likely to have a cesarean delivery if they were cared for in the private model (29.8% vs 15.9%; P < .001; aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.33-2.58) as were women who had a prior cesarean delivery (71.3% vs 41.4%; P < .001; aOR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.74-5.88).

Conclusion

In this community hospital setting, a midwife-physician laborist practice model was associated with lower cesarean rates than a private practice model.
    Cover page: Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates
    • Article
    • Peer Reviewed
    UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2015)

    Objective

    The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of and factors associated with use of complementary health approaches among women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

    Design

    We analyzed data from the Study of Pelvic Problems, Hysterectomy, and Intervention Alternatives, a prospective cohort study of women seeking care for noncancerous pelvic problems with intact uteri at enrollment. Among a subset of 699 participants who reported having CPP, we analyzed the prevalence of complementary health approaches used and associated patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, health-related quality of life, attitudes and beliefs, and conventional health care practices.

    Results

    At baseline, slightly over one-half (51%) of women with CPP used at least one complementary health approach in the past year, including acupuncture (8%), special foods or diets (22%), herbs (27%), and vitamins and minerals (29%). During follow-up surveys conducted annually for 4 years, a substantial proportion of women (44.8%) used complementary health approaches at more than half of the assessments. Users of complementary health approaches were more likely to undergo a hysterectomy or oophorectomy or to use gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or opioids during the study compared with nonusers. Women with CPP who used complementary health approaches also had more optimal health-related quality of life measured by the Pelvic Problem Impact Questionnaire (31.6 vs 25.6, P < 0.001).

    Conclusion(s)

    Many women with CPP consistently use complementary health approaches. The substantial interest in and high prevalence of complementary health approaches used alongside conventional medical approaches highlight the need for better understanding of multimodal approaches to address the complex condition of CPP.
      • Article
      • Peer Reviewed
      UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2013)

      Background

      Current guidelines recommend offering genetic testing for Lynch syndrome to individuals whose tumors suggest this condition and to relatives of affected individuals. Little is known, however, regarding how patients view the prospect of such testing. In addition, data on preferences (utilities) for the potential outcomes of testing decisions for use in cost-effectiveness analyses are lacking.

      Methods

      Time tradeoff utilities were elicited for 10 potential outcomes of Lynch syndrome testing decisions and 3 associated cancers from 70 participants, representing a range of knowledge about and experiences with Lynch syndrome.

      Results

      Highest mean utilities were assigned to scenarios in which only the assessor's sibling had Lynch-associated colorectal cancer (ranging from 0.669 ± 0.231 to 0.760 ± 0.220). Utilities assigned to scenarios in which the assessor had Lynch-associated colorectal cancer ranged from 0.605 ± 0.252 to 0.682 ± 0.246, whereas the lowest mean utilities were assigned to 2 of the general cancer states (0.601 ± 0.238 and 0.593 ± 0.272 for colorectal and ovarian cancer respectively). Only 43% of the sample assigned higher values to undergoing Lynch testing and receiving negative results versus forgoing Lynch testing, whereas 50% assigned higher values to undergoing rather than forgoing surgery to prevent a subsequent cancer.

      Conclusions

      Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome, regardless of results, can have profound effects on quality of life; the utilities we collected can be used to incorporate these effects into cost-effectiveness analyses. Importantly, preferences for the potential outcomes of testing vary substantially, calling into question the extent to which patients would avail themselves of such testing if it were offered to them.
        Cover page: Preferences for outcomes associated with decisions to undergo or forgo genetic testing for Lynch syndrome
        • Article
        • Peer Reviewed
        UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2016)

        Objective

        This study aims to identify factors associated with greater impact of vaginal symptoms on the functioning and well-being of postmenopausal women.

        Methods

        Postmenopausal women who reported vaginal dryness, itching, irritation, or pain with sexual activity completed the multidimensional Day-to-day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) questionnaire and underwent assessment of multiple sociodemographic and clinical factors that have the potential to influence the impact of vaginal symptoms. Multivariable linear regression analyses examined relationships between selected participant characteristics and DIVA scale scores assessing symptom impact on activities of daily living, emotional well-being, self-concept and body image, and sexual functioning.

        Results

        Among 745 symptomatic participants, the mean (SD) age was 56 (9) years, and 66% were racial/ethnic minorities. Women with comorbid depression reported greater impact of vaginal symptoms on all dimensions of functioning and well-being measured by the DIVA questionnaire (11%-22% estimated increase in impact scores associated with every three-point increase in Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale scores). Women with urinary incontinence also reported greater impact of vaginal symptoms on activities of daily living, emotional well-being, and self-concept and body image (27%-37% estimated increase in impact scores). Age, partner status, frequency of sexual activity, general health, and body mass index also predicted greater impact on at least one domain.

        Conclusions

        Findings suggest that special efforts should be made to identify and treat vaginal symptoms in postmenopausal women known to have depression or urinary incontinence, as these women may experience greater impact of vaginal symptoms on multiple domains of functioning and quality of life.
          Cover page: Predictors of impact of vaginal symptoms in postmenopausal women
          • Article
          • Peer Reviewed
          UC Irvine Previously Published Works (2008)

          The objective of the study was to examine whether the risk of perinatal complications increases with increasing gestational age among term pregnancies.

          This is a retrospective cohort study of low-risk women with term, singleton births in 2003 in the United States. Gestational age was subgrouped into 37, 38, 39, 40, and 41 completed weeks. Statistical comparison was performed using chi(2) test and multivariable logistic regression models, with 39 weeks' gestation as the referent.

          There were 2,527,766 women meeting study criteria. Compared with 39 weeks, delivery at 37 or 38 weeks had lower risk of febrile morbidity but slightly higher risk of cesarean delivery. Delivery at 40 or 41 weeks was also associated with higher overall maternal morbidity. For neonates, delivery at 40 or 41 weeks had higher risk of birthweight greater than 4500 g, neonatal injury (40 weeks: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.18]; 41 weeks: aOR 1.27 [95% CI, 1.17-1.37]) and meconium aspiration (40 weeks: aOR 1.55 [95% CI, 1.43-1.69]; 41 weeks: aOR 2.12 [95% CI, 1.91-2.35]). Delivery at 37 or 38 weeks had higher risk of hyaline membrane disease (37 weeks: aOR 3.12 [95% CI, 2.90-3.38]); 38 weeks: aOR 1.30 [95% CI, 1.19-1.43]) but lower risk of meconium aspiration.

          The risk of cesarean delivery and neonatal morbidity in low-risk women increases at 40 weeks and beyond, whereas the odds of serious neonatal pulmonary disease were highest at 37 weeks. Recognition of such variation in term outcomes should lead providers to avoid iatrogenic morbidity and consider interventions to prevent complications of late-term pregnancy.

            Cover page: Perinatal outcomes in low-risk term pregnancies: do they differ by week of gestation?
            • Article
            • Peer Reviewed
            UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2015)

            Objective

            The objective of the study was to examine whether the stage of labor dystocia causing a primary cesarean delivery (CD) affects a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) success.

            Study design

            This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had primary CD of singleton pregnancies for first- or second-stage labor dystocia and attempted TOLAC at a single hospital between 2002 and 2014. We compared TOLAC success rates between women whose primary CD was for first- vs second-stage labor dystocia and investigated whether the effect of prior dystocia stage on TOLAC success was modified by previous vaginal delivery (VD).

            Results

            A total of 238 women were included; nearly half (49%) achieved vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Women with a history of second-stage labor dystocia were more likely to have VBAC compared with those with first-stage dystocia, although this trend was not statistically significant among the general population (55% vs 45%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.4, 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.5]). However, among women without a prior VD, those with a history of second-stage dystocia did have statistically higher odds of achieving VBAC than those with prior first-stage dystocia (54% vs 38%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.3], P for interaction = .043).

            Conclusion

            Nearly half of women with a history of primary CD for labor dystocia will achieve VBAC. Women with a history of second-stage labor dystocia have a slightly higher VBAC rate, seen to a statistically significant degree in those without a history of prior VD. TOLAC should be offered to all eligible women and should not be discouraged in women with a prior second-stage arrest.
              Cover page: Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success
              • Article
              • Peer Reviewed
              UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2015)

              Objective

              To examine the association between expanded access to collaborative midwifery and laborist services and cesarean delivery rates.

              Methods

              This was a prospective cohort study at a community hospital between 2005 and 2014. In 2011, privately insured women changed from a private practice model to one that included 24-hour midwifery and laborist coverage. Primary cesarean delivery rates among nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex women and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) rates among women with prior cesarean delivery were compared before and after the change. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the effects of the change on the odds of primary cesarean delivery and VBAC; an interrupted time-series analysis estimated the annual rates before and after the expansion.

              Results

              There were 3,560 nulliparous term singleton vertex deliveries and 1,324 deliveries with prior cesarean delivery during the study period; 45% were among privately insured women whose care model changed. The primary cesarean delivery rate among these privately insured women decreased after the change, from 31.7% to 25.0% (P=.005, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.81). The interrupted time-series analysis estimated a 7% drop in the primary cesarean delivery rate in the year after the expansion and a decrease of 1.7% per year thereafter. The VBAC rate increased from 13.3% before to 22.4% afterward (adjusted OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.08-3.80).

              Conclusion

              The change from a private practice to a collaborative midwifery-laborist model was associated with a decrease in primary cesarean rates and an increase in VBAC rates.

              Level of evidence

              II.
                Cover page: The Association of Expanded Access to a Collaborative Midwifery and Laborist Model With Cesarean Delivery Rates
                • Article
                • Peer Reviewed
                UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2014)

                Objective

                We sought to assess the relationship between strength of preference for vaginal birth and likelihood of vaginal delivery among women attempting this delivery mode.

                Study design

                We conducted a longitudinal study of mode of delivery preferences among women who were <36 weeks' pregnant. Participants completed a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire and were asked if they preferred vaginal or cesarean delivery. Participants who preferred vaginal delivery completed a standard gamble exercise to assess the strength of this preference on a 0-to-1 scale (higher scores indicate stronger preference for vaginal delivery); those preferring cesarean delivery were assigned a value of 0. Data on clinical characteristics and delivery mode were obtained via telephone interview or chart review. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of delivery mode among women who attempted a vaginal delivery.

                Results

                Of 210 participants, 156 attempted a vaginal delivery. Their mean and median vaginal delivery preference scores were 0.70 (SD 0.31) and 0.75 (interquartile range, 0.50-0.99), respectively. In multivariate analyses, women with a prior cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.39) or who delivered an infant ≥4000 g (aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.28) had significantly lower odds of having a vaginal delivery. After controlling for potential confounders, participants with a stronger preference for vaginal delivery were at significantly higher odds of having a vaginal delivery (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01-2.34 for every 0.2 increase on the 0-to-1 scale).

                Conclusion

                Among women who attempt a vaginal delivery, the strength of preference for vaginal birth is predictive of the delivery mode ultimately undergone.
                  Cover page: Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery
                  • Article
                  • Peer Reviewed
                  UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2013)

                  Introduction

                  The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of postpartum sexual activity and functioning in a diverse population of women using the Sexual Health Outcomes in Women Questionnaire (SHOW-Q).

                  Methods

                  This was a prospective study of 160 postpartum women assessing relationships between demographic factors, mode of birth, depression, breastfeeding, and sexual activity and function. Questionnaires were administered over the telephone 8 to 10 weeks postpartum and in person 6 to 8 months postpartum. Primary outcomes were sexual activity at 8 to 10 weeks postpartum and global and subscale SHOW-Q scores at 6 to 8 months postpartum; the primary predictor was mode of birth. Associations were assessed using multiple linear and logistic regression analyses.

                  Results

                  Seventy-five percent of this population (n = 140 at 8-10 weeks, n = 129 at 6-8 months) gave birth vaginally, and 60.7% resumed sexual activity by 8 to 10 weeks postpartum. Only multiparity was associated with increased odds of having resumed sexual activity by 8 to 10 weeks postpartum (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.44; P = .03), whereas older age was associated with decreased odds (aOR, 0.92; P = .02) of having resumed sexual activity. Women who were depressed (effect estimate, -13.3; P = .01), older (-1.1, P = .01), or exclusively breastfeeding (-16.5, P < .001) had significantly poorer sexual satisfaction, whereas multiparous women reported better sexual satisfaction (11.1, P = .03). A significant relationship between mode of birth and SHOW-Q scores did not emerge, although we did observe a trend toward lower SHOW-Q scores among women who underwent cesarean compared with those giving birth vaginally.

                  Discussion

                  Multiparity and younger age predict early resumption of sexual activity, whereas depression and breastfeeding are associated with poorer postpartum sexual functioning. The relationship between mode of birth and resumed sexual activity or postpartum sexual function remains uncertain.
                    Cover page: Predictors of Postpartum Sexual Activity and Function in a Diverse Population of Women
                    • Article
                    • Peer Reviewed
                    UC San Francisco Previously Published Works (2015)

                    Objective

                    To investigate women's understanding of prenatal testing options and of their own experience with screening, diagnostic genetic testing, or both.

                    Methods

                    This was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of enhanced information and values clarification regarding prenatal genetic testing in the absence of financial barriers to testing. Women in the third trimester of pregnancy were asked whether they had discussed prenatal genetic testing with their health care providers, whether they understood this testing was optional, and whether they had undergone testing during their pregnancy. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to determine independent predictors of these outcomes.

                    Results

                    Data were available from 710 study participants. Discussions about screening tests were reported by 654 participants (92%); only 412 (58%) reported discussing diagnostic testing. That screening and diagnostic testing were optional was evident to approximately two thirds of women (n=470 and 455, respectively). Recall of actual tests undergone was correct for 626 (88%) for screening and for 700 (99%) for diagnostic testing. Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic variation existed in the understanding of whether screening and diagnostic tests were optional and in the correct recall of whether screening had been undertaken in the current pregnancy. In the usual care group, women receiving care in low-income settings were less likely to recall being offered diagnostic testing (adjusted odds ratio 0.23 [0.14-0.39]).

                    Conclusion

                    Disparities exist in women's recall of prenatal genetic testing discussions and their understanding of their own experience. Interventions that explain testing options to women and help clarify their preferences may help to eliminate these differences.
                      Cover page: Variation in Women's Understanding of Prenatal Testing.
                      Top